Excitation and coherent control of magnetization dynamics in magnetic tunnel junctions using acoustic pulses: Applied Physics Letters: Vol 113, No 7

Abstract

We experimentally study magnetization dynamics in magnetic tunnel junctions driven by femtosecond-laser-induced surface acoustic waves. The acoustic pulses induce a magnetization precession in the free layer of the magnetic tunnel junction through magnetoelastic coupling. The frequency and amplitude of the precession show a pronounced dependence on the applied magnetic field and the laser excitation position. Comparing the acoustic-wave-induced precession frequencies with precession induced by charge currents and with micromagnetic simulations, we identify spatially non-uniform magnetization modes localized close to the edge regions as being responsible for the optically induced magnetization dynamics. The experimental scheme even allows us to coherently control the magnetization precession using two acoustic pulses. This might prove important for future applications requiring ultrafast spin manipulation. Additionally, our results directly pinpoint the importance of acoustic pulses since they could be relevant when investigating optically induced temperature effects in magnetic structures.

References

1. Y. Otani, M. Shiraishi, A. Oiwa, E. Saitoh, and S. Murakami, Nat. Phys. 13, 829 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys4192, Google ScholarCrossref
2. A. V. Kimel, A. Kirilyuk, P. A. Usachev, R. V. Pisarev, A. M. Balbashov, and T. Rasing, Nature 435, 655 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03564, Google ScholarCrossref
3. N. Bergeard, M. Hehn, S. Mangin, G. Lengaigne, F. Montaigne, M. L. M. Lalieu, B. Koopmans, and G. Malinowski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 147203 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.147203, Google ScholarCrossref
4. K. Yamaguchi, M. Nakajima, and T. Suemoto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 237201 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.237201, Google ScholarCrossref
5. K. Shen and G. E. W. Bauer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 197201 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.197201, Google ScholarCrossref
6. M. Foerster, F. Macià, N. Statuto, S. Finizio, A. Hernández-Mínguez, S. Lendínez, P. V. Santos, J. Fontcuberta, J. M. Hernàndez, M. Kläui, and L. Aballe, Nat. Commun. 8, 407 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00456-0, Google ScholarCrossref
7. G.-M. Choi, C.-H. Moon, B.-C. Min, K.-J. Lee, and D. G. Cahill, Nat. Phys. 11, 576 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3355, Google ScholarCrossref
8. J. D. Costa, S. Serrano-Guisan, B. Lacoste, A. S. Jenkins, T. Böhnert, M. Tarequzzaman, J. Borme, F. L. Deepak, E. Paz, J. Ventura, R. Ferreira, and P. P. Freitas, Sci. Rep. 7, 7237 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07762-z, Google ScholarCrossref
9. Y. Au, M. Dvornik, T. Davison, E. Ahmad, P. S. Keatley, A. Vansteenkiste, B. Van Waeyenberge, and V. V. Kruglyak, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 097201 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.097201, Google ScholarCrossref
10. S. Davis, A. Baruth, and S. Adenwalla, Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 232507 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3521289, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
11. V. Sampath, N. D'Souza, D. Bhattacharya, G. M. Atkinson, S. Bandyopadhyay, and J. Atulasimha, Nano Lett. 16, 5681 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b02342, Google ScholarCrossref
12. O. Kovalenko, T. Pezeril, and V. V. Temnov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 266602 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.266602, Google ScholarCrossref
13. W. Li, B. Buford, A. Jander, and P. Dhagat, IEEE Trans. Magn. 50, 37 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2013.2285018, Google ScholarCrossref
14. J. W. Kim, M. Vomir, and J. Y. Bigot, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 166601 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.166601, Google ScholarCrossref
15. A. V. Scherbakov, A. S. Salasyuk, A. V. Akimov, X. Liu, M. Bombeck, C. Brüggemann, D. R. Yakovlev, V. F. Sapega, J. K. Furdyna, and M. Bayer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 117204 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.117204, Google ScholarCrossref
16. J. V. Jäger, A. V. Scherbakov, B. A. Glavin, A. S. Salasyuk, R. P. Campion, A. W. Rushforth, D. R. Yakovlev, A. V. Akimov, and M. Bayer, Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 92, 020404 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.020404, Google ScholarCrossref
17. Y. Yahagi, B. Harteneck, S. Cabrini, and H. Schmidt, Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 90, 140405 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.90.140405, Google ScholarCrossref
18. J. Janušonis, T. Jansma, C. L. Chang, Q. Liu, A. Gatilova, A. M. Lomonosov, V. Shalagatskyi, T. Pezeril, V. V. Temnov, and R. I. Tobey, Sci. Rep. 6, 29143 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep29143, Google ScholarCrossref
19. Z. Zeng, K. H. Cheung, H. W. Jiang, I. N. Krivorotov, J. A. Katine, V. Tiberkevich, and A. Slavin, Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 82, 100410 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.82.100410, Google ScholarCrossref
20. S. Serrano-Guisan, K. Rott, G. Reiss, J. Langer, B. Ocker, and H. W. Schumacher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 087201 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.087201, Google ScholarCrossref
21. C. Bayer, J. P. Park, H. Wang, M. Yan, C. E. Campbell, and P. A. Crowell, Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 69, 134401 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.69.134401, Google ScholarCrossref
22. N. Ogawa, W. Koshibae, A. J. Beekman, N. Nagaosa, M. Kubota, M. Kawasaki, and Y. Tokura, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112, 8977 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1504064112, Google ScholarCrossref
23. C. Wang, Y.-T. Cui, J. A. Katine, R. A. Buhrman, and D. C. Ralph, Nat. Phys. 7, 496 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1928, Google ScholarCrossref
24. A. Pushp, T. Phung, C. Rettner, B. P. Hughes, S.-H. Yang, and S. S. P. Parkin, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112, 6585 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1507084112, Google ScholarCrossref
25. P. Li, A. Chen, D. Li, Y. Zhao, S. Zhang, L. Yang, Y. Liu, M. Zhu, H. Zhang, and X. Han, Adv. Mater. 26, 4320 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201400617, Google ScholarCrossref
26. Z. Zhao, M. Jamali, N. D'Souza, D. Zhang, S. Bandyopadhyay, J. Atulasimha, and J. P. Wang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 109, 092403 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4961670, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
27. H. F. Yang, X. K. Hu, N. Liebing, J. D. Costa, M. Tarequzzaman, R. Ferreira, S. Sievers, M. Bieler, and H. W. Schumacher, Appl. Phys. Lett. 110, 232403 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4985434, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
28. H.-C. Wang, S. Fleming, and Y.-C. Lee, Appl. Opt. 48, 1444 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.48.001444, Google ScholarCrossref
29. A. Tavassolizadeh, K. Rott, T. Meier, E. Quandt, H. Hölscher, G. Reiss, and D. Meyners, Sensors 16, 1902 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3390/s16111902, Google ScholarCrossref
30. M. Bombeck, A. S. Salasyuk, B. A. Glavin, A. V. Scherbakov, C. Brüggemann, D. R. Yakovlev, V. F. Sapega, X. Liu, J. K. Furdyna, A. V. Akimov, and M. Bayer, Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 85, 195324 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.85.195324, Google ScholarCrossref
31. J. Janušonis, C. L. Chang, P. H. M. Van Loosdrecht, and R. I. Tobey, Appl. Phys. Lett. 106, 181601 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4919882, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
32. R. D. McMichael and B. B. Maranville, Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 74, 024424 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.74.024424, Google ScholarCrossref
33. J. V. Jäger, A. V. Scherbakov, T. L. Linnik, D. R. Yakovlev, M. Wang, P. Wadley, V. Holy, S. A. Cavill, A. V. Akimov, A. W. Rushforth, and M. Bayer, Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 032409 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4816014, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
34. E. Schlömann, J. Appl. Phys. 31, 1647 (1960). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1735909, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
35. A. Vansteenkiste, J. Leliaert, M. Dvornik, M. Helsen, F. Garcia-Sanchez, and B. Van Waeyenberge, AIP Adv. 4, 107133 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4899186, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
36. J. M. Shaw, T. J. Silva, M. L. Schneider, and R. D. McMichael, Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 79, 184404 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.79.184404, Google ScholarCrossref
37. X. K. Hu, H. Dey, N. Liebing, H. W. Schumacher, G. Csaba, A. Orlov, G. H. Bernstein, and W. Porod, J. Appl. Phys. 117, 243905 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4923160, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
38. S. Garzon, L. Ye, R. A. Webb, T. M. Crawford, M. Covington, and S. Kaka, Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 78, 180401 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.78.180401, Google ScholarCrossref
39. D. Bossini, S. Dal Conte, Y. Hashimoto, A. Secchi, R. V. Pisarev, T. Rasing, G. Cerullo, and A. V. Kimel, Nat. Commun. 7, 10645 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10645, Google ScholarCrossref
40. J. W. Kim, M. Vomir, and J. Y. Bigot, Sci. Rep. 5, 8511 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep08511, Google ScholarCrossref
Published by AIP Publishing.

Article Metrics

Views

346

Citations

Crossref 0

Web of Science

ISI 1