Tunneling electroresistance of MgZnO-based tunnel junctions: Applied Physics Letters: Vol 109, No 17

Abstract

We investigated the tunneling electroresistance (TER) in metal/wurtzite-MgZnO/metal junctions for applications in nonvolatile random-access memories. A resistive switching was detected utilizing an electric-field cooling at ±1 V and exhibited a TER ratio of 360%–490% at 2 K. The extracted change in the average barrier height between the two resistance states gave an estimation of the MgZnO electric polarization at 2.5 μC/cm² for the low-temperature limit. In addition, the temperature-dependent TER ratio and the shift of the localized states energies at the barrier interface supported the ferroelectric behavior of the MgZnO tunnel-barrier. From the first-principles calculations, we found a similar effect of the barrier height change coming from the reversal of ZnO electric polarization. The possibility of using metal electrodes and lower growth temperatures, in addition to the ferroelectric property, make the ZnO-based memory devices suitable for CMOS integration.

References

1. J. F. Scott and C. A. P. d. Araujo, Science 246, 1400 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.246.4936.1400, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
2. J. F. Scott, Science 315, 954 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1129564, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
3. V. Garcia and M. Bibes, Nat. Commun. 5, 4289 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5289, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
4. D. S. Jeong, R. Thomas, R. S. Katiyar, J. F. Scott, H. Kohlstedt, A. Petraru, and C. S. Hwang, Rep. Prog. Phys. 75, 076502 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/75/7/076502, Google ScholarCrossref
5. S. Majumdar and S. v. Dijken, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 47, 034010 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/47/3/034010, Google ScholarCrossref
6. L. L. Tao and J. Wang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 108, 062903 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4941805, Google ScholarScitation
7. M. Belmoubarik, T. Nozaki, H. Endo, and M. Sahashi, J. Appl. Phys. 113, 17C106 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4794875, Google ScholarScitation
8. A. Malashevich and D. Vanderbilt, Phys. Rev. B 75, 045106 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.75.045106, Google ScholarCrossref
9. A. Tsukazaki, A. Ohtomo, and M. Kawasaki, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 47, 034003 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/47/3/034003, Google ScholarCrossref
10. A. K. Tagantsev, Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 202905 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3036537, Google ScholarScitation
11. H. Moriwake, A. Konishi, T. Ogawa, K. Fujimura, C. A. J. Fisher, A. Kuwabara, T. Shimizu, S. Yasui, and M. Itoh, Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 242909 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4884596, Google ScholarScitation
12. Y. C. Yang, C. Song, F. Zeng, F. Pan, Y. N. Xie, and T. Liu, Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 242903 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2748081, Google ScholarScitation
13. Y.-H. Lin, M. Ying, M. Li, X. Wang, and C.-W. Nan, Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 222110 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2745247, Google ScholarScitation
14. Y. C. Yang, C. Song, X. H. Wang, F. Zeng, and F. Pan, J. Appl. Phys. 103, 074107 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2903152, Google ScholarScitation
15. T. S. Herng, A. Kumar, C. S. Ong, Y. P. Feng, Y. H. Lu, K. Y. Zeng, and J. Ding, Sci. Rep. 2, 587 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00587, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
16. H. Liu, Y. Wang, J. Wu, G. Zhang, and Y. Yan, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17, 9098 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CP00086F, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
17. J. Lee, N. Subramaniam, T. Kang, Y. Shon, and E. Kim, Solid State Commun. 209–210, 11 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssc.2015.02.019, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
18. A. Onodera and M. Takes, in Advances in Ferroelectrics, edited by A. Peliz-Barranco ( InTech, 2012). Google Scholar
19. Dhananjay and S. B. Krupanidhi, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 082905 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2266891, Google ScholarScitation
20. P. Kumar, J. P. Singh, H. K. Malik, S. Gautam, K. Chae, and K. Asokan, Superlattices Microstruct. 78, 183 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spmi.2014.11.033, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
21. M. Belmoubarik, M. Al-Mahdawi, H. Sato, T. Nozaki, and M. Sahashi, Appl. Phys. Lett. 106, 252403 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4923041, Google ScholarScitation
22. Y. Kozuka, A. Tsukazaki, and M. Kawasaki, Appl. Phys. Rev. 1, 011303 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4853535, Google ScholarScitation
23. A. Ohtomo and A. Tsukazaki, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 20, S1 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1088/0268-1242/20/4/001, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
24. C. Rossel, G. I. Meijer, D. Brémaud, and D. Widmer, J. Appl. Phys. 90, 2892 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1389522, Google ScholarScitation, ISI, CAS
25. F. A. Chudnovskii, L. L. Odynets, A. L. Pergament, and G. B. Stefanovich, J. Solid State Chem. 122, 95 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1006/jssc.1996.0087, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
26. L. Shi, D. Shang, J. Sun, and B. Shen, Appl. Phys. Express 2, 101602 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1143/APEX.2.101602, Google ScholarCrossref
27. N. Xu, L. Liu, X. Sun, X. Liu, D. Han, Y. Wang, R. Han, J. Kang, and B. Yu, Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 232112 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2945278, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
28. G. Chen, C. Song, C. Chen, S. Gao, F. Zeng, and F. Pan, Adv. Mater. 24, 3515 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201201595, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
29. K. Sun, H.-Y. Su, and W.-X. Li, Theor. Chem. Acc. 133, 1427 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-013-1427-8, Google ScholarCrossref
30. W. F. Brinkman, R. C. Dynes, and J. M. Rowell, J. Appl. Phys. 41, 1915 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1659141, Google ScholarScitation, ISI, CAS
31. J. G. Lu, S. Fujita, T. Kawaharamura, H. Nishinaka, Y. Kamada, and T. Ohshima, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 262107 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2424308, Google ScholarScitation
32. A. Gruverman, D. Wu, H. Lu, Y. Wang, H. W. Jang, C. M. Folkman, M. Y. Zhuravlev, D. Felker, M. Rzchowski, C.-B. Eom, and E. Y. Tsymbal, Nano Lett. 9, 3539 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl901754t, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
33. J. J. Åkerman, J. M. Slaughter, R. W. Dave, and I. K. Schuller, Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 3104 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1413716, Google ScholarScitation, CAS
34. D. Pantel and M. Alexe, Phys. Rev. B 82, 134105 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.82.134105, Google ScholarCrossref
35. C. T. Black and J. Welser, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 46, 776 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1109/16.753713, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
36. R. Kretschmer and K. Binder, Phys. Rev. B 20, 1065 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.20.1065, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
37. T. Granzow, T. Woike, M. Wöhlecke, M. Imlau, and W. Kleemann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 065701 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.065701, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
38. P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. 136, B864 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.136.B864, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
39. D. Vanderbilt, Phys. Rev. B 41, 7892 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.41.7892, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
40. M. Otani and O. Sugino, Phys. Rev. B 73, 115407 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.73.115407, Google ScholarCrossref
41. J. Dean and N. Lange, Lange's Handbook of Chemistry ( McGraw-Hill, 1999). Google Scholar
Published by AIP Publishing.

Article Metrics

Views

228

Citations

Crossref 0

Web of Science

ISI 0