Lengthscale effects on exchange coupling in Co-Pt L10 + L12 nanochessboards

The Co-Pt nanochessboard is a quasi-periodic, nanocomposite tiling of L10 and L12 magnetic phases that offers a novel structure for the investigation of exchange coupling, relevant to permanent magnet applications. Periodicity of the tiling is controlled by the rate of cooling through the eutectoid isotherm, resulting in control over the L10-L12 exchange coupling. First order reversal curve analysis reveals a transition from partial coupling to nearly complete exchange-coupling in a Co40.2Pt59.8 nanochessboard structured alloy as the periodicity is reduced below the critical correlation length. Micromagnetic simulations give insights into how exchange coupling manifests in the tiling, and its impact on microscopic magnetization reversal mechanisms.

The Co-Pt nanochessboard is a quasi-periodic, nanocomposite tiling of L1 0 and L1 2 magnetic phases that offers a novel structure for the investigation of exchange coupling, relevant to permanent magnet applications.Periodicity of the tiling is controlled by the rate of cooling through the eutectoid isotherm, resulting in control over the L1 0 -L1 2 exchange coupling.First order reversal curve analysis reveals a transition from partial coupling to nearly complete exchange-coupling in a Co 40.2 Pt 59.8 nanochessboard structured alloy as the periodicity is reduced below the critical correlation length.Micromagnetic simulations give insights into how exchange coupling manifests in the tiling, and its impact on microscopic magnetization reversal mechanisms.C 2016 Author(s).All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).[http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4962187]Exchange coupled nanocomposite magnetic materials have been key in the development of magnetic recording and spintronic technologies, [1][2][3][4] but recently have been explored in the development of improved composite permanent magnets. 5,6In principle, exchange coupling a highanisotropy magnetic material to a high-moment, magnetically soft material results in a nanocomposite that can exhibit an enhanced moment and a large coercivity. 6,7Ideally, these factors result in an improvement in the maximum energy product of the magnet.In thin films, exchange coupling can be directly controlled through choice of film materials, 8 thicknesses, and interfaces. 9In bulk materials, exchange coupling is achieved through artificial compositing 10 or processing methods 11 that create phase separation on the nanoscale.
A novel bulk nanocomposite was investigated by Leroux et al., who showed that the eutectoid transformation, A1 → L1 0 + L1 2 , in the binary Co-Pt system 12 could result in a nanochessboard microstructure.This self-assembled 2 + 1-D structure consists of magnetically hard L1 0 (tetragonal) nanorods embedded in a soft L1 2 (cubic) matrix with fully coherent interfaces.When viewed down the rod axis, a characteristic chessboard pattern is revealed.This fascinating microstructure provides an excellent platform for studying exchange coupling at the nanoscale that is topologically intermediate between idealized 1-D coupling in thin films, and the more complex, inherently 3-D environment associated with bulk nanocomposite magnets.
Here we investigate the magnetic properties of fully transformed CoPt nanochessboards with tailored periodicity, achieved by controlling the cooling rate during thermal annealing of the samples.Increasing the periodicity decouples the hard and soft phases.Magnetic reversal behavior is investigated using the first order reversal curve (FORC) technique, which shows control of the magnetic exchange coupling associated with the microstructure.Micromagnetic simulations are performed to better understand magnetic behavior in this unusual nanocomposite.
A boule of Co 40.2 Pt 59.8 was formed by arc-melting Co (99.9%) and Pt (99.99%).The resulting button consisted of a metastable, polycrystalline, A1 (FCC) solid solution of Co and Pt with 20-40 µm grain size, as discussed previously. 13,14To promote the phase transformation A1 → L1 0 + L1, encapsulated samples were slow-cooled through the eutectoid isotherm (nominally 736 • C) 12 at various rates and then held isothermally for several days prior to quenching.The two samples of interest here were cooled from 750 • C to 600 • C at a rate of 40 • C/day or 80 • C/day and then isothermally annealed at 600 • C for 1 week or 4 days, respectively.These will be referred to as the "40CPD" and "80CPD" samples.The microstructure of these samples was examined using transmission electron microscopy (TEM).X-ray diffraction analysis was also performed and supports the two-phase coexistence, but it is non-trivial to analyze due to large coherency effects and will be reported elsewhere.
Magnetic measurements were performed at room temperature using a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM) with a sweep rate of 50 mT/s and an averaging time of 0.5 s.FORCs were obtained by starting at positive saturation and decreasing the magnetic field to a scheduled reversal field, H r .Then, the magnetization is measured as the applied magnetic field, H, is increased from H r to positive saturation, thus measuring a single reversal curve.A total of 144 reversal curves were measured for H r between −1.8 T and 1.8 T with field steps of 25 mT, collecting a family of FORCs.The FORC distribution is calculated as a mixed second derivative of the magnetization with respect to H and H r using the VARIFORC 15 program within the FORCinel software package. 16It is convenient to plot the FORC distribution in a rotated coordinate system with axes H c and H u such that H c = (H − H r )/2 and H u = (H + H r )/2, where H c and H u represent coercive and interaction field distributions, respectively. 17EM is the simplest means of confirming the presence of chessboard structure.TEM micrographs on a [001] zone axis using the (110) superlattice reflection for dark field (DF) imaging are shown in Fig. 1 for 40CPD and 80CPD samples.The [100] and [010] L1 0 easy-axis variants in the [001]-oriented chessboard (i.e., the long axis of the nanorods is oriented parallel to [001]) both appear dark against the bright background of the cubic L1 2 matrix.The 40CPD sample has characteristic tiling dimensions of about 25-40 nm, while in the 80CPD sample the lateral phase dimensions are about 10-20 nm. Figure 1 shows individual "colonies" of the eutectoid chessboard.Within each large parent grain of the original polycrystalline A1 material, numerous chessboard colonies form along all three <100> directions of the parent phase, with typical colony lengthscales of 100-500 nm. 14TEM surveys of multiple parent grains were performed to ensure the micrographs are representative.It will be important to recall, when interpreting the magnetic properties obtained by VSM, that macroscopically the sample is a randomly oriented bulk polycrystal.
The FORC distributions are shown in Fig. 2 along with the corresponding raw M-H FORC data for the 40CPD and 80CPD samples.In the raw FORCs, the outer envelope is identical with the conventional hysteresis loop.Comparison of the FORC diagrams shows stark differences.The FORC diagram from the 40CPD sample, Fig. 2(a), displays two peaks centered at µ 0 H c = 0 mT, µ 0 H u = 40 mT and µ 0 H c = 247.5 mT, µ 0 H u = 0 mT.These peaks indicate two-phase magnetic behavior, 18,19 with the former identifying a soft magnetic phase, and the latter a hard phase.An additional low intensity lobe is seen extending from the soft phase diagonally out to approximately µ 0 H c = 200 mT, µ 0 H u = −225 mT which is coupled with an adjacent region of negative FORC density.This type of feature has been previously associated with magnetic interactions between hard and soft magnetic elements. 20In contrast, the 80CPD sample, Fig. 2(c), displays only a single feature occurring at µ 0 H c = 290 mT, µ 0 H u = −12 mT with no diagonal lobe, identifying single-phase magnetic behavior.
For the 40CPD sample, the two clearly defined peaks observed in FORC distribution of Fig. 2(a) are connected by significant intensity, which indicates that partial exchange coupling is occurring.In comparison, the 80CPD sample, Fig. 2(c), shows only a single peak in the FORC density plot, centered at relatively large H c .Since the TEM confirms that both L1 0 and L1 2 phases are present in this sample, the observed single-phase magnetic behavior in the presence of two ferromagnetic structural phases implies complete exchange coupling of the L1 2 phase to the harder L1 0 .The critical dimension below which complete exchange coupling is expected is approximated by d cr = 2π √ A soft /2K hard . 7Using the exchange stiffness A = 2.5 × 10 −11 J/m and the magnetocrystalline anisotropy constant of the hard L1 0 phase, 13 K = 1.5 × 10 6 J/m 3 , we obtain d cr = 18 nm.For the 80CPD sample, the transverse dimensions of the L1 2 regions (∼10-20 nm) are mostly below d cr , consistent with nearly complete exchange coupling.As a result, it is expected that exchange coupling dominates the magnetic orientation within each columnar tile.However, for the 40CPD sample, the transverse size of a majority of the L1 2 tiles (∼25 to 40 nm) exceeds d cr , and hence a significant volume fraction of the soft phase is able to switch independent of the hard phase.This reduces the coercivity by allowing domain walls to form within the L1 2 regions, which promotes reversal at lower fields. 21,22o qualitatively supplement and inform our interpretation of the observed magnetic behavior in nanochessboards, extensive micromagnetic simulations were performed on idealized chessboard structures.The complete study will be published elsewhere; here we discuss select results relevant to the experimental data that better reveal the role of lengthscales in exchange coupling for this novel geometry, and identify potential reversal mechanisms.We emphasize that while these microscopic mechanisms should be valid, reversal in real chessboards is likely more complex owing to variability in tile sizes and shapes; also the lengthscale associated with the chessboard colony size is not yet included in the simulations, and may also play a key role in the domain magnetics.
Figure 3 possesses uniaxial anisotropy, the corresponding L1 0 tiles in Fig. 3(a) have different easy axis directions depending on the crystalline orientation, which creates a complex local coupling environment.Furthermore, although we refer to the phase morphology as "tiles," each tile is extended in the out-of-plane dimension, realizing a nanorod-like structure, which will not affect exchange coupling.that the simulations consider nanochessboards of one crystallographic orientation while the real samples are polycrystalline with all orientation variants, thus no direct comparison should be made between the simulated and measured hysteresis curves.Additional descriptions of the methodology, and more domain snapshots, can be found in the supplementary material.
Figure 3(b) shows the simulated hysteresis curves for the smaller lengthscale, d = 12.6 nm < d cr .In this case the nanochessboard structure exhibits strong exchange coupling effects, which align the magnetizations of the L1 0 and L1 2 tiles, and the two-phase material behaves effectively as a single-domain single-phase magnetic material, as manifested in the hysteresis curves.The system exhibits an effective magnetic anisotropy with [110] easy axis and [001] hard axis, caused by the strong exchange coupling between adjacent L1 0 tiles via bridging by the L1 2 tiles.Domain structure in Figs.3(d) and 3(e) corresponds to the points A1 and A2, respectively, in Fig. 3(b), where the former is near the saturation under [001] field while the latter is amid the magnetic reversal under in-plane [110] field.In both situations, nearly uniform magnetization occurs over the nanochessboard, confirming complete exchange coupling, consistent with a single peak in the FORC density plot observed in the 80CPD sample.
In comparison, when the lengthscale is increased to d = 36 nm > d cr , exchange coupling is greatly reduced, the soft L1 2 tiles are unable to couple the hard L1 0 tiles, and the magnetizations of adjacent L1 0 tiles independently align along their individual easy axes.As a result, the nanochessboard structure behaves as multi-domain two-phase material, manifested in the hysteresis curves shown in Fig. 3(c).The single-event reversal behavior by homogeneous rotation is replaced by heterogeneous magnetization in both phases.The multi-domain two-phase heterogeneous magnetization processes due to reduced exchange coupling explains the multi-step reversals in the APL Mater.hysteresis curves in Fig. 3(c) and the two peaks in the FORC density plot observed in 40CPD sample.
The simulations also reveal an interesting domain phenomenon when d = 36 nm: the formation of out-of-plane magnetic domains in the soft L1 2 tiles and their important roles in magnetic reversal.Perpendicular domains form in some L1 2 tiles in the thermally demagnetized state (not shown here), under perpendicular [001] field (exemplified in B1), and even under some in-plane fields (exemplified in B2).Perpendicular domains result from the shape anisotropy of the nanorods that dictates a [001] easy axis in the L1 2 phase, which become significant only when the exchange coupling effects are weakened.Hence the magnetic reversal for H ∥ [001] becomes hysteretic as shown in Fig. 3(c).Importantly, magnetic reversals under in-plane fields are facilitated by the perpendicular domains in the L1 2 tile, see the domain structure at B2 in Fig. 3(g).Whether a perpendicular domain in a particular L1 2 tile is formed depends on the adjacent L1 0 tiles.Among 16 possible magnetization configurations in the four adjacent L1 0 tiles, four configurations prefer a perpendicular domain in the enclosed L1 2 tile, which will be discussed in detail elsewhere.A perpendicular domain builds up magnetic charges at the interface between the L1 2 tile and its L1 0 neighbors, which generates magnetostatic interactions between adjacent L1 0 tiles.Long-range magnetostatic interactions between L1 2 regions could cause the observed soft phase peak in the FORC diagram to shift to positive H u in Fig. 2(a). 23he diagonal feature extending between the two phases in Fig. 2(a) is often referred to as an "interference" region. 24,25The interference region is aligned in H r with the hard feature, and in H with the soft feature, suggesting that the down-switching (switching under an applied reversal field) of the hard layer produces new reversal events associated with the soft phase.Neighboring the interference feature is an associated negative feature; negative features have been demonstrated to result when up-switching events (re-reversal under an applied forward field in a FORC) shift in H due to a field-dependent interaction. 23Thus the re-reversal of the hard phase manifests a shift in the up-switching field in the soft phase, realized through their exchange coupling.This is consistent with recent works that suggest a correlation between the interference region, the H u shift of the soft phase feature, and the relative strength of the hard and soft phases. 25n summary, bulk nanocomposite CoPt permanent magnets were synthesized based on the nanochessboard structure, with tunable hard-soft exchange coupling.Increasing the cooling rate during thermal processing of initially disordered A1 Co 40.2 Pt 59.8 alloys resulted in a reduction of the periodicity of the resulting L1 0 + L1 2 nanochessboard microstructure.Concomitant increases in the degree of exchange coupling and permanent magnetic properties were seen in the major hysteresis loops and FORC diagrams.Micromagnetic simulations of idealized nanochessboards suggest explanations for key features in the FORC diagrams related to the degree of exchange coupling, and suggest reversal mechanisms deserving further study.
See supplementary material for a table of relevant permanent magnetic properties, FORC smoothing parameters, and for detailed experimental values and more information on the micromagnetic simulations and their results.
Funding from the NSF under Grant Nos.DMR-1105336 (P.G., E.P.V., W.A.S., and J.A.F.) and DMR-1409317 (L.G. and Y.J.) is gratefully acknowledged.Thanks to Richard Harrison for help with FORCinel and VARIFORC, and Christine Leroux for useful discussion.The parallel computer simulations were performed on XSEDE supercomputers.

FIG. 1 .
FIG. 1. (110) DF TEM imaged on the [001] zone axis for (a) 40CPD and (b) 80CPD samples.The arrows show the direction of the magnetic easy axis in the L1 0 nanorods.
FIG. 2. FORC diagrams and corresponding raw M-H FORC data for 40CPD ((a) and (b)) and 80CPD ((c) and (d)) samples.In (a) and (c), the letters h and s identify the hard and soft peaks, respectively.
The micromagnetic simulations are quasi-3-D-fields and moments have 3-D components, while the moments are assumed to be uniform along [001].Periodic boundary conditions are enforced in the plane of the chessboard.The simulations consider two different sizes, d = 12.6 nm < d cr and d = 36 nm > d cr , roughly representing the 80CPD and 40CPD samples, respectively.Magnetic field is applied along in-plane [100] and [110] and out-of-plane [001] directions.The simulated hysteresis curves and snapshots of typical domain structures are presented in Figs.3(b)-3(g).Note

4 ,
FIG. 3. (a) Micromagnetic simulation cell with L1 2 in white and L1 0 in black; yellow arrows label the easy axis in alternating L1 0 variants.Simulated hysteresis loops along three crystallographic directions for tile size d = 12.6 nm (b) and d = 36.0nm (c).Magnetic field and magnetization are scaled with respect to the saturation magnetization of L1 0 phase.(d)-(g) Magnetic domain structures corresponding to A1, A2, B1, and B2 in the hysteresis loops in (b) and (c).The magnetization vector field is visualized by black arrows for in-plane components (m x , m y ) and by color maps for its all three components (m x , m y , m z ), respectively in red, blue, and green values.The same group of four L1 2 tiles surrounding an L1 0 tile is highlighted in (d)-(g).