Published Online: 09 October 2014
Accepted: September 2014
J. Chem. Phys. 141, 144308 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4897206
more...View Affiliations
  • DNRF Centre “Glass and Time,” IMFUFA, Department of Sciences, Roskilde University, Postbox 260, DK-4000 Roskilde, Denmark
  • a)Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic mail:

Asphaltene and smaller aromatic molecules tend to form linear nanoaggregates in bitumen. Over the years bitumen undergoes chemical aging and during this process, the size of the nanoaggregate increases. This increase is associated with an increase in viscosity and brittleness of the bitumen, eventually leading to road deterioration. This paper focuses on understanding the mechanisms behind nanoaggregate size and stability. We used molecular dynamics simulations to quantify the probability of having a nanoaggregate of a given size in the stationary regime. To model this complicated behavior, we chose first to consider the simple case where only asphaltene molecules are counted in a nanoaggregate. We used a master equation approach and a related statistical mechanics model. The linear asphaltene nanoaggregates behave as a rigid linear chain. The most complicated case where all aromatic molecules are counted in a nanoaggregate is then discussed. The linear aggregates where all aromatic molecules are counted seem to behave as a flexible linear chain.
  • See also: The Journal of Chemical Physics 139 (12), 124506 (2013)
    1. 1. J. C. Petersen, Transportation Research Circular E-C140 (Transportation Research Board, 2009). Google Scholar
    2. 2. J. F. Branthaver, J. C. Petersen, R. E. Robertson, J. J. Duvall, S. S. Kim, P. M. Harnsberger, T. Mill, E. K. Ensley, F. A. Barbour, and J. F. Schabron, Technical Report No. SHRP-A-368 (Strategic Highway Research Program, 1993). Google Scholar
    3. 3. P. R. Herrington, Petrol. Sci. Technol. 16, 743 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1080/10916469808949809 , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
    4. 4. X. Lu and U. Isacsson, Constr. Build. Mater. 16, 15 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-0618(01)00033-2 , , Google ScholarCrossref
    5. 5. J. C. Petersen, F. A. Barbour, and S. M. Dorrence, Proc. Assoc. Asphalt Paving Technol. 43, 162 (1974). , Google ScholarCAS
    6. 6. O. C. Mullins, H. Sabbah, J. Eyssautier, A. E. Pomerantz, L. Barré, A. B. Andrews, Y. Ruiz-Morales, F. Mostowfi, R. McFarlane, L. Goual, R. Lepkowicz, T. Cooper, J. Orbulescu, R. M. Leblanc, J. Edwards, and R. N. Zare, Energy Fuels 26, 3986 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1021/ef300185p , , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
    7. 7. C. A. Lemarchand, T. B. Schrøder, J. C. Dyre, and J. S. Hansen, J. Chem. Phys. 139, 124506 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4821616 , , Google ScholarScitation
    8. 8. T. F. Yen, J. G. Erdman, and S. S. Pollack, Anal. Chem. 33, 1587 (1961). https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60179a039 , , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
    9. 9. G. Andreatta, N. Bostrom, and O. C. Mullins, Langmuir 21, 2728 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1021/la048640t , , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
    10. 10. L. Goual, M. Sedghi, H. Zeng, F. Mostowfi, R. McFarlane, and O. C. Mullins, Fuel 90, 2480 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2011.02.025 , , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
    11. 11. J. Eyssautier, P. Levitz, D. Espinat, J. Jestin, J. Gummel, I. Grillo, and L. Barré, J. Phys. Chem. B 115, 6827 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp111468d , , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
    12. 12. J. Murgich, M. Jesús, and Y. Aray, Energy Fuels 10, 68 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1021/ef950112p , , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
    13. 13. J. H. Pacheco-Sánchez, I. P. Zaragoza, and J. M. Martínez-Magadán, Energy Fuels 17, 1346 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1021/ef020226i , , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
    14. 14. L. Zhang and M. L. Greenfield, Energy Fuels 21, 1712 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1021/ef060658j , , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
    15. 15. T. F. Headen and E. S. Boek, Energy Fuels 25, 503 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1021/ef1010397 , , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
    16. 16. B. Aguilera-Mercado, C. Herdes, J. Murgich, and E. A. Müller, Energy Fuels 20, 327 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1021/ef050272t , , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
    17. 17. J. S. Hansen, C. A. Lemarchand, E. Nielsen, J. C. Dyre, and T. Schrøder, J. Chem. Phys. 138, 094508 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4792045 , , Google ScholarScitation, CAS
    18. 18. CO2 emission reduction by exploitation of rolling resistance modelling of pavements, see http://www.cooee-co2.dk/. , Google Scholar
    19. 19. N. Bailey, L. Bøhling, J. S. Hansen, T. Ingebrigsten, H. Larsen, C. A. Lemarchand, U. R. Pedersen, T. Schrøder, and A. A. Veldhorst, Roskilde University Molecular Dynamics (RUMD.org) package, see http://rumd.org. Google Scholar
    20. 20. ASTM. 1995, Annual Book of Standards (American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 1995); method D-2007. Google Scholar
    21. 21. P. M. Morse, Oper. Res. 3, 255 (1955). https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.3.3.255 , Google ScholarCrossref
    22. 22. M. Schwarz Jr. and D. Poland, J. Chem. Phys. 63, 557 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.431086 , , Google ScholarScitation, CAS
    23. 23. P. Sillrén, J. Bielecki, J. Mattsson, L. Börjesson, and A. Matic, J. Chem. Phys. 136, 094514 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3690137 , , Google ScholarScitation
    24. 24. Per Sillrén, “Trees, queues and alcohols,” Ph.D. thesis (Chalmers University of Technology, 2013). , Google Scholar
    25. 25. T. Erdmann and U. S. Schwarz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 108102 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.108102 , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
    26. 26. R. Mahnke and N. Pieret, Phys. Rev. E 56, 2666 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.56.2666 , , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
    27. 27. F. Dolezalek, Z. Phys. Chem. 64, 727 (1908). , Google ScholarCrossref
    28. 28. F. Dolezalek, Z. Phys. Chem. 71, 191 (1910). , Google ScholarCAS
    29. 29. K. E. Gubbins, Mol. Phys. 111, 3666 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/00268976.2013.831140 , , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
    30. 30. M. E. Cates, C. M. Marques, and J.-P. Bouchaud, J. Chem. Phys. 94, 8529 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.460086 , , Google ScholarScitation, CAS
    31. 31. J. P. Wittmer, A. Milchev, and M. E. Cates, J. Chem. Phys. 109, 834 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.476623 , , Google ScholarScitation, ISI, CAS
    32. 32. J. P. Wittmer, P. van der Schoot, A. Milchev, and J. L. Barrat, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 6992 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1311622 , , Google ScholarScitation, CAS
    33. 33. R. H. Hurt and Y. Hu, Carbon 37, 281 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(98)00176-6 , , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
    34. 34. M. Doi and S. F. Edwards, The Theory of Polymer Dynamics (Clarendon, Oxford, 1986). , Google Scholar
    35. 35. P. van der Schoot and M. E. Cates, Langmuir 10, 670 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1021/la00015a014 , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
    36. 36. A. R. Khokhlov and A. N. Semenov, Phys. A 112, 605 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4371(82)90199-6 , , Google ScholarCrossref
    37. 37. T. Kuriabova, M. D. Betterton, and M. A. Glaser, J. Mater. Chem. 20, 10366 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1039/c0jm02355h , , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
    38. 38. C. De Michele, T. Bellini, and F. Sciortino, Macromolecules 45, 1090 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1021/ma201962x , , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
    39. 39. M. S. Wertheim, J. Stat. Phys. 35, 19 (1984); https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01017362 , , Google Scholar
      M. S. Wertheim, J. Stat. Phys. 35, 35 (1984); https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01017363 , Google Scholar
      M. S. Wertheim, J. Stat. Phys. 42, 459 (1986); https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01127721 , Google Scholar
      M. S. Wertheim, J. Stat. Phys. 42, 477 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01127722 , Google ScholarCrossref
    40. 40. J. K. Johnson and K. E. Gubbins, Mol. Phys. 77, 1033 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1080/00268979200102981 , , Google ScholarCrossref
    41. 41. B. Diu, C. Guthmann, D. Lederer, and B. Roulet, Éléments de physique statistique (Hermann, Paris, 1989). , Google Scholar
    42. 42. X. Lü and J. T. Kindt, J. Chem. Phys. 120, 10328 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1729855 , Google ScholarScitation
    43. 43. X. Lü and J. T. Kindt, J. Chem. Phys. 125, 054909 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2234478 , , Google ScholarScitation
    44. 44. C. Jian, T. Tang, and S. Bhattacharjee, Energy Fuels 28, 3604 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/ef402208f , , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
    45. 45. O. C. Mullins, Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. 4, 393 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anchem-061010-113849 , , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
    46. 46. Q. Wu, A. E. Pomerantz, O. C. Mullins, and R. N. Zare, Energy Fuels 28, 475 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/ef401958n , , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
    47. 47. J. H. Pacheco-Sánchez, F. Álvarez-Ramírez, and J. M. Martínez-Magadán, Energy Fuels 18, 1676 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1021/ef049911a , , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
    48. 48. D. D. Li and M. L. Greenfield, Fuel 115, 347 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.07.012 , , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
    49. © 2014 AIP Publishing LLC.

    Select Your Access


    Purchase

    Standard PPV for $30.00