Published Online: 11 February 2013
Accepted: January 2013
Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 063102 (2013); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4791594
We consider two intrinsic sources of noise in ultra-sensitive magnetic field sensors based on MgO magnetic tunnel junctions, coming both from 25Mg nuclear spins (I = 5/2, 10% natural abundance) and S = 1 Mg-vacancies. While nuclear spins induce noise peaked in the MHz frequency range, the vacancies noise peaks in the GHz range. We find that the nuclear noise in submicron devices has a similar magnitude than the 1/f noise, while the vacancy-induced noise dominates in the GHz range. Interestingly, the noise spectrum under a finite magnetic field gradient may provide spatial information about the spins in the MgO layer.
  1. 1. S. Parkin, C. Kaiser, A. Panchula, P. Rice, B. Hughes, M. Samant, and S. Yang, Nature Mater. 3, 862 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1256 , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  2. 2. S. Yuasa, T. Nagahama, A. Fukushima, Y. Suzuki, and K. Ando, Nature Mater. 3, 868 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1257 , , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  3. 3. S. Ingvarsson, G. Xiao, S. S. P. Parkin, W. J. Gallagher, G. Grinstein, and R. H. Koch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3289 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.3289 , , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  4. 4. S. Parkin, X. Jiang, C. Kaiser, A. Panchula, K. Roche, and M. Samant, Proc. IEEE 91, 661 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2003.811807 , , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  5. 5. K. Klaassen, X. Xing, and J. van Peppen, IEEE Trans. Magn. 41, 2307 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2005.850289 , , Google ScholarCrossref
  6. 6. P. Freitas, R. Ferreira, S. Cardoso, and F. Cardoso, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 19, 165221 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/19/16/165221 , , Google ScholarCrossref
  7. 7. W. F. Egelhoff, Jr., P. W. T. Pong, J. Unguris, R. D. McMichael, E. R. Nowak, A. S. Edelstein, J. E. Burnette, and G. A. Fischer, Sens. Actuators, A 155, 217 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2009.08.016 , , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  8. 8. Z. Lei, G. Li, W. Egelhoff, P. Lai, and P. Pong, IEEE Trans. Magn. 47, 602 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2010.2100814 , , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  9. 9. R. Guerrero, F. Aliev, R. Villar, J. Hauch, M. Fraune, G. Guntherodt, K. Rott, H. Bruckl, and G. Reiss, Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 042501 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2001128 , , Google ScholarScitation
  10. 10. M. Nor, A. Faridah, T. Kato, S. Ahn, T. Daibou, K. Ono, M. Oogane, Y. Ando, and T. Miyazaki, J. Appl. Phys. 99, 08T306 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2165142 , , Google ScholarScitation
  11. 11. A. Gokce, E. Nowak, S. Yang, and S. Parkin, J. Appl. Phys. 99, 08A906 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2169591 , , Google ScholarScitation
  12. 12. F. Aliev, R. Guerrero, D. Herranz, R. Villar, F. Greullet, C. Tiusan, and M. Hehn, Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 232504 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2822812 , , Google ScholarScitation
  13. 13. T. Arakawa, T. Tanaka, K. Chida, S. Matsuo, Y. Nishihara, D. Chiba, K. Kobayashi, T. Ono, A. Fukushima, and S. Yuasa, Phys. Rev. B 86, 224423 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.86.224423 , , Google ScholarCrossref
  14. 14. M. Berglund and M. E. Wieser, Pure Appl. Chem. 83, 397 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1351/PAC-REP-10-06-02 , , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  15. 15. L. E. Halliburton, L. A. Kappers, D. L. Cowan, F. Dravnieks, and J. E. Wertz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 30, 607 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.30.607 , , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  16. 16. L. E. Halliburton, D. L. Cowan, W. B. J. Blake, and J. E. Wertz, Phys. Rev. B 8, 1610 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.8.1610 , , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  17. 17. B. Rose and L. Halliburton, J. Phys. C 7, 3981 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3719/7/21/018 , , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  18. 18. C. Araujo, M. Kapilashrami, X. Jun, O. Jayakumar, S. Nagar, Y. Wu, C. Arhammar, B. Johansson, L. Belova, R. Ahuja et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 232505 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3447376 , , Google ScholarScitation
  19. 19. N. J. Stone, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 90, 75 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adt.2005.04.001 , , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  20. 20. T. Sleator, E. L. Hahn, C. Hilbert, and J. Clarke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 1742 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.55.1742 , , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  21. 21. C. L. Degen, M. Poggio, H. J. Mamin, and D. Rugar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 250601 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.250601 , , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  22. 22. J. Wertz, P. Auzins, J. Griffiths, and J. Orton, Discuss. Faraday Soc. 28, 136 (1959). https://doi.org/10.1039/df9592800136 , , Google ScholarCrossref
  23. 23. P. S. Fiske, J. F. Stebbins, and I. Farnan, Phys. Chem. Miner. 20, 587 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00211854 , , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  24. 24. J. Freitas and M. Smith, Annu. Rep. NMR Spectrosc. 75, 25 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-397018-3.00002-8 , , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  25. 25. R. Chaves, P. Freitas, B. Ocker, and W. Maass, Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 102504 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2775802 , , Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  26. 26. R. Chaves, P. Freitas, B. Ocker, and W. Maass, J. Appl. Phys. 103, 07E931 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2839311 , , Google ScholarScitation
  27. 27. C. Tsang, C. Bonhote, Q. Dai, H. Do, B. Knigge, Y. Ikeda, Q. Le, B. Lengsfield, J. Lille, J. Li et al., IEEE Trans. Magn. 42, 145 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2005.861775 , , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  28. 28. A. Ferrari and G. Pacchioni, J. Phys. Chem. 99, 17010 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1021/j100046a029 , , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  29. © 2013 American Institute of Physics.

Select Your Access


Purchase

Standard PPV for $30.00