Published Online: 17 August 2012
Accepted: July 2012
Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 074105 (2012); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4745927
The diffusion behavior of Zn in solar-grade Cu(In,Ga)Se2 (CIGSe) is found to be similar to that in epitaxial CuInSe2 (CISe), which indicates that grain boundaries only play a minor role as segregation sites and fast-transport pathways. The diffusivity obeys the Arrhenius equation DZn = 3.8 × 10−3exp(−1.24 eV∕kBT) cm2 s−1. Surprisingly, the Zn65 diffusion profiles obtained by the radiotracer technique exhibit anomalous shapes with a second maximum near the CI(G)Se-substrate interface. The observations may be indicative of an interstitial-substitutional diffusion mechanism.
  1. 1. W. Witte, D. Hariskos, and M. Powalla, Thin solid Films 519, 7549 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2010.12.127 , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  2. 2. M. Sugiyama, A. Kinoshita, A. Miyama, H. Nakanishi, and S.F. Chichibu, J. Cryst. Growth 310, 794 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2007.11.172 , , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  3. 3. S. Nishiwaki, T. Satoh, Y. Hashimoto, S.-I. Shimikawa, S. Hayashi, T. Negami, and T. Wada, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 77, 359 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-0248(02)00355-0 , , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  4. 4. M. Benabdeslem, N. Benslim, L. Bechiri, L. Mahdjoubi, E. B. Hannech, and G. Nouet, J. Cryst. Growth 274, 144 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2004.09.085 , , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  5. 5. G. Voorwinden, P. Jackson, and R. Kniese, in Proceedings of 22nd European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, Vol. II, edited by G. Willeke, H. Ossenbrink, and P. Helm (WIP-Munich, 2007), p. 2115. , Google Scholar
  6. 6. N. Rega, S. Siebentritt, I. Beckers, J. Beckmann, J. Albert, and M. Lux-Steiner, J. Cryst. Growth 248, 169 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0248(02)01874-2 , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  7. 7. S. Siebentritt, N. Papathanasiou, J. Albert, and M. Ch. Lux-Steiner, Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 151919 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2192638 , , Google ScholarScitation
  8. 8. N. A. Stolwijk, Sh. Obeidi, J. Bastek, R. Wuerz, and A. Eicke, Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 244101 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3449125 , , Google ScholarScitation
  9. 9. K. Hiepko, J. Bastek, R. Schlesiger, G. Schmitz, R. Wuerz, and N. A. Stolwijk, Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 234101 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3665036 , , Google ScholarScitation
  10. 10. D. J. Schroeder, G. D. Berry, and A. A. Rockett, Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 4068 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.117820 , , Google ScholarScitation, CAS
  11. 11. T. Maeda and T. Wada, in EMRS Spring Meeting, Strasbourg, France, 2012. , Google Scholar
  12. 12. S. B. Zhang, S.-H. Wei, A. Zunger, and H. Katayama-Yoshida, Phys. Rev. B 57, 9642 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.57.9642 , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  13. 13. I. E. Oikkonen, M. G. Ganchenkova, A. P. Seitsonen, and R. M. Nieminen, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 23, 422202 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/23/42/422202 , , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  14. 14. U. Gösele and T. Y. Tan, in Electronic Structure and Properties of Semiconductors, edited by W. Schröter (VCH, Weinheim, 1991), p. 97. , Google Scholar
  15. 15. A. Giese, N. A. Stolwijk, and H. Bracht, Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 642 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.127071 , Google ScholarScitation, CAS
  16. 16. N. A. Stolwijk and L. Lerner, J. Appl. Phys. 110, 033526 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3609070 , , Google ScholarScitation
  17. © 2012 American Institute of Physics.

Select Your Access


Purchase

Standard PPV for $30.00