MENU
  • Scitation Home

Thank you

For your interest in AIP Conference Proceedings

Check for updates on crossmark
Prev Next
No Access Published Online: 29 October 2020

  • Anodised aluminum oxide [AAO] template based synthesis of curved CdS nanobelts

AIP Conference Proceedings 2276, 020026 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0025738
Sakshi Kapoor and S S Islama)
more...View AffiliationsView Contributors
  • Sakshi Kapoor
  • S S Islam
ABSTRACT
In this article we have demonstrated electrodeposition of CdS into AAO template, resulting into growth of CdS nanobelts than usual nanorods. During FE-SEM scanning something peculiar was observed; the nanobelts were whirling under the influence of focused electron beam, the reason for which is further discussed. Further, enhanced optical properties of the nanobelts were evaluated using UV-visible absorption spectroscopy and photoluminescence emission. The energy storage properties of the nanobelts were recorded using cyclic voltammetry (CV) and galvanic charging-discharging cycle (GCD) resulting into 578 F g−1 at 5 mV s−1.

REFERENCES
Section:
Previous section

  1. 1. Routkevitch, Dmitri, et al., The Journal of Physical Chemistry 100.33, 14037–14047 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp952910m, Google ScholarCrossref
  2. 2. Mondal, S. P., A. Dhar, and S. K. Ray., Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing 10.4-5, 185–193 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2007.11.003, Google ScholarCrossref
  3. 3. Kumar, Sanjeev, and Satinder K. Sharma., Physica Scripta 82.2, 025801(2010). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/82/02/025801, Google ScholarCrossref
  4. 4. Winter, Martin, and Ralph J. Brodd., Chemical Reviews, 4245–4270 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1021/cr020730k, Google ScholarCrossref
  5. 5. Huang, Jichun, et al., Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 696, 15–19 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2013.03.006, Google ScholarCrossref
  6. 6. Yuan, Changzhou, et al., Electrochimica Acta 88, 507–512 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2012.10.115, Google ScholarCrossref
  7. 7. Zhang, Xueyu, et al., CrystEngComm 18.7, 1090–1095 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CE02038G, Google ScholarCrossref
  8. 8. Wang, Xiuhua, et al., Journal of Materials Chemistry A 5.15, 7165–7172 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TA00593H, Google ScholarCrossref
  9. 9. Xu, Panpan, et al., Journal of Materials Chemistry A 4.13, 4920–4928 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TA09740A, Google ScholarCrossref
  10. 10. Yang, Jia, et al., Materials Chemistry and Physics 135.2-3, 687–693 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.05.045, Google ScholarCrossref
  11. 11. Adhikari, Amrita De, et al., Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 57.5, 1350–1360 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.7b04885, Google ScholarCrossref
  12. 12. Nair, Nikila, Sutripto Majumder, and Babasaheb R. Sankapal., Chemical Physics Letters 659, 105–111 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2016.07.008, Google ScholarCrossref
  1. © 2020 Author(s). Published by AIP Publishing.

Article Metrics

Views
36
Citations
Crossref 0
Web of Science
ISI 0

Altmetric

Please Note: The number of views represents the full text views from December 2016 to date. Article views prior to December 2016 are not included.