No Access
Published Online: 03 May 2018
AIP Conference Proceedings 1960, 090002 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5034928
Standard material parameters identification strategies generally use an extensive number of classical tests for collecting the required experimental data. However, a great effort has been made recently by the scientific and industrial communities to support this experimental database on heterogeneous tests. These tests can provide richer information on the material behavior allowing the identification of a more complete set of material parameters. This is a result of the recent development of full-field measurements techniques, like digital image correlation (DIC), that can capture the heterogeneous deformation fields on the specimen surface during the test. Recently, new specimen geometries were designed to enhance the richness of the strain field and capture supplementary strain states. The butterfly specimen is an example of these new geometries, designed through a numerical optimization procedure where an indicator capable of evaluating the heterogeneity and the richness of strain information. However, no experimental validation was yet performed. The aim of this work is to experimentally validate the heterogeneous butterfly mechanical test in the parameter identification framework. For this aim, DIC technique and a Finite Element Model Up-date inverse strategy are used together for the parameter identification of a DC04 steel, as well as the calculation of the indicator. The experimental tests are carried out in a universal testing machine with the ARAMIS measuring system to provide the strain states on the specimen surface. The identification strategy is accomplished with the data obtained from the experimental tests and the results are compared to a reference numerical solution.
  1. 1. T. Pottier, P. Vacher, F. Toussaint, H. Louche, and T. Coudert. “Out-of-plane Testing Procedure for Inverse Identification Purpose: Application in Sheet Metal Plasticity,” in Experimental Mechanics, 52(7):951–963, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-011-9555-3, Google ScholarCrossref
  2. 2. S. Avril, M. Bonnet, A. S. Bretelle, M. Grédiac, F. Hild, P. Ienny, F. Latourte, D. Lemosse, S. Pagano, E. Pagnacco, and F. Pierron. “Overview of identification methods of mechanical parameters based on full-field measurements,” in Experimental Mechanics, 48(4):381–402, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11340-008-9148-y, Google ScholarCrossref
  3. 3. P. A. Prates, A. F. G. Pereira, N. A. Sakharova, M. C. Oliveira, and J. V. Fernandes. “Inverse Strategies for Identifying the Parameters of Constitutive Laws of Metal Sheets,” in Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2016 (Article ID 4152963):18, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/4152963, Google ScholarCrossref
  4. 4. N. Souto, A. Andrade-Campos, and S. Thuillier. “Mechanical design of a heterogeneous test for material parameters identification,” in International Journal of Material Forming, 10(3):353–367, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-016-1284-9, Google ScholarCrossref
  5. 5. N. Souto. “Computational design of a mechanical test for material characterization by inverse analysis,” PhD thesis, University of Aveiro, 2015. Google Scholar
  6. 6. N. Souto, A. Andrade-Campos, and S. Thuillier. “A numerical methodology to design heterogeneous mechanical tests,” in International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 107:264–276, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.01.021, Google ScholarCrossref
  7. 7. A. Andrade-Campos. “Development of an optimization framework for parameter identification and shape optimization problems in engineering,” in International Journal of Manufacturing, Materials, and Mechanical Engineering 1:57–79, 2011. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijmmme.2011010105, Google ScholarCrossref
  8. 8. K. Levenberg. “A method for the solution of certain problems in least squares,” in Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, 2(2):164–168, 1944. https://doi.org/10.1090/qam/10666, Google ScholarCrossref
  1. Published by AIP Publishing.