Published Online: 21 July 2017
AIP Conference Proceedings 1863, 520005 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4992669
more...View Affiliations
The aim of this study was to compare the drag force created by two helmets (time trial and road)used by a wheelchair racer. The head and helmet of the racer were scanned to obtain the3D models. Numerical simulation was run on Fluent, having as output the drag force for both helmets (road and time trial) in two different positions (0° and 90°) and increasing velocities (from 2.0 to 6.5 m/s). The greatest aerodynamic drag was noted wearing a time trial helmet in 90° ranging from 0.1025N to 0.8475N; this was also the position with the highest drag. The velocity with higher drag for booth helmets was at 6.5 m/s. The time trial helmet at 0° had the lower aerodynamic drag, compared with the same position of road helmet. The drag force seems to be lower wearing the time trial helmet and keeping the 0° position and, thus, should be considered for sprinting events.
  1. 1. Peters, Martin. Computational Fluid Dynamics for Sport Simulation, (Springer, 2009). Google ScholarCrossref
  2. 2. T. J. LaMere and S. Labanowich, “The history of sports wheelchairs: Part III, The racing wheelchair 1976-1983”. Sports ‘n Spokes, 10 (1), pp. 12–16(1984). Google Scholar
  3. 3. F. Alam, H. Chowdhury, H. Z. Wei, I. Mustary, and G. Zimmer. “Aerodynamics of ribbed bicycle racing helmets”. Procedia engineering, 72, pp. 691–696 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.06.117, Google ScholarCrossref
  4. 4. T. Rushby-Smith, and L. Douglas. Paralympic Technology. Ingenia, 51, pp. 33 (2012). Google Scholar
  5. 5. P. Forte, T. M. Barbosa and D. A. Marinho. “Technologic Appliance and Performance Concerns in Wheelchair Racing – Helping Paralympic Athletes to Excel” inNew Perspectives in Fluid Dynamics, edited by Dr. Chaoqun Liu,pp. 101–121(InTech, 2015). Google ScholarCrossref
  6. 6. D. A. Marinho, T. M. Barbosa, V. Mantha, A. I. Rouboaand A. J. Silva. “Modelling propelling force in swimming using numerical simulations” in Fluid Dynamics, Computational Modeling and Applications, edited by Juarez LH, pp. 439–448 (InTech 2012). Google Scholar
  7. 7. D. A. Marinho, A. J. Silva, V. M. Reis, T. M. Barbosa, J. P. Vilas-Boas, F. B. Alves, L. Machado, A. Rouboa. “Three-dimensional CFD analysis of the hand and forearm in swimming”. Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 27:1, pp. 74–80 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.27.1.74, Google ScholarCrossref
  8. 8. R. H. Sanders. “Hydrodynamic characteristics of a swimmer’s hand”. Journal of Applied Biomechanics, 15 (1), pp. 3–26(1999). https://doi.org/10.1123/jab.15.1.3, Google ScholarCrossref
  9. 9. A. Aroussi, S. Kucukgokoglan, S. J. Pickering, M. Menacer. “Evaluation of four turbulence models in the interaction of multi burners swirling flows” in4th International Conference On Multiphase Flow(New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, 2001) Google Scholar
  10. 10. S. Sidelko. “Benchmark of aerodynamic cycling helmets using a refined wind tunnel test protocol for helmet drag research” Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2007. Google Scholar
  11. Published by AIP Publishing.