Free Published Online: 27 June 2017
AIP Conference Proceedings 1850, 100004 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4984461
more...View Affiliations
View Contributors
  • Ivan Ermanoski
  • Adrian Orozco
  • Johannes Grobbel
A detailed design of pressure separation by packed columns of particles, in a solar-thermochemical reactor prototype, is presented. Results show that the concept is sound and robust under a multitude operational conditions. Straightforward control approaches, such as pumping speed and pressure adjustments, can be implemented to cover a wide range of contingencies.
  1. 1. T. Nakamura, Sol. Energy 19, 467–475 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-092X(77)90102-5, Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  2. 2. E. A. Fletcher and R. L. Moen, Science 197, 1050–1056 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.197.4308.1050, Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  3. 3. Y. Tamaura, A. Steinfeld, P. Kuhn, and K. Ehrensberger, Energy 20, 325–330 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-5442(94)00099-O, Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  4. 4. N. Gokon, S. Takahashi, H. Yamamoto, and T. Kodama, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 33, 2189–2199 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.02.044, Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  5. 5. R. B. Diver, J. E. Miller, M. D. Allendorf, N. P. Siegel, and R. E. Hogan, J. Sol. Energy Eng. 130, 041001-041001–041001-041008 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2969781, Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  6. 6. J. Lapp, J. H. Davidson, and W. Lipinski, Energy 37, 591–600 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.10.045, Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  7. 7. I. Ermanoski, N. P. Siegel, and E. B. Stechel, J. Sol. Energy Eng. 135, 031002-031001–031010 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4023356, Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  8. 8. I. Ermanoski, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 39, 13114–13117 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.06.143, Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  9. 9. I. Ermanoski, et al., AIP Conference Proceedings 1734, 120001 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4949203, Google ScholarScitation
  10. 10. I. Ermanoski, J. E. Miller, and M. D. Allendorf, PCCP 16, 8418–8427 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/c4cp00978a, Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  11. 11. I. Ermanoski, Energy Procedia 69, 1731–1740 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.03.141, Google ScholarCrossref
  12. 12. L. I. Stiel and G. Thodos, Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 2, 233-& (1963). https://doi.org/10.1021/i160007a014, Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  13. 13. J. V. Sengers and B. Kamgarparsi, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 13, 185–205 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.555708, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  14. 14. E. Cunningham, Proc. R. soc. Lond. Ser. A-Contain. Pap. Math. Phys. Character 83, 357–365 (1910). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1910.0024, Google ScholarCrossref
  15. 15. Y. Ishida, Phys. Rev. 21, 0550–0563 (1923). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.21.550, Google ScholarCrossref
  16. 16. M. Knudsen and S. Weber, Ann. Phys.-Berlin 36, 983–996 (1911). Google Scholar
  17. 17. R. A. Millikan, Phys. Rev. 22, 1–23 (1923). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.22.1, Google ScholarCrossref
  18. 18. R. A. Millikan, Phys. Rev. 21, 217–238 (1923). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.21.217, Google ScholarCrossref
  19. 19. D. J. Rader, J. Aerosol. Sci. 21, 161–168 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(90)90001-E, Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  1. © 2017 Author(s). Published by AIP Publishing.