Published Online: 03 March 2017
AIP Conference Proceedings 1819, 040021 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4977151
more...View Affiliations
The CMS-TOTEM Precision Proton Spectrometer (CT-PPS) is an approved project to add tracking and timing information at approximately ±210 m from the interaction point around the CMS detector. It is designed to operate at high luminosity with up to 50 interactions per 25 ns bunch crossing to perform measurements of e.g. the quartic gauge couplings and search for rare exclusive processes. During 2016, CT-PPS took data in normal high-luminosity proton-proton LHC collisions. In the coming years, high radiation doses and large multiple-vertex interactions will represent difficult challenges that resemble those of the high-luminosity LHC program. A coordinated effort of detector upgrades with the goal of reaching the physics goals while mitigating the degradation effects is under way. Upgrades to the tracking and timing detectors are discussed.
  1. 1. CMS and TOTEM Collaborations, “CMS-TOTEM Precision Proton Spectrometer,” CERN-LHCC-2014-021. Google Scholar
  2. 2. F. Ravotti [TOTEM Collaboration], “First radiation background studies for the TOTEM Roman Pot and T2 detectors,” doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/NSSMIC.2011.6154586 (2011). Google ScholarCrossref
  3. 3. S. I. Parker, C. J. Kenney and J. Segal, “3-D: A new architecture for solid state radiation detectors,” Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 395, 328 (1997). doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(97)00694-3. Google ScholarCrossref
  4. 4. M. Mathes et al., “Test beam characterizations of 3D silicon pixel detectors,” IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 55, 3731 (2008) doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2008.2005630 [arXiv:0806.3337 [physics.ins-det]]. Google ScholarCrossref
  5. 5. B. W. Adams et al. [LAPPD Collaboration], “A brief technical history of the Large-Area Picosecond Photode-tector (LAPPD) Collaboration,” [arXiv:1603.01843 [physics.ins-det]]. Google Scholar
  6. 6. J. Va’vra, “PID techniques: Alternatives to RICH methods,” arXiv:1611.01713 [physics.ins-det]. Google Scholar
  7. 7. M. Berretti [TOTEM Collaboration], “The timing upgrade project of the TOTEM Roman Pots detectors,” Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 824, 251 (2016). doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2015.09.112. Google ScholarCrossref
  8. 8. H. F. W. Sadrozinski et al., “Ultra-fast silicon detectors (UFSD),” Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 831, 18 (2016). doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2016.03.093. Google ScholarCrossref
  9. 9. G. Kramberger et al., “Radiation effects in Low Gain Avalanche Detectors after hadron irradiations,” JINST 10, no. 07, P07006 (2015). doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/10/07/P07006. Google ScholarCrossref
  10. 10. N. Cartiglia et al., “Beam test results of a 15 ps timing system based on Ultra-Fast Silicon Detectors,” arXiv:1608.08681 [physics.ins-det]. Google Scholar
  11. 11. S. N. White, “R&D for a dedicated fast timing layer in the CMS Endcap upgrade,” Acta Phys. Pol. B Proc. Suppl. 7, 743 (2014) doi: https://doi.org/10.5506/APhysPolBSupp.7.743 [arXiv:1409.1165 [physics.ins-det]]. Google ScholarCrossref
  12. 12. M. McClish, R. Farrell, K. Vanderpuye, K. Shah, “A reexamination of deep diffused Si APDs gain and quantum efficiency”, Trans. Nucl. Sci., vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 1–6, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2006.881545, Google ScholarCrossref
  13. 13. S. N. White, private communication. Google Scholar
  14. Published by AIP Publishing.