MENU
  • Scitation Home

Thank you

For your interest in the AIP Conference Proceedings

Check for updates on crossmark
Prev Next
No Access
Published Online: 23 June 2016

Privatization in a public leadership mixed duopoly

AIP Conference Proceedings 1738, 110003 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4951872
Fernanda A. Ferreira and Flávio Ferreira
more...View Affiliations
ABSTRACT
We consider domestic and international competitions with one public leader firm and one follower private firm, producing complementary goods and competing on prices. We compare the results obtained in both models. Furthermore, we examine the impacts of privatization on consumer surplus and on social welfare.

REFERENCES
Section:
Previous section

  1. 1. J.C. Bárcena-Ruiz, “Endogenous timing in a mixed duopoly: price competition,” Journal of Economics 91, 263–272 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-007-0255-5, Google ScholarCrossref
  2. 2. F. Ferreira, “Privatization in an international mixed duopoly with environmental taxes,” in Numerical Analysis and Applied Mathematics, edited by T. E. Simos et al., AIP Conference Proceedings 1648, 2015, pp. 070003-1–070003-4. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4912377, Google ScholarScitation
  3. 3. F.A. Ferreira and F. Ferreira, “Privatization and government preferences in a mixed duopoly: Stackelberg versus Cournot”, in Discontinuity and Complexity in Nonlinear Physical Systems, edited by J.A. Tenreiro Machado et al., Springer International Publishing Switzerland, 2014, pp. 421–430. Google ScholarCrossref
  4. 4. K. Fjell and D. Pal, “A mixed oligopoly in the presence of foreign private firms,” Canadian Journal of Economics 29, 737–743 (1996). https://doi.org/10.2307/136260, Google ScholarCrossref
  5. 5. K. Fjell and J.S. Heywood, “Public Stackelberg leadership in a mixed oligopoly with foreign firms,” Australian Economic Papers 41, 267–281 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8454.00164, Google ScholarCrossref
  6. 6. T. Matsumura, “Stackelberg mixed duopoly with a foreign competitor,” Bulletin of Economic Research 55, 275–287 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8586.00175, Google ScholarCrossref
  7. 7. K. Ohnishi, “Domestic and international mixed models with price competition,” International Review of Economics 57, 1–7 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-009-0083-8, Google ScholarCrossref
  8. 8. K. Ohnishi, “Price-setting mixed duopoly models with complementary goods,” Modern Economy 1, 43–46 (2010). https://doi.org/10.4236/me.2010.11003, Google ScholarCrossref
  9. 9. D. Pal and M.D. White, “Mixed oligopoly, privatization and strategic trade policy,” Southern Economic Journsl 65, 264–281 (1998). https://doi.org/10.2307/1060667, Google ScholarCrossref
  10. 10. Y. Tomaru, “Privatization, productive efficiency and social welfare with a foreign competitor,” Research in Economics 61, 224–232 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rie.2007.05.003, Google ScholarCrossref
  1. Published by AIP Publishing.

Article Metrics

Views
23
Citations
Crossref 0
Web of Science
ISI 0

Altmetric

Please Note: The number of views represents the full text views from December 2016 to date. Article views prior to December 2016 are not included.