ABSTRACT
In this paper, we consider a competition between a domestic public firm and a foreign private firm, supposing that the production processes generates environmental pollution. Introducing the residents’ environmental preference into the public firm’s objective function, we analyse its economic impacts. We also analyse the economic impacts of the privatization.
- 1. J.C. Bárcena-Ruiz, “Endogenous timing in a mixed duopoly: price competition,” Journal of Economics 91, 263–272 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-007-0255-5, Google ScholarCrossref
- 2. B.R. Copeland and M.S. Taylor, “North-south trade and the environment,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 109, 755–787 (1994). https://doi.org/10.2307/2118421, Google ScholarCrossref
- 3. F. Ferreira, “Privatization in an international mixed duopoly with environmental taxes,” in Numerical Analysis and Applied Mathematics, edited by T. E. Simos et al., AIP Conference Proceedings 1648, 2015, pp. 070003-1–070003-4. Google ScholarScitation
- 4. F.A. Ferreira and F. Ferreira, “Privatization and government preferences in a mixed duopoly: Stackelberg versus Cournot”, in Discontinuity and Complexity in Nonlinear Physical Systems, edited by J.A. Tenreiro Machado et al., Springer International Publishing Switzerland, 2014, pp. 421–430. Google ScholarCrossref
- 5. F.A. Ferreira and F. Ferreira, “Privatization in a Mixed Duopoly with Environmental Taxes”, in Numerical Analysis and Applied Mathematics, edited by T. E. Simos et al., AIP Conference Proceedings 1558, American Institute of Physics, New York, 2013, pp. 1558–1561. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4825822, Google ScholarScitation
- 6. K. Fjell and D. Pal, “A mixed oligopoly in the presence of foreign private firms,” Canadian Journal of Economics 29, 737–743 (1996). https://doi.org/10.2307/136260, Google ScholarCrossref
- 7. K. Fjell and J.S. Heywood, “Public Stackelberg leadership in a mixed oligopoly with foreign firms,” Australian Economic Papers 41, 267–281 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8454.00164, Google ScholarCrossref
- 8. K. Kato, “Optimal degree of privatization and the environmental problem,” Journal of Economics 110, 165–180 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-012-0316-2, Google ScholarCrossref
- 9. T. Matsumura, “Stackelberg mixed duopoly with a foreign competitor,” Bulletin of Economic Research 55, 275–287 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8586.00175, Google ScholarCrossref
- 10. S. Ohori, “Environmental tax, trade and privatization,” The Kyoto Economic Review 73, 109–120 (2004). Google Scholar
- 11. J. Pi, L. Yang and Y. Zhou, “Privatization and environmental pollution in a mixed duopoly,” Zb. rad. Ekon. fak. Rij. 31, 163–192 (2013). Google Scholar
- 12. Y. Tomaru, “Privatization, productive efficiency and social welfare with a foreign competitor,” Research in Economics 61, 224–232 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rie.2007.05.003, Google ScholarCrossref
- 13. L.F.S. Wang and J. Wang, “Environmental taxes in a differentiated mixed duopoly,” Economic Systems 33, 389–396 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2009.08.002, Google ScholarCrossref
Article Metrics
Views
24
Citations
Crossref
0
Web of Science
ISI
0
Altmetric
Please Note: The number of views represents the full text views from December 2016 to date. Article views prior to December 2016 are not included.
