Published Online: 01 June 2015
Accepted: May 2015
Journal of Applied Physics 117, 214302 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4921827
more...View Affiliations
The high contrast in the electrical resistivity between amorphous and crystalline states of a phase change material can potentially enable multiple memory levels for efficient use of a data storage medium. We report on our investigation of the role of the current injection site geometry (circular and square) in stabilizing such intermediate states within a nanoscale single-phase change material system (Ge2Sb2Te5). We have developed a three dimensional multiphysics model, which includes phase change kinetics, electrical, thermal, thermoelectric, and percolation effects, all as a function of temperature, using an iterative approach with coupled differential equations. Our model suggests that the physical origin of the formation of stable intermediate states in square top contact devices is mainly due to anisotropic heating during the application of a programming current pulse. Furthermore, the threshold current requirement and the width of the programming window are determined by crystallite nucleation and growth rates such that a higher crystallization rate leads to a narrower range of current pulses for switching to intermediate resistance level(s). The experimentally determined resistance maps, those that are indicative of the crystallinity, show good agreement with the simulated phase change behavior confirming the existence of stable intermediate states. Our model successfully predicts the required programming conditions for such mixed-phase levels, which can be used to optimize memory cells for future ultra-high density data storage applications.
This work was supported by TUBITAK under Contract No. 113F385, Bogazici University Research Fund, 12B03M1, and European Union FP7 Marie Curie International Re-integration Grant PCM-256281.
  1. 1. G. W. Burr, M. J. Breitwisch, M. Franceschini, D. Garetto, K. Gopalakrishnan, B. Jackson, B. Kurdi, C. Lam, L. A. Lastras, A. Padilla, B. Rajendran, S. Raoux, and R. S. Shenoy, J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B 28, 223 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1116/1.3301579, Google ScholarCrossref
  2. 2. S. Raoux, W. Wełnic, and D. Ielmini, Chem. Rev. 110, 240 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1021/cr900040x, Google ScholarCrossref
  3. 3. N. Yamada, E. Ohno, N. Akahira, K. Nishiuchi, K. Nagata, and M. Takao, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1 26, 61 (1987). https://doi.org/10.7567/JJAPS.26S4.61, Google ScholarCrossref
  4. 4. B. C. Lee, E. Ipek, O. Mutlu, and D. Burger, ACM SIGARCH Comput. Arch. News 37, 2 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1145/1555815.1555758, Google ScholarCrossref
  5. 5. H.-S. P. Wong, S. Raoux, S. Kim, J. Liang, J. P. Reifenberg, B. Rajendran, M. Asheghi, and K. E. Goodson, Proc. IEEE 98, 2201 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2010.2070050, Google ScholarCrossref
  6. 6. W. Welnic and M. Wuttig, Mater. Today 11, 20 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(08)70118-4, Google ScholarCrossref
  7. 7. Y. N. Hwang, J. S. Hong, and S. H. Lee, Symp. VLSI Technol., Dig. Tech. Pap. 29–31 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1109/VTSA.2003.1252543, Google ScholarCrossref
  8. 8. L. B. Xu Cheng, Chin. Phys. Lett. 25, 1848 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1088/0256-307X/25/5/088, Google ScholarCrossref
  9. 9. N. Yamada, E. Ohno, K. Nishiuchi, N. Akahira, and M. Takao, J. Appl. Phys. 69, 2849 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.348620, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  10. 10. A. Pirovano, A. L. Lacaita, A. Benvenuti, F. Pellizzer, and R. Bez, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 51, 452 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1109/TED.2003.823243, Google ScholarCrossref
  11. 11. S. Raoux, G. W. Burr, M. J. Breitwisch, C. T. Rettner, Y.-C. Chen, R. M. Shelby, M. Salinga, D. Krebs, S.-H. Chen, and H.-L. Lung, IBM J. Res. Dev. 52, 465 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1147/rd.524.0465, Google ScholarCrossref
  12. 12. M. Wuttig and N. Yamada, Nat. Mater. 6, 824 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat2009, Google ScholarCrossref
  13. 13. M. Wuttig and C. Steimer, Appl. Phys. A 87, 411 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-007-3931-y, Google ScholarCrossref
  14. 14. B. Liu, T. Zhang, J. Xia, Z. Song, S. Feng, and B. Chen, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 19, L61 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1088/0268-1242/19/6/L01, Google ScholarCrossref
  15. 15. Y. Gu, Z. Song, T. Zhang, B. Liu, and S. Feng, Solid-State Electron. 54, 443 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sse.2009.11.002, Google ScholarCrossref
  16. 16. K.-F. Kao, C.-M. Lee, M.-J. Chen, M.-J. Tsai, and T.-S. Chin, Adv. Mater. 21, 1695 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200800423, Google ScholarCrossref
  17. 17. F. Rao, Z. Song, L. Wu, B. Liu, S. Feng, and B. Chen, Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 123511 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2787968, Google ScholarScitation
  18. 18. F. Rao, Z. Song, M. Zhong, L. Wu, G. Feng, B. Liu, S. Feng, and B. Chen, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 2 46, L25 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.46.L25, Google ScholarCrossref
  19. 19. S.-H. Hong, H. Lee, K.-I. Kim, Y. Choi, and Y.-K. Lee, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1 50, 081201 (2011). https://doi.org/10.7567/JJAP.50.081201, Google ScholarCrossref
  20. 20. S.-H. Hong, H. Lee, Y. Choi, and Y.-K. Lee, Curr. Appl. Phys. 11, S16 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cap.2011.06.018, Google ScholarCrossref
  21. 21. D. Ielmini, S. Lavizzari, D. Sharma, and A. L. Lacaita, IEEE Int. Electron Devides Meet. 939–942 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1109/IEDM.2007.4419107, Google ScholarCrossref
  22. 22. J. Li, B. Luan, and C. Lam, IEEE Int. Relaib. Phys. Symp. 6, C.1.1–C.1.6 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/IRPS.2012.6241871, Google ScholarCrossref
  23. 23. O. Ozatay, B. Stipe, J. A. Katine, and B. D. Terris, J. Appl. Phys. 104, 084507 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3002420, Google ScholarScitation
  24. 24. J. Reifenberg, E. Pop, A. Gibby, S. Wong, and K. Goodson, in Proceedings of ITHERM (2006), pp. 106–113. Google Scholar
  25. 25. A. Cywar, J. Li, C. Lam, and H. Silva, Nanotechnology 23, 225201 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/23/22/225201, Google ScholarCrossref
  26. 26. Y. Won, J. Lee, M. Asheghi, T. W. Kenny, and K. E. Goodson, Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 161905 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3699227, Google ScholarScitation
  27. 27. C. Peng, L. Cheng, and M. Mansuripur, J. Appl. Phys. 82, 4183 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.366220, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  28. 28. J. F. Shackelford and W. Alexander, CRC Materials Science and Engineering Handbook ( CRC Press, 2000). Google ScholarCrossref
  29. 29. P. Fiflis, L. Kirsch, D. Andruczyk, D. Curreli, and D. N. Ruzic, J. Nucl. Mater. 438, 224 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.03.043, Google ScholarCrossref
  30. 30. G. Bakan, A. Gokirmak, and H. Silva, J. Appl. Phys. 116, 234507 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4904746, Google ScholarScitation
  31. 31. J. Lee, T. Kodama, Y. Won, M. Asheghi, and K. E. Goodson, J. Appl. Phys. 112, 014902 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4731252, Google ScholarScitation
  32. 32. D.-H. Kim, F. Merget, M. Först, and H. Kurz, J. Appl. Phys. 101, 064512 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2710440, Google ScholarScitation
  33. 33. D. A. G. Bruggeman, Ann. Phys. 416, 636 (1935). https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.19354160705, Google ScholarCrossref
  34. 34. R. E. Simpson, P. Fons, A. V. Kolobov, T. Fukaya, M. Krbal, T. Yagi, and J. Tominaga, Nat. Nanotechnol. 6, 501 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2011.96, Google ScholarCrossref
  35. 35. D. Ielmini and A. L. Lacaita, Mater. Today 14, 600 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(11)70301-7, Google ScholarCrossref
  36. 36. R. G. D. Jeyasingh, D. Kuzum, and H.-S. P. Wong, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 58, 4370 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/TED.2011.2169798, Google ScholarCrossref
  37. 37. T. Tsafack, E. Piccinini, B.-S. Lee, E. Pop, and M. Rudan, J. Appl. Phys. 110, 063716 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3639279, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  38. © 2015 AIP Publishing LLC.