Published Online: 07 April 2015
Accepted: March 2015
Journal of Applied Physics 117, 134110 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4916784
more...View Affiliations
Bismuth sodium titanate–barium titanate [(1−x)(Na1/2Bi1/2)TiO3-xBaTiO3, NBT-100xBT] is one of the most well studied lead-free piezoelectric materials due in large part to the high field-induced strain attainable in compositions near the morphotropic phase boundary (x = 0.06). The BaTiO3-rich side of the phase diagram, however, has not yet been as comprehensively studied, although it might be important for piezoelectric and positive temperature coefficient ceramic applications. In this work, we present a thorough study of BaTiO3-rich NBT-100xBT by ferroelastic measurements, dielectric permittivity, X-ray diffraction, and Raman spectroscopy. We show that the high-temperature mechanical behavior, i.e., above the Curie temperature, TC, is influenced by local disorder, which appears also in pure BT. On the other hand, in NBT-100xBT (x < 1.0), lattice distortion, i.e., tetragonality, increases, and this impacts both the mechanical and dielectric properties. This increase in lattice distortion upon chemical substitution is counterintuitive by merely reasoning on the ionic size, and is due to the change in the A-O bond character induced by the Bi3+ electron lone pair, as indicated by Raman spectroscopy.
F.H.S and K.G.W. gratefully acknowledge financial support from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft under WE 4972/1-1 and WE 4972/2-1.
  1. 1. W. Jo, R. Dittmer, M. Acosta, J. Zang, C. Groh, E. Sapper, K. Wang, and J. Rödel, J. Electroceram. 29, 71 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10832-012-9742-3, Google ScholarCrossref
  2. 2. J. Rödel, W. Jo, K. T. P. Seifert, E. M. Anton, T. Granzow, and D. Damjanovic, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 92, 1153 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03061.x, Google ScholarCrossref
  3. 3. S. T. Zhang, A. B. Kounga, E. Aulbach, H. Ehrenberg, and J. Rodel, Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 112906 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2783200, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  4. 4. R. Dittmer, E.-M. Anton, W. Jo, H. Simons, J. E. Daniels, M. Hoffman, J. Pokorny, I. M. Reaney, and J. Rödel, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 95, 3519 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-2916.2012.05321.x, Google ScholarCrossref
  5. 5. R. Dittmer, W. Jo, D. Damjanovic, and J. Rödel, J. Appl. Phys. 109, 034107 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3544481, Google ScholarScitation
  6. 6. G. A. Smolenskii, V. A. Isupov, A. I. Agranovskaya, and N. N. Krainik, Sov. Phys. Solid State 2, 2651 (1961). Google Scholar
  7. 7. T. Takenaka, K. Maruyama, and K. Sakata, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1 30, 2236 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.30.2236, Google ScholarCrossref
  8. 8. J. Kling, X. Tan, W. Jo, H. J. Kleebe, H. Fuess, and J. Rödel, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 93, 2452 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.03778.x, Google ScholarCrossref
  9. 9. L. A. Schmitt, J. Kling, M. Hinterstein, M. Hoelzel, W. Jo, H. J. Kleebe, and H. Fuess, J. Mater. Sci. 46, 4368 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-011-5427-6, Google ScholarCrossref
  10. 10. J. E. Daniels, W. Jo, J. Rödel, and J. L. Jones, Appl. Phys. Lett. 95, 032904 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3182679, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  11. 11. H. Simons, J. Daniels, W. Jo, R. Dittmer, A. Studer, M. Avdeev, J. Roedel, and M. Hoffman, Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 082901 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3557049, Google ScholarScitation
  12. 12. M. Hinterstein, M. Knapp, M. Hoelzel, W. Jo, A. Cervellino, H. Ehrenberg, and H. Fuess, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 43, 1314 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889810038264, Google ScholarCrossref
  13. 13. W. Jo and J. Rödel, Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 042901 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3615675, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  14. 14. W. Jo, T. Granzow, E. Aulbach, J. Rödel, and D. Damjanovic, J. Appl. Phys. 105, 094102 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3121203, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  15. 15. R. Dittmer, E. Aulbach, W. Jo, K. G. Webber, and J. Rödel, Scripta Mater. 67, 100 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2012.03.031, Google ScholarCrossref
  16. 16. K. G. Webber, Y. Zhang, W. Jo, J. E. Daniels, and J. Rödel, J. Appl. Phys. 108, 014101 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3428373, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  17. 17. H. Cao and A. G. Evans, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 76, 890 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1993.tb05312.x, Google ScholarCrossref
  18. 18. C. S. Lynch, Acta Mater. 44, 4137 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(96)00062-6, Google ScholarCrossref
  19. 19. K. G. Webber, E. Aulbach, T. Key, M. Marsilius, T. Granzow, and J. Rödel, Acta Mater. 57, 4614 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2009.06.037, Google ScholarCrossref
  20. 20. F. Jona and G. Shirane, Ferroelectric Crystals ( Pergamon Press, New York, 1962). Google Scholar
  21. 21. G. Picht, K. G. Webber, Y. Zhang, H. Kungl, D. Damjanovic, and M. J. Hoffmann, J. Appl. Phys. 112, 124101 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4767059, Google ScholarScitation
  22. 22. J. E. Daniels, G. Picht, S. Kimber, and K. G. Webber, Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 122902 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4821446, Google ScholarScitation
  23. 23. J. Suchanicz, I. Jankowska-Sumara, and T. V. Kruzina, J. Electroceram. 27, 45 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10832-011-9648-5, Google ScholarCrossref
  24. 24. V. V. Shvartsman and D. C. Lupascu, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 95, 1 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-2916.2011.04952.x, Google ScholarCrossref
  25. 25. G. Picht, H. Kungl, M. Baeurer, and M. J. Hoffmann, Func. Mater. Lett. 3, 59 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793604710000889, Google ScholarCrossref
  26. 26. A. B. Schäufele and K. H. Härdtl, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 79, 2637 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1996.tb09027.x, Google ScholarCrossref
  27. 27. Y.-H. Seo, D. J. Franzbach, J. Koruza, A. Benčan, B. Malič, M. Kosec, J. L. Jones, and K. G. Webber, Phys. Rev. B 87, 094116 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.87.094116, Google ScholarCrossref
  28. 28. T. Leist, K. G. Webber, W. Jo, E. Aulbach, J. Rödel, A. D. Prewitt, J. L. Jones, J. Schmidlin, and C. R. Hubbard, Acta Mater. 58, 5962 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2010.07.012, Google ScholarCrossref
  29. 29. Y. W. Li, X. L. Zhou, and F. X. Li, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 43, 175501 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/43/17/175501, Google ScholarCrossref
  30. 30. D. W. Ji and S.-J. Kim, Acta Mater. 61, 1 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2012.08.050, Google ScholarCrossref
  31. 31. W. Araki and J. Malzbender, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 33, 805 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.10.035, Google ScholarCrossref
  32. 32. B. Jaffe, W. R. Cook, and H. Jaffe, Piezoelectric Ceramics ( Academic Press, London, 1971). Google Scholar
  33. 33. A. V. Polotai, A. V. Ragulya, and C. A. Randall, Ferroelectrics 288, 93 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1080/00150190390211972, Google ScholarCrossref
  34. 34. J. Suchanicz, J. Kusz, and H. Böhm, Mater. Sci. Eng. B 97, 154 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5107(02)00577-9, Google ScholarCrossref
  35. 35. V. Buscaglia, S. Tripathi, V. Petkov, M. Dapiaggi, M. Deluca, A. Gajovic, and Y. Ren, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 26, 065901 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/26/6/065901, Google ScholarCrossref
  36. 36. J. Petzelt and V. Dvorak, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 9, 1571 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3719/9/8/028, Google ScholarCrossref
  37. 37. J. Kreisel, A. M. Glazer, G. Jones, P. A. Thomas, L. Abello, and G. Lucazeau, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 12, 3267 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/12/14/305, Google ScholarCrossref
  38. 38. J. D. Freire and R. S. Katiyar, Phys. Rev. B 37, 2074 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.37.2074, Google ScholarCrossref
  39. 39. A. Scalabrin, A. S. Chaves, D. S. Shim, and S. P. S. Porto, Phys. Status Solidi B 79, 731 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.2220790240, Google ScholarCrossref
  40. 40. P. A. Fleury and P. D. Lazay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 26, 1331 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.26.1331, Google ScholarCrossref
  41. 41. A. Feteira, D. C. Sinclair, and J. Kreisel, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 93, 4174 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-2916.2010.04006.x, Google ScholarCrossref
  42. 42. R. Farhi, M. El Marssi, A. Simon, and J. Ravez, Euro. Phys. J. B 9, 599 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s100510050803, Google ScholarCrossref
  43. 43. S. Miao, J. Pokorny, U. M. Pasha, O. P. Thakur, D. C. Sinclair, and I. M. Reaney, J. Appl. Phys. 106, 114111 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3253735, Google ScholarScitation
  44. 44. J. Kreisel, P. Bouvier, M. Maglione, B. Dkhil, and A. Simon, Phys. Rev. B 69, 092104 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.69.092104, Google ScholarCrossref
  45. 45. D. Schuetz, M. Deluca, W. Krauss, A. Feteira, T. Jackson, and K. Reichmann, Adv. Funct. Mater. 22, 2285 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201102758, Google ScholarCrossref
  46. 46. M. D. Fontana, E. Bouziane, and G. E. Kugel, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 2, 8681 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/2/43/012, Google ScholarCrossref
  47. 47. N. K. Karan, R. S. Katiyar, T. Maiti, R. Guo, and A. S. Bhalla, J. Raman Spectrosc. 40, 370 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/jrs.2134, Google ScholarCrossref
  48. 48. A. A. Bokov and Z.-G. Ye, J. Mater. Sci. 41, 31 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-005-5915-7, Google ScholarCrossref
  49. 49. K. Jae-Hyeon, K. T. Hyun, K. Roleder, D. Rytz, and S. Kojima, Phys. Rev. B 84, 094123 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.094123, Google ScholarCrossref
  50. 50. V. Buscaglia et al., J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 25, 3059 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2005.03.190, Google ScholarCrossref
  51. 51. W. Kleemann, J. Adv. Dielectr. 2, 1241001 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1142/S2010135X12410019, Google ScholarCrossref
  52. 52. A. R. Akbarzadeh, S. Prosandeev, E. J. Walter, A. Al-Barakaty, and L. Bellaiche, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 257601 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.257601, Google ScholarCrossref
  53. 53. S. Prosandeev, D. Wang, A. R. Akbarzadeh, B. Dkhil, and L. Bellaiche, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 207601 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.207601, Google ScholarCrossref
  54. 54. W. J. Merz, Phys. Rev. 91, 513 (1953). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.91.513, Google ScholarCrossref
  55. 55. A. Dixit, S. B. Majumder, P. S. Dobal, R. S. Katiyar, and A. S. Bhalla, Thin Solid Films 447–448, 284 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-6090(03)01065-4, Google ScholarCrossref
  56. 56. L. Daniel, D. A. Hall, and P. J. Withers, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 47, 325303 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/47/32/325303, Google ScholarCrossref
  57. 57. G. Arlt, D. Hennings, and G. de With, J. Appl. Phys. 58, 1619 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.336051, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  58. 58. C. A. Randall, N. Kim, J. P. Kucera, W. W. Cao, and T. R. Shrout, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 81, 677 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1998.tb02389.x, Google ScholarCrossref
  59. 59. G. Arlt, Ferroelec. 76, 451 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1080/00150198708016967, Google ScholarCrossref
  60. 60. H. J. Martin, Die Ferroelektrika ( Geest & Portig, Leipzig, 1964). Google Scholar
  61. 61. J.-K. Lee, K. S. Hong, C. K. Kim, and S.-E. Park, J. Appl. Phys. 91, 4538 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1435415, Google ScholarScitation
  62. 62. K. Tkacz-Smiech, A. Kolezynski, and W. S. Ptak, Solid State Commun. 127, 557 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-1098(03)00503-9, Google ScholarCrossref
  63. 63. Y. Kuroiwa, S. Aoyagi, A. Sawada, E. Nishibori, M. Takata, M. Sakata, H. Tanaka, and J. Harada, J. Kor. Phys. Soc. 42, S1425 (2003). Google Scholar
  64. 64. R. E. Cohen, Nature 358, 136 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1038/358136a0, Google ScholarCrossref
  65. 65. P. S. Halasyamani, Chem. Mater. 16, 3586 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1021/cm049297g, Google ScholarCrossref
  66. 66. D. Fu, M. Itoh, S. Koshihara, T. Kosugi, and S. Tsuneyuki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 227601 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.227601, Google ScholarCrossref
  67. 67. G. Schileo, L. Luisman, A. Feteira, M. Deluca, and K. Reichrnann, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 33, 1457 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2013.01.011, Google ScholarCrossref
  68. 68. E. Aksel, J. S. Forrester, J. L. Jones, P. A. Thomas, K. Page, and M. R. Suchomel, Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 152901 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3573826, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  69. 69. K. Datta, P. A. Thomas, and K. Roleder, Phys. Rev. B 82, 224105 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.82.224105, Google ScholarCrossref
  70. 70. L. Gao, Y. Huang, Y. Hu, and H. Du, Ceram. Int. 33, 1041 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2006.03.006, Google ScholarCrossref
  71. 71. I. Levin, V. Krayzman, and J. C. Woicik, Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 162906 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4802996, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  72. © 2015 AIP Publishing LLC.