No Access
Published Online: 20 August 2014
Accepted: July 2014
Journal of Applied Physics 116, 074512 (2014); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4891478
more...View Affiliations
Thinning the absorber layer is one of the possibilities envisaged to further decrease the production costs of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 (CIGSe) thin films solar cell technology. In the present study, the electronic transport in submicron CIGSe-based devices has been investigated and compared to that of standard devices. It is observed that when the absorber is around 0.5 μm-thick, tunnelling enhanced interface recombination dominates, which harms cells energy conversion efficiency. It is also shown that by varying either the properties of the Mo back contact or the characteristics of 3-stage growth processing, one can shift the dominating recombination mechanism from interface to space charge region and thereby improve the cells efficiency. Discussions on these experimental facts led to the conclusions that 3-stage process implies the formation of a CIGSe/CIGSe homo-interface, whose location as well as properties rule the device operation; its influence is enhanced in submicron CIGSe based solar cells.
  1. 1. P. Jackson, D. Hariskos, R. Wuerz, W. Wischmann, and M. Powalla, Phys. Status Solidi RRL 8, 219 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/pssr.201409040, Google ScholarCrossref
  2. 2. P. Jackson, D. Hariskos, E. Lotter, S. Paetel, R. Wuerz, R. Menner, W. Wischmann, and M. Powalla, Prog. Photovoltaics 19, 894 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.1078, Google ScholarCrossref
  3. 3. A. Chirila et al., Nat. Mater. 10, 857 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3122, Google ScholarCrossref
  4. 4. I. Repins, M. A. Contreras, B. Egaas, C. DeHart, J. Scharf, C. L. Perkins, B. To, and R. Noufi, Prog. Photovoltaics 16, 235 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.822, Google ScholarCrossref
  5. 5. E. Wallin, U. Malm, T. Jarmar, O. Lundberg, M. Edoff, and L. Stolt, Prog. Photovoltaics 20, 851 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.2246, Google ScholarCrossref
  6. 6. K. Kushiya, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 122, 309 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2013.09.014, Google ScholarCrossref
  7. 7. W. N. Shafarman, R. W. Birkmire, S. Marsillac, M. Marudachalam, N. Orbey, and T. Russell, in Proceedings of the 26th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialist Conference, Piscataway (1997), p. 331. Google Scholar
  8. 8. T. Negami, S. Nishiwaki, S. Hashimoto, N. Kohara, and T. Wada, in Proceedings of the 2nd World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion, Vienna (1998), p. 1181. Google Scholar
  9. 9. T. Dullweber, O. Lundberg, J. Malmström, M. Bodegard, L. Stolt, U. Rau, H. W. Schock, and J. H. Werner, Thin Solid Films 387, 11 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-6090(00)01726-0, Google ScholarCrossref
  10. 10. O. Lundberg, M. Bodegard, J. Malmström, and L. Stolt, Prog. Photovoltaics 11, 77 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.462, Google ScholarCrossref
  11. 11. M. Gloeckler and J. R. Sites, J. Appl. Phys. 98, 103703 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2128054, Google ScholarScitation
  12. 12. A. Kanevce, Ph.D. thesis, Colorado State University, 2007. Google Scholar
  13. 13. Z. Jehl, Ph.D. thesis, Université Paris Sud-Orsay, 2012. Google Scholar
  14. 14. A. Han, Y. Zhang, W. Song, B. Li, and W. Liu, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 27, 035022 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1088/0268-1242/27/3/035022, Google ScholarCrossref
  15. 15. N. Kohara, T. Negami, M. Nishitani, and T. Wada, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1 34, L1141 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.34.L1141, Google ScholarCrossref
  16. 16. International Center for Diffraction Data, file 35–1102. Google Scholar
  17. 17. A. M. Gabor, J. R. Tuttle, M. H. Bode, A. Franz, A. L. Tennant, M. A. Contreras, R. Noufi, D. G. Jensen, and A. M. Hermann, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 41–42, 247 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/0927-0248(95)00122-0, Google ScholarCrossref
  18. 18. V. Nadenau, U. Rau, A. Jasenek, and H. W. Schock, J. Appl. Phys. 87, 584 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.371903, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  19. 19. U. Rau and H. W. Schock, Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process. 69, 131 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s003390050984, Google ScholarCrossref
  20. 20. U. Rau, Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 111 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.122967, Google ScholarScitation
  21. 21. U. Rau, A. Jasenek, H. W. Schock, F. Engelhardt, and T. Meyer, Thin Solid Films 361–362, 298 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-6090(99)00762-2, Google ScholarCrossref
  22. 22. M. A. Green, Solar Cells, Operating Principles, Technology and System Applications ( Prentice-Hall, 1982). Google Scholar
  23. 23. F. A. Padovani and R. Stratton, Solid-State Electron. 9, 695 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-1101(66)90097-9, Google ScholarCrossref
  24. 24. T. Walter, R. Herberholz, and H. W. Schock, Solid State Phenom. 51, 309–315 (1996). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.51-52.309, Google ScholarCrossref
  25. 25. L. Stolt, J. Hedström, J. Kessler, M. Ruckh, K.-O. Velthaus, and H.-W. Schock, Appl. Phys. Lett. 62, 597 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.108867, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  26. 26. D. J. Schroeder and A. A. Rockett, J. Appl. Phys. 82, 4982 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.366365, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  27. 27. P. Bommersbach, L. Arzel, M. Tomassini, E. Gautron, C. Leyder, M. Urien, D. Dupuy, and N. Barreau, Prog. Photovoltaics 21, 332 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.1193, Google ScholarCrossref
  28. 28. N. Barreau, T. Painchaud, F. Couzinié-Devy, L. Arzel, and J. Kessler, Acta Mater. 58, 5572–5577 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2010.06.025, Google ScholarCrossref
  29. 29. F. Couzinie-Devy, E. Cadel, N. Barreau, L. Arzel, and P. Pareige, Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 232108 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3665948, Google ScholarScitation
  30. 30. M. Pawłowski, P. Zabierowski, R. Bacewicz, and N. Barreau, Thin Solid Films 535, 336 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2013.02.022, Google ScholarCrossref
  31. © 2014 AIP Publishing LLC.