Abstract
In this paper we investigate the adsorption of various probe molecules in order to characterize the porous structure of a series of pillared interlayered clays (PILC). To that aim, volumetric and microcalorimetric adsorption experiments were performed on various Zr PILC samples using nitrogen, toluene, and mesitylene as probe molecules. For one of the samples, neutron scattering experiments were also performed using toluene as adsorbate. Various structural models are proposed and tested by means of a comprehensive computer simulation study, using both geometric and percolation analysis in combination with Grand Canonical Monte Carlo simulations in order to model the volumetric and microcalorimetric isotherms. On the basis of this analysis, we propose a series of structural models that aim at accounting for the adsorption experimental behavior, and make possible a microscopic interpretation of the role played by the different interactions and steric effects in the adsorption processes in these rather complex disordered microporous systems.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors acknowledge the support from the Dirección General de Investigación Científica y Técnica under Grant Nos. FIS2010-15502 and MAT2012-33633 and from the Dirección General de Universidades e Investigación de la Comunidad de Madrid under Grant No. S2009/ESP/1691 and Program MODELICO-CM. We are very grateful for the computer resources provided by IBERCIVIS project. The CSIC is also acknowledged for providing support in the form of Project No. PIE 201080E120. J.P. also acknowledges FCT for PEst-OE/QUI/UI0612/2014. A.G. acknowledges financial support from JAE-Predoc program. Very helpful assistance by Dr. Silvia Imberti from ISIS during the neutron experiments and posterior data reduction is acknowledged.
REFERENCES
- 1. A. Corma, Chem. Rev. 97, 2373 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1021/cr960406n , Google ScholarCrossref
- 2. C. Mott, Catal. Today 2, 199 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1016/0920-5861(88)85003-X , Google ScholarCrossref
- 3. J. Guil, J. Perdigón-Melón, M. B. de Carvalho, A. Carvalho, and J. Pires, Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 51, 145 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1387-1811(01)00477-2 , Google ScholarCrossref
- 4. T. A. Steriotis, K. L. Stefanopoulos, U. Keiderling, A. D. Stefanis, and A. A. G. Tomlinson, Chem. Commun. 2002, 2396–2397. https://doi.org/10.1039/b207392g , Google ScholarCrossref
- 5. A. D. Stefanis, A. Tomlinson, T. Steriotis, G. Charalambopoulou, and U. Keiderling, Appl. Surf. Sci. 253, 5633 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2006.12.095 , Google ScholarCrossref
- 6. D. P. Landau and K. Binder, A Guide to Monte Carlo Simulations in Statistical Physics, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2005). Google ScholarCrossref
- 7. X. Yi, K. S. Shing, and M. Sahimi, AIChE J. 41, 456 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690410304 , Google ScholarCrossref
- 8. X. Yi, K. S. Shing, and M. Sahimi, Chem. Eng. Sci. 51, 3409 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(95)00415-7 , Google ScholarCrossref
- 9. X. Yi, J. Ghassemzadeh, K. S. Shing, and M. Sahimi, J. Chem. Phys. 108, 2178 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.475598 , Google ScholarScitation
- 10. J. Ghassemzadeh, L. Xu, T. T. Tsotsis, and M. Sahimi, J. Phys. Chem. B 104, 3892 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp993602h , Google ScholarCrossref
- 11. D. Cao and W. Wang, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 3, 3150 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1039/b102109p , Google ScholarCrossref
- 12. D. Cao, W. Wang, and X. Duan, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 254, 1 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1006/jcis.2002.8543 , Google ScholarCrossref
- 13. D. Cao and W. Wang, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 4, 3720 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1039/b110485c , Google ScholarCrossref
- 14. D. Efremov, T. Kuznetsova, V. Doronin, and V. Sadykov, J. Phys. Chem. B 109, 7451 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp045100w , Google ScholarCrossref
- 15. W.-Z. Li, Z.-Y. Liu, Y.-L. Che, and D. Zhang, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 312, 179 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2007.04.014 , Google ScholarCrossref
- 16. X. Peng, J. Zhao, and D. Cao, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 310, 391 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2007.02.009 , Google ScholarCrossref
- 17. J. Ghassemzadeh and M. Sahimi, Mol. Phys. 102, 1447 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/00268970410001723037 , Google ScholarCrossref
- 18. M. Matusewicz, A. Patrykiejew, S. Sokolowski, and O. Pizio, J. Chem. Phys. 127, 174707 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2780890 , Google ScholarScitation
- 19. L. Pérez, S. Sokolowski, and O. Pizio, J. Chem. Phys. 109, 1147 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.476659 , Google ScholarScitation
- 20. O. Pizio and S. Sokolowski, Phys. Rev. E 56, R63 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.56.R63 , Google ScholarCrossref
- 21. E. Lomba and J.-J. Weis, J. Chem. Phys. 132, 104705 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3357351 , Google ScholarScitation
- 22. O. Pizio, S. Sokolowski, and Z. Sokolowska, J. Chem. Phys. 134, 214702 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3597773 , Google ScholarScitation, ISI
- 23. J. P. Olivier and M. L. Occelli, J. Phys. Chem. B 105, 623 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp001822l , Google ScholarCrossref
- 24. P. R. Pereira, J. Pires, and M. Brotas de Carvalho, Langmuir 14, 4584 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1021/la980209e , Google ScholarCrossref
- 25. R. Grim, Clay Mineralogy (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1968). Google Scholar
- 26. K. Ohtsuka, Y. Hayashi, and M. Suda, Chem. Mater. 5, 1823 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1021/cm00036a022 , Google ScholarCrossref
- 27. D. Zyuzin, E. Moroz, T. Kuznetsova, V. Sadykov, and V. Doronin, React. Kinet. Catal. Lett. 81, 137 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:REAC.0000016527.92435.63 , Google ScholarCrossref
- 28. H. Jung, S.-M. Paek, J.-B. Yoon, and J.-H. Choy, J. Porous Mater. 14, 369 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10934-006-9002-5 , Google ScholarCrossref
- 29. N. G. Almarza, A. Gallardo, C. Martín, J. M. Guil, and E. Lomba, J. Chem. Phys. 131, 244701 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3273209 , Google ScholarScitation
- 30. S. Torquato, Random Heterogeneous Materials. Microstructure and Macroscopic Properties (Springer, 2002). Google ScholarCrossref
- 31. C. Martín, M. Lombardero, M. Alvarez, and E. Lomba, J. Chem. Phys. 102, 2092 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.468730 , Google ScholarScitation
- 32. C. Nieto-Draghi, P. Bonnaud, and P. Ungerer, J. Phys. Chem. C 111, 15686 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0737146 , Google ScholarCrossref
- 33. H. Hamaker, Physica 4, 1058 (1937). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-8914(37)80203-7 , Google ScholarCrossref
- 34. D. Stauffer and A. Aharony, Introduction to Percolation Theory, 2nd ed. (Taylor and Francis, 2203). Google Scholar
- 35. H. A. Lorentz, Ann. Phys. 248, 127 (1881). https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.18812480110 , Google ScholarCrossref
- 36. D. Berthelot, C. R. Acad. Sci. 126, 1703 (1898). Google Scholar
- 37. T. W. Leland, J. S. Rowlinson, G. A. Sather, and I. D. Watson, Trans. Faraday Soc. 65, 2034 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1039/tf9696502034 , Google ScholarCrossref
- 38. P. Bonnaud, C. Nieto-Draghi, and P. Ungerer, J. Phys. Chem. B 111, 3730 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp067695w , Google ScholarCrossref
- 39. W. A. Steele, Surf. Sci. 36, 317 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-6028(73)90264-1 , Google ScholarCrossref
- 40. D. Moore and R. Reynolds, X-Ray Diffraction and the Identification and Analysis of Clay Minerals (Oxford University Press, 1989). Google Scholar
- 41. S. Karanikas, J. Dzubiella, A. Moncho-Jordá, and A. A. Louis, J. Chem. Phys. 128, 204704 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2921134 , Google ScholarScitation
- 42. D. W. Siderius and L. D. Gelb, J. Chem. Phys. 135, 084703 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3626804 , Google ScholarScitation
- 43. O. Redlich and J. N. S. Kwong, Chem. Rev. 44, 233 (1949). https://doi.org/10.1021/cr60137a013 , Google ScholarCrossref
- 44. M. Benedict, G. B. Webb, and L. C. Rubin, J. Chem. Phys. 8, 334 (1940). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1750658 , Google ScholarScitation
- 45. J. K. Johnson, J. A. Zollweg, and K. E. Gubbins, Mol. Phys. 78, 591 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1080/00268979300100411 , Google ScholarCrossref
- 46. M. Moussa, R. Muijlwijk, and H. V. Dijk, Physica 32, 900 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-8914(66)90021-8 , Google ScholarCrossref
- 47. W. J. Gaw and F. L. Swinton, Trans. Faraday Soc. 64, 2023 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1039/tf9686402023 , Google ScholarCrossref
- 48. J. M. Stuckey and J. H. Saylor, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 62, 2922 (1940). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01868a011 , Google ScholarCrossref
- 49. F. Karavias and A. L. Myers, Langmuir 7, 3118 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1021/la00060a035 , Google ScholarCrossref
- 50. G. D. Brunton, Clays Clay Miner. 36, 94 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.1988.0360112 , Google ScholarCrossref
- 51. C. G. Pope, J. Phys. Chem. 90, 835 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1021/j100277a025 , Google ScholarCrossref
- 52. J. Jänchen, H. Stach, P. Grobet, J. Martens, and P. Jacobs, Zeolites 12, 9 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-2449(92)90002-7 , Google ScholarCrossref
- 53. W. L. Jorgensen, E. R. Laird, T. B. Nguyen, and J. Tirado-Rives, J. Comput. Chem. 14, 206 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.540140208 , Google ScholarCrossref
- 54. E. Lorch, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 2, 229 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3719/2/2/305 , Google ScholarCrossref
- 55. For this coarse calculations we have used the Java programs available in the NIST Center for neutron research, http://www.ncnr.nist.gob/resources/sansmodels/. Google Scholar
- © 2014 AIP Publishing LLC.
Please Note: The number of views represents the full text views from December 2016 to date. Article views prior to December 2016 are not included.

