MENU
  • Scitation Home
SUBMIT YOUR ARTICLE

Thank you

For your interest in the Journal of Applied Physics

Check for updates on crossmark
Prev Next
No Access
Published Online: 04 November 2020
Accepted: September 2020

Numerical study of plasma-fluid characteristics and thrust performance of a low-power argon inductively coupled plasma electrothermal thruster featured

Journal of Applied Physics 128, 173302 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0022018
T. Fujino1,a) and M. Yamauchi2
more...View Affiliations
ABSTRACT
Low-power (from the sub-kilowatt range up to a few kilowatts) inductively coupled plasma (ICP) electrothermal thrusters for space propulsion are potential alternatives to low-power arcjet thrusters, which are often implemented on geostationary satellites for north–south station keeping. We develop an axisymmetric two-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) numerical simulation technique using a two-temperature plasma model as a computer-aided engineering tool for low-power argon ICP electrothermal thrusters. Furthermore, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to provide a basic understanding of the plasma-fluid characteristics of low-power ICP electrothermal thrusters. To this end, we perform the MHD numerical simulation for a low-power argon ICP electrothermal thruster model that was developed for thrust measurement experiments to validate the proposed numerical simulation technique. The numerical results indicate that the plasma flow produced in the low-power argon ICP electrothermal thruster model is basically in a strongly thermal and ionizing nonequililbrium state. In addition, the numerical results show that the experimentally measured thrust forces can be reproduced with an underestimation of 10% or less over the RF input power range of 0–0.6 kW considered in the experiment. Moreover, the numerical results suggest that the main reason why the performance of the low-power argon ICP electrothermal thruster model is significantly lower than the target performance is the considerable heat loss of more than 90% of the input power through the flow-channel wall.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors would like to thank T. Kato of the University of Tsukuba for insightful discussions and useful contributions.

REFERENCES
Section:
Previous section

  1. 1. G. W. Butler and R. J. Cassady, J. Propul. Power 12, 1026 (1996). https://doi.org/10.2514/3.24140, Google ScholarCrossref
  2. 2. J. S. Sovey, F. M. Curran, T. W. Haag, M. J. Patterson, E. J. Pencil, V. K. Rawlin, and J. M. Sankovic, Acta Astronaut. 30, 151 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1016/0094-5765(93)90107-8, Google ScholarCrossref
  3. 3. B. Wollenhaupt, L. Q. Hoa, and H. Georg, Aircr. Eng. Aerosp. Technol. 90, 280 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1108/AEAT-08-2016-0124, Google ScholarCrossref
  4. 4. S. Califf, T. M. Loto’aniu, and M. G. D. Early, J. Spacecr. Rockets 57, 177 (2020). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A34546, Google ScholarCrossref
  5. 5. R. J. Litchford, “High power flex-propellant arcjet performance,” AIAA Paper 2012-3300, 2012. Google Scholar
  6. 6. H. Horisawa and I. Kimura, Vacuum 59, 106 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-207X(00)00260-8, Google ScholarCrossref
  7. 7. T. B. Reed, J. Appl. Phys. 32, 821 (1961). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1736112, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  8. 8. Inductively Coupled Plasmas in Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, 2nd ed., edited by A. Montaser and D. W. Golightly (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1992). Google Scholar
  9. 9. S. Alavi and J. Mostaghimi, Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 39, 359 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11090-018-9948-5, Google ScholarCrossref
  10. 10. J. Mostaghimi and M. I. Boulos, Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 35, 421 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11090-015-9616-y, Google ScholarCrossref
  11. 11. K. Onda, Y. Tanaka, K. Akashi, R. Furukawa, Y. Nakano, T. Ishijima, Y. Uesugi, S. Sueyasu, S. Watanabe, and K. Nakamura, J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 53, 325201 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/ab8419, Google ScholarCrossref
  12. 12. E. Gomez, D. A. Rani, C. R. Cheeseman, D. Deegan, M. Wise, and A. R. Boccaccini, J. Hazard. Mater. 161, 614 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.04.017, Google ScholarCrossref
  13. 13. G. Herdrich, M. Auweter-Kurtz, H. L. Kurtz, T. Laux, and M. Winter, J. Thermophys. Heat Transfer 16, 440 (2002). https://doi.org/10.2514/2.6698, Google ScholarCrossref
  14. 14. J. Browning, C. Lee, D. Plumlee, S. Shawver, S. M. Loo, M. Yates, M. McCrink, and J. Taff, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 39, 3187 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2011.2167634, Google ScholarCrossref
  15. 15. K. Takahashi, Rev. Mod. Plasma Phys. 3, 075003 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41614-019-0024-2, Google ScholarCrossref
  16. 16. F. Romano, B. Massuti-Ballester, T. Binder, G. Herdrich, S. Fasoulas, and T. Schönherr, Acta Astronaut. 147, 114 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.03.031, Google ScholarCrossref
  17. 17. J. Pollard, D. A. Lichtin, and R. B. Cohen, “RF discharge electrothermal propulsion—Results from a lab-scale thruster,” AIAA Paper 87-2124, 1987. Google Scholar
  18. 18. Brewer, G. Frind, T. Karras, and D. G. Holmes, “Results of a preliminary, high power RF thruster test,” AIAA Paper 89-2382, 1989. Google Scholar
  19. 19. J. R. Hopkins and M. M. M, “RF discharge electrothermal propulsion: results from a lab-scale thruster,” AIAA Paper 87-2124, 1987. Google Scholar
  20. 20. J. Mostaghimi, P. Proulx, and M. I. Boulos, J. Appl. Phys. 61, 1753 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.338073, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  21. 21. Y. Tanaka, J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 37, 1190 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/37/8/007, Google ScholarCrossref
  22. 22. M. Shigeta, J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 46, 015401 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/46/1/015401, Google ScholarCrossref
  23. 23. M. Yu, K. Yamada, K. Liu, and T. Zhao, AIP Adv. 9, 015120 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5058743, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  24. 24. R. Miller, J. Appl. Phys. 40, 5260 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1657382, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  25. 25. A. T. M. Wilbers, J. J. Beulens, and D. C. Schram, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 46, 385 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4073(91)90040-W, Google ScholarCrossref
  26. 26. T. G. Owano, C. H. Kruger, and R. A. Beddini, AIAA J. 31, 75 (1993). https://doi.org/10.2514/3.11321, Google ScholarCrossref
  27. 27. M. Mitchner and C. H. Kruger, Partially Ionized Gases (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1973). Google Scholar
  28. 28. J. Mostaghimi and M. I. Boulos, Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 9, 25 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01015825, Google ScholarCrossref
  29. 29. P. A. Gnoffo, R. N. Gupta, and J. L. Shinn, “Conservation equations and physical models for hypersonic air flows in thermal and chemical nonequilibrium,” Tech. Rep. NASA TP-2867, 1989. Google Scholar
  30. 30. J. O. Hirschfelder, C. F. Curtiss, and R. B. Bird, Molecular Theory of Gases and Liquids (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1964). Google Scholar
  31. 31. R. S. Devoto, Phys. Fluids 10, 2105 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1762005, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  32. 32. M. J. Wright, D. Bose, G. E. Palmer, and E. Levin, AIAA J. 43, 2558 (2005). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.16713, Google ScholarCrossref
  33. 33. M. J. Wright and E. Levin, J. Thermophys. Heat Transfer 9, 127 (2005). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.12384, Google ScholarCrossref
  34. 34. S. Chapman and T. G. Cowling, The Mathematical Theory of Non-Uniform Gases (Cambrige University Press, London, 1953), Chap. 18, pp. 319–322. Google Scholar
  35. 35. L. Spitzer and R. Härm, Phys. Rev. 89, 977 (1953). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.89.977, Google ScholarCrossref
  36. 36. Y. Wada and M. S. Liou, “A flux splitting scheme with high-resolution and robustness for discontinuities,” AIAA Paper 94-0083, 1994. Google Scholar
  37. 37. B. V. Leer, J. Comput. Phys. 32, 101 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(79)90145-1, Google ScholarCrossref
  38. 38. C. Hirsch, Numerical Computation of Internal and External Flows, Volume 2: Computational Methods for Inviscid and Viscous Flows (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1990), pp. 542–543. Google Scholar
  39. 39. J. Blazek, Computational Fluid Dynamics: Principles and Applications (Elsevier Science, Oxford, 2005), Chap. 4. Google Scholar
  40. 40. A. Jameson, W. Schmidt, and E. Turkel, “Modified k-epsilon model for compressible free shear flows,” AIAA Paper 81-1259, 1981. Google Scholar
  41. 41. H. Katsurayama and T. Abe, J. Appl. Phys. 113, 053304 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4776765, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  42. 42. M. H. Gutknecht, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 14, 1020 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1137/0914062, Google ScholarCrossref
  43. 43. R. Ye and T. Ishigaki, J. Appl. Phys. 97, 123306 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1931036, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  44. 44. J. H. S. Lenzner, M. Auweter-Kurtz, and P. C. Sleziona, J. Thermophys. Heat Transfer 14, 388 (2000). https://doi.org/10.2514/2.6536, Google ScholarCrossref
  45. 45. G. W. Sutton and A. Sherman, Engineering Magnetohydrodynamics (Dover Publications, Inc., New York, 2006), Chap. 13. Google Scholar
  46. 46. R. J. Litchford, J. W. Cole, J. T. Lineberry, J. N. Chapman, H. J. Schmidt, and C. W. Lineberry, NASA Technical Report NASA/TP-2003-212285, 2003. Google Scholar
  1. Published under license by AIP Publishing.

Article Metrics

Views
666
Citations
Crossref 0
Web of Science
ISI 0

Altmetric

Please Note: The number of views represents the full text views from December 2016 to date. Article views prior to December 2016 are not included.