Abstract
Chemical pressure is an effective method to tune physical properties, particularly for diluted magnetic semiconductors (DMSs) of which ferromagnetic ordering is mediated by charge carriers. Via substitution of smaller Ca for larger Sr, we introduce chemical pressure on (Sr,Na)(Cd,Mn)2As2 to fabricate a new DMS material (Ca,Na)(Cd,Mn)2As2. Carriers and spins are introduced by substitutions of (Ca,Na) and (Cd,Mn), respectively. The unit cell volume reduces by 6.2% after complete substitution of Ca for Sr, suggesting a subsistent chemical pressure. Importantly, the local geometry of the [Cd/MnAs4] tetrahedron is optimized via chemical compression that increases the Mn–As hybridization leading to enhanced ferromagnetic interactions. As a result, the maximum Curie temperature (TC) is increased by about 50% while the maximum saturation moment increases by over 100% from (Sr,Na)(Cd,Mn)2As2 to (Ca,Na)(Cd,Mn)2As2. The chemical pressure estimated from the equation of state is equal to an external physical pressure of 3.6 GPa.
The diluted magnetic semiconductors (DMSs) have been investigated extensively as they offer an opportunity to control the ferromagnetic properties by changing carrier density. The advantage leads to potential applications in spintronic devices.1–3 Specifically, recently couples of Fe-doped III–V DMS reached relatively high Curie temperature,4–6 which challenges existing concepts and motivates further understanding of ferromagnetism in DMS. The spin and charge doping are induced by one element doping such as Mn doping into (Ga,Mn)As leading to difficulty in tuning either conducting or magnetic properties.7 Consequently, a series of a new type of DMS materials with independent carrier and spin doping have been discovered to overcome aforementioned difficulty, e.g., Li1+x(Zn,Mn)As termed “111” type or (Ba,K)(Zn,Mn)2As2 (BZA) termed “122” type. BZA holds the record of Curie temperature among the “111” and “122”-type DMSs.7–11
Given a DMS material, effective ways to modify TC can be achieved by increasing the carrier density using an applied electric field, photoexcitations, or pressure.7,12 Particularly, pressure is expected to increase both carrier concentration and Mn–As hybridization which result in an enhancement of ferromagnetic interactions in DMS materials.13 On the other hand, internal chemical pressure, which plays a comparable role as external physical pressure, is widely used to modify physical properties in many functional materials. For instance, an equivalent increase in superconducting critical temperature in cuprate superconductors has been reported via relatively low pressures (4–6 GPa) induced by chemical pressure.14,15 Superconductivity in the iron-based compound BaFe2As2 can be induced by moderate pressure (<6 GPa) and isovalent chemical doping (BaFe2As2−xPx), respectively.16,17 Comparing to external physical pressure, internal chemical pressure, which can be applied by isovalent substitutions, does not require any specific devices (e.g., diamond anvil cell or piston cylinder cell). Nevertheless, chemical pressure-effects in DMS materials are rarely reported.
Previous studies of physical pressure-effects on “122” BZA only presented negative pressure-effect on TC. The proposed reason is that physical pressure distorts [MnAs4] tetrahedra and then reduces effective Mn–As hybridization which in turn damages ferromagnetic ordering.18–20 In this work, we generated chemical pressure by changing atom size on another group of DMS (Sr,Na)(Cd,Mn)2As2.21 Replacing Sr by Ca, (Ca,Na)(Cd,Mn)2As2 was synthesized as a new DMS material. From Sr- to Ca-compound, the unit cell volume decreases by 6.2% suggesting positive chemical pressure effect. It is found that local geometry of [MnAs4] tetrahedron in (Ca,Na)(Cd,Mn)2As2 is optimized by chemical pressure. Consequently, a successful improvement of ferromagnetic ordering by chemical pressure has been observed: comparing to (Sr,Na)(Cd,Mn)2As2, both maximum Curie temperature and saturation moment in (Ca,Na)(Cd,Mn)2As2 are significantly enhanced.
Polycrystalline samples of (Ca,Na)(Cd,Mn)2As2 were synthesized by solid state reaction with high purity elements. The stoichiometric ratios of starting materials were well mixed and pressed into pellets. All the processes were conducted under the protection of high-purity argon due to the air-sensitive starting materials. The pellets were sealed in tantalum-tubes with 1 bar of argon, and then the Ta-tubes were enclosed into evacuated quartz tubes. The samples were first heated at 600 °C for 12 h. Then, the products were reground, pelleted, and sintered at 650 °C for another 12 h. The recovered samples were characterized by powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) with a Rigaku diffractometer using Cu-Kα radiation at room-temperature. A Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) was used to investigate the morphology and particle size. Real compositions of all the elements were measured with energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis on the SEM. The real atom ratios of our samples are consistent with their normal stoichiometry. For example, the real composition of nominal (Ca0.95Na0.05)(Cd0.95Mn0.05)2As2 is determined as (Ca0.9546Na0.0454)(Cd0.9396Mn0.0604)2As2. Consequently, we use normal composition of each sample in this manuscript, for the sake of simplification. The dc magnetic properties were measured with a Superconductivity Quantum Interference Device (SQUID, Quantum Design), and transport properties were examined by Physical Property Measurement System (PPMS, Quantum Design). We calculated the equation of state (EoS) by first-principles calculations with a plane augmented-wave (PW) pseudopotential and generalized gradient approximation implemented in the VASP code with 16 × 16 × 8 k-point grid and 500 eV energy cutoff to build up relationship between cell volume and pressure [P(V)] of SrCd2As2.
Both CaCd2As2 and SrCd2As2 crystallize into a hexagonal structure with P-3m1 space group (No. 164) as shown in Fig. 1(a). Powder X-ray diffraction patterns for samples show that all of the peaks can be well indexed into P-3m1 space group (Fig. S1). For all the samples, crystal grains have sharp boundaries indicating good crystallization, as shown in Fig. 1(b). The lattice constants were calculated by Rietveld refinement. Both of a-axis and c-axis shrink linearly with increasing Mn doping level as shown in Fig. 1(c) because Mn2+ (0.66 Å) is smaller than Cd2+ (0.78 Å), well following the Vegard law, an evidence of successful (Cd,Mn) substitution. CaCd2As2 and SrCd2As2 are quasi-2D-materials where Ca/Sr ions layers and honeycomblike Cd2As2 layers stack alternately along the c axis.22 Given lattice constants for SrCd2As2 (a ∼ 4.4516 Å, c ∼ 7.4221 Å, V ∼ 127.4 Å3) and CaCd2As2 (a ∼ 4.3909 Å, c ∼ 7.1870 Å, V ∼ 120.0 Å3), chemical compression effect is visible in the latter, particularly along the c-axis. Besides, two more principal deviations between CaCd2As2 and SrCd2As2 are the Cd/Mn–As bond lengths and As–Cd/Mn–As bond angles in Cd2As2 layers which will be discussed in more details.

FIG. 1. (a) Crystal structure of the parent phase, CaCd2As2. The CdAs sublayers are highlighted with yellow parallelograms. (b) SEM images of (Ca0.95Na0.05)(Cd0.9Mn0.1)2As2. (c) Lattice constants vs Mn doping levels. (d) [Cd/MnAs]4 tetrahedra in (Ca0.95Na0.05)(Cd0.95Mn0.05)As2 and (Sr0.95Na0.05)(Cd0.95Mn0.05)As2. Marked bond length and bond angle are the ones within the CdAs sublayers.
Figure 2(a) shows temperature dependent of magnetization [M(T)] curves for (Ca1−xNax)(Cd1−yMny)2As2 (x = 0.025, 0.05, 0.1, 0.15; y = 0.05, 0.15, 0.2) under field H = 500 Oe. There is no obvious difference between zero field cooling (ZFC) and field cooling (FC), but clear ferromagnetic signatures are observed for all samples, i.e., sharp upturns with decreasing temperature. TC were determined from valleys of dM/dT curves. Above TC, susceptibility is fitted with the Curie-Weiss law [inset of Fig. 2(a)], (χ − χ0)−1 = (T − θ)/C, where χ0 stands for a temperature-independent term and θ stands for paramagnetic temperature. Neither TC nor θ monotonically increases with increasing Mn or Na doping level [Fig. 2(c)]. Maximum TC ∼ 19 K and θ ∼ 22 K are obtained for x = 0.05 and y = 0.15. The maximum TC of (Ca,Na)(Cd,Mn)2As2 is about 50% higher than that of (Sr,Na)(Cd,Mn)2As2 (the maximum TC ∼ 13 K).21 In Fig. 2(c), Tc decreases slightly with a higher Na-doping level when x > 0.05, presumable due to more defects induced by Na doping in specimens. After reaching maximum TC, ferromagnetic ordering is also weakened by overdoped Mn, similar to analogs (Sr,Na)(Zn,Mn)2As2 and (Sr,Na)(Cd,Mn)2As2.21,23 A presumably reason is that increasing chemical substitution tends to enhance antiferromagnetic coupling between either substitutional Mn and interstitial Mn or substitutional Mn in the nearest neighbor Cd sites due to high Mn concentration. Effective paramagnetic moments (Meff) are calculated from the Curie constant C. For example, Meff of (Ca0.95Na0.05)(Cd0.95Mn0.05)2As2 is 5.3μB/Mn which is close to an expected value of s = 5/2 configuration of Mn2+ [ = 5.9μB with g = 2]. Ferromagnetic characteristics, which are spontaneous magnetization under very low fields and narrow but clear hysteresis loops, are also found in M(H) curves as plotted in Fig. 2(b). Coercive fields are smaller than 100 Oe. Saturation moments (Msat) decrease with increasing Mn [Fig. 2(d)] due to increased antiferromagnetic interactions as proposed to explain the decrease in TC. Nevertheless, maximum Msat of (Ca,Na)(Cd,Mn)2As2 is significant larger than that of (Sr,Na)(Cd,Mn)2As2 (maximum Msat < 1μB/Mn). The larger Msat indicates that more local spins on Mn are ferromagnetic ordered, consistent with higher TC in (Ca,Na)(Cd,Mn)2As2.21

FIG. 2. (a) M(T) measured under H = 500 Oe of (Ca1−xNax)(Cd1−yMny)2As2 (x = 0.025, 0.05, 0.1, 0.15; y = 0.05, 0.15, 0.2). (b) The hysteresis loops at 2 K for (Ca1−xNax)(Cd1−yMny)2As2 (x = 0.025, 0.05, 0.1, 0.15; y = 0.05, 0.15, 0.2). (c) TC and θ vs Na- and Mn-doping level. (d) Msat vs Mn doping level.
Electrical transport measurements are shown in Fig. 3. The temperature dependent resistivity [ρ(T)] for parent compound CaCd2As2 shows semiconducting behavior within a temperature range of 2–300 K [Fig. 3(a)]. It is worth noting that the resistivity of CaCd2As2 is much smaller than SrCd2As2 (ρ300K ∼ 1 * 104 Ω mm and ρ120K ∼ 1 * 107 Ω mm).21 It is consistent with the aforementioned scenario that shortened Cd/Mn–As bond lengths and optimized As–Zn/Mn–As bond angle within sublayers enhance intrasublayer Cd/Mn–As hybridization and in turn benefit conduction. On the other hand, ρ2K of CaCd2As2 is 3 orders magnitude larger than all the Na-doped (Ca,Na)(Cd,Mn)2As2, indicating significantly increased carrier concentrations via Na doping. The scheme is further supported as shown in Fig. 3(a) by the decrease in resistivity of (Ca1−xNax)(Cd0.85Mn0.15)2As2 with an increasing Na-doping level. In contrast, as shown in Fig. 3(b), resistivity of (Ca0.95Na0.05)(Cd1−yMny)2As2 gradually increases with increasing Mn concentrations.
Figure 4(a) shows ρ(T) curves for (Ca0.95Na0.05)(Cd0.85Mn0.15)2As2 under various fields. Negative magnetroresistance [MR = Δρ/ρ0 = (ρH − ρ0)/ρ0] is found below ∼18 K consistent with TC from magnetization data. Above 18 K, positive MR emerges. The consistency indicates that the negative MR is related to ferromagnetic ordering. In Fig. 4(b), MR does not saturate at H = 7 T and T = 2 K, where the spins are almost fully aligned according to the M(H) curve. In (Ga,Mn)As and analog (Sr,Na)(Cd,Mn)2As2, the unsaturated MR is explained with giant splitting of the valence band. In order to understand such behavior, the negative magnetroresistance dates at 2 K are fitted with following equation:24–26
where C0 ≈ 0.605, e is the elemental charge, is the reduced Planck constant, and 1/2 ≤ nv ≤ 2 depending on the number of hole sub-bands contributing to the charge transport. The best fitting to Eq. (1) gives nv = 0.62, close to that of (Sr,Na)(Cd,Mn)2As2. The maximum MR is ∼15% at T = 2 K and H = 7 T. It is larger than analogs (Sr,Na)(Zn,Mn)2As2 and (Ca,Na)(Zn,Mn)2As2 as well as (Ba,K)(Zn,Mn)2As2 which has a much higher TC.10,27,28
| (1) |

FIG. 4. (a) ρ(T) curves of (Ca0.95Na0.05)(Cd0.85Mn0.15)2As2 under various fields. (b) Magnetoresistance curves of (Ca0.95Na0.05)(Cd0.85Mn0.15)2As2 measured in an external field up to 7 T at T = 2, 10, 20, and 50 K, respectively. The pink circles show the fitting result according to Eq. (1). (c) Hall effect measurement results for (Ca0.9Na0.1)(Cd0.85Mn0.15)2As2. The inset shows AHE and hysteresis loop in the low-field region.
The carrier type of the parent phase CaCd2As2 and doped phase (Ca,Na)(Cd,Mn)2As2 is p-type. The hole concentration of these samples is about 1019–1020 cm−3. Figure 4(c) shows Hall resistivity [ρxy(H)] below and above TC for (Ca0.9Na0.1)(Cd0.85Mn0.15)2As2 as a typical example. At T = 2 K, the clear anomalous Hall effect (AHE) is a strong evidence for intrinsic ferromagnetism in a DMS material. Carrier concentration calculated with linear ρxy(H) at a high-field range is np = 2.98 × 1019 cm−3. At 300 K, ρxy is proportional to field and we obtain np = 5.38 × 1019 cm−3.
Considering key roles of local geometry of [Zn/MnAs]4 tetrahedra to ferromagnetic interaction in BZA, we compare Cd/Mn–As bond lengths and As–Cd/Mn–As bond angles of CaCd2As2 and SrCd2As2 to seek microscopic insight into the origin of improved ferromagnetic ordering in CaCd2As2. For carrier-mediated ferromagnetism in DMS, itinerant carriers play an important role in ferromagnetic interaction.29–38 Given the quasi-2D structure of CaCd2As2 and SrCd2As2, one can expect that carriers are more itinerant along the ab-plane than the c-axis. If one takes a close look at Cd2As2 planes, it is easy to find two sublayers within one CdAs plane [Fig. 1(a)]. It is reasonable to assume that intrasublayer component is more important than the intersublayer one to modify carrier mobility within the Cd2As2 plane. With the same doping levels, the sublayer of CaCd2As2 has shorter Cd/Mn–As bond length and more optimal As–Cd/Mn–As bond angles than that of SrCd2As2. As shown in Fig. 1(d), the (Ca0.95Na0.05)(Cd0.95Mn0.05)As2 has the average Cd/Mn–As bond length of 2.700 Å and the average As–Cd/Mn–As bond angle within sublayers of 108.9° that is close to the ∼109.47° for a nondistorted ideal tetrahedron.18 On the other hand, in (Sr0.95Na0.05)(Cd0.95Mn0.05)As2, the average Cd/Mn–As bond length is 2.712 Å and the average As–Cd/Mn–As bond angle is 113.6° that is apparently deviated from ∼109.47°. The shortened Cd/Mn–As bond length will definitely increase Mn–As hybridization. Additionally, the ideal As–Cd/Mn–As bond angle will increase the overlap of Mn–As planar orbitals and guarantee the maximum strength of Mn–As hybridization, hence increasing the ferromagnetic interactions. Previous studies of physical pressure-effects on “122” BZA indicated that shortened Zn/Mn–As bond length and optimized As–Zn/Mn–As bond angle (∼109.47° for a regular tetrahedron) will enhance Cd/Mn–As hybridization.18 In short, (Ca,Na)(Cd,Mn)2As2 has stronger intrasublayer Cd/Mn–As hybridization than that for (Sr,Na)(Cd,Mn)2As2. As a result, we found improved ferromagnetic ordering in (Ca,Na)(Cd,Mn)2As2. Consequently, it is reasonable to assume that more chemical pressure could further improve TC within this system, e.g., replacing Ca with Mg.
We calculated the equation of state (EoS) equation with first-principles calculations with the plane augmented-wave (PW) pseudopotential method implemented in the VASP code39 to build up relationship between cell volume and pressure [P(V)] of SrCd2As2 (Fig. S2). Based on the P(V) curve, we estimate that an external pressure of 3.6 GPa can reduce cell volume of SrCd2As2 to 120.0 Å3 (volume of CaCd2As2 at ambient pressure).
In summary, we successfully synthesized a new type of DMS, (Ca,Na)(Cd,Mn)2As2. The carriers and spins are introduced via (Ca,Na) and (Cd,Mn) substitutions independently. The Curie temperature of (Ca,Na)(Cd,Mn)2As2 is 50% higher than that of (Sr,Na)(Cd,Mn)2As2 due to the effects of chemical pressure, and the saturation moment is also enhanced dramatically. The significant improvement of ferromagnetism in (Ca,Na)(Cd,Mn)2As2 indicates the prospect to search for high temperature diluted magnetic semiconductors via proper chemical pressure.
See supplementary material for the PXRD pattern of (Ca0.95Na0.05)(Cd1−yMny)2As2 (y = 0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, and 0.2) and the calculated P(V) of SrCd2As2
This work was financially supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2017YFB0405703), the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (Grant No. 2018YFA03057001), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China through the research projects (Grant No. 11534016).
REFERENCES
- 1. I. Zutic, J. Fabian, and S. Das Sarma, Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 323 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.76.323, Google ScholarCrossref
- 2. T. Jungwirth, J. Wunderlich, V. Novak, K. Olejnik, B. L. Gallagher, R. P. Campion, K. W. Edmonds, A. W. Rushforth, A. J. Ferguson, and P. Nemec, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 855 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.86.855, Google ScholarCrossref
- 3. H. Ohno, Science 281, 951 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.281.5379.951, Google ScholarCrossref
- 4. N. T. Tu, P. N. Hai, L. D. Anh, and M. Tanaka, Appl. Phys. Lett. 108, 192401 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4948692, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
- 5. N. T. Tu, P. N. Hai, L. D. Anh, and M. Tanaka, Appl. Phys. Express 11, 063005 (2018). https://doi.org/10.7567/apex.11.063005, Google ScholarCrossref
- 6. N. T. Tu, P. N. Hai, L. D. Anh, and M. Tanaka, Appl. Phys. Lett. 112, 122409 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5022828, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
- 7. A. Hirohata, H. Sukegawa, H. Yanagihara, I. Zutic, T. Seki, S. Mizukami, and R. Swaminathan, IEEE Trans. Magn. 51, 0800511 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/tmag.2015.2457393, Google ScholarCrossref
- 8. I. Zutic and T. Zhou, Sci. China: Phys., Mech. Astron. 61, 067031 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-018-9191-0, Google ScholarCrossref
- 9. J. K. Glasbrenner, I. Zutic, and I. I. Mazin, Phys. Rev. B 90, 140403 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.90.140403, Google ScholarCrossref
- 10. K. Zhao, Z. Deng, X. C. Wang, W. Han, J. L. Zhu, X. Li, Q. Q. Liu, R. C. Yu, T. Goko, B. Frandsen, L. Liu, F. Ning, Y. J. Uemura, H. Dabkowska, G. M. Luke, H. Luetkens, E. Morenzoni, S. R. Dunsiger, A. Senyshyn, P. Böni, and C. Q. Jin, Nat. Commun. 4, 1442 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2447, Google ScholarCrossref
- 11. K. Zhao, B. J. Chen, G. Q. Zhao, Z. Yuan, Q. Q. Liu, Z. Deng, J. L. Zhu, and C. Q. Jin, Chin. Sci. Bull. 59, 2524 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-014-0398-z, Google ScholarCrossref
- 12. H. Ohno, D. Chiba, F. Matsukura, T. Omiya, E. Abe, T. Dietl, Y. Ohno, and K. Ohtani, Nature 408, 944 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/35050040, Google ScholarCrossref
- 13. M. Csontos, G. Mihaly, B. Janko, T. Wojtowicz, X. Liu, and J. K. Furdyna, Nat. Mater. 4, 447 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1388, Google ScholarCrossref
- 14. M. Almamouri, P. P. Edwards, C. Greaves, and M. Slaski, Nature 369, 382 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1038/369382a0, Google ScholarCrossref
- 15. W. B. Gao, Q. Q. Liu, L. X. Yang, Y. Yu, F. Y. Li, C. Q. Jin, and S. Uchida, Phys. Rev. B 80, 094523 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.80.094523, Google ScholarCrossref
- 16. S. Kasahara, T. Shibauchi, K. Hashimoto, K. Ikada, S. Tonegawa, R. Okazaki, H. Shishido, H. Ikeda, H. Takeya, K. Hirata, T. Terashima, and Y. Matsuda, Phys. Rev. B 81, 184519 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.81.184519, Google ScholarCrossref
- 17. S. A. J. Kimber, A. Kreyssig, Y. Z. Zhang, H. O. Jeschke, R. Valenti, F. Yokaichiya, E. Colombier, J. Yan, T. C. Hansen, T. Chatterji, R. J. McQueeney, P. C. Canfield, A. I. Goldman, and D. N. Argyriou, Nat. Mater. 8, 471 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat2443, Google ScholarCrossref
- 18. F. Sun, G. Q. Zhao, C. A. Escanhoela, B. J. Chen, R. H. Kou, Y. G. Wang, Y. M. Xiao, P. Chow, H. K. Mao, D. Haskel, W. G. Yang, and C. Q. Jin, Phys. Rev. B 95, 094412 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.95.094412, Google ScholarCrossref
- 19. G. Q. Zhao, Z. Li, F. Sun, Z. Yuan, B. J. Chen, S. Yu, Y. Peng, Z. Deng, X. C. Wang, and C. Q. Jin, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 30, 254001 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648x/aac367, Google ScholarCrossref
- 20. F. Sun, N. N. Li, B. J. Chen, Y. T. Jia, L. J. Zhang, W. M. Li, G. Q. Zhao, L. Y. Xing, G. Fabbris, Y. G. Wang, Z. Deng, Y. J. Uemura, H. K. Mao, D. Haskel, W. G. Yang, and C. Q. Jin, Phys. Rev. B 93, 224403 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.93.224403, Google ScholarCrossref
- 21. B. J. Chen, Z. Deng, W. M. Li, M. R. Gao, Z. Li, G. Q. Zhao, S. Yu, X. C. Wang, Q. Q. Liu, and C. Q. Jin, J. Appl. Phys. 120, 083902 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4961565, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
- 22. P. Klufers and A. Mewis, Z. Naturforsch., B 32, 753 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1515/znb-1977-0706, Google ScholarCrossref
- 23. X. Yang, Y. Li, P. Zhang, H. Jiang, Y. Luo, Q. Chen, C. Feng, C. Cao, J. Dai, T. Qian, G. Cao, and Z.-A. Xu, J. Appl. Phys. 114, 223905 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4842875, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
- 24. A. Kawabata, Solid State Commun. 34, 431 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-1098(80)90644-4, Google ScholarCrossref
- 25. T. Omiya, F. Matsukura, T. Dietl, Y. Ohno, T. Sakon, M. Motokawa, and H. Ohno, Physica E 7, 976 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/s1386-9477(00)00099-0, Google ScholarCrossref
- 26. F. Matsukura, M. Sawicki, T. Dietl, D. Chiba, and H. Ohno, Physica E 21, 1032 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physe.2003.11.165, Google ScholarCrossref
- 27. B. J. Chen, K. Zhao, Z. Deng, W. Han, J. L. Zhu, X. C. Wang, Q. Q. Liu, B. Frandsen, L. Liu, S. Cheung, F. L. Ning, T. J. S. Munsie, T. Medina, G. M. Luke, J. P. Carlo, J. Munevar, Y. J. Uemura, and C. Q. Jin, Phys. Rev. B 90, 155202 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.90.155202, Google ScholarCrossref
- 28. K. Zhao, B. J. Chen, Z. Deng, W. Han, G. Q. Zhao, J. L. Zhu, Q. Q. Liu, X. C. Wang, B. Frandsen, L. Liu, S. Cheung, F. L. Ning, T. J. S. Munsie, T. Medina, G. M. Luke, J. P. Carlo, J. Munevar, G. M. Zhang, Y. J. Uemura, and C. Q. Jin, J. Appl. Phys. 116, 163906 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4899190, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
- 29. Z. Deng, C. Q. Jin, Q. Q. Liu, X. C. Wang, J. L. Zhu, S. M. Feng, L. C. Chen, R. C. Yu, C. Arguello, T. Goko, F. L. Ning, J. S. Zhang, Y. Y. Wang, A. A. Aczel, T. Munsie, T. J. Williams, G. M. Luke, T. Kakeshita, S. Uchida, W. Higemoto, T. U. Ito, B. Gu, S. Maekawa, G. D. Morris, and Y. J. Uemura, Nat. Commun. 2, 422 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1425, Google ScholarCrossref
- 30. Z. Deng, K. Zhao, B. Gu, W. Han, J. L. Zhu, X. C. Wang, X. Li, Q. Q. Liu, R. C. Yu, T. Goko, B. Frandsen, L. Liu, J. S. Zhang, Y. Y. Wang, F. L. Ning, S. Maekawa, Y. J. Uemura, and C. Q. Jin, Phys. Rev. B 88, 081203 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.88.081203, Google ScholarCrossref
- 31. R. Wang, Z. X. Huang, G. Q. Zhao, S. Yu, Z. Deng, C. Q. Jin, Q. J. Jia, Y. Chen, T. Y. Yang, X. M. Jiang, and L. X. Cao, AIP Adv. 7, 045017 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4982713, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
- 32. G. Q. Zhao, C. J. Lin, Z. Deng, G. X. Gu, S. Yu, X. C. Wang, Z. Z. Gong, Y. J. Uemera, Y. Q. Li, and C. Q. Jin, Sci. Rep. 7, 14473 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-08394-z, Google ScholarCrossref
- 33. C. Ding, H. Y. Man, C. Qin, J. C. Lu, Y. L. Sun, Q. Wang, B. Q. Yu, C. M. Feng, T. Goko, C. J. Arguello, L. Liu, B. A. Frandsen, Y. J. Uemura, H. D. Wang, H. Luetkens, E. Morenzoni, W. Han, C. Q. Jin, T. Munsie, T. J. Williams, R. M. D’Ortenzio, T. Medina, G. M. Luke, T. Imai, and F. L. Ning, Phys. Rev. B 88, 041102 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.88.041102, Google ScholarCrossref
- 34. W. Han, K. Zhao, X. C. Wang, Q. Q. Liu, F. L. Ning, Z. Deng, Y. Liu, J. L. Zhu, C. Ding, H. Y. Man, and C. Q. Jin, Sci. China: Phys., Mech. Astron. 56, 2026 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-013-5320-1, Google ScholarCrossref
- 35. H. Y. Man, S. L. Guo, Y. Sui, Y. Guo, B. Chen, H. D. Wang, C. Ding, and F. L. Ning, Sci. Rep. 5, 15507 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep15507, Google ScholarCrossref
- 36. F. Sun, C. Xu, S. Yu, B. J. Chen, G. Q. Zhao, Z. Deng, W. G. Yang, and C. Q. Jin, Chin. Phys. Lett. 34, 067501 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/0256-307x/34/6/067501, Google ScholarCrossref
- 37. B. A. Frandsen, Z. Z. Gong, M. W. Terban, S. Banerjee, B. J. Chen, C. Q. Jin, M. Feygenson, Y. J. Uemura, and S. J. L. Billinge, Phys. Rev. B 94, 094102 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.94.094102, Google ScholarCrossref
- 38. S. C. Erwin and I. Zutic, Nat. Mater. 3, 410 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1127, Google ScholarCrossref
- 39. G. Kresse and D. Joubert, Phys. Rev. B 59(3), 1758 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.59.1758, Google ScholarCrossref
All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Please Note: The number of views represents the full text views from December 2016 to date. Article views prior to December 2016 are not included.




