Abstract
We report on the self-induced electron trapping occurring in an ultracold neutral plasma that is set to expand freely. At the early stages of the plasma, the ions are not thermalized which follow a Gaussian spatial profile, providing the trapping to the coldest electrons. In the present work, we provide a theoretical model describing the electrostatic potential and perform molecular dynamics simulations to validate our findings. We show that in the strong confinement regime, the plasma potential is of a Thomas-Fermi type, similar to the case of heavy atomic species. The numerically simulated spatial profiles of the particles corroborate this claim. We also extract the electron temperature and coupling parameter from the simulation, so the duration of the transient Thomas-Fermi is obtained.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors thank Fundação da Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT-Portugal) through the Ph.D. Grant No. PD/BD/105875/2014 (PD-F APPLAuSE) and through the Grant No. IF/00433/2015. Stimulating discussion with João Rodrigues is also acknowledged.
References
- 1. T. C. Killian, Science 316, 705 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1130556, Google ScholarCrossref
- 2. T. C. Killian, S. Kulin, S. D. Bergeson, L. A. Orozco, C. Orzel, and S. L. Rolston, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4776 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.4776, Google ScholarCrossref
- 3. S. Kulin, T. C. Killian, S. D. Bergeson, and S. L. Rolston, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 318 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.318, Google ScholarCrossref
- 4. T. C. Killian, M. J. Lim, S. Kulin, R. Dumke, S. D. Bergeson, and S. L. Rolston, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3759 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.3759, Google ScholarCrossref
- 5. T. Killian, T. Pattard, T. Pohl, and J. Rost, Phys. Rep. 449, 77 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2007.04.007, Google ScholarCrossref
- 6. J. T. Mendonça, R. Kaiser, H. Terças, and J. Loureiro, Phys. Rev. A 78, 013408 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.78.013408, Google ScholarCrossref
- 7. H. Terças, J. T. Mendonça, and R. Kaiser, EPL (Europhys. Lett.) 89, 53001 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/89/53001, Google ScholarCrossref
- 8. J. P. Morrison, C. J. Rennick, J. S. Keller, and E. R. Grant, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 205005 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.205005, Google ScholarCrossref
- 9. N. Saquet, J. P. Morrison, M. Schulz-Weiling, H. Sadeghi, J. Yiu, C. J. Rennick, and E. R. Grant, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 44, 184015 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/44/18/184015, Google ScholarCrossref
- 10. F. Robicheaux, B. J. Bender, and M. A. Phillips, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 47, 245701 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/47/24/245701, Google ScholarCrossref
- 11. R. S. Fletcher, X. L. Zhang, and S. L. Rolston, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 145001 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.145001, Google ScholarCrossref
- 12. C. E. Simien, Y. C. Chen, P. Gupta, S. Laha, Y. N. Martinez, P. G. Mickelson, S. B. Nagel, and T. C. Killian, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 143001 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.143001, Google ScholarCrossref
- 13. P. McQuillen, J. Castro, S. J. Bradshaw, and T. C. Killian, Phys. Plasmas 22, 043514 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4918705, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
- 14. T. Chen, R. Lu, L. Guo, and S. Han, Phys. Plasmas 23, 092102 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4961957, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
- 15. E. A. Cummings, J. E. Daily, D. S. Durfee, and S. D. Bergeson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 235001 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.235001, Google ScholarCrossref
- 16. L. Landau and E. Lifshitz, Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed. ( Pergamon, 1977). Google ScholarCrossref
- 17. P. Gibbon, “PEPC: Pretty efficient parallel coulomb-solver,” in Sonstiger Interner Bericht ZAM-IB-2003-05 ( ZAM, Jülich, Forschungszentrum, 2003). Google Scholar
- 18. B. Josh and H. Piet, Nature 324, 446 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1038/324446a0, Google ScholarCrossref
- 19. L. Greengard and V. Rokhlin, J. Comput. Phys. 73, 325 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(87)90140-9, Google ScholarCrossref
- 20. L. Guo, R. H. Lu, and S. S. Han, Phys. Rev. E 81, 046406 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.81.046406, Google ScholarCrossref
- 21. W. L. Slattery, G. D. Doolen, and H. E. DeWitt, Phys. Rev. A 26, 2255 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.26.2255, Google ScholarCrossref
- 22. D. H. E. Dubin and T. M. O'Neil, Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, 87 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.71.87, Google ScholarCrossref
- 23. S. J. Aarseth, M. Henon, and R. Wielen, Astron. Astrophys. 37, 183 (1974). Google Scholar
- 24. S. D. Bergeson and F. Robicheaux, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 073202 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.073202, Google ScholarCrossref
- 25. P. McQuillen, T. Strickler, T. Langin, and T. C. Killian, Phys. Plasmas 22, 033513 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4915135, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
- 26. J. T. Mendonça and H. Terças, Physics of Ultra-Cold Matter, 3rd ed. ( Springer, 2013). Google ScholarCrossref
- 27. M. Murillo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 115003 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.115003, Google ScholarCrossref
- 28. S. Laha, P. Gupta, C. E. Simien, H. Gao, J. Castro, T. Pohl, and T. C. Killian, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 155001 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.155001, Google ScholarCrossref
Published under license by AIP Publishing.
Please Note: The number of views represents the full text views from December 2016 to date. Article views prior to December 2016 are not included.


