No Access
Published Online: 01 March 2019
Accepted: February 2019
Physics of Plasmas 26, 033501 (2019); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5064445
more...View Affiliations
We report on the self-induced electron trapping occurring in an ultracold neutral plasma that is set to expand freely. At the early stages of the plasma, the ions are not thermalized which follow a Gaussian spatial profile, providing the trapping to the coldest electrons. In the present work, we provide a theoretical model describing the electrostatic potential and perform molecular dynamics simulations to validate our findings. We show that in the strong confinement regime, the plasma potential is of a Thomas-Fermi type, similar to the case of heavy atomic species. The numerically simulated spatial profiles of the particles corroborate this claim. We also extract the electron temperature and coupling parameter from the simulation, so the duration of the transient Thomas-Fermi is obtained.
The authors thank Fundação da Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT-Portugal) through the Ph.D. Grant No. PD/BD/105875/2014 (PD-F APPLAuSE) and through the Grant No. IF/00433/2015. Stimulating discussion with João Rodrigues is also acknowledged.
  1. 1. T. C. Killian, Science 316, 705 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1130556, Google ScholarCrossref
  2. 2. T. C. Killian, S. Kulin, S. D. Bergeson, L. A. Orozco, C. Orzel, and S. L. Rolston, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4776 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.4776, Google ScholarCrossref
  3. 3. S. Kulin, T. C. Killian, S. D. Bergeson, and S. L. Rolston, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 318 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.318, Google ScholarCrossref
  4. 4. T. C. Killian, M. J. Lim, S. Kulin, R. Dumke, S. D. Bergeson, and S. L. Rolston, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3759 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.3759, Google ScholarCrossref
  5. 5. T. Killian, T. Pattard, T. Pohl, and J. Rost, Phys. Rep. 449, 77 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2007.04.007, Google ScholarCrossref
  6. 6. J. T. Mendonça, R. Kaiser, H. Terças, and J. Loureiro, Phys. Rev. A 78, 013408 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.78.013408, Google ScholarCrossref
  7. 7. H. Terças, J. T. Mendonça, and R. Kaiser, EPL (Europhys. Lett.) 89, 53001 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/89/53001, Google ScholarCrossref
  8. 8. J. P. Morrison, C. J. Rennick, J. S. Keller, and E. R. Grant, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 205005 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.205005, Google ScholarCrossref
  9. 9. N. Saquet, J. P. Morrison, M. Schulz-Weiling, H. Sadeghi, J. Yiu, C. J. Rennick, and E. R. Grant, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 44, 184015 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/44/18/184015, Google ScholarCrossref
  10. 10. F. Robicheaux, B. J. Bender, and M. A. Phillips, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 47, 245701 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/47/24/245701, Google ScholarCrossref
  11. 11. R. S. Fletcher, X. L. Zhang, and S. L. Rolston, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 145001 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.145001, Google ScholarCrossref
  12. 12. C. E. Simien, Y. C. Chen, P. Gupta, S. Laha, Y. N. Martinez, P. G. Mickelson, S. B. Nagel, and T. C. Killian, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 143001 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.143001, Google ScholarCrossref
  13. 13. P. McQuillen, J. Castro, S. J. Bradshaw, and T. C. Killian, Phys. Plasmas 22, 043514 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4918705, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  14. 14. T. Chen, R. Lu, L. Guo, and S. Han, Phys. Plasmas 23, 092102 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4961957, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  15. 15. E. A. Cummings, J. E. Daily, D. S. Durfee, and S. D. Bergeson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 235001 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.235001, Google ScholarCrossref
  16. 16. L. Landau and E. Lifshitz, Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed. ( Pergamon, 1977). Google ScholarCrossref
  17. 17. P. Gibbon, “PEPC: Pretty efficient parallel coulomb-solver,” in Sonstiger Interner Bericht ZAM-IB-2003-05 ( ZAM, Jülich, Forschungszentrum, 2003). Google Scholar
  18. 18. B. Josh and H. Piet, Nature 324, 446 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1038/324446a0, Google ScholarCrossref
  19. 19. L. Greengard and V. Rokhlin, J. Comput. Phys. 73, 325 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(87)90140-9, Google ScholarCrossref
  20. 20. L. Guo, R. H. Lu, and S. S. Han, Phys. Rev. E 81, 046406 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.81.046406, Google ScholarCrossref
  21. 21. W. L. Slattery, G. D. Doolen, and H. E. DeWitt, Phys. Rev. A 26, 2255 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.26.2255, Google ScholarCrossref
  22. 22. D. H. E. Dubin and T. M. O'Neil, Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, 87 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.71.87, Google ScholarCrossref
  23. 23. S. J. Aarseth, M. Henon, and R. Wielen, Astron. Astrophys. 37, 183 (1974). Google Scholar
  24. 24. S. D. Bergeson and F. Robicheaux, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 073202 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.073202, Google ScholarCrossref
  25. 25. P. McQuillen, T. Strickler, T. Langin, and T. C. Killian, Phys. Plasmas 22, 033513 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4915135, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  26. 26. J. T. Mendonça and H. Terças, Physics of Ultra-Cold Matter, 3rd ed. ( Springer, 2013). Google ScholarCrossref
  27. 27. M. Murillo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 115003 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.115003, Google ScholarCrossref
  28. 28. S. Laha, P. Gupta, C. E. Simien, H. Gao, J. Castro, T. Pohl, and T. C. Killian, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 155001 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.155001, Google ScholarCrossref
  29. Published under license by AIP Publishing.