No Access Submitted: 29 May 2018 Accepted: 16 July 2018 Published Online: 09 August 2018
Chaos 28, 083108 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5042026
We conceive a new recurrence quantifier for time series based on the concept of information entropy, in which the probabilities are associated with the presence of microstates defined on the recurrence matrix as small binary submatrices. The new methodology to compute the entropy of a time series has advantages compared to the traditional entropies defined in the literature, namely, a good correlation with the maximum Lyapunov exponent of the system and a weak dependence on the vicinity threshold parameter. Furthermore, the new method works adequately even for small segments of data, bringing consistent results for short and long time series. In a case where long time series are available, the new methodology can be employed to obtain high precision results since it does not demand large computational times related to the analysis of the entire time series or recurrence matrices, as is the case of other traditional entropy quantifiers. The method is applied to discrete and continuous systems.
The authors acknowledge the support of Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, CNPq, Brazil (Grant No. 302785/2017-5), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de pessoal de Nível Superior, CAPES, through Project Nos. 88881.119252/2016-01 and BEX: 11264/13-6, and Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos (FINEP).
  1. 1. E. Bradley and H. Kantz, Chaos 25, 097610 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4917289, Google ScholarScitation
  2. 2. H. Kantz and T. Schreiber, Nonlinear Time Series Analysis (Cambridge University Press, 2004), Vol. 7. Google Scholar
  3. 3. S. H. Strogatz, Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos: With Applications to Physics, Biology, Chemistry, and Engineering (Westview Press, 2014). Google Scholar
  4. 4. J. M. Cushing, R. F. Costantino, B. Dennis, R. Desharnais, and S. M. Henson, Chaos in Ecology: Experimental Nonlinear Dynamics (Elsevier, 2002), Vol. 1. Google Scholar
  5. 5. D. A. Hsieh, J. Fin. 46, 1839 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb04646.x, Google ScholarCrossref
  6. 6. H. Herzel, W. Ebeling, and A. O. Schmitt, Phys. Rev. E 50, 5061 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.50.5061, Google ScholarCrossref
  7. 7. E. M. Izhikevich, Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience (MIT Press, 2007). Google Scholar
  8. 8. T. L. Prado, S. R. Lopes, C. A. S. Batista, J. Kurths, and R. L. Viana, Phys. Rev. E 90, 032818 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.90.032818, Google ScholarCrossref
  9. 9. H. Poincaré, Acta Math. 13, A3 (1890). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02392506, Google ScholarCrossref
  10. 10. J.-P. Eckmann, S. O. Kamphorst, and D. Ruelle, Europhys. Lett. 4, 973 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/4/9/004, Google ScholarCrossref
  11. 11. S. Mallat, A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing (Academic Press, 1999). Google Scholar
  12. 12. N. Marwan, M. C. Romano, M. Thiel, and J. Kurths, Phys. Rep. 438, 237 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2006.11.001, Google ScholarCrossref
  13. 13. J. P. Zbilut and C. L. Webber, Phys. Lett. A 171, 199 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(92)90426-M, Google ScholarCrossref
  14. 14. C. L. Webber and J. P. Zbilut, J. Appl. Physiol. 76, 965 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1994.76.2.965, Google ScholarCrossref
  15. 15. C. Letellier, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 254102 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.254102, Google ScholarCrossref
  16. 16. D. Eroglu, T. K. D. Peron, N. Marwan, F. A. Rodrigues, L. d. F. Costa, M. Sebek, I. Z. Kiss, and J. Kurths, Phys. Rev. E 90, 042919 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.90.042919, Google ScholarCrossref
  17. 17. C. Bandt and B. Pompe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 174102 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.174102, Google ScholarCrossref
  18. 18. N. Marwan, J. F. Donges, Y. Zou, R. V. Donner, and J. Kurths, Phys. Lett. A 373, 4246 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2009.09.042, Google ScholarCrossref
  19. 19. D. B. Vasconcelos, S. R. Lopes, R. L. Viana, and J. Kurths, Phys. Rev. E 73, 056207 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.73.056207, Google ScholarCrossref
  20. 20. T. L. Prado, P. P. Galúzio, S. Lopes, and R. L. Viana, Chaos 24, 013106 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4861895, Google ScholarScitation
  21. 21. K. T. Alligood, T. D. Sauer, and J. A. Yorke, Chaos (Springer, 1996). Google ScholarCrossref
  22. 22. A. J. Lichtenberg and M. A. Lieberman, Regular and Chaotic Dynamics, 2nd ed. (Springer-Verlag, 1992), Vol. 1. Google ScholarCrossref
  23. 23. A. Wolf, J. B. Swift, H. L. Swinney, and J. A. Vastano, Physica D 16, 285 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(85)90011-9, Google ScholarCrossref
  24. 24. L. Lacasa, B. Luque, F. Ballesteros, J. Luque, and J. C. Nuno, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 4972 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0709247105, Google ScholarCrossref
  1. © 2018 Author(s). Published by AIP Publishing.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Proin imperdiet nibh sed ipsum molestie eu mattis justo malesuada. Curabitur id quam augue, ac eleifend justo. Integer eget metus sagittis velit semper auctor vel et nunc. Phasellus tempus felis at arcu fringilla at ndimentum libero placerat. Aenean ut imperdiet dolor. Nulla pretium mi vestibulum dui dictum sed ullamcorper tellus sodales. Duis non nibh id ipsum feugiat imperdiet id fermentum nunc. Maecenas id ultricies felis. Suspendisse lacinia rhoncus vestibulum. Vestibulum molestie vulputate convallis.Fusce et augue erat, nec mollis mi.