Published Online: 03 July 2018
Accepted: June 2018
Appl. Phys. Lett. 113, 013902 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5037220
Reducing the lattice thermal conductivity (κL) comprises one of the crucial aspects of thermoelectric research. Ternary intermetallic half Heusler compounds have revealed properties promising for thermoelectric applications. Studies have shown that self doping with Ni in Ni based half Heuslers leads to unprecedented lowering in the κL. Although the underlying physical mechanisms have not been explored in detail, with ZrNiSn as a case study, we experimentally investigate the change in κL with increase in the Ni concentration in Ni based n-type half Heusler alloys. We observe that at excess Ni doping of 3% in the half Heusler lattice, the thermal conductivity reduces by more than 60%. Our density functional theory based analysis on the ongoing phenomena reveals that at ultralow Ni doping, the localized modes of the antisite Ni defect hybridize with the acoustic modes and this plays the most dominant role in scattering of the thermal phonons leading to significant lowering in κL. Our theoretical analysis can be employed for predicting a suitable dopants that may reduce the κL prior to the synthesis of the compound in the laboratory.
  1. 1. J. Yang, H. Li, T. Wu, W. Zhang, L. Chen, and J. Yang, Adv. Funct. Mater. 18, 2880 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.200701369, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  2. 2. S. Chen and Z. Ren, Mater. Today 16, 387 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2013.09.015, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  3. 3. T. Zhu, C. Fu, H. Xie, Y. Liu, and X. Zhao, Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1500588 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201500588. Google ScholarCrossref
  4. 4. C. Fu, S. Bai, Y. Liu, Y. Tang, L. Chen, X. Zhao, and T. Zhu, Nat. Commun. 6, 8144 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9144. Google ScholarCrossref
  5. 5. W. G. Zeier, J. Schmitt, G. Hautier, U. Aydemir, Z. Gibbs, C. Felser, and G. J. Snyder, Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 16032 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1038/natrevmats.2016.32. Google ScholarCrossref
  6. 6. P. Hołuj, C. Euler, B. Balke, U. Kolb, G. Fiedler, M. M. Müller, T. Jaeger, E. Chávez Angel, P. Kratzer, and G. Jakob, Phys. Rev. B 92, 125436 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.125436, Google ScholarCrossref
  7. 7. C. Uher, J. Yang, S. Hu, D. T. Morelli, and G. P. Meisner, Phys. Rev. B 59, 8615 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.59.8615, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  8. 8. G. Joshi, X. Yan, H. Wang, W. Liu, G. Chen, and Z. Ren, Adv. Energy Mater. 1, 643 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201100126, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  9. 9. J. Zhang, X. Zhang, and Y. Wang, Sci. Rep. 7, 14590 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15205-y, Google ScholarCrossref
  10. 10. N. S. Chauhan, S. Bathula, A. Vishwakarma, R. Bhardwaj, B. Gahtori, A. Kumar, and A. Dhar, ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 1, 757–764 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.7b00203. Google ScholarCrossref
  11. 11. W. Xie, A. Weidenkaff, X. Tang, Q. Zhang, J. Poon, and T. M. Tritt, Nanomaterials 2, 379 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3390/nano2040379, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  12. 12. G. Rogl, P. Sauerschnig, Z. Rykavets, V. Romaka, P. Heinrich, B. Hinterleitner, A. Grytsiv, E. Bauer, and P. Rogl, Acta Mater. 131, 336 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2017.03.071, Google ScholarCrossref
  13. 13. H. Xie, H. Wang, C. Fu, Y. Liu, G. J. Snyder, X. Zhao, and T. Zhu, Sci. Rep 4, 6888 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1038/srep06888. Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  14. 14. W. Jeitschko, Metall. Mater. Trans. B 1, 3159 (1970) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03038432. Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  15. 15. S. Öğüt and K. M. Rabe, Phys. Rev. B 51, 10443 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.51.10443, Google ScholarCrossref
  16. 16. T. Graf, C. Felser, and S. S. Parkin, Prog. Solid State Chem. 39, 1 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progsolidstchem.2011.02.001, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  17. 17. S. Bhattacharya, M. J. Skove, M. Russell, T. M. Tritt, Y. Xia, V. Ponnambalam, S. J. Poon, and N. Thadhani, Phys. Rev. B 77, 184203 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.77.184203, Google ScholarCrossref
  18. 18. V. Kocevski and C. Wolverton, Chem. Mater. 29(21), 9386–9398 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b03379. Google ScholarCrossref
  19. 19. J. He, M. Amsler, Y. Xia, S. S. Naghavi, V. I. Hegde, S. Hao, S. Goedecker, V. Ozoliņš, and C. Wolverton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 046602 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.046602, Google ScholarCrossref
  20. 20. J. Carrete, W. Li, N. Mingo, S. Wang, and S. Curtarolo, Phys. Rev. X 4, 011019 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.4.011019, Google ScholarCrossref
  21. 21. G. Xing, J. Sun, Y. Li, X. Fan, W. Zheng, and D. J. Singh, Phys. Rev. Mater. 1, 065405 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.1.065405, Google ScholarCrossref
  22. 22. C. Yu, T.-J. Zhu, R.-Z. Shi, Y. Zhang, X.-B. Zhao, and J. He, Acta Mater. 57, 2757 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2009.02.026, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  23. 23. Y. Liu, P. Sahoo, J. P. Makongo, X. Zhou, S.-J. Kim, H. Chi, C. Uher, X. Pan, and P. F. Poudeu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 7486 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja311059m, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  24. 24. J. P. Makongo, D. K. Misra, X. Zhou, A. Pant, M. R. Shabetai, X. Su, C. Uher, K. L. Stokes, and P. F. Poudeu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 18843 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja206491j, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  25. 25. A. Bhardwaj, N. Chauhan, B. Sancheti, G. Pandey, T. Senguttuvan, and D. Misra, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17, 30090 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CP05213K, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  26. 26. D. T. Do, S. D. Mahanti, and J. J. Pulikkoti, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 26, 275501 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/26/27/275501, Google ScholarCrossref
  27. 27. C. S. Birkel, J. E. Douglas, B. R. Lettiere, G. Seward, N. Verma, Y. Zhang, T. M. Pollock, R. Seshadri, and G. D. Stucky, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15, 6990 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cp50918d, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  28. 28. A. Page, C. Uher, P. F. Poudeu, and A. Van der Ven, Phys. Rev. B 92, 174102 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.174102, Google ScholarCrossref
  29. 29. P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. 136, B864 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.136.B864, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  30. 30. W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Phys. Rev. 140, A1133 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  31. 31. G. Kresse and J. Hafner, Phys. Rev. B 49, 14251 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.49.14251, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  32. 32. J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  33. 33. P. Pulay, Chem. Phys. Lett. 73, 393 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(80)80396-4, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  34. 34. A. Togo, F. Oba, and I. Tanaka, Phys. Rev. B 78, 134106 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.78.134106, Google ScholarCrossref
  35. 35. M. Asen-Palmer, K. Bartkowski, E. Gmelin, M. Cardona, A. P. Zhernov, A. V. Inyushkin, A. Taldenkov, V. I. Ozhogin, K. M. Itoh, and E. E. Haller, Phys. Rev. B 56, 9431 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.56.9431, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  36. 36. J. Callaway, Phys. Rev. 113, 1046 (1959). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.113.1046, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  37. 37. Y. Zhang, E. Skoug, J. Cain, V. Ozoliņš, D. Morelli, and C. Wolverton, Phys. Rev. B 85, 054306 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.85.054306, Google ScholarCrossref
  38. 38. P. Sauerschnig, A. Grytsiv, J. Vrestal, V. Romaka, B. Smetana, G. Giester, E. Bauer, and P. Rogl, J. Alloys Compd. 742, 1058–1082 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.12.012. Google ScholarCrossref
  39. 39. V. Romaka, P. Rogl, L. Romaka, Y. Stadnyk, A. Grytsiv, O. Lakh, and V. Krayovskii, Intermetallics 35, 45 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intermet.2012.11.022, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  40. 40. H.-S. Kim, Z. M. Gibbs, Y. Tang, H. Wang, and G. J. Snyder, APL Mater. 3, 041506 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4908244, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  41. 41.Although κel shows a dip at x = 0.05 (see supplementary material), but the magnitude of this plunge is much lower (1/10th) in magnitude than that observed in κ.
  42. 42. H. Xie, H. Wang, Y. Pei, C. Fu, X. Liu, G. J. Snyder, X. Zhao, and T. Zhu, Adv. Funct. Mater. 23, 5123 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201300663, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  43. 43. D. Wu, A. S. Petersen, and S. J. Poon, AIP Adv. 3, 082116 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4818972, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  44. Published by AIP Publishing.