No Access Submitted: 21 April 2018 Accepted: 02 August 2018 Published Online: 09 October 2018
Chaos 28, 106310 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5037142
more...View Affiliations
In this paper, we consider two clustered neuronal networks with dense intra-synaptic links within each cluster and sparse inter-synaptic links between them. We focus on the effects of intra- and inter-time delays on the spiking regularity and timing in both clusters. With the aid of simulation results, we show that intermediate intra- and inter-time delays are able to separately induce fast regular firing spiking activity with a high firing rate as well as a high spiking regularity. Moreover, when both intra- and inter-time delays are present, we find that fast regular firings are induced much more frequently than if only a single type of delay is present in the system. Our results indicate that appropriately adjusted intra- and inter-time delays can significantly facilitate fast regular firing in neuronal networks. Based on a detailed analysis, we conjecture that this is most likely when the largest value of common divisors of the intra- and inter-time delays falls into a range where fast regular firings are induced by suitable intra- or inter-time delays alone.
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NNSFC) (Grant No. 11472061). Matjaž Perc acknowledges support from the Slovenian Research Agency (Grant Nos. P5-0027 and J1-7009). Jürgen Kurths acknowledges support by the DFG/FAPESP (Project No. IRTG 1740/TRP 2011/50151-0).
  1. 1. A. Thomson, D. West, and I. Vlachonikolis, Neurosci. Lett. 52, 329 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3940(84)90183-6, Google ScholarCrossref
  2. 2. G. Maimon and J. Assad, Neuron 62, 426 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2009.03.021, Google ScholarCrossref
  3. 3. R. Adrian, A. Sarbaz, M. Malmierca, and F. Beau, J. Neurophysiol. 77, 2945 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1997.77.6.2945, Google ScholarCrossref
  4. 4. A. Nasimi and R. Adrian, J. Comp. Physiol. A 196, 889 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-010-0532-6, Google ScholarCrossref
  5. 5. Y. B. Gong, Y. H. Hao, Y. H. Xie, X. G. Ma, and C. L. Yang, Biophys. Chem. 144, 88 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpc.2009.07.001, Google ScholarCrossref
  6. 6. G. Schmid, I. Goychuk, and P. Hänggi, Phys. Biol. 1, 61 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1088/1478-3967/1/2/002, Google ScholarCrossref
  7. 7. G. Schmid, I. Goychuk, and P. Hänggi, Physica A 344, 665 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2004.06.049, Google ScholarCrossref
  8. 8. Y. B. Gong, B. Xu, X. G. Ma, and J. Q. Han, Sci. China Ser. B, Chem. 51, 341 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11426-008-0010-y, Google ScholarCrossref
  9. 9. M. Ozer, M. Perc, and M. Uzuntarla, Europhys. Lett. 86, 40008 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/86/40008, Google ScholarCrossref
  10. 10. X. J. Sun, J. Z. Lei, M. Perc et al., Eur. Phys. J. B 79, 61 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2010-10031-3, Google ScholarCrossref
  11. 11. X. J. Sun and X. Shi, Sci. China Technol. Sci. 57, 879 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-014-5529-x, Google ScholarCrossref
  12. 12. X. J. Sun, Theor. Appl. Mech. Lett. 4, 013005 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1063/2.1401305, Google ScholarCrossref
  13. 13. R. X. Han, J. Wang, R. Miao, B. Deng, Y. M. Qin, H. T. Yu, and X. L. Wei, IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 28, 191 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2015.2502993, Google ScholarCrossref
  14. 14. A. S. Pikovsky and J. Kurths, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 775 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.775, Google ScholarCrossref
  15. 15. D. Q. Guo, M. Perc, Y. S. Zhang, P. Xu, and D. Z. Yao, Phys. Rev. E 96, 022415 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.96.022415, Google ScholarCrossref
  16. 16. H. T. Yu, R. F. Galan, J. Wang, Y. B. Cao, and J. Liu, Physica A 471, 263 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2016.12.039, Google ScholarCrossref
  17. 17. J. B. Jia and H. G. Gu, Chaos 25, 123124 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4938733, Google ScholarScitation
  18. 18. M. Perc, Chaos Soliton Fractals 31, 64 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2005.09.021, Google ScholarCrossref
  19. 19. M. Gosak, M. Marhl, and M. Perc, Biophys. Chem. 128, 210 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpc.2007.04.007, Google ScholarCrossref
  20. 20. M. Perc and M. Marhl, Phys. Rev. E 73, 066205 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.73.066205, Google ScholarCrossref
  21. 21. M. Perc, New J. Phys. 7, 252 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/7/1/252, Google ScholarCrossref
  22. 22. X. J. Sun, M. Perc, Q. S. Lu, and J. Kurths, Chaos 18, 023102 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2900402, Google ScholarScitation
  23. 23. X. J. Sun, Q. S. Lu, and Q. Y. Wang, Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos 19, 737 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1142/S021812740902310X, Google ScholarCrossref
  24. 24. X. J. Sun, Q. S. Lu, and J. Kurths, Physica A 387, 6679 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2008.08.027, Google ScholarCrossref
  25. 25. H. Nguyen and N. Alexander, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 187, 179 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2010-01282-3, Google ScholarCrossref
  26. 26. J. A. White, J. T. Rubinstein, and A. R. Kay, Trends Neurosci. 23, 131 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-2236(99)01521-0, Google ScholarCrossref
  27. 27. J. Ma and J. Tang, Nonlinear Dyn. 89, 1569-1578 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-017-3565-3, Google ScholarCrossref
  28. 28. Y. Xu, H. P. Ying, Y. Jia, J. Ma, and H. Hayat, Sci. Rep.-UK 7, 43452 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep43452, Google ScholarCrossref
  29. 29. S. L. Guo, J. Ma, J. Tang, and C. N. Wang, Complexity 2017, 4631602 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4631602, Google ScholarCrossref
  30. 30. W. T. Yu, J. Tang, J. Ma, and X. Yang, Europhys. Lett. 114, 50006 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/114/50006, Google ScholarCrossref
  31. 31. H. X. Qin, J. Ma, W. Y. Jin, and C. N. Wang, Sci. China Technol. Sci. 57, 936 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-014-5534-0, Google ScholarCrossref
  32. 32. H. T. Yu, X. M. Guo, and J. Wang, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. 42, 532 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2016.06.021, Google ScholarCrossref
  33. 33. Z. G. Zhao and H. G. Gu, Chaos Solitons Fractals 80, 96 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2015.06.017, Google ScholarCrossref
  34. 34. X. L. Yang, D. V. Senthilkumar, and J. Kurths, Chaos 22, 043150 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4772999, Google ScholarScitation
  35. 35. Q. Y. Wang, H. H. Zhang, M. Perc, and G. R. Chen, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 17, 3979 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2012.02.019, Google ScholarCrossref
  36. 36. C. G. Yu, M. Yi, and J. W. Shuai, Chaos 23, 033140 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4821942, Google ScholarScitation
  37. 37. B. M. Adhikari, A. Prasad, and M. Dhamala, Chaos 21, 023116 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3584822, Google ScholarScitation
  38. 38. M. Dhamala, V. K. Jirsa, and M. Z. Ding, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 074104 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.074104, Google ScholarCrossref
  39. 39. Q. Y. Wang, Z. S. Duan, M. Perc, and G. R. Chen, Europhys. Lett. 83, 50008 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/83/50008, Google ScholarCrossref
  40. 40. Q. Y. Wang, M. Perc, Z. S. Duan, and G. R. Chen, Phys. Rev. E 80, 026206 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.80.026206, Google ScholarCrossref
  41. 41. Q. Y. Wang, Q. S. Lu, and G. R. Chen, Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos 18, 1189 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127408020914, Google ScholarCrossref
  42. 42. Q. Y. Wang and G. R. Chen, Chaos 21, 013123 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3562547, Google ScholarScitation
  43. 43. H. T. Yu, J. Wang, C. Liu et al., Physica A 405, 25 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2014.03.011, Google ScholarCrossref
  44. 44. X. J. Sun and G. F. Li, Nonlinear Dyn. 89, 1 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-017-3432-2, Google ScholarCrossref
  45. 45. X. J. Sun, P. Perc, and J. Kurths, Chaos 27, 053113 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4983838, Google ScholarScitation
  46. 46. H. Yan and X. J. Sun, Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos 27, 1750112 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127417501127, Google ScholarCrossref
  47. 47. D. Q. Guo, Q. Y. Wang, and M. Perc, Phys. Rev. E 85, 061905 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.85.061905, Google ScholarCrossref
  48. 48. Y. B. Gong, Y. H. Hao, X. Lin et al., BioSystems 106, 76 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2011.07.001, Google ScholarCrossref
  49. 49. Q. Wang and Y. B. Gong, Appl. Math. Mod. 40, 7147 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2016.03.003, Google ScholarCrossref
  50. 50. H. Wu, Z. H. Hou, and H. W. Xin, Chaos 20, 043140 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3528938, Google ScholarScitation
  51. 51. M. Gassel, E. Glatt, and F. Kaiser, Phys. Rev. E 77, 066220 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.77.066220, Google ScholarCrossref
  52. 52. X. L. Yang, H. D. Li, and Z. K. Sun, PLoS ONE 12, e0177918 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177918, Google ScholarCrossref
  53. 53. C. Hilgetag and M. Kaiser, Neuroinformatics 2, 353 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1385/NI:2:3:353, Google ScholarCrossref
  54. 54. O. Sporns, D. Chialvo, M. Kaiser, and C. Hilgetag, Trends Cogn. Sci. 8, 418 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.07.008, Google ScholarCrossref
  55. 55. R. Fitzhugh, J. Biophys. 1, 445 (1961). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(61)86902-6, Google ScholarCrossref
  56. 56. J. S. Nagumo, S. Arimoto, and S. Yashizawa, Proc. IRE 50, 2061 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1109/JRPROC.1962.288235, Google ScholarCrossref
  57. 57. L. Huang, K. Park, Y. C. Lai, L. Yang, and K. Yang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 164101 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.164101, Google ScholarCrossref
  58. 58. X. J. Sun, J. Z. Lei, M. Perc, J. Kurths, and G. R. Chen, Chaos 21, 016110 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3559136, Google ScholarScitation
  59. 59. H. Y. Li, X. J. Sun, and J. H. Xiao, Chaos 28, 043113 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4997679, Google ScholarScitation
  60. 60. M. Rosenblum, N. Tukhlina, A. Pikovsky, and L. Cimponeriu, Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos 16, 1989 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127406015842, Google ScholarCrossref
  61. 61. W. Zou, D. V. Senthilkumar, Y. Tang, Y. Wu, J. Q. Lu, and J. Kurths, Phys. Rev. E 88, 032916 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.88.032916, Google ScholarCrossref
  62. 62. G. B. Ermentrout and N. Kopell, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 50, 125 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1137/0150009, Google ScholarCrossref
  63. 63. G. F. Li and X. J. Sun, Acta Phys. Sin.-Ch. Ed. 66, 240501 (2017). https://doi.org/10.7498/aps.66.240501, Google ScholarCrossref
  64. 64. G. Saxena and A. Prasad, Phys. Rev. E 82, 017201 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.82.017201, Google ScholarCrossref
  65. 65. W. Yang, Y. W. Wang, Y. J. Shen, and L. Q. Pan, Nonlinear Dyn. 90, 2767 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-017-3836-z, Google ScholarCrossref
  66. 66. J. M. Höfener, G. C. Sethia, and T. Gross, Philos. T. R. Soc. A 371, 20120462 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2012.0462, Google ScholarCrossref
  1. © 2018 Author(s). Published by AIP Publishing.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Proin imperdiet nibh sed ipsum molestie eu mattis justo malesuada. Curabitur id quam augue, ac eleifend justo. Integer eget metus sagittis velit semper auctor vel et nunc. Phasellus tempus felis at arcu fringilla at ndimentum libero placerat. Aenean ut imperdiet dolor. Nulla pretium mi vestibulum dui dictum sed ullamcorper tellus sodales. Duis non nibh id ipsum feugiat imperdiet id fermentum nunc. Maecenas id ultricies felis. Suspendisse lacinia rhoncus vestibulum. Vestibulum molestie vulputate convallis.Fusce et augue erat, nec mollis mi.