No Access
Published Online: 15 June 2018
Accepted: May 2018
Journal of Applied Physics 123, 233102 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5022881
Based on the covariance matrix adaptation evolution strategy (CMA-ES), advanced designs of direct-current (DC) electric cloaks composed of bulk isotropic materials are presented through a topology optimization using a level set method. The designed DC electric cloaks succeed in providing DC electric invisibility of an electrical insulator in DC flow; specifically, an electric potential distribution is found that closely reproduces a distribution when no insulator is present. To produce this invisibility, we minimized the difference between distributions for the DC electric cloak and one without insulating obstacles as the objective function. CMA-ES explores optimal sets of level set functions as design variables that minimize the objective function with a perimeter constraint. In the best case in our simulation, the minimized objective function under cloaking reaches 0.00194% of that in the absence of cloaking. Toward multidirectional DC electric cloaks, a topology optimization subject to four-axial structural symmetries is demonstrated.
This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI [Grant No. 17K17778].
  1. 1. U. Leonhardt, Science 312, 1777 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1126493, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  2. 2. J. B. Pendry, D. Schurig, and D. R. Smith, Science 312, 1780 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1125907, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  3. 3. D. Schurig, J. J. Mock, B. J. Justine, S. A. Cummer, J. B. Pendry, A. F. Starr, and D. R. Smith, Science 314, 977 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1133628, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  4. 4. H. Chen, B.-I. Wu, B. Zhang, and J. A. Kong, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 063903 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.063903, Google ScholarCrossref
  5. 5. Y. Yang, L. Jing, B. Zheng, R. Hao, W. Yin, E. Li, C. M. Soukoulis, and H. Chen, Adv. Mater. 28, 6866 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201600625, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  6. 6. M. Selvanayagam and G. V. Eleftheriades, Phys. Rev. X 3, 041011 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.3.041011, Google ScholarCrossref
  7. 7. Y. Ma, Y. Liu, L. Lan, T. Wu, W. Jiang, C. K. Ong, and S. He, Sci. Rep. 3, 2182 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep02182, Google ScholarCrossref
  8. 8. J. Li and J. B. Pendry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 203901 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.203901, Google ScholarCrossref
  9. 9. Y. Lai, H. Chen, Z.-Q. Zhang, and C. T. Chan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 093901 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.093901, Google ScholarCrossref
  10. 10. S. A. Cummer and D. Schurig, New J. Phys. 9, 45 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/9/3/045, Google ScholarCrossref
  11. 11. T. Han, X. Bai, D. Gao, J. T. L. Thong, B. Li, and C.-W. Qiu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 054302 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.054302, Google ScholarCrossref
  12. 12. Y. Ma, L. Lan, W. Jiang, F. Sun, and S. He, NPG Asia Mater. 5, e73 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/am.2013.60, Google ScholarCrossref
  13. 13. Y. A. Urzhumov and D. R. Smith, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 074501 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.074501, Google ScholarCrossref
  14. 14. Y. Ma, Y. Liu, M. Raza, Y. Wang, and S. He, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 205501 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.205501, Google ScholarCrossref
  15. 15. M. P. Bendsøe and N. Kikuchi, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 71, 197 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(88)90086-2, Google ScholarCrossref
  16. 16. J. Andkjær and O. Sigmund, Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 021112 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3540687, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  17. 17. J. Andkjær, N. A. Mortensen, and O. Sigmund, Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 101106 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3691835, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  18. 18. G. Fujii, H. Watanabe, T. Yamada, T. Ueta, and M. Mizuno, Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 251106 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812471, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  19. 19. T. Yamada, H. Watanabe, G. Fujii, and T. Matsumoto, IEEE Trans. Magn. 49, 2073 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2013.2243120, Google ScholarCrossref
  20. 20. M. Otomori, T. Yamada, J. Andkjær, K. Izui, S. Nishiwaki, and N. Kogiso, IEEE Trans. Magn. 49, 2081 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2013.2239965, Google ScholarCrossref
  21. 21. B. Vial and Y. Hao, Opt. Express 23, 23551 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.23.023551, Google ScholarCrossref
  22. 22. Y. Deng and J. G. Korvink, Proc. R. Soc. A 472, 20150835 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2015.0835, Google ScholarCrossref
  23. 23. N. Kishimoto, K. Izui, S. Nishiwaki, and T. Yamada, Appl. Phys. Lett. 110, 201104 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4983715, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  24. 24. G. Fujii and T. Ueta, Phys. Rev. E 94, 043301 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.94.043301, Google ScholarCrossref
  25. 25. K. Nakamoto, H. Isakari, T. Takahashi, and T. Matsumoto, Mech. Eng. J. 4, 16 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1299/mej.16-00268, Google ScholarCrossref
  26. 26. M. Takahashi, Y. Akimoto, and G. Fujii, Trans. Jpn. Soc. Mech. Eng. 84, 17-00590 (2018) (in Japanese). Google Scholar
  27. 27. G. Fujii, Y. Akimoto, and M. Takahashi, Appl. Phys. Lett. 112, 061108 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5016090, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  28. 28. G. Fujii, H. Watanabe, T. Yamada, T. Ueta, and M. Mizuno, in Proceedings of WCSMO10 (2013), p. 5283. Google Scholar
  29. 29. L. Lan, F. Sun, Y. Liu, C. K. Ong, and Y. Ma, Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 121113 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4821951, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  30. 30. F. Yang, Z. L. Mei, T. Y. Jin, and T. J. Cui, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 053902 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.053902, Google ScholarCrossref
  31. 31. Z. L. Mei, Y. S. Liu, F. Yang, and T. J. Cui, Opt. Express 20, 25758 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.025758, Google ScholarCrossref
  32. 32. W. X. Jiang, C. Y. Luo, Z. L. Mei, and T. J. Cui, Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 014102 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4774301, Google ScholarScitation
  33. 33. F. Yang, Z. L. Mei, X. Y. Yang, T. Y. Jin, and T. J. Cui, Adv. Funct. Mater. 23, 4306 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201300226, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  34. 34. Q. Ma, Z. L. Mei, S. K. Zhu, T. Y. Jin, and T. J. Cui, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 173901 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.173901, Google ScholarCrossref
  35. 35. T. Han, H. Ye, Y. Luo, S. P. Yeo, J. Teng, S. Zhang, and C.-W. Qiu, Adv. Mater. 26, 3478 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201305586, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  36. 36. N. Hansen and A. Ostermeier, Evol. Comput. 9, 159 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1162/106365601750190398, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  37. 37. N. Hansen, A. Auger, R. Ros, S. Finck, and P. Pošík, in Proceedings of the GECCO-2010 (ACM, 2010), pp. 1689–1696. Google Scholar
  38. 38. G. Fujii, M. Takahashi, and Y. Akimoto, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 332, 624 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2018.01.008, Google ScholarCrossref
  39. 39. N. Hansen, e-print arXiv:1604.00772 (2016). Google Scholar
  1. Published by AIP Publishing.