No Access
Published Online: 11 May 2018
Accepted: April 2018
J. Chem. Phys. 148, 184110 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5019805
We report theoretical calculations of positron-electron annihilation spectra of noble gas atoms and small molecules using the nuclear orbital plus molecular orbital method. Instead of a nuclear wavefunction, the positronic wavefunction is obtained as the solution of the coupled Hartree-Fock or Kohn-Sham equation for a positron and the electrons. The molecular field is included in the positronic Fock operator, which allows an appropriate treatment of the positron-molecule repulsion. The present treatment succeeds in reproducing the Doppler shift, i.e., full width at half maximum (FWHM) of experimentally measured annihilation (γ-ray) spectra for molecules with a mean absolute error less than 10%. The numerical results indicate that the interpretation of the FWHM in terms of a specific molecular orbital is not appropriate.
Some of the present calculations were performed at the Research Center for Computational Science (RCCS), Okazaki Research Facilities, Institutes of Natural Sciences (NINS). This study was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research “KAKENHI No. 26248009” from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan, and by the Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology (CREST) Program, “Theoretical Design of Materials with Innovative Functions Based on Relativistic Electronic Theory” of the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST). F.W. acknowledges the Australian Research Council (ARC) Discovery Project (DP) No. DP110101371.
  1. 1. F. Tuomisto and I. Makkonen, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 1583 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.85.1583, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  2. 2. K. Shizuma, M. Nishi, T. Fujita, and Y. Yoshizawa, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 44, 1757 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1143/jpsj.44.1757, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  3. 3. A. T. Stewart, C. V. Briscoe, and J. J. Steinbacher, Can. J. Phys. 68, 1362 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1139/p90-196, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  4. 4. P. G. Coleman, S. Rayner, F. M. Jacobsen, M. Charlton, and T. L. West, J. Phys. B: At., Mol. Opt. Phys. 27, 981 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/27/5/017, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  5. 5. P. Van Reeth, J. W. Humberston, K. Iwata, R. J. Greaves, and C. M. Surko, J. Phys. B: At., Mol. Opt. Phys. 29, L465 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/29/12/004, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  6. 6. K. Iwata, G. F. Gribakin, R. G. Greaves, and C. M. Surko, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 39 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.79.39, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  7. 7. K. Iwata, R. G. Greaves, and C. M. Surko, Phys. Rev. A 55, 3586 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.55.3586, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  8. 8. S. Tang, M. D. Tinkle, R. G. Greaves, and C. M. Surko, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3793 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.68.3793, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  9. 9. R. P. McEachran, D. L. Morgan, A. G. Ryman, and A. D. Stauffer, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 10, 663 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3700/10/4/018, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  10. 10. R. P. McEachran, A. G. Ryman, and A. D. Stauffer, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 11, 551 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3700/11/3/025, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  11. 11. R. P. McEachran, D. L. Morgan, A. G. Ryman, and A. D. Stauffer, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 11, 951 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3700/11/5/527, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  12. 12. R. P. McEachran, A. G. Ryman, and A. D. Stauffer, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 12, 1031 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3700/12/6/019, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  13. 13. R. P. McEachran, A. D. Stauffer, and L. E. M. Campbell, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 13, 1281 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3700/13/6/030, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  14. 14. L. J. M. Dunlop and G. F. Gribakin, J. Phys. B: At., Mol. Opt. Phys. 39, 1647 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/39/7/008, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  15. 15. Y. Cheng and J. Mitroy, Phys. Rev. A 90, 042702 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.90.042702, Google ScholarCrossref
  16. 16. D. G. Green and G. F. Gribakin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 093201 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.114.093201, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  17. 17. D. G. Green and G. F. Gribakin, e-print arXiv:1502.08045v2 (2015). Google Scholar
  18. 18. F. Wang, L. Selvam, G. F. Gribakin, and C. M. Surko, J. Phys. B: At., Mol. Opt. Phys. 43, 165207 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-4075/43/16/165207, Google ScholarCrossref
  19. 19. D. G. Green, S. Saha, F. Wang, G. F. Gribakin, and C. M. Surko, Mater. Sci. Forum 666, 21 (2011). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.666.21, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  20. 20. D. G. Green, S. Saha, F. Wang, G. F. Gribakin, and C. M. Surko, New J. Phys. 14, 035021 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/14/3/035021, Google ScholarCrossref
  21. 21. F. Wang, X. G. Ma, L. Selvam, G. F. Gribakin, and C. M. Surko, Eur. Phys. J. D 66, 107 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2012-20741-1, Google ScholarCrossref
  22. 22. F. Wang, X. G. Ma, L. Selvam, G. Gribakin, and C. M. Surko, New J. Phys. 14, 085022 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/14/8/085022, Google ScholarCrossref
  23. 23. X. Ma and F. Wang, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 85, 59 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2012.11.008, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  24. 24. X. Ma and F. Wang, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 89, 14 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2013.03.029, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  25. 25. X. Ma and F. Wang, J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 196, 146 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elspec.2014.01.012, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  26. 26. X. Ma, L. Wang, and C. Yang, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 83, 054301 (2014). https://doi.org/10.7566/jpsj.83.054301, Google ScholarCrossref
  27. 27. X. G. Ma, Y. H. Zhu, and Y. Liu, Phys. Lett. A 379, 2306 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2015.07.025, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  28. 28. X. Ma, Y. Zhu, and Y. Liu, Phys. Lett. A 380, 1848 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2016.03.034, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  29. 29. Y. Liu, X. G. Ma, and Y. H. Zhu, Commun. Theor. Phys. 65, 531 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/0253-6102/65/4/531, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  30. 30. X. Ma, M. Wang, Y. Zhu, Y. Liu, C. Yang, and D. Wang, Phys. Rev. A 94, 052709 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.94.052709, Google ScholarCrossref
  31. 31. D. G. Green and G. F. Gribakin, Phys. Rev. A 95, 036701 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.95.036701, Google ScholarCrossref
  32. 32. M. Tachikawa, K. Mori, H. Nakai, and K. Iguchi, Chem. Phys. Lett. 290, 437 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-2614(98)00519-3, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  33. 33. H. Nakai, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 86, 511 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1002/qua.1106.abs, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  34. 34. H. Nakai, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 107, 2849 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1002/qua.21379, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  35. 35. Y. Imamura, Y. Tsukamoto, H. Kiryu, and H. Nakai, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 82, 1133 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1246/bcsj.82.1133, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  36. 36. Y. Shigeta, Y. Ozaki, K. Kodama, H. Nagao, H. Kawabe, and K. Nishikawa, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 69, 629 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-461x(1998)69:5<629::aid-qua1>3.0.co;2-x, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  37. 37. M. Tachikawa, Chem. Phys. Lett. 360, 494 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0009-2614(02)00881-3, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  38. 38. T. Ishimoto, M. Tachikawa, and U. Nagashima, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 109, 2677 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/qua.22069, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  39. 39. S. P. Webb, T. Iordanov, and S. Hammes-Schiffer, J. Chem. Phys. 117, 4106 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1494980, Google ScholarScitation, ISI, CAS
  40. 40. C. Swalina, M. V. Pak, A. Chakraborty, and S. Hammes-Schiffer, J. Phys. Chem. A 110, 9983 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp0634297, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  41. 41. A. D. Bochevarov, E. F. Valeev, and C. D. Sherrill, Mol. Phys. 102, 111 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/00268970410001668525, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  42. 42. S. A. González, N. F. Aguirre, and A. Reyes, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 108, 1742 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1002/qua.21584, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  43. 43. R. Flores-Moreno, E. Posada, F. Moncada, J. Romero, J. Charry, M. Díaz-Tinoco, S. A. González, N. F. Aguirre, and A. Reyes, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 114, 50 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/qua.24500, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  44. 44. M. Tachikawa, Y. Kita, and R. J. Buenker, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13, 2701 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1039/c0cp01650k, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  45. 45. K. Koyanagi, Y. Kita, Y. Shigeta, and M. Tachikawa, ChemPhysChem 14, 3458 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.201300549, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  46. 46. Y. Kita and M. Tachikawa, Eur. Phys. J. D 68, 116 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2014-40799-9, Google ScholarCrossref
  47. 47. M. Nummela, H. Raebiger, D. Yoshida, and M. Tachikawa, J. Phys. Chem. A 120, 4037 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.6b01780, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  48. 48. Y. Takeda, Y. Kita, and M. Tachikawa, Eur. Phys. J. D 70, 132 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e2016-70140-7, Google ScholarCrossref
  49. 49. K. R. Brorsen, M. V. Pak, and S. Hammes-Schiffer, J. Phys. Chem. A 121, 515 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.6b10124, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  50. 50. J. Romero, J. A. Charry, R. Flores-Moreno, M. T. do N. Varella, and A. Reyes, J. Chem. Phys. 141, 114103 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4895043, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  51. 51. J. Charry, J. Romero, M. T. do N. Varella, and A. Reyes, Phys. Rev. A 89, 052709 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.89.052709, Google ScholarCrossref
  52. 52. G. F. Gribakin, J. A. Young, and C. M. Surko, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2557 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.82.2557, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  53. 53. C. C. J. Roothaan, Rev. Mod. Phys. 23, 69 (1951). https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.23.69, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  54. 54. W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Phys. Rev. 140, A1133 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.140.a1133, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  55. 55. A. D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys. 88, 2547 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.454033, Google ScholarScitation, ISI, CAS
  56. 56. M. W. Schmidt, K. K. Baldridge, J. A. Boatz, S. T. Elbert, M. S. Gordon, J. J. Jensen, S. Koseki, N. Matsunaga, K. A. Nguyen, S. Su, T. L. Windus, M. Dupuis, and J. A. Montgomery, J. Comput. Chem. 14, 1347 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.540141112, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  57. 57. R. D. Bardo and K. Ruedenberg, J. Chem. Phys. 60, 918 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1681168, Google ScholarScitation, ISI, CAS
  58. 58. P. A. M. Dirac, Proc. R. Soc. A 123, 714 (1929). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1929.0094, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  59. 59. J. C. Slater, Phys. Rev. 81, 385 (1951). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev.81.385, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  60. 60. S. H. Vosko, L. Wilk, and M. Nusair, Can. J. Phys. 58, 1200 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1139/p80-159, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  61. 61. A. D. Becke, Phys. Rev. A 38, 3098 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.38.3098, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  62. 62. C. Lee, W. Yang, and R. G. Parr, Phys. Rev. B 37, 785 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.37.785, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  63. 63. A. D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 5648 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.464913, Google ScholarScitation, ISI, CAS
  64. 64. H. Iikura, T. Tsuneda, T. Yanai, and K. Hirao, J. Chem. Phys. 115, 3540 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1383587, Google ScholarScitation, ISI, CAS
  65. 65. B. Cordero, V. Gómez, A. E. Platero-Prats, M. Revés, J. Echeverría, E. Cremades, F. Barragán, and S. Alvarez, Dalton Trans. 0(21), 2832 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1039/b801115j, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  66. 66. A. Bondi, J. Phys. Chem. 68, 441 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1021/j100785a001, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  67. 67. M. Tachikawa, R. J. Buenker, and M. Kimura, J. Chem. Phys. 119, 5005 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1597671, Google ScholarScitation, ISI, CAS
  68. 68. H. Chojnacki and K. Strasburger, Mol. Phys. 104, 2273 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/00268970600655477, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  69. 69. Y. Kita, M. Tachikawa, N. D. Drummond, and R. J. Needs, Chem. Lett. 39, 1136 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1246/cl.2010.1136, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  70. 70. S. Bubin and L. Adamowicz, J. Chem. Phys. 120, 6051 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1651056, Google ScholarScitation, ISI, CAS
  71. 71. Y. Kita, R. Maezono, M. Tachikawa, M. Towler, and R. J. Needs, J. Chem. Phys. 131, 134310 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3239502, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  72. 72. H. Nakai and K. Sodeyama, J. Chem. Phys. 118, 1119 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1528951, Google ScholarScitation, ISI, CAS
  73. 73. M. Hoshino and H. Nakai, J. Chem. Phys. 124, 194110 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2193513, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  74. 74. K. Sodeyama, H. Nishizawa, M. Hoshino, M. Kobayashi, and H. Nakai, Chem. Phys. Lett. 433, 409 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2006.11.054, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  75. 75. Y. Imamura, H. Kiryu, and H. Nakai, J. Comput. Chem. 29, 735 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.20840, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  76. 76. J. A. Young and C. M. Surko, Phys. Rev. A 77, 052704 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.77.052704, Google ScholarCrossref
  77. 77. J. A. Young and C. M. Surko, Phys. Rev. A 78, 032702 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.78.032702, Google ScholarCrossref
  1. Published by AIP Publishing.