MENU
  • Scitation Home
SUBMIT YOUR ARTICLE

Thank you

For your interest in the Physics of Plasmas (PHP)

To support global research during the COVID-19 pandemic, AIP Publishing is making our content freely available to scientists who register on Scitation.
To gain access, please log in or create an account and then click here to activate your free access. You must be logged in to Scitation to activate your free access.
Check for updates on crossmark
Prev Next
No Access
Published Online: 27 December 2017
Accepted: December 2017

Study of the design and efficiency of single stage EHD thrusters at the sub-atmospheric pressure of 1.3 kPa

Physics of Plasmas 24, 123513 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5018424
Victor H. Granados1,a),b), Mario J. Pinheiro2, and Paulo A. Sá1
more...View Affiliations
Abstract
The goal of this article is to contribute to the advancement and the improvement of the performances of electrohydrodynamic (EHD) propulsion systems for space missions, especially in what concerns the control of the geometries of the electrodes and the employed gas and its efficiency. We use a previously developed self-consistent model to compare and study the performance of these systems using three different working gases (argon, nitrogen, and oxygen) in terms of net thrust production and thrust-to-power efficiency of single-stage EHD thrusters. In order to verify the dependency of those physical parameters on the configuration and orientation of the electrodes, we conduct systematic simulations of three thruster cathode configurations (conical, cylindrical, and funnel-like). In the present study, the working pressure is ≈1.3 kPa (10 Torr), well below the normal atmospheric pressure, and the gas temperature is 300 K. A similar systematic investigation was conducted in a recent paper at a relatively much lower pressure of 0.5 Torr (20 times less) for the same cathode duct geometries and working gases, which permit to compare the performances of the considered thrusters and gases at these two pressures; then and now, the distance between the electrodes is fixed at 28 mm, but in addition to the pressure, other parameters were modified. Thus, the input voltage is fixed at 3 kV, and the resistance of the ballast varies in the range of 500–5000 MΩ. Nitrogen gas performed better than argon for all proposed geometries, doubling the produced thrust while presenting higher T/P ratios in almost all cases. Oxygen presented significantly better performance than nitrogen's and argon's, e.g., funnel like cathode configuration presented a net thrust higher than 0.1 mN, about one order of magnitude higher than nitrogen's.

References

  1. 1. See http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/missions/deep-space-1-ds1 for Deep Space 1 NASA mission website. Google Scholar
  2. 2. S. Mazouffre, “ Electric propulsion for satellites and spacecraft: Established technologies and novel approaches,” Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 25, 033002 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-0252/25/3/033002, Google ScholarCrossref
  3. 3. K. Masuyama and S. Barrett, “ On the performance of electrohydrodynamic propulsion,” Proc. R Soc. A 469, 20120623 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2012.0623, Google ScholarCrossref
  4. 4. J. Wilson, H. D. Perkins, and W. K. Thompson, “ An investigation of ionic wind propulsion,” Technical Report No. NASA/TM-2009-215822 (2009). Google Scholar
  5. 5. L. Pekker and M. Young, “ Model of ideal electrohydrodynamic thruster,” J. Propul. Power 27, 4 (2011). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.B34097, Google ScholarCrossref
  6. 6. D. F. Colas, A. Ferret, D. Z. Pai, D. D. Lacoste, and C. O. Laux, “ Ionic wind generation by a wire-cylinder-plate corona discharge in air at atmospheric pressure,” J. Appl. Phys. 108, 103306 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3514131, Google ScholarScitation
  7. 7. M. Rickard, D. Dunn-Rankin, F. Weinberg, and F. Carleton, “ Characterization of ionic wind velocity,” J. Electrostat. 63, 711–716 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elstat.2005.03.033, Google ScholarCrossref
  8. 8. F. Hauksbee, Physico-Mechanical Experiments on Various Subjects, 1st ed. ( R. Brugis, London, 1709), pp. 46–47. Google Scholar
  9. 9. A. Chattock, “ On the velocity and mass of ions in the electric wind in air,” Philos Mag. 48, 401–402 (1899). https://doi.org/10.1080/14786449908621431, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  10. 10. A. Seversky, “ Ionocraft,” U.S. Patent 3,130,945A (28 April 1964). Google Scholar
  11. 11. N. E. Jewell-Larsen, H. Ran, Y. Zhang, M. K. Schwiebert, K. A. H. Tessera, and A. V. Mamishev, “ Electrohydrodynamic (EHD) cooled laptop,” in 2009 25th Annual IEEE Semiconductor Thermal Measurement and Management Symposium, San Jose, CA (2009), pp. 261–266. Google ScholarCrossref
  12. 12. P. Chen, Z. Wu, X. Liu, K. Xie, N. Wang, Y. Meng, and J. Ouyang, “ Study of airbreathing electric thruster for nearspace propulsion,” in Joint Conference of 30th ISTS, 34th IEPC and 6th NSAT, Hyogo-Kobe, Japan, 4–10 July 2015 (2015), p. 270. Google Scholar
  13. 13. E. D. Fylladitakis, M. P. Theodoridis, and A. X. Moronis, “ Review on the history, research, and applications of electrohydrodynamics,” IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 42(2), 358–375 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2013.2297173, Google ScholarCrossref
  14. 14. M. J. Johnson and D. B. Go, “ Recent advances in electrodynamic pumps operated by ionic winds: A review,” Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 26, 103002 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6595/aa88e7, Google ScholarCrossref
  15. 15. V. H. Granados, M. J. Pinheiro, and P. A. Sá, “ Electrostatic propulsion device for aerodynamics applications,” Phys. Plasmas 23, 073514 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4958815, Google ScholarScitation
  16. 16. See http://www.comsol.com for COMSOL Multiphysics website. Google Scholar
  17. 17. See http://www.lxcat.net for Morgan database; accessed 25 January 2015. Google Scholar
  18. 18. T. F. O'Malley, A. J. Cunningham, and R. M. Hobson, J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. 5, 2126 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3700/5/11/019, Google ScholarCrossref
  19. 19. A. Bogaerts and R. Gijbels, “ Modeling of metastable argon atoms in a direct-current glow discharge,” Phys. Rev. A 52, 3743–3751 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.52.3743, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  20. 20. S. K. Lam, C.-E. Zheng, D. Lo, A. Dem'yanov, and A. P. Napartovich, “ Kinetics of A r 2 * in high-pressure pure argon,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 33, 242 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/33/3/310, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  21. 21. R. L. Fitzwilson and L. M. Chanin, “ Positive ion ratio measurements in Ar, Kr, and Xe glow discharges,” J. Appl. Phys. 44, 5337 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1662153, Google ScholarScitation, CAS
  22. 22. See http://www.lxcat.net for IST-Lisbon database; accessed 25 January 2015. Google Scholar
  23. 23. See http://www.lxcat.net for Itikawa database; accessed 25 January 2015. Google Scholar
  24. 24. I. A. Kossyi, A. Y. Kostinsky, A. A. Matveyev, and V. P. Silakov, “ Kinetic scheme of the non-equilibrium discharge in nitrogen-oxygen mixtures,” Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 1, 207 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-0252/1/3/011, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  25. 25. L. Prevosto, H. Kelly, and B. Mancinelli, “ Modelling of an atmospheric pressure nitrogen glow discharge operating in high-gas temperature regimes,” Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 36, 973–992 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11090-016-9716-3, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  26. 26. E. Tatarova, F. M. Dias, C. M. Ferreira, V. Guerra, J. Loureiro, E. Stoykova, I. Ghanashev, and I. Zhelyazkov, “ Self-consistent kinetic model of a surface-wave-sustained discharge in nitrogen,” J. Physics D: Appl. Phys. 30, 2663–2676 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/30/19/003, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  27. 27. J. Loureiro and C. M. Ferreira, “ Coupled electron energy and vibrational distribution functions in stationary N2 discharges,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 19, 17 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/19/1/007, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  28. 28. G. Gousset, C. M. Ferreira, M. Pinheiro, P. A. Sá, M. Touzeau, M. Vialle, and J. Loureiro, “ Electron and heavy-particle kinetics in the low pressure oxygen positive column,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 24, 290 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/24/3/010, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  29. 29. M. Capitelli, C. M. Ferreira, B. F. Gordiets, and A. I. Osipov, Plasma Kinetics in Atmospheric Gases ( Springer-Verlag, 2000). Google ScholarCrossref
  30. 30. H. Wang, V. S. Sukhomlinov, I. D. Kaganovich, and A. S. Mustafaev, “ Ion velocity distribution function in argon and helium discharge: Detailed comparison of numerical simulation results and experimental data,” Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 26, 024002 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6595/26/2/024002, Google ScholarCrossref
  31. 31. B. Gordiets, C. M. Ferreira, M. J. Pinheiro, and A. Ricard, “ Self-consistent kinetic model of low-pressure N2-H2 flowing discharges: I. Volume processes,” Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 7, 363 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-0252/7/3/015, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  32. 32. B. Gordiets, C. M. Ferreira, M. J. Pinheiro, and A. Ricard, “ Self-consistent kinetic model of low-pressure N2-H2 flowing discharges: II. Surface processes and densities of N, H, NH3 species,” Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 7, 379 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-0252/7/3/016, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  33. 33. I. Kaganovich, Y. Raitses, D. Sydorenko, and A. Smolyakov, “ Kinetic effects in a Hall thruster discharge,” Phys. Plasmas 14, 057104 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2709865, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  34. 34. P. A. Sá, J. Loureiro, and C. M. Ferreira, “ Effects of electron-electron collisions on the characteristics of DC and microwave discharges in argon at low pressures,” J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 25, 960 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/25/6/010, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  35. 35. G. J. M. Hagelaar and L. C. Pitchford, “ Solving the Boltzmann equation to obtain electron transport coefficients and rate coefficients for fluid models,” Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 14, 722 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-0252/14/4/011, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  36. 36. A. Fridman and L. Kennedy, Plasma Physics and Engineering ( CRC Press, 2011). Google Scholar
  37. 37. P. Grondein, T. Lafleur, P. Chabert, and A. Aanesland, “ Global model of an iodine gridded plasma thruster,” Phys. Plasmas 23, 033514 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4944882, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  38. 38. J. Boeuf, “ Tutorial: Physics and modeling of Hall thrusters,” J. Appl. Phys. 121, 011101 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4972269, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  39. 39. J. Loureiro and J. Amorim, Kinetics and Spectroscopy of Low Temperature Plasmas ( Springer, Switzerland, 2016), pp. 87–146. Google ScholarCrossref
  40. 40. B. F. Gordiets, C. M. Ferreira, V. L. Guerra, J. M. A. H. Loureiro, J. Nahorny, D. Pagnon, M. Touzeau, and M. Vialle, “ Kinetic model of a low-pressure N2-O2 flowing glow discharge,” IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 23(4), 750–768 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1109/27.467998, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  41. 41. V. L. Marković, Z. L. Petrović, and M. M. Pejović, “ Surface recombination of atoms in a nitrogen afterglow,” J. Chem. Phys. 100, 8514 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.466750, Google ScholarScitation, CAS
  42. 42. V. Guerra, “ Theoretical investigation of the influence of the wall temperature on the probability for surface atomic recombination of a single species,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 45, 8200 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.45.8200, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  43. 43. M. J. Pinheiro, C. M. Ferreira, and G. Gousset, Multicomponent reactive gas dynamic model for low-pressure discharges in flowing oxygen, in Molecular Physics and Hypersonic Flows ( Springer, Netherlands, 1996), pp. 485–494. Google ScholarCrossref
  44. 44. V. H. Granados, M. J. Pinheiro, and P. A. Sá, “ Single-stage EHD thruster response to several simulation conditions in nitrogen gas,” Phys. Plasmas 24, 093508 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4986219, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  45. 45. Y. P. Raizer, in Gas Discharge Physics, edited by J. E. Allen ( Springer Science + Business Media, 1991). Google ScholarCrossref
  46. 46. A. V. Phelps and S. C. Brown, Phys. Rev. 86, 102 (1952). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.86.102, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  47. 47. M. A. Lieberman and A. J. Lichtenberg, Principles of Plasma Discharges and Materials Processing, 2nd ed. ( John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2005). Google ScholarCrossref
  48. Published by AIP Publishing.

Article Metrics

Views
202
Citations
Crossref 3
Web of Science
ISI 1

Altmetric

Please Note: The number of views represents the full text views from December 2016 to date. Article views prior to December 2016 are not included.