ABSTRACT
This paper presents topology optimization for thermal cloaks expressed by level-set functions and explored using the covariance matrix adaptation evolution strategy (CMA-ES). Designed optimal configurations provide superior performances in thermal cloaks for the steady-state thermal conduction and succeed in realizing thermal invisibility, despite the structures being simply composed of iron and aluminum and without inhomogeneities caused by employing metamaterials. To design thermal cloaks, a prescribed objective function is used to evaluate the difference between the temperature field controlled by a thermal cloak and when no thermal insulator is present. The CMA-ES involves searches for optimal sets of level-set functions as design variables that minimize a regularized fitness involving a perimeter constraint. Through topology optimization subject to structural symmetries about four axes, we obtain a concept design of a thermal cloak that functions in an isotropic heat flux.
This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI (Grant No. 17K17778).
REFERENCES
- 1. J. B. Pendry, D. Schurig, and D. R. Smith, Science 312, 1780 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1125907, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
- 2. U. Leonhardt, Science 312, 1777 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1126493, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
- 3. D. Schurig, J. J. Mock, B. J. Justine, S. A. Cummer, J. B. Pendry, A. F. Starr, and D. R. Smith, Science 314, 977 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1133628, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
- 4. Y. Yang, L. Jing, B. Zheng, R. Hao, W. Yin, E. Li, C. M. Soukoulis, and H. Chen, Adv. Mater. 28, 6866 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201600625, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
- 5. M. Selvanayagam and G. V. Eleftheriades, Phys. Rev. X 3, 041011 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.3.041011, Google ScholarCrossref
- 6. L. Shen, B. Zheng, Z. Liu, Z. Wang, S. Lin, S. Dehdashti, E. Li, and H. Chen, Adv. Opt. Mater. 3, 1738 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.201500267, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
- 7. Y. Lai, H. Chen, Z.-Q. Zhang, and C. T. Chan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 093901 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.093901, Google ScholarCrossref
- 8. S. A. Cummer and D. Schurig, New J. Phys. 9, 45 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/9/3/045, Google ScholarCrossref
- 9. H. Chen and C. T. Chan, Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 183518 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2803315, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
- 10. F. Yang, Z. L. Mei, T. Y. Jin, and T. J. Cui, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 053902 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.053902, Google ScholarCrossref
- 11. F. Yang, Z. L. Mei, X. Y. Yang, T. Y. Jin, and T. J. Cui, Adv. Funct. Mater. 23, 4306 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201300226, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
- 12. Y. A. Urzhumov and D. R. Smith, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 074501 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.074501, Google ScholarCrossref
- 13. M. P. Bendsøe and N. Kikuchi, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 71, 197 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(88)90086-2, Google ScholarCrossref
- 14. J. Andkjær, N. A. Mortensen, and O. Sigmund, Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 101106 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3691835, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
- 15. G. Fujii, H. Watanabe, T. Yamada, T. Ueta, and M. Mizuno, Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 251106 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812471, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
- 16. T. Yamada, H. Watanabe, G. Fujii, and T. Matsumoto, IEEE Trans. Magn. 49, 2073 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2013.2243120, Google ScholarCrossref
- 17. N. Kishimoto, K. Izui, S. Nishiwaki, and T. Yamada, Appl. Phys. Lett. 110, 201104 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4983715, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
- 18. G. Fujii, M. Takahashi, and Y. Akimoto, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2018.01.008. Google Scholar
- 19. G. Fujii and T. Ueta, Phys. Rev. E 94, 043301 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.94.043301, Google ScholarCrossref
- 20. G. Fujii, Y. Akimoto, and M. Takahashi, “ Achieving direct current electric invisibility through a topology optimization based on CMA-ES,” J. Appl. Phys. (submitted). Google Scholar
- 21. C. Z. Fan, Y. Gao, and J. P. Huang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 251907 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2951600, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
- 22. T. Chen, C.-N. Weng, and J.-S. Chen, Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 114103 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2988181, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
- 23. S. Guenneau, C. Amra, and D. Veynante, Opt. Exp. 20, 8207 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.008207, Google ScholarCrossref
- 24. R. Schittny, M. Kadic, S. Guenneau, and M. Wegener, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 195901 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.195901, Google ScholarCrossref
- 25. Y. Ma, L. Lan, W. Jiang, F. Sun, and S. He, NPG Asia Mater. 5, e73 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/am.2013.60, Google ScholarCrossref
- 26. E. M. Dede, T. Nomura, and J. Lee, Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 49, 59 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-013-0963-0, Google ScholarCrossref
- 27. T. Han, T. Yuan, B. Li, and C.-W. Qiu, Sci. Rep. 3, 1593 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01593, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
- 28. T. Han, X. Bai, D. Gao, J. T. L. Thong, B. Li, and C.-W. Qiu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 054302 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.054302, Google ScholarCrossref
- 29. H. Xu, X. Shi, F. Gao, H. Sun, and B. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 054301 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.054301, Google ScholarCrossref
- 30. N. Hansen, preprint arXiv:1604.00772 (2016). Google Scholar
- 31. D. M. Nguyen, H. Xu, Y. Zhang, and B. Zhang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 107, 121901 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4930989, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
Please Note: The number of views represents the full text views from December 2016 to date. Article views prior to December 2016 are not included.


