No Access
Published Online: 09 February 2018
Accepted: January 2018
Appl. Phys. Lett. 112, 061108 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5016090
This paper presents topology optimization for thermal cloaks expressed by level-set functions and explored using the covariance matrix adaptation evolution strategy (CMA-ES). Designed optimal configurations provide superior performances in thermal cloaks for the steady-state thermal conduction and succeed in realizing thermal invisibility, despite the structures being simply composed of iron and aluminum and without inhomogeneities caused by employing metamaterials. To design thermal cloaks, a prescribed objective function is used to evaluate the difference between the temperature field controlled by a thermal cloak and when no thermal insulator is present. The CMA-ES involves searches for optimal sets of level-set functions as design variables that minimize a regularized fitness involving a perimeter constraint. Through topology optimization subject to structural symmetries about four axes, we obtain a concept design of a thermal cloak that functions in an isotropic heat flux.
This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI (Grant No. 17K17778).
  1. 1. J. B. Pendry, D. Schurig, and D. R. Smith, Science 312, 1780 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1125907, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  2. 2. U. Leonhardt, Science 312, 1777 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1126493, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  3. 3. D. Schurig, J. J. Mock, B. J. Justine, S. A. Cummer, J. B. Pendry, A. F. Starr, and D. R. Smith, Science 314, 977 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1133628, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  4. 4. Y. Yang, L. Jing, B. Zheng, R. Hao, W. Yin, E. Li, C. M. Soukoulis, and H. Chen, Adv. Mater. 28, 6866 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201600625, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  5. 5. M. Selvanayagam and G. V. Eleftheriades, Phys. Rev. X 3, 041011 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.3.041011, Google ScholarCrossref
  6. 6. L. Shen, B. Zheng, Z. Liu, Z. Wang, S. Lin, S. Dehdashti, E. Li, and H. Chen, Adv. Opt. Mater. 3, 1738 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.201500267, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  7. 7. Y. Lai, H. Chen, Z.-Q. Zhang, and C. T. Chan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 093901 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.093901, Google ScholarCrossref
  8. 8. S. A. Cummer and D. Schurig, New J. Phys. 9, 45 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/9/3/045, Google ScholarCrossref
  9. 9. H. Chen and C. T. Chan, Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 183518 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2803315, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  10. 10. F. Yang, Z. L. Mei, T. Y. Jin, and T. J. Cui, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 053902 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.053902, Google ScholarCrossref
  11. 11. F. Yang, Z. L. Mei, X. Y. Yang, T. Y. Jin, and T. J. Cui, Adv. Funct. Mater. 23, 4306 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201300226, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  12. 12. Y. A. Urzhumov and D. R. Smith, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 074501 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.074501, Google ScholarCrossref
  13. 13. M. P. Bendsøe and N. Kikuchi, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 71, 197 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7825(88)90086-2, Google ScholarCrossref
  14. 14. J. Andkjær, N. A. Mortensen, and O. Sigmund, Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 101106 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3691835, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  15. 15. G. Fujii, H. Watanabe, T. Yamada, T. Ueta, and M. Mizuno, Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 251106 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4812471, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  16. 16. T. Yamada, H. Watanabe, G. Fujii, and T. Matsumoto, IEEE Trans. Magn. 49, 2073 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2013.2243120, Google ScholarCrossref
  17. 17. N. Kishimoto, K. Izui, S. Nishiwaki, and T. Yamada, Appl. Phys. Lett. 110, 201104 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4983715, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  18. 18. G. Fujii, M. Takahashi, and Y. Akimoto, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2018.01.008. Google Scholar
  19. 19. G. Fujii and T. Ueta, Phys. Rev. E 94, 043301 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.94.043301, Google ScholarCrossref
  20. 20. G. Fujii, Y. Akimoto, and M. Takahashi, “ Achieving direct current electric invisibility through a topology optimization based on CMA-ES,” J. Appl. Phys. (submitted). Google Scholar
  21. 21. C. Z. Fan, Y. Gao, and J. P. Huang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 251907 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2951600, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  22. 22. T. Chen, C.-N. Weng, and J.-S. Chen, Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 114103 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2988181, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  23. 23. S. Guenneau, C. Amra, and D. Veynante, Opt. Exp. 20, 8207 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.008207, Google ScholarCrossref
  24. 24. R. Schittny, M. Kadic, S. Guenneau, and M. Wegener, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 195901 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.195901, Google ScholarCrossref
  25. 25. Y. Ma, L. Lan, W. Jiang, F. Sun, and S. He, NPG Asia Mater. 5, e73 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/am.2013.60, Google ScholarCrossref
  26. 26. E. M. Dede, T. Nomura, and J. Lee, Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 49, 59 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-013-0963-0, Google ScholarCrossref
  27. 27. T. Han, T. Yuan, B. Li, and C.-W. Qiu, Sci. Rep. 3, 1593 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01593, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  28. 28. T. Han, X. Bai, D. Gao, J. T. L. Thong, B. Li, and C.-W. Qiu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 054302 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.054302, Google ScholarCrossref
  29. 29. H. Xu, X. Shi, F. Gao, H. Sun, and B. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 054301 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.054301, Google ScholarCrossref
  30. 30. N. Hansen, preprint arXiv:1604.00772 (2016). Google Scholar
  31. 31. D. M. Nguyen, H. Xu, Y. Zhang, and B. Zhang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 107, 121901 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4930989, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  1. Published by AIP Publishing.