No Access Submitted: 06 November 2017 Accepted: 26 March 2018 Published Online: 11 April 2018
Chaos 28, 043111 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5012519
This paper aims to report two novel bursting patterns, the turnover-of-pitchfork-hysteresis-induced bursting and the compound pitchfork-hysteresis bursting, demonstrated for the Duffing system with multiple-frequency parametric excitations. Typically, a hysteresis behavior between the origin and non-zero equilibria of the fast subsystem can be observed due to delayed pitchfork bifurcation. Based on numerical analysis, we show that the stable equilibrium branches, related to the non-zero equilibria resulted from the pitchfork bifurcation, may become the ones with twists and turns. Then, the novel bursting pattern turnover-of-pitchfork-hysteresis-induced bursting is revealed accordingly. In particular, we show that additional pitchfork bifurcation points may appear in the fast subsystem under certain parameter conditions. This creates multiple delay-induced hysteresis behavior and helps us to reveal the other novel bursting pattern, the compound pitchfork-hysteresis bursting. Besides, effects of parameters on the bursting patterns are studied to explore the relation of these two novel bursting patterns.
The authors express their gratitude to the editor and the anonymous reviewers whose comments and suggestions helped in the improvement of this paper. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11572141, 11632008, 11772161, and 11502091) and the Training Project for Young Backbone Teacher of Jiangsu University.
  1. 1. M. Desroches, J. Guckenheimer, B. Krauskopf, C. Kuehn, H. M. Osinga, and M. Wechselberger, SIAM Rev. 54, 211 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1137/100791233, Google ScholarCrossref
  2. 2. J. Y. Hou, X. H. Li, and J. F. Chen, J. Vibroeng. 18, 4812 (2016). https://doi.org/10.21595/jve.2016.17197, Google ScholarCrossref
  3. 3. A. Vidal, Lect. Notes Control Inf. Sci. 341, 439 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-34774-7, Google ScholarCrossref
  4. 4. G. V. Savino and C. M. Formigli, Biosystems 97, 9 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2009.03.005, Google ScholarCrossref
  5. 5. E. M. Izhikevich, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 14, 1569 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1109/TNN.2003.820440, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  6. 6. S. Liepelt, J. A. Freund, L. Schimansky-Geier, A. Neiman, and D. F. Russell, J. Theor. Biol. 237, 30 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2005.03.029, Google ScholarCrossref
  7. 7. Q. S. Lu, H. G. Gu, Z. Q. Yang, X. Shi, L. X. Duan, and Y. H. Zheng, Acta Mech. Sin. 24, 593 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-008-0204-8, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  8. 8. A. N. Pisarchika and U. Feudel, Phys. Rep. 540, 167 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2014.02.007, Google ScholarCrossref
  9. 9. M. Krupa, A. Vidal, M. Desroches, and F. Clément, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst. 11, 1458 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1137/110860136, Google ScholarCrossref
  10. 10. R. Curtu, Physica D 239, 504 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2009.12.010, Google ScholarCrossref
  11. 11. O. V. Maslennikov and V. I. Nekorkin, Chaos 23, 023129 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4811545, Google ScholarScitation
  12. 12. X. J. Han, F. B. Xia, C. Zhang, and Y. Yu, Nonlinear Dyn. 88, 2693 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-017-3403-7, Google ScholarCrossref
  13. 13. C. Kuehn, Multiple Time Scale Dynamics ( Springer, Berlin, 2015). Google ScholarCrossref
  14. 14. E. M. Izhikevich, Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos 10, 1171 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127400000840, Google ScholarCrossref
  15. 15. H. Simo and P. Woafo, Mech. Res. Commun. 38, 537 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechrescom.2011.07.007, Google ScholarCrossref
  16. 16. X. H. Li and J. Y. Hou, Int. J. Nonlinear Mech. 81, 165 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2016.01.014, Google ScholarCrossref
  17. 17. Z. Rakaric and I. Kovacic, Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 81, 35 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2016.03.006, Google ScholarCrossref
  18. 18. X. J. Han and Q. S. Bi, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 16, 4146 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2011.02.021, Google ScholarCrossref
  19. 19. M. Golubitsky, K. Josic, and T. J. Kaper, in Global Analysis of Dynamical Systems: Festschrift Dedicated to Floris Takens on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday, edited by H. W. Broer , B. Krauskopf , and G. Vegter ( Institute of Physics, Bristol, 2001), pp. 277–308. Google Scholar
  20. 20. H. M. Osinga, A. Sherman, and K. Tsaneva-Atanasovac, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. A 32, 2853 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3934/dcds.2012.32.2853, Google ScholarCrossref
  21. 21. M. L. Saggio, A. Spiegler, C. Bernard, and V. K. Jirsa, J. Math. Neurosci. 7, 7 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13408-017-0050-8, Google ScholarCrossref
  22. 22. X. J. Han, Q. S. Bi, P. Ji, and J. Kurths, Phys. Rev. E 92, 012911 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.92.012911, Google ScholarCrossref
  23. 23. X. J. Han, Y. Yu, C. Zhang, F. B. Xia, and Q. S. Bi, Int. J. Nonlinear Mech. 89, 69 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2016.11.008, Google ScholarCrossref
  24. 24. G. J. M. Maree, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 56, 889 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1137/S0036139993257399, Google ScholarCrossref
  25. 25. N. Berglund and H. Kunz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1691 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.1691, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  26. 26. X. J. Han, Q. S. Bi, C. Zhang, and Y. Yu, Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos 24, 1450098 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127414500989, Google ScholarCrossref
  27. 27. X. J. Han and Q. S. Bi, Sci. China Technol. Sci. 55, 702 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-011-4655-y, Google ScholarCrossref
  28. 28. L. X. Duan, Q. S. Lu, and Q. Y. Wang, Neurocomputing 72, 341 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2008.01.019, Google ScholarCrossref
  29. 29. Q. S. Lu, Z. Q. Yang, L. X. Duan, H. G. Gu, and W. Ren, Chaos Solitons Fractals 40, 577 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2007.08.040, Google ScholarCrossref
  30. 30. B. Ibarz, J. M. Casado, and M. A. F. Sanjuán, Phys. Rep. 501, 1 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2010.12.003, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  31. 31. O. V. Maslennikov and V. I. Nekorkin, Chaos 26, 073104 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4955084, Google ScholarScitation
  32. 32. X. J. Han, Y. Yu, and C. Zhang, Nonlinear Dyn. 88, 2889 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-017-3418-0, Google ScholarCrossref
  33. 33. J. C. Butcher, Numerical Methods for Ordinary Differential Equations ( Wiley, New York, 2008). Google ScholarCrossref
  34. 34. E. Jakobsson and R. Guttman, “ Continuous stimulation and threshold of axons: The other legacy of Kenneth Cole,” in The Biophysical Approach to Excitable Systems, edited by W. J. Adelman and D. E. Goldman ( Plenum, New York, 1981), pp. 197–211. Google ScholarCrossref
  35. 35. J. Z. Su, “ The phenomenon of delayed bifurcation and its analyses,” in Multiple-Time-Scale Dynamical Systems, edited by C. K. R. T. Jones and A. I. Khibnik ( Springer, New York, 2001), pp. 203–214. Google ScholarCrossref
  1. © 2018 Author(s). Published by AIP Publishing.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Proin imperdiet nibh sed ipsum molestie eu mattis justo malesuada. Curabitur id quam augue, ac eleifend justo. Integer eget metus sagittis velit semper auctor vel et nunc. Phasellus tempus felis at arcu fringilla at ndimentum libero placerat. Aenean ut imperdiet dolor. Nulla pretium mi vestibulum dui dictum sed ullamcorper tellus sodales. Duis non nibh id ipsum feugiat imperdiet id fermentum nunc. Maecenas id ultricies felis. Suspendisse lacinia rhoncus vestibulum. Vestibulum molestie vulputate convallis.Fusce et augue erat, nec mollis mi.