No Access Submitted: 15 July 2017 Accepted: 19 September 2017 Published Online: 03 October 2017
Chaos 27, 103102 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4996264
We study the transport of a particle subjected to a Lévy noise in a rough ratchet potential which is constructed by superimposing a fast oscillating trigonometric function on a common ratchet background. Due to the superposition of roughness, the transport process exhibits significantly different properties under the excitation of Lévy noises compared to smooth cases. The influence of the roughness on the directional motion is explored by calculating the mean velocities with respect to the Lévy stable index α and the spatial asymmetry parameter q of the ratchet. Variations in the splitting probability have been analyzed to illustrate how roughness affects the transport. In addition, we have examined the influences of roughness on the mean first passage time to know when it accelerates or slows down the first passage process. We find that the roughness can lead to a fast reduction of the absolute value of the mean velocity for small α, however the influence is small for large α. We have illustrated that the ladder-like roughness on the potential wall increases the possibility for particles to cross the gentle side of the ratchet, which results in an increase of the splitting probability to right for the right-skewed ratchet potential. Although the roughness increases the corresponding probability, it does not accelerate the mean first passage process to the right adjacent well. Our results show that the influences of roughness on the mean first passage time are sensitive to the combination of q and α. Hence, the proper q and α can speed up the passage process, otherwise it will slow down it.
This work was supported by the NSF of China (Grant No. 11772255), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, the Innovation foundation for doctor dissertation, and the Top International University Visiting Program for Outstanding Young scholars of NPU. Y.X. would like to thank the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation.
  1. 1. C. V. Broeck, R. Kawai, and P. Meurs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 090601 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.090601, Google ScholarCrossref
  2. 2. G. Carlo, G. Benenti, G. Casati, and D. Shepelyansky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 164101 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.164101, Google ScholarCrossref
  3. 3. B. Lisowski, D. Valenti et al., Phys. Rev. E 91, 042713 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.91.042713, Google ScholarCrossref
  4. 4. Y. Xu, Y. G. Li et al., Sci. Rep. 6, 31505 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep31505, Google ScholarCrossref
  5. 5. J. Wu, Y. Xu, H. Y. Wang, and J. Kurths, Chaos 27, 063105 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4984806, Google ScholarScitation
  6. 6. Z. Wang, Y. Xu, and H. Yang, Sci. China Technol. Sci. 59(3), 371 (2016). Google ScholarCrossref
  7. 7. Y. Xu, H. Li et al., J. Appl. Mech. 84, 091004 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4037158. Google ScholarCrossref
  8. 8. P. Reimann, Phys. Rep. 361, 57 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-1573(01)00081-3, Google ScholarCrossref
  9. 9. P. Hänggi and F. Marchesoni, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 387 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.387, Google ScholarCrossref
  10. 10. R. Y. Chen, W. L. Pan, J. Q. Zhang, and L. R. Nie, Chaos 26, 093113 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4961966, Google ScholarScitation
  11. 11. J. Spiechowicz, M. Kostur, and J. Łuczka, Chaos 27, 023111 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4976586, Google ScholarScitation
  12. 12. Y. Xu, Q. Liu, G. B. Guo, C. Xu, and D. Liu, Nonlinear Dyn. 89, 1579 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-017-3536-8. Google ScholarCrossref
  13. 13. F. Matthaus, M. S. Mommer, T. Curk, and J. Dobnikar, PLoS One 6, e18623 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018623, Google ScholarCrossref
  14. 14. G. M. Viswanathan, V. Afanasyev et al., Nature 381, 413 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1038/381413a0, Google ScholarCrossref
  15. 15. O. Sotolongo-Costa, J. C. Antoranz et al., Geophys. Res. Lett. 27, 1965, doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GL011394 (2000). Google ScholarCrossref
  16. 16. X. R. Shen, H. Zhang, Y. Xu, and S. X. Meng, IEEE Sens. J. 16, 1998 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2015.2506120, Google ScholarCrossref
  17. 17. P. D. Ditlevsen, Geophys. Res. Lett. 26, 1441, doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL900252 (1999). Google ScholarCrossref
  18. 18. P. Barthelemy, J. Bertolotti, and D. S. Wiersma, Nature 453, 495 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06948, Google ScholarCrossref
  19. 19. A. Singh and M. Soltani, PLoS One 8, e84301 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084301, Google ScholarCrossref
  20. 20. B. Munsky, G. Neuert, and A. Oudenaarden, Science 336, 183 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1216379, Google ScholarCrossref
  21. 21. C. P. Brangwynne, G. H. Koenderink, F. C. MacKintosh, and D. A. Weitz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 118104 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.118104, Google ScholarCrossref
  22. 22. D. Robert, T. Nguyen, F. Gallet, and C. Wilhelm, PLoS One 5, e10046 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010046, Google ScholarCrossref
  23. 23. J. Wu, Y. Xu, and J. Ma, PLoS One 12(3), e0174330 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174330, Google ScholarCrossref
  24. 24. E. Barkai, Y. Garini, and R. Metzler, Phys. Today 65(8), 29 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1063/PT.3.1677, Google ScholarCrossref
  25. 25. I. Pavlyukevich, B. Dybiec, A. Chechkin, and I. M. Sokolov, Eur. Phys. J.: Spec. Top. 191, 223 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2010-01352-6, Google ScholarCrossref
  26. 26. I. Pavlyukevich, Y. G. Li, Y. Xu, and A. Chechkin, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 48, 495004 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/48/49/495004, Google ScholarCrossref
  27. 27. C. Guarcello, D. Valenti, A. Carollo, and B. Spagnolo, J. Stat. Mech. 05, 054012 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2016/05/054012, Google ScholarCrossref
  28. 28. B. Dybiec, E. Gudowska-Nowak, and I. M. Sokolov, Phys. Rev. E 78, 011117 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.78.011117, Google ScholarCrossref
  29. 29. D. del-Castillo-Negrete, V. Y. Gonchar, and A. Chechkin, Physica A 387, 6693 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2008.08.034, Google ScholarCrossref
  30. 30. S. Risau-Gusman, S. Ibáñez, and S. Bouzat, Phys. Rev. E 87, 022105 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.87.022105, Google ScholarCrossref
  31. 31. H. Frauenfelder, S. G. Sligar, and P. G. Wolynes, Science 254, 1598 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1749933, Google ScholarCrossref
  32. 32. A. Ansari, J. Berendzen et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 82, 5000 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.82.15.5000, Google ScholarCrossref
  33. 33. R. Zwanzig, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 85, 2029 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.85.7.2029, Google ScholarCrossref
  34. 34. C. Hyeon and D. Thirumalai, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 10249 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1833310100, Google ScholarCrossref
  35. 35. R. Nevo, V. Brumfeld, R. Kapon, P. Hinterdorfer, and Z. Reich, EMBO Rep. 6, 482 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7400403, Google ScholarCrossref
  36. 36. L. Delemotte, M. A. Kasimova et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, 124 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1416959112, Google ScholarCrossref
  37. 37. T. Linder, B. L. de Groot, and A. Stary-Weinzinger, PLoS Comput. Biol. 9, e1003058 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003058, Google ScholarCrossref
  38. 38. P. Charbonneau, J. Kurchan et al., Nat. Commun. 5, 3725 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4725, Google ScholarCrossref
  39. 39. J. C. Ye, J. Lu et al., Nat. Mater. 9, 619 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat2802, Google ScholarCrossref
  40. 40. I. Golding and E. C. Cox, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 098102 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.098102, Google ScholarCrossref
  41. 41. D. M. Webber, V. Tishchenko et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 041803 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.041803, Google ScholarCrossref
  42. 42. A. Heuer, B. Doliwa, and A. Saksaengwijit, Phys. Rev. E 72, 021503 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.72.021503, Google ScholarCrossref
  43. 43. P. G. Debenedetti and F. H. Stillinger, Nature 410, 259 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/35065704, Google ScholarCrossref
  44. 44. D. Mondal, P. K. Ghosh, and D. S. Ray, J. Chem. Phys. 130, 074703 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3076934, Google ScholarScitation
  45. 45. Y. G. Li, Y. Xu, J. Kurths, and X. L. Yue, Phys. Rev. E 94, 042222 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.94.042222, Google ScholarCrossref
  46. 46. J. Howard, Mechanics of Motor Proteins and the Cytoskeletons ( Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, 2001). Google Scholar
  47. 47. H. Katori, S. Schlipf, and H. Walther, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79(12), 2221 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.2221, Google ScholarCrossref
  1. © 2017 Author(s). Published by AIP Publishing.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Proin imperdiet nibh sed ipsum molestie eu mattis justo malesuada. Curabitur id quam augue, ac eleifend justo. Integer eget metus sagittis velit semper auctor vel et nunc. Phasellus tempus felis at arcu fringilla at ndimentum libero placerat. Aenean ut imperdiet dolor. Nulla pretium mi vestibulum dui dictum sed ullamcorper tellus sodales. Duis non nibh id ipsum feugiat imperdiet id fermentum nunc. Maecenas id ultricies felis. Suspendisse lacinia rhoncus vestibulum. Vestibulum molestie vulputate convallis.Fusce et augue erat, nec mollis mi.