ABSTRACT
We study the transport of a particle subjected to a Lévy noise in a rough ratchet potential which is constructed by superimposing a fast oscillating trigonometric function on a common ratchet background. Due to the superposition of roughness, the transport process exhibits significantly different properties under the excitation of Lévy noises compared to smooth cases. The influence of the roughness on the directional motion is explored by calculating the mean velocities with respect to the Lévy stable index and the spatial asymmetry parameter of the ratchet. Variations in the splitting probability have been analyzed to illustrate how roughness affects the transport. In addition, we have examined the influences of roughness on the mean first passage time to know when it accelerates or slows down the first passage process. We find that the roughness can lead to a fast reduction of the absolute value of the mean velocity for small , however the influence is small for large . We have illustrated that the ladder-like roughness on the potential wall increases the possibility for particles to cross the gentle side of the ratchet, which results in an increase of the splitting probability to right for the right-skewed ratchet potential. Although the roughness increases the corresponding probability, it does not accelerate the mean first passage process to the right adjacent well. Our results show that the influences of roughness on the mean first passage time are sensitive to the combination of and . Hence, the proper and can speed up the passage process, otherwise it will slow down it.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the NSF of China (Grant No. 11772255), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, the Innovation foundation for doctor dissertation, and the Top International University Visiting Program for Outstanding Young scholars of NPU. Y.X. would like to thank the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation.
REFERENCES
- 1. C. V. Broeck, R. Kawai, and P. Meurs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 090601 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.090601, Google ScholarCrossref
- 2. G. Carlo, G. Benenti, G. Casati, and D. Shepelyansky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 164101 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.164101, Google ScholarCrossref
- 3. B. Lisowski, D. Valenti et al., Phys. Rev. E 91, 042713 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.91.042713, Google ScholarCrossref
- 4. Y. Xu, Y. G. Li et al., Sci. Rep. 6, 31505 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep31505, Google ScholarCrossref
- 5. J. Wu, Y. Xu, H. Y. Wang, and J. Kurths, Chaos 27, 063105 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4984806, Google ScholarScitation
- 6. Z. Wang, Y. Xu, and H. Yang, Sci. China Technol. Sci. 59(3), 371 (2016). Google ScholarCrossref
- 7. Y. Xu, H. Li et al., J. Appl. Mech. 84, 091004 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4037158. Google ScholarCrossref
- 8. P. Reimann, Phys. Rep. 361, 57 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-1573(01)00081-3, Google ScholarCrossref
- 9. P. Hänggi and F. Marchesoni, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 387 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.387, Google ScholarCrossref
- 10. R. Y. Chen, W. L. Pan, J. Q. Zhang, and L. R. Nie, Chaos 26, 093113 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4961966, Google ScholarScitation
- 11. J. Spiechowicz, M. Kostur, and J. Łuczka, Chaos 27, 023111 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4976586, Google ScholarScitation
- 12. Y. Xu, Q. Liu, G. B. Guo, C. Xu, and D. Liu, Nonlinear Dyn. 89, 1579 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-017-3536-8. Google ScholarCrossref
- 13. F. Matthaus, M. S. Mommer, T. Curk, and J. Dobnikar, PLoS One 6, e18623 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018623, Google ScholarCrossref
- 14. G. M. Viswanathan, V. Afanasyev et al., Nature 381, 413 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1038/381413a0, Google ScholarCrossref
- 15. O. Sotolongo-Costa, J. C. Antoranz et al., Geophys. Res. Lett. 27, 1965, doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2000GL011394 (2000). Google ScholarCrossref
- 16. X. R. Shen, H. Zhang, Y. Xu, and S. X. Meng, IEEE Sens. J. 16, 1998 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2015.2506120, Google ScholarCrossref
- 17. P. D. Ditlevsen, Geophys. Res. Lett. 26, 1441, doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/1999GL900252 (1999). Google ScholarCrossref
- 18. P. Barthelemy, J. Bertolotti, and D. S. Wiersma, Nature 453, 495 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06948, Google ScholarCrossref
- 19. A. Singh and M. Soltani, PLoS One 8, e84301 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084301, Google ScholarCrossref
- 20. B. Munsky, G. Neuert, and A. Oudenaarden, Science 336, 183 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1216379, Google ScholarCrossref
- 21. C. P. Brangwynne, G. H. Koenderink, F. C. MacKintosh, and D. A. Weitz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 118104 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.118104, Google ScholarCrossref
- 22. D. Robert, T. Nguyen, F. Gallet, and C. Wilhelm, PLoS One 5, e10046 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010046, Google ScholarCrossref
- 23. J. Wu, Y. Xu, and J. Ma, PLoS One 12(3), e0174330 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174330, Google ScholarCrossref
- 24. E. Barkai, Y. Garini, and R. Metzler, Phys. Today 65(8), 29 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1063/PT.3.1677, Google ScholarCrossref
- 25. I. Pavlyukevich, B. Dybiec, A. Chechkin, and I. M. Sokolov, Eur. Phys. J.: Spec. Top. 191, 223 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2010-01352-6, Google ScholarCrossref
- 26. I. Pavlyukevich, Y. G. Li, Y. Xu, and A. Chechkin, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 48, 495004 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/48/49/495004, Google ScholarCrossref
- 27. C. Guarcello, D. Valenti, A. Carollo, and B. Spagnolo, J. Stat. Mech. 05, 054012 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2016/05/054012, Google ScholarCrossref
- 28. B. Dybiec, E. Gudowska-Nowak, and I. M. Sokolov, Phys. Rev. E 78, 011117 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.78.011117, Google ScholarCrossref
- 29. D. del-Castillo-Negrete, V. Y. Gonchar, and A. Chechkin, Physica A 387, 6693 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2008.08.034, Google ScholarCrossref
- 30. S. Risau-Gusman, S. Ibáñez, and S. Bouzat, Phys. Rev. E 87, 022105 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.87.022105, Google ScholarCrossref
- 31. H. Frauenfelder, S. G. Sligar, and P. G. Wolynes, Science 254, 1598 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1749933, Google ScholarCrossref
- 32. A. Ansari, J. Berendzen et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 82, 5000 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.82.15.5000, Google ScholarCrossref
- 33. R. Zwanzig, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 85, 2029 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.85.7.2029, Google ScholarCrossref
- 34. C. Hyeon and D. Thirumalai, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 10249 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1833310100, Google ScholarCrossref
- 35. R. Nevo, V. Brumfeld, R. Kapon, P. Hinterdorfer, and Z. Reich, EMBO Rep. 6, 482 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7400403, Google ScholarCrossref
- 36. L. Delemotte, M. A. Kasimova et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, 124 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1416959112, Google ScholarCrossref
- 37. T. Linder, B. L. de Groot, and A. Stary-Weinzinger, PLoS Comput. Biol. 9, e1003058 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003058, Google ScholarCrossref
- 38. P. Charbonneau, J. Kurchan et al., Nat. Commun. 5, 3725 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4725, Google ScholarCrossref
- 39. J. C. Ye, J. Lu et al., Nat. Mater. 9, 619 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat2802, Google ScholarCrossref
- 40. I. Golding and E. C. Cox, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 098102 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.098102, Google ScholarCrossref
- 41. D. M. Webber, V. Tishchenko et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 041803 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.041803, Google ScholarCrossref
- 42. A. Heuer, B. Doliwa, and A. Saksaengwijit, Phys. Rev. E 72, 021503 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.72.021503, Google ScholarCrossref
- 43. P. G. Debenedetti and F. H. Stillinger, Nature 410, 259 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/35065704, Google ScholarCrossref
- 44. D. Mondal, P. K. Ghosh, and D. S. Ray, J. Chem. Phys. 130, 074703 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3076934, Google ScholarScitation
- 45. Y. G. Li, Y. Xu, J. Kurths, and X. L. Yue, Phys. Rev. E 94, 042222 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.94.042222, Google ScholarCrossref
- 46. J. Howard, Mechanics of Motor Proteins and the Cytoskeletons ( Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, 2001). Google Scholar
- 47. H. Katori, S. Schlipf, and H. Walther, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79(12), 2221 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.2221, Google ScholarCrossref
Please Note: The number of views represents the full text views from December 2016 to date. Article views prior to December 2016 are not included.


