Abstract
Thermal analysis of battery geometries is essential for applications, as the thermal behavior of a battery influences its cycling life. Two geometries, square frame and conventional, have been studied for a scan rate of 290C. The square frame shows a capacity value of 290,15 Ahm−2 which is 446 times higher than the one for the conventional geometry, when the area is maintained constant for all components. In the adiabatic model, the square frame geometry has higher capacity value in comparison to the conventional geometry.
REFERENCES
- 1. M. Wakihara, O. Yamamoto, Lithium ion batteries: fundamentals and performance, Kodansha, 1998. Google ScholarCrossref
- 2. B. Scrosati, J. Garche, J Power Sources, 195 (2010) 2419–2430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.048, Google ScholarCrossref
- 3. D. Miranda, et al., Applied Energy, 165 (2016) 318–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.12.068, Google ScholarCrossref
- 4. D. Miranda, et al., AIP Conference Proceedings, 1738 (2016) 370010. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4952155, Google ScholarScitation
- 5. D. H. Jeon, Current Applied Physics, 14 (2014) 196–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cap.2013.11.006, Google ScholarCrossref
- 6. D. Miranda, et al., Journal of Eletroanalytical Chemistry, 739 (2015) 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2014.12.010, Google ScholarCrossref
- 7. M. Doyle, et al., J. Electrochem. Soc., 143 (1996) 1890–1903. https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1836921, Google ScholarCrossref
Published by AIP Publishing.
Please Note: The number of views represents the full text views from December 2016 to date. Article views prior to December 2016 are not included.

