ABSTRACT
We investigate the logical information transmission of a synthetic gene network under Lévy flight superdiffusion by an information-based methodology. We first present the stochastic synthetic gene network model driven by a square wave signal under Lévy noise caused by Lévy flight superdiffusion. Then, to quantify the potential of logical information transmission and logical stochastic resonance, we theoretically obtain an information-based methodology of the symbol error rate, the noise entropy, and the mutual information of the logical information transmission. Consequently, based on the complementary “on” and “off” states shown in the logical information transmission for the repressive proteins, we numerically calculate the symbol error rate for logic gates, which demonstrate that the synthetic gene network under Lévy noise can achieve some logic gates as well as logical stochastic resonance. Furthermore, we calculate the noise entropy and the mutual information between the square wave signal and the logical information transmission, which reveal and quantify the potential of logical information transmission and logical stochastic resonance. In addition, we analyze the synchronization degree of the mutual information for the accomplished logical stochastic resonance of two repressive proteins of the synthetic gene network by synchronization variances, which shows that those mutual information changes almost synchronously.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 11602003 and 11372247. Y. Xu acknowledges the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.
REFERENCES
- 1. T. S. Gardner, C. R. Cantor, and J. J. Collins, Nature 403(6767), 339–342 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/35002131, Google ScholarCrossref
- 2. H. Kobayashi, M. Kaern, M. Araki, K. Chung, T. S. Gardner, C. R. Cantor, and J. J. Collins, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101(22), 8414–8419 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0402940101, Google ScholarCrossref
- 3. B. B. Mandelbrot, The Fractal Geometry of Nature. ( W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1982). Google Scholar
- 4. M. F. Shlesinger and J. Klafter, Lévy Walks Versus Lévy Flights ( Springer Netherlands, 1986). Google ScholarCrossref
- 5. S. G. Nurzaman, Y. Matsumoto, Y. Nakamura, K. Shirai, S. Koizumi, and H. Ishiguro, PLoS One 6(2), e16168 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016168, Google ScholarCrossref
- 6. A. A. Dubkov and A. A. Kharcheva, Europhys. Lett. 113(3), 30009 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/113/30009, Google ScholarCrossref
- 7. A. A. Dubkov, B. Spagnolo, and V. V. Uchaikin, Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos 18(9), 2649–2672 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127408021877, Google ScholarCrossref
- 8. Z. Wang, Y. Xu, and H. Yang, Sci. China Technol. Sci. 59(3), 371–375 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-015-6001-2, Google ScholarCrossref
- 9. M. Strasser, F. J. Theis, and C. Marr, Biophys. J. 102(1), 19–29 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2011.11.4000, Google ScholarCrossref
- 10. C. H. Zeng, T. Yang, Q. L. Han, C. Zhang, D. Tian, and H. Wang, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 28(31), 1450223 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217979214502233, Google ScholarCrossref
- 11. J. W. Wang, J. J. Zhang, Z. J. Yuan, and T. S. Zhou, BMC Syst. Biol. 1, 50 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-1-50, Google ScholarCrossref
- 12. Y. Xu, Y. N. Zhu, J. W. Shen, and J. B. Su, Physica A 416, 461–466 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2014.08.042, Google ScholarCrossref
- 13. Y. Li, Y. Xu, J. Kurths, and X. Yue, Phys. Rev. E 94(4), 042222 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.94.042222, Google ScholarCrossref
- 14. H. Chen, P. Thill, and J. Cao, J. Chem. Phys. 144(17), 175104 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4948461, Google ScholarScitation
- 15. Y. Xu, J. Feng, J. J. Li, and H. Q. Zhang, Chaos 23(1), 013110 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4775758, Google ScholarScitation
- 16. Y. Xu, Y. Li, H. Zhang, X. Li, and J. Kurths, Sci. Rep. 6, 31505 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep31505, Google ScholarCrossref
- 17. A. Daza, A. Wagemakers, S. Rajasekar, and M. A. F. Sanjuan, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. 18(2), 411–416 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2012.07.010, Google ScholarCrossref
- 18. A. Sharma, V. Kohar, M. D. Shrimali, and S. Sinha, Nonlinear Dyn. 76(1), 431–439 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-013-1136-9, Google ScholarCrossref
- 19. Y. Xu, J. Wu, H. Q. Zhang, and S. J. Ma, Nonlinear Dyn. 70(70), 531–539 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-012-0473-4, Google ScholarCrossref
- 20. Y. Xu, J. Wu, L. Du, and H. Yang, Chaos, Solitons Fractals 92, 91–100 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2016.09.015, Google ScholarCrossref
- 21. Y. Xu, X. Jin, and H. Zhang, Phys. Rev. E 88(5), 052721 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.88.052721, Google ScholarCrossref
- 22. E. H. Hellen, S. K. Dana, J. Kurths, E. Kehler, and S. Sinha, PLoS One 8, e76032 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076032, Google ScholarCrossref
- 23. A. Dari, B. Kia, X. Wang, A. R. Bulsara, and W. Ditto, Phys. Rev. E 83(4 Pt 1), 041909 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.83.041909, Google ScholarCrossref
- 24. Y. Xu, X. Jin, H. Zhang, and T. Yang, J. Stat. Phys. 152(4), 753–768 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-013-0782-0, Google ScholarCrossref
- 25. K. Murali, S. Sinha, W. L. Ditto, and A. R. Bulsara, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102(10), 104101 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.104101, Google ScholarCrossref
- 26. A. Dari, B. Kia, A. R. Bulsara, and W. L. Ditto, Chaos 21(4), 047521 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3660159, Google ScholarScitation
- 27. H. Ando, S. Sinha, R. Storni, and K. Aihara, EPL 93(5), 50001 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/93/50001, Google ScholarCrossref
- 28. K. Hlaváčková-Schindler, M. Paluš, M. Vejmelka, and J. Bhattacharya, Phys. Rep. 441(1), 1–46 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2006.12.004, Google ScholarCrossref
- 29. E. Bianco-Martinez, N. Rubido, C. G. Antonopoulos, and M. S. Baptista, Chaos 26(4), 043102 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4945420, Google ScholarScitation
- 30. A. Janicki and A. Weron, Simulation and Chaotic Behavior of Alpha-Stable Stochastic Processes ( Marcel Dekker INC, New York, 1994). Google Scholar
- 31. J. Hasty, J. Pradines, M. Dolnik, and J. J. Collins, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97(5), 2075–2080 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.040411297, Google ScholarCrossref
- 32. L. Z. Zeng, R. H. Bao, and B. H. Xu, J. Phys. A - Math. Theor. 40(26), 7175–7185 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/40/26/005, Google ScholarCrossref
- 33. M. Andrecut and S. A. Kauffman, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 20(29), 4947–4963 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1142/S021797920603576X, Google ScholarCrossref
Please Note: The number of views represents the full text views from December 2016 to date. Article views prior to December 2016 are not included.


