Published Online: 21 March 2017
Accepted: February 2017
Appl. Phys. Lett. 110, 122404 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4977946
more...View Affiliations
Epitaxial Fe/magnesium gallium spinel oxide (MgGa2O4)/Fe(001) magnetic tunnel junctions (MTJs) were fabricated by magnetron sputtering. A tunnel magnetoresistance (TMR) ratio up to 121% at room temperature (196% at 4 K) was observed, suggesting a TMR enhancement by the coherent tunneling effect in the MgGa2O4 barrier. The MgGa2O4 layer had a spinel structure and it showed good lattice matching with the Fe layers owing to slight tetragonal lattice distortion of MgGa2O4. Barrier thickness dependence of the tunneling resistance and current-voltage characteristics revealed that the height of the MgGa2O4 barrier is much lower than that of an MgAl2O4 barrier. This study demonstrates the potential of Ga-based spinel oxides for MTJ barriers having a large TMR ratio at a low resistance area product.
  1. 1. H. J. M. Swagten, in Handbook of Magnetic Materials, edited by K. H. J. Buschow ( Elsevier Science, 2007), Vol. 17, p. 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1567-2719(07)17001-3, Google ScholarCrossref
  2. 2. W. H. Butler, X.-G. Zhang, T. C. Schulthess, and J. M. MacLaren, Phys. Rev. B 63, 054416 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.63.054416, Google ScholarCrossref
  3. 3. J. Mathon and A. Umersky, Phys. Rev. B 63, 220403(R) (2001). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.63.220403, Google ScholarCrossref
  4. 4. S. S. P. Parkin, C. Kaiser, A. Panchula, P. M. Rice, B. Hughes, M. Samant, and S.-H. Yang, Nat. Mater. 3, 862 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1256, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  5. 5. S. Yuasa, T. Nagahama, A. Fukushima, Y. Suzuki, and K. Ando, Nat. Mater. 3, 868 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1257, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  6. 6. Y. Uehara, A. Furuya, K. Sunaga, T. Miyajima, and H. Kanai, J. Magn. Soc. Jpn. 34, 311 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3379/msjmag.1003R027, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  7. 7. D. L. Li, Q. L. Ma, S. G. Wang, R. C. C. Ward, T. Hesjedal, X.-G. Zhang, A. Kohn, E. Amsellem, G. Yang, J. L. Liu, J. Jiang, H. X. Wei, and X. F. Han, Sci. Rep. 4, 7277 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep07277, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  8. 8. Ikhtiar, S. Kasai, P.-H. Cheng, T. Ohkubo, Y. K. Takahashi, T. Furubayashi, and K. Hono, Appl. Phys. Lett. 108, 242416 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4953783, Google ScholarScitation
  9. 9. H. Sukegawa, H. Xiu, T. Ohkubo, T. Furubayashi, T. Niizeki, W. Wang, S. Kasai, S. Mitani, K. Inomata, and K. Hono, Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 212505 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3441409, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  10. 10. Y. Miura, S. Muramoto, K. Abe, and M. Shirai, Phys. Rev. B 86, 24426 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.86.024426, Google ScholarCrossref
  11. 11. H. Sukegawa, Y. Miura, S. Muramoto, S. Mitani, T. Niizeki, T. Ohkubo, K. Abe, M. Shirai, K. Inomata, and K. Hono, Phys. Rev. B 86, 184401 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.86.184401, Google ScholarCrossref
  12. 12. T. Scheike, H. Sukegawa, K. Inomata, T. Ohkubo, K. Hono, and S. Mitani, Appl. Phys. Express 9, 53004 (2016). https://doi.org/10.7567/APEX.9.053004, Google ScholarCrossref
  13. 13. N. Matsuo, N. Doko, T. Takada, H. Saito, and S. Yuasa, Phys. Rev. Appl. 6, 034011 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.6.034011, Google ScholarCrossref
  14. 14. T. Scheike, H. Sukegawa, and S. Mitani, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 55, 110310 (2016). https://doi.org/10.7567/JJAP.55.110310, Google ScholarCrossref
  15. 15. Y.-N. Xu and W. Y. Ching, Phys. Rev. B 43, 4461 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.43.4461, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  16. 16. H. Sukegawa, S. Mitani, T. Ohkubo, K. Inomata, and K. Hono, Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 142409 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4824134, Google ScholarScitation
  17. 17. J. Zhang, X.-G. Zhang, and X. F. Han, Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 222401 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4722804, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  18. 18. Z. Galazka, D. Klimm, K. Irmscher, R. Uecker, M. Pietsch, R. Bertram, M. Naumann, M. Albrecht, A. Kwasniewski, R. Schewski, and M. Bickermann, Phys. Status Solidi A 212, 1455 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.201431835, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  19. 19. R. J. Hill, J. R. Craig, and G. V. Gibbs, Phys. Chem. Miner. 4, 317 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00307535, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  20. 20. M. Belmoubarik, H. Sukegawa, T. Ohkubo, S. Mitani, and K. Hono, Appl. Phys. Lett. 108, 132404 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4945049, Google ScholarScitation
  21. 21. A. Seko, K. Yuge, F. Oba, A. Kuwabara, and I. Tanaka, Phys. Rev. B 73, 184117 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.73.184117, Google ScholarCrossref
  22. 22. D. Simeone, C. Dodane-Thiriet, D. Gosset, P. Daniel, and M. Beauvy, J. Nucl. Mater. 300, 151 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3115(01)00749-8, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  23. 23. G. Baldinozzi, D. Simeone, D. Gosset, S. Surblé, L. Mazérolles, and L. Thomé, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 266, 2848 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2008.03.218, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  24. 24. M. Jullière, Phys. Lett. A 54, 225 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(75)90174-7, Google ScholarCrossref
  25. 25. R. J. Soulen, Jr., J. M. Byers, M. S. Osofsky, B. Nadgorny, T. Ambrose, S. F. Cheng, P. R. Broussard, C. T. Tanaka, J. Nowak, J. S. Moodera, A. Barry, and J. M. D. Coey, Science 282, 85 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.282.5386.85, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  26. 26. V. Drewello, J. Schmalhorst, A. Thomas, and G. Reiss, Phys. Rev. B 77, 014440 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.77.014440, Google ScholarCrossref
  27. 27. F. Bonell, S. Andrieu, C. Tiusan, F. Montaigne, E. Snoeck, B. Belhadji, L. Calmels, F. Bertran, P. Le Fèvre, and A. Taleb-Ibrahimi, Phys. Rev. B 82, 092405 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.82.092405, Google ScholarCrossref
  28. 28. J. G. Simmons, J. Appl. Phys. 34, 1793 (1963). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1702682, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  29. Published by AIP Publishing.