No Access
Published Online: 10 January 2017
Accepted: December 2016
Journal of Applied Physics 121, 025701 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4973899
more...View Affiliations
We investigate the optical emission properties of the active InGaN shell of high aspect-ratio InGaN/GaN core-shell microrods (μRods) by confocal quasi-resonant polarization-resolved and excitation density dependent micro-photoluminescence (μPL). The active shell, multiple thin InGaN/GaN quantum wells (MQWs), was deposited on GaN μRods selectively grown by metal organic vapor phase epitaxy on patterned SiO2/n-GaN/sapphire template. High spatial resolution mappings reveal a very homogeneous emission intensity along the whole μRods including the tip despite a red-shift of 30 nm from the base to the tip along the 8.6 μm-long m-plane sidewalls. Looking at the Fabry-Perot interference fringes superimposed on the μPL spectra, we get structural information on the μRods. A high degree of linear polarization (DLP) of 0.6–0.66 is measured on the lower half of the m-plane side facets with a slight decrease toward the tip. We observe the typical drop of the DLP with an excitation density caused by degenerate filling of valence bands (Fermi regime). Local internal quantum efficiencies (IQEs) of 55±11% up to 73±7% are estimated on the m-plane facet from measurements at low temperature. Finally, simultaneously fitting the DLP and IQE as a function of the excitation density, we determine the carrier density inside the active region and the recombination rate coefficients of the m-plane MQWs. We show that phase-space filling and the background carrier density have to be included in the recombination rate model.
This work was supported by the Leistungszentrum Nachhaltigkeit Freiburg (project NaLuWiLeS) and the Cluster of Excellence BrainLinks-BrainTools (DFG, Grant No. EXC 1086).
  1. 1. M. Mandl, X. Wang, T. Schimpke, C. Klper, M. Binder, J. Ledig, A. Waag, X. Kong, A. Trampert, F. Bertram, J. Christen, F. Barbagini, E. Calleja, and M. Strassburg, Phys. Status Solidi RRL 7, 800 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/pssr.201307250, Google ScholarCrossref
  2. 2. M. J. Davies, P. Dawson, S. Hammersley, T. Zhu, M. J. Kappers, C. J. Humphreys, and R. A. Oliver, Appl. Phys. Lett. 108, 252101 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4954236, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  3. 3. C. Mounir, T. Schimpke, G. Rossbach, A. Avramescu, M. Strassburg, and U. T. Schwarz, J. Appl. Phys. 120, 155702 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4964871, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  4. 4. M. Tchernycheva, P. Lavenus, H. Zhang, A. V. Babichev, G. Jacopin, M. Shahmohammadi, F. H. Julien, R. Ciechonski, G. Vescovi, and O. Kryliouk, Nano Lett. 14, 2456 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl5001295, Google ScholarCrossref
  5. 5. E. D. Le Boulbar, P. R. Edwards, S. H. Vajargah, I. Griffiths, I. Grgel, P.-M. Coulon, D. Cherns, R. W. Martin, C. J. Humphreys, C. R. Bowen, D. W. E. Allsopp, and P. A. Shields, Cryst. Growth. Des. 16, 1907–1916 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.cgd.5b01438, Google ScholarCrossref
  6. 6. T. Schimpke, M. Mandl, I. Stoll, B. Pohl-Klein, D. Bichler, F. Zwaschka, J. Strube-Knyrim, B. Huckenbeck, B. Max, M. Müller, P. Veit, F. Bertram, J. Christen, J. Hartmann, A. Waag, H.-J. Lugauer, and M. Strassburg, Phys. Status Solidi A 213, 1577–1584 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.201532904, Google ScholarCrossref
  7. 7. Y. Wang, M. Pan, and T. Li, “ Light-emitting diodes: materials, devices, and applications for solid state lighting XVIII,” Proc. SPIE 9003, 90030D–90030D–8 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2040710. Google ScholarCrossref
  8. 8. N. F. Gardner, J. C. Kim, J. J. Wierer, Y. C. Shen, and M. R. Krames, Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 111101 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1875765, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  9. 9. X. Wang, J. Hartmann, M. Mandl, M. S. Mohajerani, H.-H. Wehmann, M. Strassburg, and A. Waag, J. Appl. Phys. 115, 163104 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4871782, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  10. 10. M. Müller, P. Veit, F. F. Krause, T. Schimpke, S. Metzner, F. Bertram, T. Mehrtens, K. Müller-Caspary, A. Avramescu, M. Strassburg, A. Rosenauer, and J. Christen, Nano Lett. 16, 5340–5346 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.6b01062, Google ScholarCrossref
  11. 11. L. Schade, U. T. Schwarz, T. Wernicke, J. Rass, S. Ploch, M. Weyers, and M. Kneissl, Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 051103 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3618676, Google ScholarScitation
  12. 12. C. Mounir, U. T. Schwarz, I. L. Koslow, M. Kneissl, T. Wernicke, T. Schimpke, and M. Strassburg, Phys. Rev. B 93, 235314 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.235314, Google ScholarCrossref
  13. 13. T. Krause, M. Hanke, Z. Cheng, M. Niehle, A. Trampert, M. Rosenthal, M. Burghammer, J. Ledig, J. Hartmann, H. Zhou, H.-H. Wehmann, and A. Waag, Nanotechnology 27, 325707 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/27/32/325707, Google ScholarCrossref
  14. 14. P.-M. Coulon, M. Hugues, B. Alloing, E. Beraudo, M. Leroux, and J. Zuniga-Perez, Opt. Express 20, 18707 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.018707, Google ScholarCrossref
  15. 15. S. Pezzagna, J. Brault, M. Leroux, J. Massies, and M. d. Micheli, J. Appl. Phys. 103, 123112 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2947598, Google ScholarScitation
  16. 16. P. W. Epperlein, “ Basic diode laser engineering principles,” in Semiconductor Laser Engineering, Reliability and Diagnostics ( John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2013), pp. 3–100. Google ScholarCrossref
  17. 17. B. Galler, H.-J. Lugauer, M. Binder, R. Hollweck, Y. Folwill, A. Nirschl, A. Gomez-Iglesias, B. Hahn, J. Wagner, and M. Sabathil, Appl. Phys. Express 6, 112101 (2013). https://doi.org/10.7567/APEX.6.112101, Google ScholarCrossref
  18. 18. J. Lee, X. Li, X. Ni, U. Özgür, H. Morkoç, T. Paskova, G. Mulholland, and K. R. Evans, Appl. Phys. Lett. 95, 201113 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3266833, Google ScholarScitation
  19. 19. L. Schade, T. Wernicke, J. Rass, S. Ploch, M. Weyers, M. Kneissl, and U. T. Schwarz, Phys. Status Solidi B 253, 145 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.201552419, Google ScholarCrossref
  20. 20. Photocurrent measurements on a contacted planar SQW LED under reversed bias show that the absorption is proportional to the laser excitation density over the whole investigated excitation density range. Google Scholar
  21. 21. A. David and M. J. Grundmann, Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 103504 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3330870, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  22. 22. D. Schiavon, M. Binder, M. Peter, B. Galler, P. Drechsel, and F. Scholz, Phys. Status Solidi B 250, 283 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.201248286, Google ScholarCrossref
  23. 23. B. Galler, P. Drechsel, R. Monnard, P. Rode, P. Stauss, S. Froehlich, W. Bergbauer, M. Binder, M. Sabathil, B. Hahn, and J. Wagner, Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 131111 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4754688, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  24. 24. P. Dawson, S. Schulz, R. A. Oliver, M. J. Kappers, and C. J. Humphreys, J. Appl. Phys. 119, 181505 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4948237, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  1. © 2017 Author(s). Published by AIP Publishing.