MENU
  • Scitation Home
SUBMIT YOUR ARTICLE

Thank you

For your interest in the Physics of Plasmas

Check for updates on crossmark
Prev Next
No Access Submitted: 27 March 2016 Accepted: 31 May 2016 Published Online: 21 June 2016

Investigation of complexity dynamics in a DC glow discharge magnetized plasma using recurrence quantification analysis

Physics of Plasmas 23, 062312 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4953903
Vramori Mitra1, Bornali Sarma1, Arun Sarma1, M. S. Janaki2, A. N. Sekar Iyengar2, Norbert Marwan3, and Jürgen Kurths3,4
more...View Affiliations
ABSTRACT
Recurrence is an ubiquitous feature which provides deep insights into the dynamics of real dynamical systems. A suitable tool for investigating recurrences is recurrence quantification analysis (RQA). It allows, e.g., the detection of regime transitions with respect to varying control parameters. We investigate the complexity of different coexisting nonlinear dynamical regimes of the plasma floating potential fluctuations at different magnetic fields and discharge voltages by using recurrence quantification variables, in particular, DET, Lmax, and Entropy. The recurrence analysis reveals that the predictability of the system strongly depends on discharge voltage. Furthermore, the persistent behaviour of the plasma time series is characterized by the Detrended fluctuation analysis technique to explore the complexity in terms of long range correlation. The enhancement of the discharge voltage at constant magnetic field increases the nonlinear correlations; hence, the complexity of the system decreases, which corroborates the RQA analysis.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors are thankful to BRNS-DAE, Government of India for the financial support under the project grant (Reference No. 2013/34/29/BRNS). The authors would like to express their heartfelt thanks to all the members of plasma Physics division of Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics for their help and constant support.

REFERENCES

  1. 1. J.-P. Eckman, S. O. Kamphorst, and D. Ruelle, Europhys. Lett. 4, 973 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/4/9/004, Google ScholarCrossref
  2. 2. H. Sabelli, Nonlinear Dyn., Psychol., Life Sci. 5, 89 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026478316970, Google ScholarCrossref
  3. 3. T. Chelidze and T. Matcharashvili, Comput. Geosci. 29, 587 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-3004(03)00040-2, Google ScholarCrossref
  4. 4. C. Stan, C. P. Cristescu, and D. G. Dimitriu, Phys. Plasmas 17, 042115 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3385796, Google ScholarScitation
  5. 5. D. L. Toufen, Z. O. Guimarães-Filho, I. L. Caldas, J. D. Szezech, S. Lopes, R. L. Viana, and K. W. Gentlen, Phys. Plasmas 20, 022310 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4793732, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  6. 6. O. Kopaek, V. Karas, J. Kova, and Z. Stuchlk, Astrophys. J. 722, 1240 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/722/2/1240, Google ScholarCrossref
  7. 7. J. A. Hołyst and M. Zebrowska, Int. J. Theor. Appl. Finance 3, 419 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219024900000310, Google ScholarCrossref
  8. 8. N. Marwan, M. C. Romano, M. Thiel, and J. Kurths, Phys. Rep. 438, 237 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2006.11.001, Google ScholarCrossref
  9. 9. Z. O. Guimaraes-Filho, I. L. Caldas, R. L. Vianab, J. Kurths, I. C. Nascimento, and Yu. K. Kuznetsov, Phys. Lett. A 372, 1088 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2007.07.088, Google ScholarCrossref
  10. 10. Z. O. Guimaraes-Filho, I. L. Caldas, R. L. Viana, I. C. Nascimento, Yu. K. Kuznetsov, and J. Kurths, Phys. Plasmas 17, 012303 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3280010, Google ScholarScitation
  11. 11. M. Rajkovic, T.-H. Watanabe, and M. Skoric, Phys. Plasmas 16, 092306 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3237133, Google ScholarScitation
  12. 12. J. A. Mier, R. Sanchez, L. Garcia, J. Varela, and D. E. Newman, Phys. Plasmas 18, 062306 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3599437, Google ScholarScitation
  13. 13. V. Mitra, A. Sarma, M. S. Janaki, A. N. Sekar Iyengar, B. Sarma, N. Marwan, J. Kurths, P. K. Shaw, D. Saha, and S. Ghosh, Chaos, Solitons Fractals 69, 285 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2014.10.005, Google ScholarCrossref
  14. 14. V. Mitra, B. Sarma, A. Sarma, M. S. Janaki, and A. N. Sekar Iyengar, Phys. Plasmas 23, 032304 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4942932, Google ScholarScitation
  15. 15. D. Eroglu, T. K. D. M. Peron, N. Marwan, F. A. Rodrigues, L. da, F. Costa, M. Sebek, I. Z. Kiss, and J. Kurths, Phys. Rev. E 90, 042919 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.90.042919, Google ScholarCrossref
  16. 16. D. Weixing, H. Wie, W. Xiaodong, and C. X. Yu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 170 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.170, Google ScholarCrossref
  17. 17. W. X. Ding, H. Q. She, W. Huang, and C. X. Yu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 96 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.96, Google ScholarCrossref
  18. 18. M. A. Hassouba, H. I. Al-Naggar, N. M. Al-Naggar, and C. Wilke, Phys. Plasmas 13, 073504 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2219420, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  19. 19. P. Y. Cheung and A. Y. Wong, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 551 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.551, Google ScholarCrossref
  20. 20. T. Braun, J. A. Lisboa, R. E. Francke, and J. A. C. Gallas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 613 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.613, Google ScholarCrossref
  21. 21. A. Atipo, G. Bonhomme, and T. Pierre, Eur. Phys. J. D 19, 79 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e20020058, Google ScholarCrossref
  22. 22. J. Qin, L. Wang, D. P. Yuan, P. Gao, and B. Z. Zang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 163 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.63.163, Google ScholarCrossref
  23. 23. M. Nurujjaman, R. Narayanan, and A. N. Sekar Iyengar, Chaos 17, 043121 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2815818, Google ScholarScitation
  24. 24. E. A. F. Ihelen, Front. Phys. 3, 141 (2012). Google Scholar
  25. 25. J. W. Kantrlhaldt, S. A. Zschiegner, E. K. Buunde, S. Havlin, and H. E. Stanley, Phys. A 316, 87 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4371(02)01383-3, Google ScholarCrossref
  26. 26. F. Takens, Lecture Notes in Mathematics ( Springer, 1981), Vol. 898, p. 366. Google Scholar
  27. 27. A. M. Fraser and H. L. Swinney, Phys. Rev. A 33, 1134 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.33.1134, Google ScholarCrossref
  28. 28. S. Schinkel, N. Marwan, O. Dimigen, and J. Kurths, Phys. Lett. A 373, 2245 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2009.04.045, Google ScholarCrossref
  29. 29. N. Marwan and J. Kurths, Phys. Lett. A. 336, 349 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2004.12.056, Google ScholarCrossref
  30. 30. C. L. Webber and J. P. Zbilut, “ Recurrence quantification analysis of nonlinear dynamical systems,” in Tutorials in Contemporary Nonlinear Methods for the Behavioral Sciences, edited by M. A. Riley and G. C. Van Orden ( National Science Foundation, 2005) pp. 26–96. Google Scholar
  31. 31. N. Marwan and J. Kurths, Phys. Lett. A 302, 299 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9601(02)01170-2, Google ScholarCrossref
  32. 32. N. Marwan, Eur. Phys. J. Special Top. 164, 3 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2008-00829-1. Google ScholarCrossref
  33. 33. B. Sarma, S. Chauhan, A. M. Whartan, and A. N. Sekar Iyengar, J. Plasma Phys. 79, 885 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022377813000639, Google ScholarCrossref
  34. 34. R. Mane, “ On the dimension of the compact invariant sets of certain non-linear maps,” Dynamical systems and turbulence (Lecture Notes in Mathematics) ( Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1981), Vol. 898, p. 230. Google Scholar
  35. 35. M. B. Kennel, R. Brown, and H. D. I. Abarbanel, Phys. Rev. A 45, 3403 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.45.3403, Google ScholarCrossref
  36. 36. M. Thiel, M. C. Romano, J. Kurths, R. Meucci, E. Allaria, and F. T. Arecchi, Phys. D 171, 138 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2789(02)00586-9, Google ScholarCrossref
  37. 37. B. Sarma, S. S. Chauhan, A. M. Whartan, and A. N. Sekar Iyengar, Phys. Scr. 88, 065005 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/88/06/065005, Google ScholarCrossref
  38. 38. R. Hegger, H. Kantz, and T. Schreiber, Chaos 9, 413 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.166424, Google ScholarScitation
  39. 39. L. L. Trulla, A. Giuliani, J. P. Zbilut, and C. L. Webber, Phys. Lett. A 223, 255 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9601(96)00741-4, Google ScholarCrossref
  40. 40. S. V. Buldyrev, A. L. Goldberger, S. Havlin, R. N. Mantegna, M. E. Matsa, C.-K. Peng, M. Simons, and H. E. Stanley, Phys. Rev. E 51, 5084 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.51.5084, Google ScholarCrossref
  41. 41. C.-K. Peng, S. V. Buldyrev, A. L. Goldberger, R. N. Mantegna, M. Simons, and H. E. Stanley, Phys. A 221, 180 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4371(95)00247-5, Google ScholarCrossref
  42. 42. S. V. Buldyrev, N. V. Dokholyan, A. L. Goldberger, S. Havlin, C.-K. Peng, H. E. Stanley, and G. M. Viswanathan, Phys. A 249, 430 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4371(97)00503-7, Google ScholarCrossref
  43. 43. C.-K. Peng, J. Mietus, J. M. Hausdorff, S. Havlin, H. E. Stanley, and A. L. Goldberger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1343 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.1343, Google ScholarCrossref
  44. 44. C.-K. Peng, S. Havlin, H. E. Stanley, and A. L. Goldberger, Chaos 5, 82 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.166141, Google ScholarScitation
  45. 45. Y. H. Liu, P. Cizeau, M. Meyer, C.-K. Peng, and H. E. Stanley, Phys. A 245, 437 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4371(97)00368-3, Google ScholarCrossref
  46. 46. M. Ausloos and K. Ivanova, Phys. A 286, 353 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4371(00)00328-9, Google ScholarCrossref
  47. 47. E. Koscielny-Bunde, A. Bunde, S. Havlin, H. E. Roman, Y. Goldreich, and H.-J. Schellnhuber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 729 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.729, Google ScholarCrossref
  48. 48. P. Talkner and R. O. Weber, Phys. Rev. E 62, 150 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.62.150, Google ScholarCrossref
  49. 49. J. W. Kantelhardt, R. Berkovits, S. Havlin, and A. Bunde, Phys. A 266, 461 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4371(98)00631-1, Google ScholarCrossref
  50. 50. N. Vandewalle, M. Ausloos, M. Houssa, P. W. Mertens, and M. M. Heyns, Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 1579 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.123622, Google ScholarScitation
  1. © 2016 Author(s). Published by AIP Publishing.

Article Metrics

Views
80
Citations
Crossref 6
Web of Science
ISI 6

Altmetric

Please Note: The number of views represents the full text views from December 2016 to date. Article views prior to December 2016 are not included.

Resources

General Information

 

Website © AIP Publishing LLC. Article copyright remains as specified within the article.
Scitation logo
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Proin imperdiet nibh sed ipsum molestie eu mattis justo malesuada. Curabitur id quam augue, ac eleifend justo. Integer eget metus sagittis velit semper auctor vel et nunc. Phasellus tempus felis at arcu fringilla at ndimentum libero placerat. Aenean ut imperdiet dolor. Nulla pretium mi vestibulum dui dictum sed ullamcorper tellus sodales. Duis non nibh id ipsum feugiat imperdiet id fermentum nunc. Maecenas id ultricies felis. Suspendisse lacinia rhoncus vestibulum. Vestibulum molestie vulputate convallis.Fusce et augue erat, nec mollis mi.