Abstract
Bi2Te3-based compounds are a well-known class of outstanding thermoelectric materials. β-As2Te3, another member of this family, exhibits promising thermoelectric properties around 400 K when appropriately doped. Herein, we investigate the high-temperature thermoelectric properties of the β-As2−xBixTe3 solid solution. Powder X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy experiments showed that a solid solution only exists up to x = 0.035. We found that substituting Bi for As has a beneficial influence on the thermopower, which, combined with extremely low thermal conductivity values, results in a maximum ZT value of 0.7 at 423 K for x = 0.017 perpendicular to the pressing direction.
The efficiency with which thermoelectric materials convert a thermal gradient into electricity and vice-versa at an operating temperature T, is governed by the dimensionless figure of merit ZT = α2T/ρ(κe + κL).1,2 High ZT values are synonymous with high efficiency and are achieved in materials exhibiting a fine balance between the thermopower α, the electrical resistivity ρ, and the electronic and lattice thermal conductivities, κe and κL, respectively.1,2 Heavily doped semiconductors with carrier concentrations ranging from 1019 to 1021 cm−3 and crystallizing with a complex unit cell usually achieve the best compromise between these three transport properties. 1,2
Depending on the synthesis conditions, the polymorphic compound As2Te3 crystallizes with either monoclinic (space group C2/m) or rhombohedral symmetry (space group ), referred to as the α and β form, respectively.3–7 α-As2Te3 undergoes several phase transitions at high pressures driving this insulator into a semi-metallic phase before eventually entering a metallic regime.8 At ambient pressure, β-As2Te3 transforms into the α form above 473 K and undergoes a subtle lattice distortion near 190 K that breaks the rhombohedral symmetry and leads to a novel monoclinic unit cell exhibiting a fourfold modulation along the b axis (named β′).9 Interestingly, both α-As2Te3 and β-As2Te3 phases are semiconductors that meet the aforementioned requirements.10–14 In particular, they share the remarkable feature of being poor thermal conductors with lattice thermal conductivities well below 1 W m−1 K−1 above 300 K. Maximum ZT values of 0.8 at 523 K and 0.65 at 423 K were achieved in α-As2Te3 and β-As2Te3, respectively, using the substitution of Sn for As as a tuning parameter of the hole concentration.10,13
The β-As2Te3 compound is isostructural to the well-known Bi2Te3-based thermoelectric materials used in solid-state cooling applications.1,2 First reported as a high-pressure phase,7 polycrystalline samples could be obtained with high purity by conventional melting-quenching techniques allowing for a detailed investigation of its transport properties and of the influence of substitution on either the As or Te site.10 Our prior work on Sn-substituted β-As2Te3 has provided hints at the presence of defects in this material, 10 akin to the Bi2Te3-based alloys where defect chemistry plays a central role in determining the thermoelectric performances.1,2 In addition, this compound has been suggested to harbor topological insulating properties when an uniaxial strain is applied along the c axis,14,15 which could be experimentally realized by applying either an external pressure or a chemical pressure through substitutions.
Despite the large number of isovalent and aliovalent substitutions that can be envisaged, alloying β-As2Te3 with isostructural Bi2Te3 appears as a natural route to further improve the ZT values in this family. The possibility to form a solid solution between these two compounds is of particular interest for both practical and fundamental reasons. Continuously varying the As/Bi ratio could act as a tuning parameter of the spin-orbit coupling that would give rise to a transition from a trivial band insulator to a topological insulator, as observed, for instance, in the Pb1−xSnxSe or TlBiSe2−xSx systems.16–19 On a more practical point of view, alloying with Bi may help to increase the power factor of β-As2Te3 and to push the maximum ZT values of β-As2Te3 closer to room temperature.
Our preliminary investigation of the low-temperature thermoelectric properties of the β-As2−xBixTe3 compounds has revealed that Bi helps to decrease the electrical resistivity without being at the expense of a significant increase in the thermal conductivity. 12 Remarkably, the ZT values achieved at 300 K were similar to those measured in Sn-substituted samples, suggesting that interesting thermoelectric performances could be obtained at higher temperatures.12 Herein, we extend these investigations with a detailed study of the thermoelectric properties at moderately high temperatures (300–423 K) of polycrystalline β-As2−xBixTe3 samples in the homogeneity range. The substitution of Bi for As results in a significant increase in the ZT values with respect to the unsubstituted phase β-As2Te3 with a peak ZT of 0.7 at 423 K for x = 0.017 perpendicular to the pressing direction.
All synthetic procedures were carried out in a dry, argon-filled glove box. Caution is required for preparing and handling samples made with arsenic and for their disposal. More specifically, the As vapor pressure may become significant at high temperatures thereby possibly resulting in an explosion of the quartz tube and releasing toxic As vapor. Polycrystalline β-As2−xBixTe3 samples (x = 0.0, 0.015, 0.025, 0.035, 0.1, 0.2) were prepared by direct reactions of stoichiometric quantities of pure elements (99.99% As Goodfellow, 99.999% Te 5N + and 99.9999% Bi 5N +, all in shots). The mixtures were loaded in quartz tubes sealed under secondary vacuum and heated up to 923 K at a rate of 10 K min−1. The tubes were maintained at this temperature for 2 h before being quenched in icy water. The resulting ingots were ground into fine powders and consolidated at room temperature under a pressure of 750 MPa yielding dense cylindrical pellets (∼10 mm in diameter and ∼7 mm in thickness). No further annealing step has been applied to the pellets after consolidation. The remarkable mechanical properties of this family of compounds led to geometric densities higher than 95% of the theoretical densities.
The phase purity and crystal structure were verified by powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) using a Bruker D8 Advance diffractometer (CuKα1 radiation). The lattice parameters were determined at 300 K by Rietveld refinements of the PXRD patterns using the Fullprof software (Table I). The chemical homogeneity and spatial distribution of the elements were assessed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDXS) using a Quanta FEG (FEI). The chemical compositions were determined by electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) on mirror-polished surface of bulk pieces with a JEOL JXA 8530F instrument equipped with wavelength-dispersive spectrometers. β-As2Te3 and Bi were used as standards to determine the As, Te, and Bi contents. The binary β-As2Te3 compound was used to lower the mismatch between these samples and other As and Te standards owing to differing chemical environments of these elements. Because the absence of secondary phases in β-As2Te3 was confirmed by EDXS analyses, this sample was considered as stoichiometric for these measurements. With these standards, the total weight percentage of each analyzed point was between 99% and 101%. The chemical composition of each sample was obtained by averaging the atomic percentage of 90 different data points.
TABLE I. Nominal and actual compositions measured by EPMA on the polycrystalline series β-As2−xBixTe3. The compositions have been normalized to five atoms per formula unit. The lattice parameters (a and c) were determined from Rietveld refinements against PXRD patterns collected at 300 K. The Hall carrier concentration (pH) and the Hall mobility (μH) measured at 300 K in samples cut perpendicular to the pressing direction are also mentioned.
| Nominal composition | EPMA | a (Å), c (Å) | pH (1019 cm−3) | μH (cm2 V−1 s−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| As2Te3 | As1.985Te3.015 | 4.0473(2), 29.502(3) | 8.4 | 48.6 |
| As1.985Bi0.015Te3 | As1.995Bi0.017Te2.988 | 4.0503(2), 29.538(2) | 7.1 | 81.2 |
| As1.975Bi0.025Te3 | As1.980Bi0.024Te2.996 | 4.0518(2), 29.554(2) | 6.8 | 69.5 |
| As1.965Bi0.035Te3 | As1.968Bi0.035Te2.997 | 4.0531(2), 29.566(1) | 8.0 | 57.8 |
Owing to the anisotropy in the transport properties observed in Sn-substituted samples, the cold-pressed cylindrical pellets were cut into bar-, disc- or parallelepiped-shaped samples with a diamond wire saw both parallel and perpendicular to the pressing direction. The thermopower and electrical resistivity were measured simultaneously on bar-shaped samples between 300 and 423 K using a ZEM-3 (Ulvac-Riko) apparatus. The disc- or parallelepiped-shaped samples were utilized to measure the thermal diffusivity a in the same temperature range using a Netzsch LFA 427 system. Thermal conductivity was calculated from the formula κ = aCpd where Cp is the specific heat and d is the experimental density. While the temperature dependence of d was neglected, the specific heat was measured from 300 to 423 K using a Netzsch Pegasus 404 apparatus. The combined uncertainty in the determination of the ZT values is estimated to be 17%.20
The crystal structure and phase purity of the β-As2−xBixTe3 samples were confirmed by PXRD and SEM experiments. Figure 1 shows a representative Rietveld refinement of the PXRD pattern of the x = 0.017 sample. Except for an additional reflection near 2θ = 31° visible in all PXRD patterns and identified as the binary AsTe phase, no other secondary phases are visible for Bi contents up to x = 0.035. Above this concentration, additional reflections appear suggesting that β-As2−xBixTe3 is a solid solution up to only x = 0.035. SEM images collected in backscattering electron mode confirmed the phase-pure nature of the samples for x ≤ 0.035.12 Hence, only the chemical compositions and transport properties of single-phase samples (x ≤ 0.035) were subsequently studied. EPMA measurements confirmed the very good chemical homogeneity of the matrix and revealed an excellent correlation between the nominal and actual compositions (see Table I). Hereafter, we use the actual Bi content to label the samples.

FIG. 1. Rietveld refinement of the representative PXRD pattern of the x = 0.017 sample (RB = 6.94, χ2 = 6.94). The asterisk marks the reflection ascribed to the AsTe impurity phase. The vertical green ticks mark the calculated reflection positions of the space group. The lowest blue line corresponds to the residuals of the refinement. The inset shows the evolution of the reduced hexagonal lattice parameters a/a0 and c/c0 determined at 300 K along with the reduced unit cell volume V/V0 as a function of the actual Bi content (a0, c0, and V0 are the lattice parameters and volume of the binary sample β-As2Te3). The lines are guides to the eye. The errors related to the determination of the lattice parameters are smaller than the size of the symbols used.
The trends in the crystal structure upon alloying with Bi were determined by Rietveld refinements against PXRD data. The variations in the lattice parameters a and c, shown in the inset of Figure 1 as a function of the actual Bi content, indicate a monotonous expansion of the unit cell with x in agreement with the larger ionic radii of Bi with respect to As. Both parameters increase with x in a non-linear manner with a tendency to saturate at high Bi concentrations.
Figure 2(a) shows the evolution of ρ as a function of temperature as the Bi content varies from x = 0 up to 0.035. The linear increase in the ρ values with temperature indicates that all samples have a metallic character. While all the samples share the common characteristic to exhibit significantly lower ρ in the perpendicular direction than in the parallel direction, the ρ values of the x = 0.017 and 0.035 samples are lower than for x = 0.0. The fact that ρ does not evolve monotonically with x is tied to the non-monotonic variations in the Hall carrier concentration pH and Hall mobility μH revealed by Hall effect measurements (Table I). pH first decreases from 8.4 × 1019 cm−3 to 6.8 × 1019 cm−3 on going from x = 0.0 to 0.024 before increasing to 8.4 × 1019 cm−3 for x = 0.035. Concomitantly, μH increases from 49 cm2 V−1 s−1 up to 81 cm2 V−1 s−1 in the x = 0.017 sample. Further alloying with Bi results in a gradual decrease in μH to 58 cm2 V−1 s−1 in the x = 0.035 specimen. These results suggest that the activity of Bi as a dopant is non trivial and could reflect a strong influence of Bi atoms on the native defects induced by non-stoichiometry that exist in β-As2Te3, a situation similar to Bi2Te3-based materials where defect chemistry plays a prominent role.2,21

FIG. 2. Temperature dependence of the electrical resistivity ρ (a), thermopower α (b), total thermal conductivity κ (c), and dimensionless thermoelectric figure of merit ZT (d). The lines are guides to the eye. The color-coded symbols are similar for all panels. The open and filled symbols refer to measurements performed parallel and perpendicular, respectively, to the pressing direction. For the sake of clarity, only the thermopower data taken in the perpendicular direction are shown in panel (b). In panel (c), the solid black line stands for the minimum thermal conductivity (0.38 W m−1 K−1) estimated from the longitudinal and transverse sound velocities (Ref. 13).
The linear dependence of α(T), shown in Figure 2(b), is consistent with the diffusive regime expected in metals and degenerate semiconductors. In contrast to ρ, α appears independent of the direction of the measurement to within experimental uncertainty with α values varying from 115 μV K−1 at 300 K for x = 0.0 up to 170 μV K−1 at 423 K for x = 0.035. The maximum α values reached at 423 K are similar to those measured in the Sn-substituted series for similar hole concentrations.
The temperature dependence of the total thermal conductivity is shown in Figure 2(c). The electronic contribution to the thermal conductivity κe was calculated by the Wiedemann-Franz law κe = LT/ρ where the Lorentz number L determined for β-As2Te3 (1.9 × 10−8 V2 K−2 at 300 K) has been considered.14 Despite a limited structural complexity, the resulting lattice thermal conductivity κL (not shown) of the samples is extremely low, of the order of 0.7 and 0.4 W m−1 K−1 in the perpendicular and parallel directions, respectively. Because of this extremely low thermal transport, Bi does not have a strong influence on κL. Of note, these values are significantly lower than those measured in Bi2Te3-based alloys but similar to those achieved in α-As2Te3 or in other chalcogenides.2,10,22–27 In the parallel direction, κL approaches the lowest limit of the thermal conductivity (Figure 2(c)) estimated using the model developed by Cahill and Pohl and the measured longitudinal and transverse sound velocities.13,28–30
Figure 2(d), which shows the variations in temperature of the ZT values, indicates that ZT increases with temperature for all samples. The peak ZT of 0.7 at 423 K achieved in the x = 0.017 sample in the perpendicular direction represents an increase of 40% compared to the parent compound and evidences the beneficial influence of Bi on the thermoelectric properties of β-As2Te3. However, due to the narrow compositional range that can be reached in the β-As2−xBixTe3 solid solution, Bi does not push the peak ZT closer to room temperature. As noted in our prior study,12 the anisotropy in the electrical resistivity and in the thermal conductivity of β-As2−xBixTe3 does not compensate each other, giving rise to different ZT values in the parallel and perpendicular directions. Although the hole concentration only slightly changes with the Bi content, the ZT increases thanks to enhanced power factors achieved at 423 K upon Bi alloying.
In summary, β-As2Te3 was found to form a solid solution with Bi2Te3 in only a narrow compositional window. The alloyed β-As2−xBixTe3 samples are homogeneous up to x = 0.035 as revealed by PXRD and SEM experiments. In this concentration range, the samples behave as heavily doped semiconductors with hole concentrations of the order of 8 × 1019 cm−3 at 300 K. Because the lattice thermal conductivity in β-As2Te3 nears the minimum thermal conductivity, alloying with Bi did not influence significantly the thermal transport. The measured values smoothly decrease below 1 W m−1 K−1 at 423 K for all samples. The beneficial effect of Bi on the power factor combined with very low thermal conductivity values led to a peak ZT of 0.7 at 423 K for x = 0.017 perpendicular to the pressing direction. The complex evolution of the transport properties of β-As2Te3 with the nature of the substituting elements requires further theoretical insights to better understand their influence on the electronic band structure. β-As2Te3 finally appears as an interesting class of compounds that clearly warrants further investigations due to its good thermoelectric performances.
The authors acknowledge the financial support from the French National Agency (ANR) in the frame of its program “PROGELEC” (Verre Thermo-Générateur “VTG”).
REFERENCES
- 1. H. J. Goldsmid, Thermoelectric Refrigeration (Temple Press Books Ltd., London, UK, 1964). Google ScholarCrossref
- 2. Thermoelectrics and Its Energy Harvesting, edited by D. M. Rowe (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2012). Google Scholar
- 3. T. C. Harman, B. Paris, S. E. Miller, and H. L. Goering, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2, 181 (1957). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3697(57)90081-1, Google ScholarCrossref
- 4. N. S. Platakis, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 24, 365 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3093(77)90105-3, Google ScholarCrossref
- 5. Y. Sharma and P. Srivastava, Opt. Mater. 33, 899 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2011.01.020, Google ScholarCrossref
- 6. T. J. Scheidemantel and J. V. Badding, Solid State Commun. 127, 667 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-1098(03)00518-0, Google ScholarCrossref
- 7. T. J. Scheidemantel, J. F. Meng, and J. V. Badding, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 66, 1744 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2005.07.006, Google ScholarCrossref
- 8. J. Zhao, L. Yang, Z. Yu, Y. Wang, C. Li, K. Yang, Z. Liu, and Y. Wang, Inorg. Chem. 55, 3907–3914 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.6b00073, Google ScholarCrossref
- 9. C. Morin, S. Corallini, J. Carreaud, J.-B. Vaney, G. Delaizir, J.-C. Crivello, E. B. Lopes, A. Piarristeguy, J. Monnier, C. Candolfi, V. Nassif, G. Cuello, A. Pradel, A. P. Goncalves, B. Lenoir, and E. Alleno, Inorg. Chem. 54, 9936 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b01676, Google ScholarCrossref
- 10. J.-B. Vaney, J. Carreaud, G. Delaizir, A. Pradel, A. Piarristeguy, C. Morin, E. Alleno, J. Monnier, A. P. Gonçalves, C. Candolfi, A. Dauscher, and B. Lenoir, Adv. Electron. Mater. 1, 1400008 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/aelm.201400008, Google ScholarCrossref
- 11. J.-B. Vaney, J. Carreaud, G. Delaizir, C. Morin, J. Monnier, E. Alleno, A. Piarristeguy, A. Pradel, A. P. Gonçalves, E. B. Lopes, C. Candolfi, A. Dauscher, and B. Lenoir, J. Electron. Mater. 45, 1447 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-015-4063-3, Google ScholarCrossref
- 12. J.-B. Vaney, J. Carreaud, G. Delaizir, C. Morin, J. Monnier, E. Alleno, A. Piarristeguy, A. Pradel, A. P. Gonçalves, E. B. Lopes, C. Candolfi, A. Dauscher, and B. Lenoir, J. Electron. Mater. 45, 1786 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-015-4227-1, Google ScholarCrossref
- 13. J.-B. Vaney, J. Carreaud, G. Delaizir, A. Piarristeguy, A. Pradel, E. Alleno, J. Monnier, E. B. Lopes, A. P. Gonçalves, A. Dauscher, C. Candolfi, and B. Lenoir, J. Mater. Chem. C 4, 2329 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TC04267D, Google ScholarCrossref
- 14. J.-B. Vaney, J.-C. Crivello, C. Morin, G. Delaizir, J. Carreaud, A. Piarristeguy, J. Monnier, E. Alleno, A. Pradel, E. B. Lopes, A. P. Gonçalves, A. Dauscher, C. Candolfi, and B. Lenoir, “Electronic structure, low-temperature transport and thermodynamic properties of polymorphic β-As2Te3,” RSC Adv. (to be published). https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA01770C, Google ScholarCrossref
- 15. K. Pal and U. V. Waghmare, Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 062105 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4892941, Google ScholarScitation
- 16. P. Dziawa, B. J. Kowalski, K. Dybko, R. Buczko, A. Szczerbabow, M. Szot, E. Lusabowska, T. Balasubramanian, B. M. Wojek, M. H. Berntsen, O. Tjernberg, and T. Story, Nat. Mater. 11, 1023 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3449, Google ScholarCrossref
- 17. T. Liang, Q. Gibson, J. Xiong, M. Hirschberger, S. P. Kodavayur, R. J. Cava, and N. P. Ong, Nat. Commun. 4, 2696 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3696, Google ScholarCrossref
- 18. M. Neupane, S.-Y. Xu, R. Sankar, Q. Gibson, Y. J. Wang, I. Belopolski, N. Alidoust, G. Bian, P. P. Shibayev, D. S. Sanchez, Y. Ohtsubo, A. Taleb-Ibrahimi, S. Basak, W.-F. Tsai, H. Lin, T. Dubrakiewicz, R. J. Cava, A. Bansil, F. C. Chou, and M. Z. Hasan, Phys. Rev. B 92, 075131 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.075131, Google ScholarCrossref
- 19. T. Sato, K. Segawa, K. Kosaka, S. Souma, K. Nakayama, K. Eto, T. Minami, Y. Ando, and T. Takahashi, Nat. Phys. 7, 840 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys2058, Google ScholarCrossref
- 20. E. Alleno, D. Bérardan, C. Byl, C. Candolfi, R. Daou, R. Decourt, E. Guilmeau, S. Hébert, J. Hejtmanek, B. Lenoir, P. Masschelein, V. Ohorodniichuk, M. Pollet, S. Populoh, D. Ravot, O. Rouleau, and M. Soulier, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 86, 011301 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4905250, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
- 21. C. Drasar, P. Lostak, and C. Uher, J. Electron. Mater. 39, 2162 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-009-0986-x, Google ScholarCrossref
- 22. S. Sassi, C. Candolfi, J.-B. Vaney, V. Ohorodniichuk, P. Masschelein, A. Dauscher, and B. Lenoir, Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 212105 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4880817, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
- 23. C.-L. Chen, H. Wang, Y.-Y. Chen, T. Day, and G. J. Snyder, J. Mater. Chem. A 2, 11171 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ta01643b, Google ScholarCrossref
- 24. Q. Zhang, E. Kedebe Chere, J. Sun, F. Cao, K. Dahal, S. Chen, G. Chen, and Z. Ren, Adv. Energy Mater. 5, 1500360 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201500360, Google ScholarCrossref
- 25. J.-S. Rhyee, K. H. Lee, S. M. Lee, E. Cho, S. Kim, E. Lee, Y. S. Kwon, J. H. Shim, and G. Kotliar, Nature 459, 965 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08088, Google ScholarCrossref
- 26. Z.-S. Lin, L. Chen, L.-M. Wang, J.-T. Zhao, and L.-M. Wu, Adv. Energy Mater. 25, 4800 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201302038, Google ScholarCrossref
- 27. J. H. Kim, M. J. Kim, S. Oh, J.-S. Rhyee, S.-D. Park, and D. Ahn, Dalton Trans. 44, 3185 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/c4dt03432e, Google ScholarCrossref
- 28. D. G. Cahill, S. K. Watson, and R. O. Pohl, Phys. Rev. B 46, 6131 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.46.6131, Google ScholarCrossref
- 29. D. G. Cahill and R. O. Pohl, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 39, 93 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pc.39.100188.000521, Google ScholarCrossref
- 30. H. Deng, J. Alloys Compd. 656, 695 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.09.195, Google ScholarCrossref
All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Please Note: The number of views represents the full text views from December 2016 to date. Article views prior to December 2016 are not included.


