MENU
  • Scitation Home
SUBMIT YOUR ARTICLE

Thank you

For your interest in the Journal of Applied Physics (JAP)

Check for updates on crossmark
Prev Next
Published Online: 06 April 2016
Accepted: March 2016

Enhanced oxygen vacancy diffusion in Ta2O5 resistive memory devices due to infinitely adaptive crystal structure

Journal of Applied Physics 119, 134502 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4945579
Hao Jiang1,2 and Derek A. Stewart1, a)
more...View Affiliations
Abstract
Metal oxide resistive memory devices based on Ta2O5 have demonstrated high switching speed, long endurance, and low set voltage. However, the physical origin of this improved performance is still unclear. Ta2O5 is an important archetype of a class of materials that possess an adaptive crystal structure that can respond easily to the presence of defects. Using first principles nudged elastic band calculations, we show that this adaptive crystal structure leads to low energy barriers for in-plane diffusion of oxygen vacancies in λ phase Ta2O5. Identified diffusion paths are associated with collective motion of neighboring atoms. The overall vacancy diffusion is anisotropic with higher diffusion barriers found for oxygen vacancy movement between Ta-O planes. Coupled with the fact that oxygen vacancy formation energy in Ta2O5 is relatively small, our calculated low diffusion barriers can help explain the low set voltage in Ta2O5 based resistive memory devices. Our work shows that other oxides with adaptive crystal structures could serve as potential candidates for resistive random access memory devices. We also discuss some general characteristics for ideal resistive RAM oxides that could be used in future computational material searches.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors gratefully acknowledge helpful discussions with B. Magyari-Köpe, J. Childress, and J. Read.

References

  1. 1. A. Sawa, Mater. Today 11, 28 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(08)70119-6, Google ScholarCrossref
  2. 2. R. Waser, R. Dittmann, G. Staikov, and K. Szot, Adv. Mater. 21, 2632 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200900375, Google ScholarCrossref
  3. 3. J. J. Yang, M. D. Pickett, X. Li, D. A. Ohlberg, D. R. Stewart, and R. S. Williams, Nat. Nanotechnol. 3, 429 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2008.160, Google ScholarCrossref
  4. 4. M.-J. Lee, C. B. Lee, D. Lee, S. R. Lee, M. Chang, J. H. Hur, Y.-B. Kim, C.-J. Kim, D. H. Seo, and S. Seo, Nat. Mater. 10, 625 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3070, Google ScholarCrossref
  5. 5. J. J. Yang, M. Zhang, J. P. Strachan, F. Miao, M. D. Pickett, R. D. Kelley, G. Medeiros-Ribeiro, and R. S. Williams, Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 232102 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3524521, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  6. 6. F. Miao, J. P. Strachan, J. J. Yang, M.-X. Zhang, I. Goldfarb, A. C. Torrezan, P. Eschbach, R. D. Kelley, G. Medeiros-Ribeiro, and R. S. Williams, Adv. Mater. 23, 5633 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201103379, Google ScholarCrossref
  7. 7. Z. Wei, Y. Kanzawa, K. Arita, Y. Katoh, K. Kawai, S. Muraoka, S. Mitani, S. Fujii, K. Katayama, and M. Iijima, in IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting, 2008, IEDM 2008 (IEEE, 2008), pp. 1–4. Google ScholarCrossref
  8. 8. M.-J. Lee, S. Han, S. H. Jeon, B. H. Park, B. S. Kang, S.-E. Ahn, K. H. Kim, C. B. Lee, C. J. Kim, and I.-K. Yoo, Nano Lett. 9, 1476 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl803387q, Google ScholarCrossref
  9. 9. K.-H. Xue, B. Traoré, P. Blaise, L. R. Fonseca, E. Vianello, G. Molas, B. De Salvo, G. Ghibaudo, B. Magyari-Köpe, and Y. Nishi, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 61, 1394 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/TED.2014.2312943, Google ScholarCrossref
  10. 10. G.-S. Park, Y. B. Kim, S. Y. Park, X. S. Li, S. Heo, M.-J. Lee, M. Chang, J. H. Kwon, M. Kim, and U.-I. Chung, Nat. Commun. 4, 2382 (2013). Google ScholarCrossref
  11. 11. S. Clima, K. Sankaran, Y. Y. Chen, A. Fantini, U. Celano, A. Belmonte, L. Zhang, L. Goux, B. Govoreanu, R. Degraeve et al., Phys. Status Solidi RRL 8, 501 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/pssr.201409054, Google ScholarCrossref
  12. 12. J. J. Yang, J. P. Strachan, F. Miao, M.-X. Zhang, M. D. Pickett, W. Yi, D. A. Ohlberg, G. Medeiros-Ribeiro, and R. S. Williams, Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process 102, 785 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-011-6265-8, Google ScholarCrossref
  13. 13. J. P. Strachan, G. Medeiros-Ribeiro, J. J. Yang, M.-X. Zhang, F. Miao, I. Goldfarb, M. Holt, V. Rose, and R. S. Williams, Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 242114 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3599589, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  14. 14. J. P. Strachan, M. D. Pickett, J. J. Yang, S. Aloni, D. Kilcoyne, and S. R. Williams, Adv. Mater. 22, 3573 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201000186, Google ScholarCrossref
  15. 15. K. Lehovec, J. Less Common Met. 7, 397 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5088(64)90036-0, Google ScholarCrossref
  16. 16. S.-H. Lee, J. Kim, S.-J. Kim, S. Kim, and G.-S. Park, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 235502 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.235502, Google ScholarCrossref
  17. 17. Y.-N. Wu, L. Li, and H.-P. Cheng, Phys. Rev. B 83, 144105 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.83.144105, Google ScholarCrossref
  18. 18. R. Nashed, W. M. Hassan, Y. Ismail, and N. K. Allam, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15, 1352 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1039/C2CP43492J, Google ScholarCrossref
  19. 19. S. Pérez-Walton, C. Valencia-Balvín, G. M. Dalpian, and J. M. Osorio-Guillén, Phys Status Solidi B 250, 1644 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.201248577, Google ScholarCrossref
  20. 20. J.-Y. Kim, B. Magyari-Köpe, K.-J. Lee, H.-S. Kim, S.-H. Lee, and Y. Nishi, Phys. Status Solidi RRL 8, 560 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/pssr.201409018, Google ScholarCrossref
  21. 21. R. Bassiri, K. Borisenko, D. Cockayne, J. Hough, I. MacLaren, and S. Rowan, Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 031904 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3535982, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  22. 22. Y. Guo and J. Robertson, Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 112906 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4869553, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  23. 23. J. S. Anderson, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1973, 1107. https://doi.org/10.1039/dt9730001107, Google ScholarCrossref
  24. 24. R. Marschall and L. Wang, Catal. Today 225, 111 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2013.10.088, Google ScholarCrossref
  25. 25. C. Chaneliere, J. Autran, R. Devine, and B. Ballard, Mater. Sci. Eng. R 22, 269 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-796X(97)00023-5, Google ScholarCrossref
  26. 26. P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococcioni, and I. Dabo, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21, 395502 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/21/39/395502, Google ScholarCrossref
  27. 27. A. Janotti and C. G. Van de Walle, Phys. Rev. B 76, 165202 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.76.165202, Google ScholarCrossref
  28. 28. C. O'Rourke and D. R. Bowler, J. Phys. Chem. C 118, 7261 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp407736f, Google ScholarCrossref
  29. 29. C. Freysoldt, B. Grabowski, T. Hickel, J. Neugebauer, G. Kresse, A. Janotti, and C. G. Van de Walle, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 253 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.86.253, Google ScholarCrossref
  30. 30. G.-Y. Huang, C.-Y. Wang, and J.-T. Wang, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21, 195403 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/21/19/195403, Google ScholarCrossref
  31. 31. M. Liu, Z. Rong, R. Malik, P. Canepa, A. Jain, G. Ceder, and K. A. Persson, Energy Environ. Sci. 8, 964 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/C4EE03389B, Google ScholarCrossref
  32. 32. S. K. Estreicher, D. J. Backlund, C. Carbogno, and M. Scheffler, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 10221 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201100733, Google ScholarCrossref
  33. 33. H. Iddir, S. Ögüt, P. Zapol, and N. D. Browning, Phys. Rev. B 75, 073203 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.75.073203, Google ScholarCrossref
  34. 34. M. Y. Yang, K. Kamiya, B. Magyari-Köpe, M. Niwa, Y. Nishi, and K. Shiraishi, Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 093504 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4819772, Google ScholarScitation
  35. 35. G. Henkelman, B. P. Uberuaga, and H. Jónsson, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 9901 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1329672, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  36. 36. See supplementary material at http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4945579 for animations of oxygen vacancy diffusion in λ Ta2O5 and technical details on comparison of relaxed vacancy structures. Google Scholar
  37. 37. Y. Guo, J. Robertson, and S. J. Clark, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 27, 025501 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/27/2/025501, Google ScholarCrossref
  38. 38. R. Nakamura, T. Toda, S. Tsukui, M. Tane, M. Ishimaru, T. Suzuki, and H. Nakajima, J. Appl. Phys. 116, 033504 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4889800, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  39. 39. N. Cabrera and N. F. Mott, Rep. Prog. Phys. 12, 163 (1948). https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/12/1/308, Google ScholarCrossref
  40. 40. D. B. Strukov and R. S. Williams, Appl. Phys. A 94, 515 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-008-4975-3, Google ScholarCrossref
  41. 41. L. Larcher, O. Pirrotta, F. M. Puglisi, A. Padovani, P. Pavan, and L. Vandelli, ECS Trans. 64, 49 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1149/06414.0049ecst, Google ScholarCrossref
  42. 42. S. Wicklein, C. Petti, T. Minville, A. Bandyopadhyay, and A. Ilkbahar, ECS Trans. 69, 33 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1149/06903.0033ecst, Google ScholarCrossref
  43. 43. A. Marchewka, B. Roesgen, K. Skaja, H. Du, C.-L. Jia, J. Mayer, V. Rana, R. Waser, and S. Menzel, Adv. Electron. Mater. 2, 1500233 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/aelm.201500233, Google ScholarCrossref
  44. 44. Y. Guo and J. Robertson, Microelectron. Eng. 147, 254 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mee.2015.04.065, Google ScholarCrossref
  45. 45. J. Zheng, G. Ceder, T. Maxisch, W. Chim, and W. Choi, Phys. Rev. B 75, 104112 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.75.104112, Google ScholarCrossref
  46. 46. D. Liu, S. Clark, and J. Robertson, Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 032905 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3293440, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  47. 47. N. Capron, P. Broqvist, and A. Pasquarello, Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 192905 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2807282, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  48. 48. Y. Guo and J. Robertson, Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 223516 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4903470, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  49. © 2016 AIP Publishing LLC.

Article Metrics

Views
505
Citations
Crossref 14
Web of Science
ISI 14

Altmetric

Please Note: The number of views represents the full text views from December 2016 to date. Article views prior to December 2016 are not included.