Published Online: 30 March 2016
Accepted: March 2016
Appl. Phys. Lett. 108, 132404 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4945049
We developed a fabrication process of an epitaxial MgAl2O4 barrier for magnetic tunnel junctions (MTJs) using a direct sputtering method from an MgAl2O4 spinel sintered target. Annealing the sputter-deposited MgAl2O4 layer sandwiched between Fe electrodes led to the formation of a (001)-oriented cation-disorder spinel with atomically sharp interfaces and lattice-matching with the Fe electrodes. A large tunnel magnetoresistance ratio up to 245% at 297 K (436% at 3 K) was achieved in the Fe/MgAl2O4/Fe(001) MTJ as well as an excellent bias voltage dependence. These results indicate that the direct sputtering is an alternative method for the realization of high performance MTJs with a spinel-based tunnel barrier.
  1. 1. S. S. P. Parkin, C. Kaiser, A. Panchula, P. M. Rice, B. Hughes, M. Samant, and S.-H. Yang, Nat. Mater. 3, 862 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1256, Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  2. 2. S. Yuasa, T. Nagahama, A. Fukushima, Y. Suzuki, and K. Ando, Nat. Mater. 3, 868 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1257, , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  3. 3. E. Y. Tsymbal and I. Zutic, Handbook of Spin Transport and Magnetism ( CRC Press, 2011). , Google ScholarCrossref
  4. 4. M. Gajek, J. J. Nowak, J. Z. Sun, P. L. Trouilloud, E. J. O'Sullivan, D. W. Abraham, M. C. Gaidis, G. Hu, S. Brown, Y. Zhu, R. P. Robertazzi, W. J. Gallagher, and D. C. Worledge, Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 132408 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3694270, , Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  5. 5. H. Ohno, T. Endoh, T. Hanyu, Y. Ando, and S. Ikeda, in Advances in Non-Volatile Memory and Storage Technology, edited by Y. Nishi ( Woodhead Publishing, 2014), pp. 455–494. , Google ScholarCrossref
  6. 6. L. Thomas, G. Jan, J. Zhu, H. Liu, Y.-J. Lee, S. Le, R.-Y. Tong, K. Pi, Y.-J. Wang, D. Shen, R. He, J. Haq, J. Teng, V. Lam, K. Huang, T. Zhong, T. Torng, and P.-K. Wang, J. Appl. Phys. 115, 172615 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4870917, , Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  7. 7. D. D. Djayaprawira, K. Tsunekawa, M. Nagai, H. Maehara, S. Yamagata, N. Watanabe, S. Yuasa, Y. Suzuki, and K. Ando, Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 092502 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1871344, , Google ScholarScitation
  8. 8. K. Tsunekawa, D. D. Djayaprawira, M. Nagai, H. Maehara, S. Yamagata, N. Watanabe, S. Yuasa, Y. Suzuki, and K. Ando, Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 072503 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2012525, , Google ScholarScitation
  9. 9. W. Shen, D. Mazumdar, X. Zou, X. Liu, B. D. Schrag, and G. Xiao, Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 182508 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2201547, , Google ScholarScitation
  10. 10. G.-X. Miao, K. B. Chetry, A. Gupta, W. H. Butler, K. Tsunekawa, D. Djayaprawira, and G. Xiao, J. Appl. Phys. 99, 08T305 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2162047, , Google ScholarScitation
  11. 11. S. Ikeda, J. Hayakawa, Y. Ashizawa, Y. M. Lee, K. Miura, H. Hasegawa, M. Tsunoda, F. Matsukura, and H. Ohno, Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 082508 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2976435, , Google ScholarScitation
  12. 12. T. Dimopoulos, G. Gieres, J. Wecker, N. Wiese, Y. Luo, and K. Samwer, J. Appl. Phys. 98, 073705 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2077847, , Google ScholarScitation
  13. 13. Y. Choi, H. Tsunematsu, S. Yamagata, H. Okuyama, Y. Nagamine, and K. Tsunekawa, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1 48, 120214 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.48.120214, , Google ScholarCrossref
  14. 14. T. Seki, H. Kubota, A. Fukushima, K. Yakushiji, S. Yuasa, K. Ando, H. Maehara, S. Yamagata, H. Okuyama, and K. Tsunekawa, J. Appl. Phys. 108, 123915 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3524543, , Google ScholarScitation
  15. 15. H. Sukegawa, Y. Miura, S. Muramoto, S. Mitani, T. Niizeki, T. Ohkubo, K. Abe, M. Shirai, K. Inomata, and K. Hono, Phys. Rev. B 86, 184401 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.86.184401, , Google ScholarCrossref
  16. 16. J. Zhang, X.-G. Zhang, and X. F. Han, Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 222401 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4722804, , Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  17. 17. Y. Miura, S. Muramoto, K. Abe, and M. Shirai, Phys. Rev. B 86, 024426 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.86.024426, , Google ScholarCrossref
  18. 18. H. Sukegawa, H. Xiu, T. Ohkubo, T. Furubayashi, T. Niizeki, W. Wang, S. Kasai, S. Mitani, K. Inomata, and K. Hono, Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 212505 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3441409, , Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  19. 19. H. Sukegawa, K. Inomata, and S. Mitani, Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 092403 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4895104, , Google ScholarScitation
  20. 20. T. Scheike, H. Sukegawa, T. Furubayashi, Z. Wen, K. Inomata, T. Ohkubo, K. Hono, and S. Mitani, Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 242407 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4904716, , Google ScholarScitation
  21. 21. H. Sukegawa, S. Mitani, T. Ohkubo, K. Inomata, and K. Hono, Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 142409 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4824134, , Google ScholarScitation
  22. 22. S.-H. Wei and S. B. Zhang, Phys. Rev. B 63, 045112 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.63.045112, , Google ScholarCrossref
  23. 23. F. Bonell, S. Andrieu, C. Tiusan, F. Montaigne, E. Snoeck, B. Belhadji, L. Calmels, F. Bertran, P. Le Fèvre, and A. Taleb-Ibrahimi, Phys. Rev. B 82, 092405 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.82.092405, , Google ScholarCrossref
  24. 24. S. Yuasa and D. D. Djayaprawira, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 40, R337 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/40/21/R01, , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  25. 25. I. Rungger, O. Mryasov, and S. Sanvito, Phys. Rev. B 79, 094414 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.79.094414, , Google ScholarCrossref
  26. 26. Y. Lu, H.-X. Yang, C. Tiusan, M. Hehn, M. Chshiev, A. Duluard, B. Kierren, G. Lengaigne, D. Lacour, C. Bellouard, and F. Montaigne, Phys. Rev. B 86, 184420 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.86.184420, , Google ScholarCrossref
  27. 27. K. D. Belashchenko, J. Velev, and E. Y. Tsymbal, Phys. Rev. B 72, 140404 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.72.140404, , Google ScholarCrossref
  28. 28. R. B. Gangineni, C. Bellouard, A. Duluard, B. Negulescu, C. Baraduc, G. Gaudin, and C. Tiusan, Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 182402 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4875386, , Google ScholarScitation
  29. 29. P.-J. Zermatten, G. Gaudin, G. Maris, M. Miron, A. Schuhl, C. Tiusan, F. Greullet, and M. Hehn, Phys. Rev. B 78, 033301 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.78.033301, , Google ScholarCrossref
  30. 30. V. Drewello, M. Schäfers, O. Schebaum, A. A. Khan, J. Münchenberger, J. Schmalhorst, G. Reiss, and A. Thomas, Phys. Rev. B 79, 174417 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.79.174417, , Google ScholarCrossref
  31. 31. S. Zhang, P. M. Levy, A. C. Marley, and S. S. P. Parkin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3744 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.3744, , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
  32. 32. W. Wang, H. Sukegawa, R. Shan, S. Mitani, and K. Inomata, Appl. Phys. Lett. 95, 182502 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3258069, , Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  33. © 2016 AIP Publishing LLC.