No Access Submitted: 05 May 2015 Accepted: 29 January 2016 Published Online: 12 February 2016
Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy 8, 013304 (2016); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4941782
more...View Affiliations
View Contributors
  • Naseem Ali
  • Aleksandr S. Aseyev
  • Raúl Bayoán Cal
Hot-wire measurements obtained in a 3 × 3 wind turbine array boundary layer are utilized to analyze high order structure functions, intermittency effects as well as the probability density functions of velocity increments at different scales within the energy cascade. The intermittency exponent is found to be greater in the far-wake region in comparison with the near-wake. At hub height, the intermittency exponent is found to be null. Extended self-similarity scaling exponents of the second, fourth, and fifth order structure functions remain relatively constant as a function of height in the far-wake; whereas in the near-wake, these are highly affected by the passage of the rotor where tip vortices reside, thus showing a dependence on physical location. When comparing with proposed models, these generally overpredict the structure functions in the far-wake region. The probability density function distributions in the far-wake region display wider tails compared to the near-wake region, and the constant skewness hypothesis based on the local isotropy is disrupted in the wake.
The authors thank the reviewers whose constructive comments helped to improve this work. This work is in part funded by the National Science Foundation (Grant No. CBET-1034581).
  1. 1. G. W. E. Council, GWEC, November (2012). Google Scholar
  2. 2. W. Zhang, C. D. Markfort, and F. Porté-Agel, Exp. Fluids 52, 1219 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-011-1250-8, Google ScholarCrossref
  3. 3. N. Ali, A. Aseyev, J. McCraney, V. Vuppuluri, O. Abbass, T. Al Jubaree, M. Melius, and R. B. Cal, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 59, 423 (2014). Google Scholar
  4. 4. L. Vermeer, J. N. Sørensen, and A. Crespo, Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 39, 467 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-0421(03)00078-2, Google ScholarCrossref
  5. 5. M. Calaf, C. Meneveau, and J. Meyers, Phys. Fluids 22, 015110 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3291077, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  6. 6. N. Hamilton, M. Melius, and R. B. Cal, Wind Energy 18(2), 277–295 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1002/we.1697. Google ScholarCrossref
  7. 7. M. Chamecki and N. Dias, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 130, 2733 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.03.155, Google ScholarCrossref
  8. 8. V. I. Tatarskii, Wave Propagation in Turbulent Medium, translated by R. A. Silverman ( McGraw-Hill, 1961), Vol. 1. Google ScholarCrossref
  9. 9. A. N. Kolmogorov, Proc.: Math. Phys. Sci. 32, 15 (1941). Google Scholar
  10. 10. S. B. Pope, Turbulent Flows ( Cambridge University Press, 2000). Google ScholarCrossref
  11. 11. C. Meneveau and K. Sreenivasan, J. Fluid Mech. 224, 429 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112091001830, Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  12. 12. A. N. Kolmogorov, J. Fluid Mech. 13, 82 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112062000518, Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  13. 13. J. C. Vassilicos, Intermittency in Turbulent Flows ( Cambridge University Press, 2001). Google Scholar
  14. 14. U. Frisch, P.-L. Sulem, and M. Nelkin, J. Fluid Mech. 87, 719 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112078001846, Google ScholarCrossref
  15. 15. O. N. Boratav and R. B. Pelz, Phys. Fluids 9, 1400 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.869253, Google ScholarScitation
  16. 16. J. Gao, Y. Cao, W.-W. Tung, and J. Hu, Multiscale Analysis of Complex Time Series: Integration of Chaos and Random Fractal Theory, and Beyond ( John Wiley & Sons, 2007). Google ScholarCrossref
  17. 17. R. Benzi, S. Ciliberto, R. Tripiccione, C. Baudet, F. Massaioli, and S. Succi, Phys. Rev. E 48, R29 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.48.R29, Google ScholarCrossref
  18. 18. A. Babiano, B. Dubrulle, and P. Frick, Phys. Rev. E 55, 2693 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.55.2693, Google ScholarCrossref
  19. 19. M. Briscolini, P. Santangelo, S. Succi, and R. Benzi, Phys. Rev. E 50, R1745 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.50.R1745, Google ScholarCrossref
  20. 20. A. E. Arnéodo, C. Baudet, F. Belin, R. Benzi, B. Castaing, B. Chabaud, R. Chavarria, S. Ciliberto, R. Camussi, F. Chilla et al., Europhys. Lett. 34, 411 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1209/epl/i1996-00472-2, Google ScholarCrossref
  21. 21. E. Gaudin, B. Protas, S. Goujon-Durand, J. Wojciechowski, and J. Wesfreid, Phys. Rev. E 57, R9 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.57.R9, Google ScholarCrossref
  22. 22. Z.-S. She and E. Leveque, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 336 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.336, Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  23. 23. B. Dubrulle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 959 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.959, Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  24. 24. J. M. Vindel, C. Yage, and J. M. Redondo, Nonlinear Processes Geophys. 15, 915 (2008). https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-15-915-2008, Google ScholarCrossref
  25. 25. F. Anselmet, Y. Gagne, E. J. Hopfinger, and R. A. Antonia, J. Fluid Mech. 140, 63 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112084000513, Google ScholarCrossref
  26. 26. A. Vincent and M. Meneguzzi, J. Fluid Mech. 225, 1 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112091001957, Google ScholarCrossref
  27. 27. P. D. Ditlevsen and I. Mogensen, Phys. Rev. E 53, 4785 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.53.4785, Google ScholarCrossref
  28. 28. P. Milan, M. Wächter, and J. Peinke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 138701 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.138701, Google ScholarCrossref
  29. 29. T. Mücke, D. Kleinhans, and J. Peinke, Wind Energy 14, 301 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/we.422, Google ScholarCrossref
  30. 30. R. B. Cal, J. Lebrón, L. Castillo, H. S. Kang, and C. Meneveau, J. Renewable Sustainable Energy 2, 013106 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3289735, Google ScholarScitation
  31. 31. M. S. Melius, M. Tutkun, and R. B. Cal, J. Renewable Sustainable Energy 6, 023121 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4869566, Google ScholarScitation
  32. 32. N. Hamilton, H. S. Kang, C. Meneveau, and R. B. Cal, J. Renewable Sustainable Energy 4, 063105 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4761921, Google ScholarScitation
  33. 33. F. Böttcher, S. Barth, and J. Peinke, Stochastic Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 21, 299 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-006-0065-2, Google ScholarCrossref
  34. 34. V. Kuznetsov, A. Praskovsky, and V. Sabelnikov, J. Fluid Mech. 243, 595 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112092002842, Google ScholarCrossref
  35. 35. G. G. Katul, M. B. Parlange, and C. R. Chu, Phys. Fluids 6, 2480 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.868196, Google ScholarScitation
  36. 36. R. Antonia, N. Phan-Thien, and B. Satyaprakash, Phys. Fluids 24, 554 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.863406, Google ScholarScitation
  37. 37. A. Chambers and R. Antonia, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 28, 343 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00121313, Google ScholarCrossref
  38. 38. O. B. Mahjoub, J. M. Redondo, and A. Babiano, Appl. Sci. Res. 59, 299 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1001199825354, Google ScholarCrossref
  39. 39. G. G. Katul, M. B. Parlange, J. D. Albertson, and C. R. Chu, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 72, 123 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00712392, Google ScholarCrossref
  40. 40. A. Monin and A. Yaglom, Statistical Fluid Mechanics ( MIT Press, 1975), Vol. II. Google Scholar
  41. 41. O. B. Mahjoub, Ph.D. thesis, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, 2001. Google Scholar
  42. 42. R. A. Antonia, A. J. Chambers, and B. R. Satyaprakash, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 21, 159 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02033934, Google ScholarCrossref
  43. 43. G. Katul, C.-I. Hsieh, and J. Sigmon, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 82, 49 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1000178707511, Google ScholarCrossref
  44. 44. A. A. Townsend, The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow ( Cambridge University Press, 1980). Google Scholar
  1. © 2016 AIP Publishing LLC.