ABSTRACT
Hot-wire measurements obtained in a 3 × 3 wind turbine array boundary layer are utilized to analyze high order structure functions, intermittency effects as well as the probability density functions of velocity increments at different scales within the energy cascade. The intermittency exponent is found to be greater in the far-wake region in comparison with the near-wake. At hub height, the intermittency exponent is found to be null. Extended self-similarity scaling exponents of the second, fourth, and fifth order structure functions remain relatively constant as a function of height in the far-wake; whereas in the near-wake, these are highly affected by the passage of the rotor where tip vortices reside, thus showing a dependence on physical location. When comparing with proposed models, these generally overpredict the structure functions in the far-wake region. The probability density function distributions in the far-wake region display wider tails compared to the near-wake region, and the constant skewness hypothesis based on the local isotropy is disrupted in the wake.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors thank the reviewers whose constructive comments helped to improve this work. This work is in part funded by the National Science Foundation (Grant No. CBET-1034581).
REFERENCES
- 1. G. W. E. Council, GWEC, November (2012). Google Scholar
- 2. W. Zhang, C. D. Markfort, and F. Porté-Agel, Exp. Fluids 52, 1219 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00348-011-1250-8, Google ScholarCrossref
- 3. N. Ali, A. Aseyev, J. McCraney, V. Vuppuluri, O. Abbass, T. Al Jubaree, M. Melius, and R. B. Cal, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 59, 423 (2014). Google Scholar
- 4. L. Vermeer, J. N. Sørensen, and A. Crespo, Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 39, 467 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-0421(03)00078-2, Google ScholarCrossref
- 5. M. Calaf, C. Meneveau, and J. Meyers, Phys. Fluids 22, 015110 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3291077, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
- 6. N. Hamilton, M. Melius, and R. B. Cal, Wind Energy 18(2), 277–295 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1002/we.1697. Google ScholarCrossref
- 7. M. Chamecki and N. Dias, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 130, 2733 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.03.155, Google ScholarCrossref
- 8. V. I. Tatarskii, Wave Propagation in Turbulent Medium, translated by R. A. Silverman ( McGraw-Hill, 1961), Vol. 1. Google ScholarCrossref
- 9. A. N. Kolmogorov, Proc.: Math. Phys. Sci. 32, 15 (1941). Google Scholar
- 10. S. B. Pope, Turbulent Flows ( Cambridge University Press, 2000). Google ScholarCrossref
- 11. C. Meneveau and K. Sreenivasan, J. Fluid Mech. 224, 429 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112091001830, Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
- 12. A. N. Kolmogorov, J. Fluid Mech. 13, 82 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112062000518, Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
- 13. J. C. Vassilicos, Intermittency in Turbulent Flows ( Cambridge University Press, 2001). Google Scholar
- 14. U. Frisch, P.-L. Sulem, and M. Nelkin, J. Fluid Mech. 87, 719 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112078001846, Google ScholarCrossref
- 15. O. N. Boratav and R. B. Pelz, Phys. Fluids 9, 1400 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.869253, Google ScholarScitation
- 16. J. Gao, Y. Cao, W.-W. Tung, and J. Hu, Multiscale Analysis of Complex Time Series: Integration of Chaos and Random Fractal Theory, and Beyond ( John Wiley & Sons, 2007). Google ScholarCrossref
- 17. R. Benzi, S. Ciliberto, R. Tripiccione, C. Baudet, F. Massaioli, and S. Succi, Phys. Rev. E 48, R29 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.48.R29, Google ScholarCrossref
- 18. A. Babiano, B. Dubrulle, and P. Frick, Phys. Rev. E 55, 2693 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.55.2693, Google ScholarCrossref
- 19. M. Briscolini, P. Santangelo, S. Succi, and R. Benzi, Phys. Rev. E 50, R1745 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.50.R1745, Google ScholarCrossref
- 20. A. E. Arnéodo, C. Baudet, F. Belin, R. Benzi, B. Castaing, B. Chabaud, R. Chavarria, S. Ciliberto, R. Camussi, F. Chilla et al., Europhys. Lett. 34, 411 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1209/epl/i1996-00472-2, Google ScholarCrossref
- 21. E. Gaudin, B. Protas, S. Goujon-Durand, J. Wojciechowski, and J. Wesfreid, Phys. Rev. E 57, R9 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.57.R9, Google ScholarCrossref
- 22. Z.-S. She and E. Leveque, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 336 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.72.336, Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
- 23. B. Dubrulle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 959 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.73.959, Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
- 24. J. M. Vindel, C. Yage, and J. M. Redondo, Nonlinear Processes Geophys. 15, 915 (2008). https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-15-915-2008, Google ScholarCrossref
- 25. F. Anselmet, Y. Gagne, E. J. Hopfinger, and R. A. Antonia, J. Fluid Mech. 140, 63 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112084000513, Google ScholarCrossref
- 26. A. Vincent and M. Meneguzzi, J. Fluid Mech. 225, 1 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112091001957, Google ScholarCrossref
- 27. P. D. Ditlevsen and I. Mogensen, Phys. Rev. E 53, 4785 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.53.4785, Google ScholarCrossref
- 28. P. Milan, M. Wächter, and J. Peinke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 138701 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.138701, Google ScholarCrossref
- 29. T. Mücke, D. Kleinhans, and J. Peinke, Wind Energy 14, 301 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/we.422, Google ScholarCrossref
- 30. R. B. Cal, J. Lebrón, L. Castillo, H. S. Kang, and C. Meneveau, J. Renewable Sustainable Energy 2, 013106 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3289735, Google ScholarScitation
- 31. M. S. Melius, M. Tutkun, and R. B. Cal, J. Renewable Sustainable Energy 6, 023121 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4869566, Google ScholarScitation
- 32. N. Hamilton, H. S. Kang, C. Meneveau, and R. B. Cal, J. Renewable Sustainable Energy 4, 063105 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4761921, Google ScholarScitation
- 33. F. Böttcher, S. Barth, and J. Peinke, Stochastic Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 21, 299 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-006-0065-2, Google ScholarCrossref
- 34. V. Kuznetsov, A. Praskovsky, and V. Sabelnikov, J. Fluid Mech. 243, 595 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022112092002842, Google ScholarCrossref
- 35. G. G. Katul, M. B. Parlange, and C. R. Chu, Phys. Fluids 6, 2480 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.868196, Google ScholarScitation
- 36. R. Antonia, N. Phan-Thien, and B. Satyaprakash, Phys. Fluids 24, 554 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.863406, Google ScholarScitation
- 37. A. Chambers and R. Antonia, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 28, 343 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00121313, Google ScholarCrossref
- 38. O. B. Mahjoub, J. M. Redondo, and A. Babiano, Appl. Sci. Res. 59, 299 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1001199825354, Google ScholarCrossref
- 39. G. G. Katul, M. B. Parlange, J. D. Albertson, and C. R. Chu, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 72, 123 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00712392, Google ScholarCrossref
- 40. A. Monin and A. Yaglom, Statistical Fluid Mechanics ( MIT Press, 1975), Vol. II. Google Scholar
- 41. O. B. Mahjoub, Ph.D. thesis, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, 2001. Google Scholar
- 42. R. A. Antonia, A. J. Chambers, and B. R. Satyaprakash, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 21, 159 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02033934, Google ScholarCrossref
- 43. G. Katul, C.-I. Hsieh, and J. Sigmon, Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 82, 49 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1000178707511, Google ScholarCrossref
- 44. A. A. Townsend, The Structure of Turbulent Shear Flow ( Cambridge University Press, 1980). Google Scholar
Please Note: The number of views represents the full text views from December 2016 to date. Article views prior to December 2016 are not included.

