No Access
Published Online: 24 August 2015
Accepted: July 2015
Journal of Applied Physics 118, 083901 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4928325
more...View Affiliations
We conducted systematic measurements on the carrier lifetime (τc), spin relaxation time (τs), and circular polarization of photoluminescence (Pcirc) in (100) GaAs/AlGaAs multiple quantum wells grown by molecular beam epitaxy (MBE). The τc values are strongly affected by MBE growth conditions (0.4–9 ns), whereas the τs are almost constant at about 0.13 ns. The result suggests that spin detection efficiency [τs/(τc + τs)], which is expected to be proportional to a steady-state Pcirc, is largely dependent on growth condition. We confirmed that the Pcirc has similar dependence on growth condition to those of τs/(τc + τs) values. The study thus indicates that choosing the appropriate growth condition of the QW is indispensable for obtaining a high Pcirc from a spin-polarized light-emitting diode (spin-LED).
This work was supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Area, “Nano Spin Conversion Science” (Grant Nos. 26103003 and 26103004), and Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (A) (Grant No. 26709027).
  1. 1. M. Holub and P. Battacharya, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 40, R179 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/40/11/R01, Google ScholarCrossref
  2. 2. J. Sinova and I. Žutić, Nat. Mater. 11, 368 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3304, Google ScholarCrossref
  3. 3. Optical Orientation, edited by F. Meier and B. P. Zakharchenya ( Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 1984). Google ScholarCrossref
  4. 4. R. Fiederling, K. Kelm, G. Reuscher, W. Ossau, G. Schmidt, A. Waag, and L. W. Molenkamp, Nature (London) 402, 787 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/45502, Google ScholarCrossref
  5. 5. Y. Ohno, D. K. Young, B. Beschoten, F. Matsukura, H. Ohno, and D. D. Awschalom, Nature (London) 402, 790 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/45509, Google ScholarCrossref
  6. 6. G. Kioseoglou, A. T. Hanbicki, J. M. Sullivan, O. M. J. van't Erve, C. H. Li, S. C. Erwin, R. Mallory, M. Yasar, A. Petrou, and B. T. Jonker, Nat. Mater. 3, 799 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1239, Google ScholarCrossref
  7. 7. H. J. Zhu, M. Ramsteiner, H. Kostial, M. Wassermeier, H. P. Schonherr, and K. H. Ploog, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 016601 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.016601, Google ScholarCrossref
  8. 8. A. T. Hanbicki, B. T. Jonker, G. Itskos, G. Kioseoglou, and A. Petrou, Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 1240 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1449530, Google ScholarScitation
  9. 9. V. F. Motsnyi, V. I. Safarov, J. De Boeck, J. Das, W. Van Roy, E. Goovaerts, and G. Borghs, Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 265 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1491010, Google ScholarScitation
  10. 10. T. Manago and H. Akinaga, Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 694 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1496493, Google ScholarScitation
  11. 11. X. Jiang, R. Wang, R. M. Shelby, R. M. Macfarlane, S. R. Bank, J. S. Harris, and S. S. P. Parkin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 056601 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.056601, Google ScholarCrossref
  12. 12. H. Saito, J. C. Le Breton, V. Zayets, Y. Mineno, S. Yuasa, and K. Ando, Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 012501 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3282799, Google ScholarScitation
  13. 13. S. H. Liang, T. T. Zhang, P. Barate, J. Frougier, M. Vidal, P. Renucci, B. Xu, H. Jaffrès, J.-M. George, X. Devaux, M. Hehn, X. Marie, S. Mangin, H. X. Yang, A. Hallal, M. Chshiev, T. Amand, H. F. Liu, D. P. Liu, X. F. Han, Z. G. Wang, and Y. Lu, Phys. Rev. B 90, 085310 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.90.085310, Google ScholarCrossref
  14. 14. X. Y. Dong, C. Adelmann, J. Q. Xie, C. J. Palmstrøm, X. Lou, J. Strand, P. A. Crowell, J.-P. Barnes, and A. K. Petford-Long, Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 102107 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1881789, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  15. 15. M. C. Hickey, C. D. Damsgaard, I. Farrer, S. N. Holmes, A. Husmann, J. B. Hansen, C. S. Jacobsen, D. A. Ritchie, R. F. Lee, G. A. C. Jones, and M. Pepper, Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 252106 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1949722, Google ScholarScitation
  16. 16. E. Wada, K. Watanabe, Y. Shirahata, M. Ito, M. Yamaguchi, and T. Taniyama, Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 102510 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3357436, Google ScholarScitation
  17. 17. N. Yokota, K. Ikeda, Y. Nishizaki, S. Koh, and H. Kawaguch, IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 22, 1689 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2010.2079927, Google ScholarCrossref
  18. 18. N. Yokota, Y. Tsunemi, K. Ikeda, and H. Kawaguchi, Appl. Phys. Exp. 5, 122401 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1143/APEX.5.122401, Google ScholarCrossref
  19. 19. R. J. Seymour and R. R. Alfano, Appl. Phys. Lett. 37, 231 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.91835, Google ScholarScitation
  20. 20. G. Gupta, M. Y. Frankel, J. A. Valdmanis, J. F. Whitaker, G. A. Mourou, F. W. Smith, and A. R. Calawa, Appl. Phys. Lett. 59, 3276 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.105729, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  21. 21.In the calculation, we used the following values: the effective mass of electron (0.067), heavy-hole (0.50) and light-hole (0.087) in GaAs, and the conduction- and valence-band offsets at the GaAs/Al0.3Ga0.7As of 0.23 and 0.15 eV, respectively.
  22. 22. M. I. D'yakonov and V. I. Perel', Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 60, 1954 (1971) Google Scholar
    M. I. D'yakonov and V. I. Perel'[Sov. Phys. JETP 33, 1053 (1971)]. Google Scholar
  23. 23. A. Tackeuchi, Y. Nishikawa, and O. Wada, Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 797 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.116536, Google ScholarScitation
  24. 24. R. S. Britton, T. Grevatt, A. Malinowski, R. T. Harley, P. Perozzo, A. R. Cameron, and A. Miller, Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 2140 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.122403, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  1. © 2015 AIP Publishing LLC.