ABSTRACT
We conducted systematic measurements on the carrier lifetime (τc), spin relaxation time (τs), and circular polarization of photoluminescence (Pcirc) in (100) GaAs/AlGaAs multiple quantum wells grown by molecular beam epitaxy (MBE). The τc values are strongly affected by MBE growth conditions (0.4–9 ns), whereas the τs are almost constant at about 0.13 ns. The result suggests that spin detection efficiency [τs/(τc + τs)], which is expected to be proportional to a steady-state Pcirc, is largely dependent on growth condition. We confirmed that the Pcirc has similar dependence on growth condition to those of τs/(τc + τs) values. The study thus indicates that choosing the appropriate growth condition of the QW is indispensable for obtaining a high Pcirc from a spin-polarized light-emitting diode (spin-LED).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Area, “Nano Spin Conversion Science” (Grant Nos. 26103003 and 26103004), and Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (A) (Grant No. 26709027).
REFERENCES
- 1. M. Holub and P. Battacharya, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 40, R179 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/40/11/R01, Google ScholarCrossref
- 2. J. Sinova and I. Žutić, Nat. Mater. 11, 368 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3304, Google ScholarCrossref
- 3. Optical Orientation, edited by F. Meier and B. P. Zakharchenya ( Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 1984). Google ScholarCrossref
- 4. R. Fiederling, K. Kelm, G. Reuscher, W. Ossau, G. Schmidt, A. Waag, and L. W. Molenkamp, Nature (London) 402, 787 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/45502, Google ScholarCrossref
- 5. Y. Ohno, D. K. Young, B. Beschoten, F. Matsukura, H. Ohno, and D. D. Awschalom, Nature (London) 402, 790 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/45509, Google ScholarCrossref
- 6. G. Kioseoglou, A. T. Hanbicki, J. M. Sullivan, O. M. J. van't Erve, C. H. Li, S. C. Erwin, R. Mallory, M. Yasar, A. Petrou, and B. T. Jonker, Nat. Mater. 3, 799 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1239, Google ScholarCrossref
- 7. H. J. Zhu, M. Ramsteiner, H. Kostial, M. Wassermeier, H. P. Schonherr, and K. H. Ploog, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 016601 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.016601, Google ScholarCrossref
- 8. A. T. Hanbicki, B. T. Jonker, G. Itskos, G. Kioseoglou, and A. Petrou, Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 1240 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1449530, Google ScholarScitation
- 9. V. F. Motsnyi, V. I. Safarov, J. De Boeck, J. Das, W. Van Roy, E. Goovaerts, and G. Borghs, Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 265 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1491010, Google ScholarScitation
- 10. T. Manago and H. Akinaga, Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 694 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1496493, Google ScholarScitation
- 11. X. Jiang, R. Wang, R. M. Shelby, R. M. Macfarlane, S. R. Bank, J. S. Harris, and S. S. P. Parkin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 056601 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.056601, Google ScholarCrossref
- 12. H. Saito, J. C. Le Breton, V. Zayets, Y. Mineno, S. Yuasa, and K. Ando, Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 012501 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3282799, Google ScholarScitation
- 13. S. H. Liang, T. T. Zhang, P. Barate, J. Frougier, M. Vidal, P. Renucci, B. Xu, H. Jaffrès, J.-M. George, X. Devaux, M. Hehn, X. Marie, S. Mangin, H. X. Yang, A. Hallal, M. Chshiev, T. Amand, H. F. Liu, D. P. Liu, X. F. Han, Z. G. Wang, and Y. Lu, Phys. Rev. B 90, 085310 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.90.085310, Google ScholarCrossref
- 14. X. Y. Dong, C. Adelmann, J. Q. Xie, C. J. Palmstrøm, X. Lou, J. Strand, P. A. Crowell, J.-P. Barnes, and A. K. Petford-Long, Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 102107 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1881789, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
- 15. M. C. Hickey, C. D. Damsgaard, I. Farrer, S. N. Holmes, A. Husmann, J. B. Hansen, C. S. Jacobsen, D. A. Ritchie, R. F. Lee, G. A. C. Jones, and M. Pepper, Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 252106 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1949722, Google ScholarScitation
- 16. E. Wada, K. Watanabe, Y. Shirahata, M. Ito, M. Yamaguchi, and T. Taniyama, Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 102510 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3357436, Google ScholarScitation
- 17. N. Yokota, K. Ikeda, Y. Nishizaki, S. Koh, and H. Kawaguch, IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 22, 1689 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2010.2079927, Google ScholarCrossref
- 18. N. Yokota, Y. Tsunemi, K. Ikeda, and H. Kawaguchi, Appl. Phys. Exp. 5, 122401 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1143/APEX.5.122401, Google ScholarCrossref
- 19. R. J. Seymour and R. R. Alfano, Appl. Phys. Lett. 37, 231 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.91835, Google ScholarScitation
- 20. G. Gupta, M. Y. Frankel, J. A. Valdmanis, J. F. Whitaker, G. A. Mourou, F. W. Smith, and A. R. Calawa, Appl. Phys. Lett. 59, 3276 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.105729, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
- 21.In the calculation, we used the following values: the effective mass of electron (0.067), heavy-hole (0.50) and light-hole (0.087) in GaAs, and the conduction- and valence-band offsets at the GaAs/Al0.3Ga0.7As of 0.23 and 0.15 eV, respectively.
- 22.
M. I. D'yakonov and
V. I. Perel', Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 60, 1954 (1971) Google Scholar
M. I. D'yakonov and V. I. Perel'[Sov. Phys. JETP 33, 1053 (1971)]. Google Scholar - 23. A. Tackeuchi, Y. Nishikawa, and O. Wada, Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 797 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.116536, Google ScholarScitation
- 24. R. S. Britton, T. Grevatt, A. Malinowski, R. T. Harley, P. Perozzo, A. R. Cameron, and A. Miller, Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 2140 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.122403, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
Please Note: The number of views represents the full text views from December 2016 to date. Article views prior to December 2016 are not included.

