Published Online: 03 August 2015
Accepted: July 2015
Appl. Phys. Lett. 107, 052401 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4927827
more...View Affiliations
We present a comparative study of high frequency dynamics and low frequency noise in elliptical magnetic tunnel junctions with lateral dimensions under 100 nm presenting current-switching phenomena. The analysis of the high frequency oscillation modes with respect to the current reveals the onset of a steady-state precession regime for negative bias currents above J=107A/cm2, when the magnetic field is applied along the easy axis of magnetization. By the study of low frequency noise for the same samples, we demonstrate the direct link between changes in the oscillation modes with the applied current and the normalised low frequency (1/f) noise as a function of the bias current. These findings prove that low frequency noise studies could be a simple and powerful technique to investigate spin-torque based magnetization dynamics.
We would like to acknowledge the support by the Spanish MINECO (MAT2012-32743), and the Comunidad de Madrid through NANOFRONTMAG-CM (S2013/MIT-2850) and CCC-UAM (SVORTEX).
  1. 1. M. Julliere, Phys. Lett. A 54, 225 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(75)90174-7, Google ScholarCrossref
  2. 2. J. S. Moodera, L. R. Kinder, T. M. Wong, and R. Meservey, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3273 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.3273, Google ScholarCrossref
  3. 3. T. Miyazaki and N. Tezuka, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 139(3), L231–L234 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-8853(95)90001-2, Google ScholarCrossref
  4. 4. D. Ralph and M. Stiles, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 320, 1190 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2007.12.019, Google ScholarCrossref
  5. 5. J. Slonczewski, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 159(1), L1–L7 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-8853(96)00062-5, Google ScholarCrossref
  6. 6. J.-V. Kim, Q. Mistral, C. Chappert, V. S. Tiberkevich, and A. N. Slavin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 167201 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.167201, Google ScholarCrossref
  7. 7. V. Tiberkevich, A. Slavin, and J.-V. Kim, Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 192506 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2812546, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  8. 8. Q. Mistral, J.-V. Kim, T. Devolder, P. Crozat, C. Chappert, J. A. Katine, M. J. Carey, and K. Ito, Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 192507 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2201897, Google ScholarScitation
  9. 9. S. Petit, C. Baraduc, C. Thirion, U. Ebels, Y. Liu, M. Li, P. Wang, and B. Dieny, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 077203 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.077203, Google ScholarCrossref
  10. 10. D. Houssameddine, S. H. Florez, J. A. Katine, J.-P. Michel, U. Ebels, D. Mauri, O. Ozatay, B. Delaet, B. Viala, L. Folks et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 022505 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2956418, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  11. 11. D. Houssameddine, U. Ebels, B. Dieny, K. Garello, J.-P. Michel, B. Delaet, B. Viala, M.-C. Cyrille, J. A. Katine, and D. Mauri, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 257202 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.257202, Google ScholarCrossref
  12. 12. T. Devolder, L. Bianchini, J.-V. Kim, P. Crozat, C. Chappert, S. Cornelissen, M. Op de Beeck, and L. Lagae, J. Appl. Phys. 106, 103921 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3260233, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  13. 13. K. V. Thadani, G. Finocchio, Z.-P. Li, O. Ozatay, J. C. Sankey, I. N. Krivorotov, Y.-T. Cui, R. A. Buhrman, and D. C. Ralph, Phys. Rev. B 78, 024409 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.78.024409, Google ScholarCrossref
  14. 14. J. P. Cascales, D. Herranz, J. L. Sambricio, U. Ebels, J. A. Katine, and F. G. Aliev, Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 092404 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4794537, Google ScholarScitation
  15. 15. J. P. Cascales, Ph.D. dissertation, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain, 2015. Google Scholar
  16. 16. D. Houssameddine, Ph.D. thesis, Université Joseph-Fourier - Grenoble I, 2009. Google Scholar
  17. 17. S. Yuasa, T. Nagahama, A. Fukushima, Y. Suzuki, and K. Ando, Nat. Mater. 3, 868 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1257, Google ScholarCrossref
  18. 18. J. Alvarez-Hérault, Ph.D. thesis, Université de Grenoble, 2010. Google Scholar
  19. 19. A. Helmer, S. Cornelissen, T. Devolder, J.-V. Kim, W. van Roy, L. Lagae, and C. Chappert, Phys. Rev. B 81, 094416 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.81.094416, Google ScholarCrossref
  20. 20. H. T. Hardner, M. B. Weissman, M. B. Salamon, and S. S. P. Parkin, Phys. Rev. B 48, 16156 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.48.16156, Google ScholarCrossref
  21. 21. D. Herranz, F. Bonell, A. Gomez-Ibarlucea, S. Andrieu, F. Montaigne, R. Villar, C. Tiusan, and F. G. Aliev, Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 202501 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3430064, Google ScholarScitation
  22. 22. A. Eklund, S. Bonetti, S. R. Sani, S. Majid Mohseni, J. Persson, S. Chung, S. Amir Hossein Banuazizi, E. Iacocca, M. Ostling, J. Akerman et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 092405 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4867257, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  23. 23. R. Sharma, P. Drrenfeld, E. Iacocca, O. G. Heinonen, J. Kerman, and P. K. Muduli, Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 132404 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4896634, Google ScholarScitation
  24. 24. A. Gokce, E. R. Nowak, S. H. Yang, and S. S. P. Parkin, J. Appl. Phys. 99, 08A906 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2169591, Google ScholarScitation
  25. 25. F. G. Aliev, R. Guerrero, D. Herranz, R. Villar, F. Greullet, C. Tiusan, and M. Hehn, Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 232504 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2822812, Google ScholarScitation
  26. 26. J. Almeida, P. Wisniowski, and P. Freitas, IEEE Trans. Magn. 44, 2569–2572 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2008.2002604, Google ScholarCrossref
  27. © 2015 AIP Publishing LLC.