No Access Submitted: 03 March 2015 Accepted: 21 June 2015 Published Online: 08 July 2015
Journal of Applied Physics 118, 024301 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4923407
more...View Affiliations
  • 1School of Electrical Computer and Energy Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85287-8806, USA
  • 2Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA
  • a)Present address: Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, Minnesota 55455, USA. E-mail: .

View Contributors
  • Nishant Chandra
  • Clarence J. Tracy
  • Jeong-Hyun Cho
  • S. T. Picraux
  • Raghuraj Hathwar
  • Stephen M. Goodnick
The processing and performance of Schottky diodes formed from arrays of vertical Ge nanowires (NWs) grown on Ge and Si substrates are reported. The goal of this work is to investigate CMOS compatible processes for integrating NWs as components of vertically scaled integrated circuits, and elucidate transport in vertical Schottky NWs. Vertical phosphorus (P) doped Ge NWs were grown using vapor-liquid-solid epitaxy, and nickel (Ni)-Ge Schottky contacts were made to the tops of the NWs. Current-voltage (I-V) characteristics were measured for variable ranges of NW diameters and numbers of nanowires in the arrays, and the I-V characteristics were fit using modified thermionic emission theory to extract the barrier height and ideality factor. As grown NWs did not show rectifying behavior due to the presence of heavy P side-wall doping during growth, resulting in a tunnel contact. After sidewall etching using a dilute peroxide solution, rectifying behavior was obtained. Schottky barrier heights of 0.3–0.4 V and ideality factors close to 2 were extracted using thermionic emission theory, although the model does not give an accurate fit across the whole bias range. Attempts to account for enhanced side-wall conduction due to non-uniform P doping profile during growth through a simple shunt resistance improve the fit, but are still insufficient to provide a good fit. Full three-dimensional numerical modeling using Silvaco Atlas indicates that at least part of this effect is due to the presence of fixed charge and acceptor like traps on the NW surface, which leads to effectively high ideality factors.
The authors would like to acknowledge support for this work through the National Science Foundation through NSF Award No. 100133. This work was performed, in part, at the Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies, a U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science User Facility at Los Alamos National Laboratory (Contract No. DE-AC52-06NA25396).
  1. 1. M. Meyyappan, Inorganic Nanowires: Applications, Properties, and Characterization ( CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA, 2010). Google Scholar
  2. 2. D. K. Ferry, Science 319, 579 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1154446, Google ScholarCrossref
  3. 3. S. D. Carnevale, T. F. Kent, P. J. Phillips, A. T. M. G. Sarwar, C. Selcu, R. F. Klie, and R. C. Myers, Nano Lett. 13, 3029 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl400200g, Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  4. 4. F. Léonard, A. A. Talin, B. S. Swartzentruber, and S. T. Picraux, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 106805 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.106805, Google ScholarCrossref
  5. 5. J.-R. Kim, H. Oh, H. M. So, J.-J. Kim, J. Kim, C. J. Lee, and S. C. Lyu, Nanotechnology 13, 701 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/13/5/333, Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  6. 6. Q. Tang, T. I. Kamins, X. Liu, D. E. Grupp, and J. S. Harris, Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 8, G204 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1945371, Google ScholarCrossref
  7. 7. J. Goldberger, A. I. Hochbaum, R. Fan, and P. Yang, Nano Lett. 6, 973 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl060166j, Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  8. 8. H. Schmid, C. Bessire, M. T. Björk, A. Schenk, and H. Riel, Nano Lett. 12, 699 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl2035964, Google ScholarCrossref
  9. 9. J. B. Jackson, D. Kapoor, S.-G. Jun, and M. S. Miller, J. Appl. Phys. 102, 054310 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2778290, Google ScholarScitation
  10. 10. K. Ikeda, Y. Yamashita, N. Sugiyama, N. Taoka, and S. Takagi, Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 152115 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2191829, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  11. 11. Y. Zhou, W. Han, Y. Wang, F. Xiu, J. Zou, R. K. Kawakami, and K. L. Wang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 102103 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3357423, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  12. 12. P. S. Y. Lim, D. Z. Chi, X. C. Wang, and Y.-C. Yeo, Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 172103 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4762003, Google ScholarScitation
  13. 13. A. Chawanda, C. Nyamhere, F. D. Auret, W. Mtangi, M. Diale, and J. M. Nel, J. Alloys Compd. 492, 649 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.11.202, Google ScholarCrossref
  14. 14. P. Manandhar, E. A. Akhadov, C. Tracy, and S. T. Picraux, Nano Lett. 10, 2126 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl100747w, Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  15. 15. H. Schmid, M. T. Björk, J. Knoch, H. Riel, W. Riess, P. Rice, and T. Topuria, J. Appl. Phys. 103, 024304 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2832760, Google ScholarScitation
  16. 16. R. Li, H. B. Yao, S. J. Lee, D. Z. Chi, M. B. Yu, G. Q. Lo, and D. L. Kwong, Thin Solid Films 504, 28 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2005.09.033, Google ScholarCrossref
  17. 17. H. B. Yao, C. C. Tan, S. L. Liew, C. T. Chua, C. K. Chua, R. Li, R. T. P. Lee, S. J. Lee, and D. Z. Chi, in International Workshop on Junction Technology, Shanghai, China (2006), pp. 164–169. Google Scholar
  18. 18. S. T. Picraux, S. A. Dayeh, P. Manandhar, D. E. Perea, and S. G. Choi, JOM 62, 35 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-010-0057-z, Google ScholarCrossref
  19. 19. H. Jagannathan, M. Deal, Y. Nishi, J. Woodruff, and C. Chidsey, J. Appl. Phys. 100, 024318 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2219007, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  20. 20. J. H. Jung, H. S. Yoon, Y. L. Kim, M. S. Song, Y. Kim, Z. G. Chen, J. Zou, D. Y. Choi, J. H. Kang, H. J. Joyce, Q. Gao, H. H. Tan, and C. Jagadish, Nanotechnology 21, 295602 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/21/29/295602, Google ScholarCrossref
  21. 21. S. J. Park, S. H. Chung, B.-J. Kim, M. Qi, X. Xu, E. A. Stach, and C. Yang, J. Mater. Res. 26, 2744 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2011.313, Google ScholarCrossref
  22. 22. S. T. Le, P. Jannaty, A. Zaslavsky, S. A. Dayeh, and S. T. Picraux, Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 262102 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3457862, Google ScholarScitation
  23. 23. E. Tutuc, J. O. Chu, J. A. Ott, and S. Guha, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 263101 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2410238, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  24. 24. J. H. Woodruff, J. B. Ratchford, I. A. Goldthorpe, P. C. McIntyre, and E. D. Christopher, Nano Lett. 7, 1637 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl070595x, Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  25. 25. S. M. Sze and K. K. Ng, Physics of Semiconductor Devices ( John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey, USA, 2007). Google Scholar
  26. 26. D. E. Perea, E. R. Hemesath, E. J. Schwalbach, J. L. Lensch-Falk, P. W. Voorhees, and L. J. Lauhon, Nat. Nanotechnol. 4, 315 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2009.51, Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  27. 27. J. G. Connell, K. H. Yoon, D. E. Perea, E. J. Schwalbach, P. W. Voorhees, and L. J. Lauhon, Nano Lett. 13, 199 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl3038695, Google ScholarCrossref
  28. 28. P. Chattopadhyay, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 29, 823 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/29/3/047, Google ScholarCrossref
  1. © 2015 AIP Publishing LLC.