Abstract
The high contrast in the electrical resistivity between amorphous and crystalline states of a phase change material can potentially enable multiple memory levels for efficient use of a data storage medium. We report on our investigation of the role of the current injection site geometry (circular and square) in stabilizing such intermediate states within a nanoscale single-phase change material system (Ge 2Sb2Te5). We have developed a three dimensional multiphysics model, which includes phase change kinetics, electrical, thermal, thermoelectric, and percolation effects, all as a function of temperature, using an iterative approach with coupled differential equations. Our model suggests that the physical origin of the formation of stable intermediate states in square top contact devices is mainly due to anisotropic heating during the application of a programming current pulse. Furthermore, the threshold current requirement and the width of the programming window are determined by crystallite nucleation and growth rates such that a higher crystallization rate leads to a narrower range of current pulses for switching to intermediate resistance level(s). The experimentally determined resistance maps, those that are indicative of the crystallinity, show good agreement with the simulated phase change behavior confirming the existence of stable intermediate states. Our model successfully predicts the required programming conditions for such mixed-phase levels, which can be used to optimize memory cells for future ultra-high density data storage applications.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by TUBITAK under Contract No. 113F385, Bogazici University Research Fund, 12B03M1, and European Union FP7 Marie Curie International Re-integration Grant PCM-256281.
References
- 1. G. W. Burr, M. J. Breitwisch, M. Franceschini, D. Garetto, K. Gopalakrishnan, B. Jackson, B. Kurdi, C. Lam, L. A. Lastras, A. Padilla, B. Rajendran, S. Raoux, and R. S. Shenoy, J. Vac. Sci. Technol., B 28, 223 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1116/1.3301579, Google ScholarCrossref
- 2. S. Raoux, W. Wełnic, and D. Ielmini, Chem. Rev. 110, 240 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1021/cr900040x, Google ScholarCrossref
- 3. N. Yamada, E. Ohno, N. Akahira, K. Nishiuchi, K. Nagata, and M. Takao, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1 26, 61 (1987). https://doi.org/10.7567/JJAPS.26S4.61, Google ScholarCrossref
- 4. B. C. Lee, E. Ipek, O. Mutlu, and D. Burger, ACM SIGARCH Comput. Arch. News 37, 2 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1145/1555815.1555758, Google ScholarCrossref
- 5. H.-S. P. Wong, S. Raoux, S. Kim, J. Liang, J. P. Reifenberg, B. Rajendran, M. Asheghi, and K. E. Goodson, Proc. IEEE 98, 2201 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2010.2070050, Google ScholarCrossref
- 6. W. Welnic and M. Wuttig, Mater. Today 11, 20 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(08)70118-4, Google ScholarCrossref
- 7. Y. N. Hwang, J. S. Hong, and S. H. Lee, Symp. VLSI Technol., Dig. Tech. Pap. 29–31 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1109/VTSA.2003.1252543, Google ScholarCrossref
- 8. L. B. Xu Cheng, Chin. Phys. Lett. 25, 1848 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1088/0256-307X/25/5/088, Google ScholarCrossref
- 9. N. Yamada, E. Ohno, K. Nishiuchi, N. Akahira, and M. Takao, J. Appl. Phys. 69, 2849 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.348620, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
- 10. A. Pirovano, A. L. Lacaita, A. Benvenuti, F. Pellizzer, and R. Bez, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 51, 452 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1109/TED.2003.823243, Google ScholarCrossref
- 11. S. Raoux, G. W. Burr, M. J. Breitwisch, C. T. Rettner, Y.-C. Chen, R. M. Shelby, M. Salinga, D. Krebs, S.-H. Chen, and H.-L. Lung, IBM J. Res. Dev. 52, 465 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1147/rd.524.0465, Google ScholarCrossref
- 12. M. Wuttig and N. Yamada, Nat. Mater. 6, 824 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat2009, Google ScholarCrossref
- 13. M. Wuttig and C. Steimer, Appl. Phys. A 87, 411 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-007-3931-y, Google ScholarCrossref
- 14. B. Liu, T. Zhang, J. Xia, Z. Song, S. Feng, and B. Chen, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 19, L61 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1088/0268-1242/19/6/L01, Google ScholarCrossref
- 15. Y. Gu, Z. Song, T. Zhang, B. Liu, and S. Feng, Solid-State Electron. 54, 443 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sse.2009.11.002, Google ScholarCrossref
- 16. K.-F. Kao, C.-M. Lee, M.-J. Chen, M.-J. Tsai, and T.-S. Chin, Adv. Mater. 21, 1695 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200800423, Google ScholarCrossref
- 17. F. Rao, Z. Song, L. Wu, B. Liu, S. Feng, and B. Chen, Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 123511 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2787968, Google ScholarScitation
- 18. F. Rao, Z. Song, M. Zhong, L. Wu, G. Feng, B. Liu, S. Feng, and B. Chen, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 2 46, L25 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.46.L25, Google ScholarCrossref
- 19. S.-H. Hong, H. Lee, K.-I. Kim, Y. Choi, and Y.-K. Lee, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1 50, 081201 (2011). https://doi.org/10.7567/JJAP.50.081201, Google ScholarCrossref
- 20. S.-H. Hong, H. Lee, Y. Choi, and Y.-K. Lee, Curr. Appl. Phys. 11, S16 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cap.2011.06.018, Google ScholarCrossref
- 21. D. Ielmini, S. Lavizzari, D. Sharma, and A. L. Lacaita, IEEE Int. Electron Devides Meet. 939–942 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1109/IEDM.2007.4419107, Google ScholarCrossref
- 22. J. Li, B. Luan, and C. Lam, IEEE Int. Relaib. Phys. Symp. 6, C.1.1–C.1.6 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/IRPS.2012.6241871, Google ScholarCrossref
- 23. O. Ozatay, B. Stipe, J. A. Katine, and B. D. Terris, J. Appl. Phys. 104, 084507 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3002420, Google ScholarScitation
- 24. J. Reifenberg, E. Pop, A. Gibby, S. Wong, and K. Goodson, in Proceedings of ITHERM (2006), pp. 106–113. Google Scholar
- 25. A. Cywar, J. Li, C. Lam, and H. Silva, Nanotechnology 23, 225201 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/23/22/225201, Google ScholarCrossref
- 26. Y. Won, J. Lee, M. Asheghi, T. W. Kenny, and K. E. Goodson, Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 161905 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3699227, Google ScholarScitation
- 27. C. Peng, L. Cheng, and M. Mansuripur, J. Appl. Phys. 82, 4183 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.366220, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
- 28. J. F. Shackelford and W. Alexander, CRC Materials Science and Engineering Handbook ( CRC Press, 2000). Google ScholarCrossref
- 29. P. Fiflis, L. Kirsch, D. Andruczyk, D. Curreli, and D. N. Ruzic, J. Nucl. Mater. 438, 224 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.03.043, Google ScholarCrossref
- 30. G. Bakan, A. Gokirmak, and H. Silva, J. Appl. Phys. 116, 234507 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4904746, Google ScholarScitation
- 31. J. Lee, T. Kodama, Y. Won, M. Asheghi, and K. E. Goodson, J. Appl. Phys. 112, 014902 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4731252, Google ScholarScitation
- 32. D.-H. Kim, F. Merget, M. Först, and H. Kurz, J. Appl. Phys. 101, 064512 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2710440, Google ScholarScitation
- 33. D. A. G. Bruggeman, Ann. Phys. 416, 636 (1935). https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.19354160705, Google ScholarCrossref
- 34. R. E. Simpson, P. Fons, A. V. Kolobov, T. Fukaya, M. Krbal, T. Yagi, and J. Tominaga, Nat. Nanotechnol. 6, 501 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2011.96, Google ScholarCrossref
- 35. D. Ielmini and A. L. Lacaita, Mater. Today 14, 600 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(11)70301-7, Google ScholarCrossref
- 36. R. G. D. Jeyasingh, D. Kuzum, and H.-S. P. Wong, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 58, 4370 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/TED.2011.2169798, Google ScholarCrossref
- 37. T. Tsafack, E. Piccinini, B.-S. Lee, E. Pop, and M. Rudan, J. Appl. Phys. 110, 063716 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3639279, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
- © 2015 AIP Publishing LLC.
Please Note: The number of views represents the full text views from December 2016 to date. Article views prior to December 2016 are not included.


