ABSTRACT
We present measurements of the thermal dynamics of a Co-based single building block of an artificial square spin ice fabricated by focused electron-beam-induced deposition. We employ micro-Hall magnetometry, an ultra-sensitive tool to study the stray field emanating from magnetic nanostructures, as a new technique to access the dynamical properties during the magnetization reversal of the spin-ice nanocluster. The obtained hysteresis loop exhibits distinct steps, displaying a reduction of their “coercive field” with increasing temperature. Therefore, thermally unstable states could be repetitively prepared by relatively simple temperature and field protocols allowing one to investigate the statistics of their switching behavior within experimentally accessible timescales. For a selected switching event, we find a strong reduction of the so-prepared states' “survival time” with increasing temperature and magnetic field. Besides the possibility to control the lifetime of selected switching events at will, we find evidence for a more complex behavior caused by the special spin ice arrangement of the macrospins, i.e., that the magnetic reversal statistically follows distinct “paths” most likely driven by thermal perturbation.
We thank Dr. Torsten Henning from the “Micro- and Nanofabrication Laboratory” at Justus-Liebig-University in Gießen, Germany, for support with electron-beam lithography.
REFERENCES
- 1. C. Nisoli, R. Moessner, and P. Schiffer, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 1473 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.85.1473, Google ScholarCrossref
- 2. E. Mengotti, L. J. Heyderman, A. F. Rodríguez, F. Nolting, R. V. Hügli, and H.-B. Braun, Nat. Phys. 7, 68 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1794, Google ScholarCrossref
- 3. S. Zhang, I. Gilbert, C. Nisoli, G.-W. Chern, M. J. Erickson, L. O'Brien, C. Leighton, P. E. Lammert, V. H. Crespi, and P. Schiffer, Nature 500, 553–557 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12399, Google ScholarCrossref
- 4. V. Kapaklis, U. B. Arnalds, A. Harman-Clarke, E. T. Papaioannou, M. Karimipour, P. Korelis, A. Taroni, P. C. W. Holdsworth, S. T. Bramwell, and B. Hjörvarsson, New J. Phys. 14, 035009 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/14/3/035009, Google ScholarCrossref
- 5. U. B. Arnalds, A. Farhan, R. V. Chopdekar, V. Kapaklis, A. Balan, E. T. Papaioannou, M. Ahlberg, F. Nolting, L. J. Heyderman, and B. Hjörvarsson, Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 112404 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4751844, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
- 6. A. Farhan, P. M. Derlet, A. Kleibert, A. Balan, R. V. Chopdekar, M. Wyss, J. Perron, A. Scholl, F. Nolting, and L. J. Heyderman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 057204 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.057204, Google ScholarCrossref
- 7. M. Huth, F. Porrati, C. Schwalb, M. Winhold, R. Sachser, M. Dukic, J. Adams, and G. Fantner, Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 3, 597 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3762/bjnano.3.70, Google ScholarCrossref
- 8. P. Das, F. Porrati, S. Wirth, A. Bajpai, M. Huth, Y. Ohno, H. Ohno, and J. Müller, Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 042507 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3467870, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
- 9. P. Das, A. Bajpai, Y. Ohno, H. Ohno, and J. Müller, J. Appl. Phys. 112, 053921 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4751350, Google ScholarScitation
- 10. W. Wernsdorfer, E. Orozco, K. Hasselbach, A. Benoit, B. Barbara, N. Demoncy, A. Loiseau, H. Pascard, and D. Mailly, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1791–1794 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.1791, Google ScholarCrossref
- 11. E. Mengotti, L. J. Heyderman, A. Fraile Rodríguez, A. Bisig, L. Le Guyader, F. Nolting, and H. B. Braun, Phys. Rev. B 78, 144402 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.78.144402, Google ScholarCrossref
Please Note: The number of views represents the full text views from December 2016 to date. Article views prior to December 2016 are not included.
