No Access Submitted: 08 December 2014 Accepted: 20 January 2015 Published Online: 03 February 2015
Journal of Applied Physics 117, 055501 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4907213
more...View Affiliations
Bulk Heterojunction (BHJ) organic photovoltaic devices performances depend on the relative organization and physical properties of the electron-donor and -acceptor materials. In this paper, BHJs of poly(3-hexyl-thiophene) (P3HT) associated with an electron acceptor material, 1-(3-methoxycarbonyl)-propyl-1-phenyl[6,6]C6 (PCBM) or [Ni(4dodpedt)2], are studied in terms of morphology, ordering, and electrical properties. First, comparison between the two BHJs performed by Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) and Raman characterizations shows that P3HT structuration is improved by blending with [Ni(4dodpedt)2]. Then, the relationship between charges trapping, electrical properties, and film morphology is investigated using conductive AFM and Kelvin Force Microscopy. Measurements in dark condition and under solar cell simulator provide complementary information on electrical phenomena in these organic nanostructures. Finally, time dependent measurement highlights the influence of charges stacking on conduction. Specifically, we demonstrate that charge accumulation initiated by illumination remains valid after switching off the light, and induces the modification in current versus voltage characteristic of P3HT: PCBM blend. Finally, we observe a current increasing which can be attributed to the energy barrier decreasing due to charges trapping in PCBM.
This work was partly supported by the French RENATECH network and by the INSIS Institute of CNRS. The financial support by the Mexican Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnológica (CONACYT) was acknowledged.
From technical point of view, the authors thank Bruker for the access to ICON customized for AFM measurement under illumination, and Corinne Routaboul for her technical help during Raman spectroscopy measurements.
  1. 1. Y. Chen, X. Wan, and G. Long, Acc. Chem. Res. 46, 2645–2655 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/ar400088c, Google ScholarCrossref
  2. 2. J. Zhou, Y. Zuo, X. Wan, G. Long, Q. Zhang, W. Ni, Y. Liu, Z. Li, G. He, C. Li, B. Kan, M. Li, and Y. Chen, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 8484–8487 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja403318y, Google ScholarCrossref
  3. 3. X. Zhang, Z. Lu, L. Ye, C. Zhan, J. Hou, S. Zhang, B. Jiang, Y. Zhao, J. Huang, S. Zhang, Y. Liu, Q. Shi, L. Yunqi, and J. Yao, Adv. Mater. 25, 5791–5797 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201300897, Google ScholarCrossref
  4. 4. Y. Li, C.-C. Chen, Z. Hong, J. Gao, Y. M. Yang, H. Zhou, L. Dou, G. Li, and Y. Yang, Sci. Rep. 3, 3356 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1038/srep03356. Google ScholarCrossref
  5. 5. A. J. Heeger, Adv. Mater. 26, 10–28 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201304373, Google ScholarCrossref
  6. 6. M. C. Scharber and N. S. Sariciftci, Prog. Polym. Sci. 38, 1929 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.05.001, Google ScholarCrossref
  7. 7. F. Padinger, R. S. Rittberger, and N. S. Sariciftci, Adv. Funct. Mater. 13, 85 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.200390011, Google ScholarCrossref
  8. 8. H. Hoppe and N. S. Sariciftci, J. Mater. Chem. 16, 45 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1039/b510618b, Google ScholarCrossref
  9. 9. R. Berger, H. J. Butt, M. B. Retschke, and S. A. L. Weber, Macromol. Rapid Commun. 30, 1167 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.200900220, Google ScholarCrossref
  10. 10. V. Palermo, M. Palma, and P. Samori, Adv. Matter 18, 145 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200501394, Google ScholarCrossref
  11. 11. O. Douhéret, L. Lutsen, A. Swinnen, M. Breselge, K. Vandewal et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 032107 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2227846, Google ScholarScitation
  12. 12. K. Maturova, M. Kemerink, M. M. Wienk, D. S. H. Charrier, and A. J. Janssen, Adv. Funct. Mater. 19, 1379–1386 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.200801283, Google ScholarCrossref
  13. 13. C. Groves, O. G. Reid, and D. S. Ginger, Acc. Chem. Res. 43, 612–620 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1021/ar900231q, Google ScholarCrossref
  14. 14. M. Dantes, J. Peet, and T. Q. Nguyen, J. Phys. Chem. C 112, 7241–7249 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1021/jp712086q. Google ScholarCrossref
  15. 15. O. G. Reid, K. Munechika, and D. S. Ginger, Nano Lett. 8, 1602–1609 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl080155l, Google ScholarCrossref
  16. 16. D. C. Coffey, O. G. Reid, D. B. Rodovsky, G. P. Bartholomew, and D. S. Ginger, Nano Lett. 7, 738–744 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl062989e, Google ScholarCrossref
  17. 17. D. A. Kamkar, M. Wang, F. Wudi, and T. Q. Nguyen, ACS Nano 6, 1149–1157 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1021/nn204565h, Google ScholarCrossref
  18. 18. E. J. Spadafora, R. Demadrille, B. Ratier, and B. Grevin, Nano Lett. 10, 3337–3342 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl101001d, Google ScholarCrossref
  19. 19. B. Rezek, J. Cermak, M. Ledinsky, P. Hubik, J. J. Mares, A. Purkrt, V. Cimrova, A. Fejfar, and J. Kocka, Nanoscale Res. Lett. 6, 238–250 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1071/CH9631090, Google ScholarCrossref
  20. 20. T. T. Bui, B. Garreau-de Bonneval, and K. I. Moineau-Chane Ching, New J. Chem. 34, 337–347 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1039/b9nj00519f, Google ScholarCrossref
  21. 21. T. T. Bui, O. Thiebaut, E. Grelet, M.-F. Achard, B. Garreau-de Bonneval, and K. I. Moineau Chane-Ching, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2011, 2663–2676. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejic.201001288, Google ScholarCrossref
  22. 22. J.-Y. Cho, B. Domercq, S. C. Jones, J. Yu, X. Zhang, Z. An, M. Bishop, S. Barlow, S. R. Marder, and B. Kippelen, J. Mater. Chem. 17, 2642–2647 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1039/b701036b, Google ScholarCrossref
  23. 23. Q. Miao, J. Gao, Z. Wang, H. Yu, Y. Luo, and T. Ma, Inorg. Chim. Acta 376, 619–627 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ica.2011.07.046, Google ScholarCrossref
  24. 24. J. J. Benson-Smith, L. Goris, K. Vandewal, K. Haenen, J. V. Manca, D. Vanderzande, D. D. C. Bradley, and J. Nelson, Adv. Funct. Mater. 17, 451–457 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.200600484, Google ScholarCrossref
  25. 25. M. Al-Ibrahim, H.-K. Roth, U. Zhokhavets, G. Gobsch, and S. Sensfuss, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 85, 13–20 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2004.03.001. Google ScholarCrossref
  26. 26. F. X. Perrin, D. M. Panaitescu, A. N. Frone, C. Radovici, and C. Nicolae, Polymer 54, 2347–2354 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2013.02.035, Google ScholarCrossref
  27. 27. D. M. Panaitescu, A. N. Frone, and I. C. Spataru, Compos. Sci. Technol. 74, 131–138 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.10.001, Google ScholarCrossref
  28. 28. S. Janietz, D. D. C. Bradley, M. Grell, C. Giebeler, M. Inbasekaran, and E. P. Woo, Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 2453–2455 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.122479, Google ScholarScitation
  29. 29. See http://www.bruker.com/fileadmin/user_upload/8-PDF-Docs/SurfaceAnalysis/AFM/DataSheets/DS099-RevA0-Photoconductive_AFM-Datasheet.pdf for details about pC-AFM setup using on Bruker ICON AFM. Google Scholar
  30. 30. A. Cuenat, A. Muñiz-Piniella, M. Muñoz-Rojo, W. C. Tsoi, and C. E. Murphy, Nanotechnology 23, 045703 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/23/4/045703, Google ScholarCrossref
  31. 31. A. Salleo, R. J. Kline, D. M. DeLongchamp, and M. L. Chabinyc, Adv. Mater. 22, 3812–3838 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200903712, Google ScholarCrossref
  32. 32. D. Hernandez Maldonado, B. Ramos, C. Villeneuve-Faure, E. Bedel-Pereira, I. Séguy, A. Sournia-Saquet, F. Alary, J. L. Heully, and K. I. Moineau-Chane Ching, Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 103302 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4868106, Google ScholarScitation
  33. 33. Y. Gao and J. K. Gery, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 9654–9662 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja900636z, Google ScholarCrossref
  34. 34. W. C. Tsoi, D. T. James, J. Soo Kim, P. G. Nicholson, C. E. Murphy, D. D. C. Bradley, J. Nelson, and J. S. Kim, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 9834–9843 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja2013104, Google ScholarCrossref
  35. 35. V. D. Mihailetchi, L. J. A. Koster, P. W. M. Blom, C. Melzer, B. de Boer, J. K. J. Duren, and R. A. J. Janssen, Adv. Funct. Mater 15, 795–801 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.200400345, Google ScholarCrossref
  36. 36. M. M. Mandoc, B. de Boer, and P. W. M. Blom, Phys. Rev. B 73, 155205 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.73.155205, Google ScholarCrossref
  37. 37. S. M. Sze, Physics of Semoconductor Devices ( Wiley, Murray Hill, NJ, 1981). Google Scholar
  38. 38. M. Chiesa, L. Burgi, J. S. Kim, R. Shikler, R. H. Friend, and H. Sirrinfhaus, Nano Lett. 5, 559–563 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl047929s, Google ScholarCrossref
  39. 39. D. C. Coffey and D. S. Ginger, Nature Mater. 5, 735–740 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1712, Google ScholarCrossref
  40. 40. N. S. Sariciftci, L. Smilowitz, A. J. Heeger, and F. Wudl, Science 258, 1474–1476 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.258.5087.1474, Google ScholarCrossref
  41. 41. R. A. J. Janssen and J. Nelson, Adv. Mater. 25, 1847–1858 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201202873, Google ScholarCrossref
  42. 42. D. Godovsky, Org. Electron. 12, 190–194 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgel.2010.10.015, Google ScholarCrossref
  1. © 2015 AIP Publishing LLC.