MENU
  • Scitation Home
SUBMIT YOUR ARTICLE

Thank you

For your interest in the Journal of Applied Physics (JAP)

Check for updates on crossmark
Prev Next
Published Online: 06 January 2015
Accepted: December 2014

Modification of the structural and magnetic properties of granular FePt films by seed layer conditioning

Journal of Applied Physics 117, 013907 (2015); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4905422
S. Wicht1,2, a), V. Neu1, L. Schultz1, V. Mehta3, S. Jain3, J. Reiner3, O. Mosendz3, O. Hellwig3, D. Weller3, and B. Rellinghaus1, b)
more...View Affiliations
Abstract
The steadily increasing amount of digital information necessitates the availability of reliable high capacity magnetic data storage. Here, future hard disk drives with extended areal storage densities beyond 1.0 Tb/in2 are envisioned by using high anisotropy granular and chemically L10-ordered FePt (002) perpendicular media within a heat-assisted magnetic recording scheme. Perpendicular texturing of the [001] easy axes of the individual grains can be achieved by using MgO seed layers. It is therefore investigated, if and how an Ar+ ion irradiation of the MgO seed layer prior to the deposition of the magnetic material influences the MgO surface properties and hereby the FePt [001] texture. Structural investigations reveal a flattening of the seed layer surface accompanied by a change in the morphology of the FePt grains. Moreover, the fraction of small second layer particles and the degree of coalescence of the primarily deposited FePt grains strongly increases. As for the magnetic performance, this results in a reduced coercivity along the magnetic easy axis (out of plane) and in enhanced hard axis (in-plane) remanence values. The irradiation induced changes in the magnetic properties of the granular FePt-C films are traced back to the accordingly modified atomic structure of the FePt-MgO interface region.

References

  1. 1. M. H. Kryder, E. C. Gage, T. W. McDaniel, W. A. Challener, R. E. Rottmayer, G. Ju, Y.-T. Hsia, and M. F. Erden, Proc. IEEE 96, 1810–1835 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2008.2004315, Google ScholarCrossref
  2. 2. X. Wang, K. Gao, H. Zhou, A. Itagi, M. Seigler, and E. Gage, IEEE Trans. Magn. 49, 686–692 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2012.2221689, Google ScholarCrossref
  3. 3. K. F. Dong, H. H. Li, J. F. Hu, Y. G. Peng, G. Ju, G. M. Chow, and J. S. Chen, IEEE Trans. Magn. 49, 668 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2012.2223204, Google ScholarCrossref
  4. 4. A. C. Sun, P. C. Kuo, J. H. Hsu, H. L. Huang, and J. M. Sun, J. Appl. Phys. 98, 076109 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2073967, Google ScholarScitation
  5. 5. O. Mosendz, S. Pisana, J. W. Reiner, B. Stipe, and D. Weller, J. Appl. Phys. 111, 07B729 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3680543, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  6. 6. D. Weller, O. Mosendz, G. Parker, S. Pisana, and T. S. Santos, Phys. Status Solidi A 210, 1245 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.201329106, Google ScholarCrossref
  7. 7. S. Wicht, V. Neu, L. Schultz, D. Weller, O. Mosendz, G. Parker, S. Pisana, and B. Rellinghaus, J. Appl. Phys. 114, 063906 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4817274, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  8. 8. J. L. Robins and T. N. Rhodin, Surf. Sci. 2, 346 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-6028(64)90074-3, Google ScholarCrossref
  9. 9. A. D. Gates and J. L. Robins, Surf. Sci. 191, 499 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6028(87)81194-9, Google ScholarCrossref
  10. 10. J. A. Venables and J. H. Harding, J. Cryst. Growth 211, 27 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0248(99)00837-4, Google ScholarCrossref
  11. 11. C. T. Campbell, Surf. Sci. Rep. 27, 1 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5729(96)00011-8, Google ScholarCrossref
  12. 12. J. A. Venables, Surf. Sci. 299/300, 798 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-6028(94)90698-X, Google ScholarCrossref
  13. 13. G. Ehrlich and F. G. Hudda, J. Chem. Phys. 44, 1039 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1726787, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  14. 14. R. L. Schwoebel, J. Appl. Phys. 40, 614 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1657442, Google ScholarScitation
  15. 15. T. Shiroyama, T. Abe, Y. Takahashi, and K. Hono, IEEE Trans. Magn. 49, 3616 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2013.2239963, Google ScholarCrossref
  16. 16. B. S. D. C. S. Varaprasad, M. Chen, Y. K. Takahashi, and K. Hono, IEEE Trans. Magn. 49, 718 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2012.2218227, Google ScholarCrossref
  17. 17. F. Schäffel, C. Täschner, M. H. Rümmeli, V. Neu, U. Wolff, U. Queitsch, D. Pohl, R. Kaltofen, A. Leonhardt, B. Rellinghaus, B., Büchner, and L. Schultz, Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 193107 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3136429, Google ScholarScitation
  18. 18. D. Pohl, F. Schäffel, M. H. Rümmeli, E. Mohn, C. Täschner, L. Schultz, C. Kisielowski, and B. Rellinghaus, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 185501 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.185501, Google ScholarCrossref
  19. 19. T. Schrefl, H. F. Schmidt, J. Fidler, and H. Kronmueller, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 124, 251 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-8853(93)90123-J, Google ScholarCrossref
  20. 20. W. Scholz, J. Fidler, T. Schrefl, D. Suess, H. Forster, R. Dittrich, and V. Tsiantos, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 272, 1524 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2003.12.374, Google ScholarCrossref
  21. 21. W. Scholz, D. Suess, T. Schrefl, and J. Fidler, J. Appl. Phys. 95, 6807 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1689612, Google ScholarScitation
  22. 22. Y. Labaye, O. Crisan, L. Berger, J. M. Greneche, and J. M. D. Coey, J. Appl. Phys. 91, 8715 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1456419, Google ScholarScitation
  23. © 2015 AIP Publishing LLC.

Article Metrics

Views
118
Citations
Crossref 10
Web of Science
ISI 11

Altmetric

Please Note: The number of views represents the full text views from December 2016 to date. Article views prior to December 2016 are not included.