No Access Submitted: 25 January 1999 Accepted: 25 March 1999 Published Online: 26 May 1999
J. Chem. Phys. 110, 11335 (1999); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.479074
more...View Affiliations
  • The Physical and Theoretical Chemistry Laboratory, The Department of Chemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QZ, United Kingdom
View Contributors
  • M. Brouard
  • I. Burak
  • S. D. Gatenby
  • D. Hart
  • D. Minayev
The product state-resolved dynamics of the photon-initiated reaction H+N2O→OH×(2Π3/2,v,N)+N2 has been studied using Doppler-resolved laser induced fluorescence (LIF) at a mean collision energy of 143 kJ mol−1 (≡1.48 eV). Nascent OH(v=0,1) rovibrational population measurements indicate that only a small fraction of the available energy is channeled into the internal modes of the OH reaction products, as is consistent with previous work at other collision energies. State-resolved angular scattering distributions have been determined and are found to depend sensitively on product OH rovibrational quantum state. For the v=0 products, the angular scattering distributions are forward-backward peaking at low N, changing to sideways peaking at high N. OH products born in the v=1,N=6 state possess forward-backward peaking angular scattering distributions, similar to the OH(v=0) products born with intermediate N. In addition to these findings, the experiments have allowed the precise determination of the OH quantum state-resolved distributions of kinetic energy releases and, hence, by energy balance, of internal energies accessed in the N2 co-products. The product state-resolved kinetic energy disposals are found to broaden somewhat, and to favor higher kinetic energy disposal, as the internal energy of the OH is increased. The internal energies accessed in the OH and N2 products are therefore (anti-)correlated. More interestingly, the kinetic energy distributions are bimodal, particularly for OH(v=0) fragments born in high N, and for those born in v=1. This finding is attributed to the operation of two microscopic reaction mechanisms, which are probably associated with H atom attack at the two ends of the NNO target molecule. The results are discussed in the light of previous experimental and theoretical work.
  1. 1. P. Marshall, A. Fontijn, and C. F. Melius, J. Chem. Phys. 86, 5540 (1987). Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  2. 2. P. Marshall, T. Ko, and A. Fontijn, J. Phys. Chem. 93, 1922 (1989). Google ScholarCrossref
  3. 3. N. L. Arthur, L. A. Cooper, and Y. M. Gershenzon, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 93, 3485 (1997). Google ScholarCrossref
  4. 4. J. A. Miller and C. F. Melius, Proceedings of the 24th International Symposium on Combustion (The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, 1992), p. 714. Google Scholar
  5. 5. T. Fueno, M. Fukuda, and K. Yokoyama, Chem. Phys. 124, 265 (1988). Google ScholarCrossref
  6. 6. J. W. Bozzelli, A. Y. Chang, and A. M. Dean, Proceedings of the 25th International Symposium on Combustion (The Combustion Institute, Pittsburgh, 1994). Google Scholar
  7. 7. E. W. G. Diauand M. C. Lin, J. Phys. Chem. 99, 6589 (1995). Google ScholarCrossref
  8. 8. W. E. Hollingsworth, J. Subbiah, G. W. Flynn, and R. E. Weston, Jr., J. Chem. Phys. 82, 2295 (1984). Google ScholarScitation
  9. 9. H. Ohoyama, M. Takayanagi, T. Nishiya, and I. Hanazaki, Chem. Phys. Lett. 162, 1 (1989). Google ScholarCrossref
  10. 10. G. Hoffmann, D. Oh, H. Iams, and C. Wittig, Chem. Phys. Lett. 155, 356 (1989). Google ScholarCrossref
  11. 11. G. Hoffman, D. Oh, and C. Wittig, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 2 85, 1141 (1989). Google ScholarCrossref
  12. 12. E. Bohmer, S. K. Shin, Y. Chen, and C. Wittig, J. Chem. Phys. 97, 2536 (1992). Google ScholarScitation
  13. 13. H. Ohoyama, T. Sawai, S. Tsuboi, and T. Kasai, J. Chem. Phys. 109, 4443 (1998). Google ScholarScitation
  14. 14. S. I. Ionov, P. I. Ionov, and C. Wittig, Faraday Discuss. 97, 391 (1994). Google ScholarCrossref
  15. 15. K. S. Bradleyand G. C. Schatz, J. Phys. Chem. 100, 12154 (1996). Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  16. 16. S. P. Walch, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 1170 (1993). Google ScholarScitation
  17. 17. K. S. Bradley, P. McCabe, G. C. Schatz, and S. P. Walch, J. Phys. Chem. 102, 6696 (1995). Google ScholarScitation
  18. 18. J. L. Durant, Jr., J. Phys. Chem. 98, 518 (1994). Google ScholarCrossref
  19. 19. M. Brouard, I. Burak, S. D. Gatenby, and G. A. J. Markillie, Chem. Phys. Lett. 287, 682 (1997). Google ScholarCrossref
  20. 20. F. J. Aoiz, M. Brouard, P. A. Enriquez, and R. Sayos, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 89, 1427 (1994). Google ScholarCrossref
  21. 21. M. Brouard and J. P. Simons, in Chemical Dynamics and Kinetics of Small Free Radicals, edited by A. Wagner and K. Liu (World Scientific, Singapore, 1995), p. 795. Google Scholar
  22. 22. A. J. Alexander, M. Brouard, K. S. Kalogerakis, and J. P. Simons, Chem. Soc. Rev. 27, 405 (1998). Google ScholarCrossref
  23. 23. A. J. Orr-Ewingand R. N. Zare, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 45, 315 (1994). Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  24. 24. A. J. Orr Ewing and R. N. Zare, in Chemical Dynamics and Kinetics of Small Free Radicals, edited by A. Wagner and K. Liu (World Scientific, Singapore, 1995), p. 936. Google Scholar
  25. 25. A. J. Orr-Ewing, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 92, 881 (1996). Google ScholarCrossref
  26. 26. F. J. Aoiz, M. Brouard, and P. A. Enriquez, J. Chem. Phys. 105, 4964 (1996). Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  27. 27. M. Brouard, S. D. Gatenby, and D. M. Joseph (unpublished). Google Scholar
  28. 28. M. Brouard, I. Burak, and S. D. Gatenby (unpublished). Google Scholar
  29. 29. M. Brouard, I. Burak, G. A. J. Markillie, K. McGrath, and C. Vallance, Chem. Phys. Lett. 281, 97 (1997). Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  30. 30. M. Brouard, H. M. Lambert, S. P. Rayner, and J. P. Simons, Mol. Phys. 89, 403 (1996). Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  31. 31. G. P. Morley, I. R. Lambert, D. H. Mordaunt, S. H. S. Wilson, M. N. R. Ashfold, R. N. Dixon, and C. M. Western, J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 89, 3865 (1993). Google ScholarCrossref
  32. 32. M. Brouard, S. P. Duxon, P. A. Enriquez, and J. P. Simons, J. Chem. Phys. 97, 7414 (1992). Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  33. 33. I. L. Chidseyand D. R. Crosley, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 23, 187 (1980). Google ScholarCrossref
  34. 34. D. R. Yarkony, J. Chem. Phys. 97, 1838 (1992). Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  35. 35. R. N. Dixon, J. Chem. Phys. 85, 1866 (1986). Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  36. 36. H. L. Kim, M. A. Wickramaaratchi, X. Zheng, and G. E. Hall, J. Chem. Phys. 101, 2033 (1994). Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  37. 37. S. J. Greenland, Part II thesis, Oxford University, 1997. Google Scholar
  38. 38. W. H. Press, B. P. Flannery, S. A. Teukolsky, and W. T. Vetterling, Numerical Recipes (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1986). Google Scholar
  39. 39. A. J. Alexander, D. A. Blunt, M. Brouard, J. P. Simons, F. J. Aoiz, L. Banares, Y. Fujimura, and M. Tsubouchi, Faraday Discuss. 108, 375 (1998). Google ScholarCrossref
  40. 40. T. F. Haniscoand A. C. Kummel, J. Phys. Chem. 97, 7242 (1993). Google ScholarCrossref, ISI
  41. 41. K. S. Bradleyand G. C. Schatz, J. Chem. Phys. 106, 8464 (1997). Google ScholarScitation
  42. 42. E. H. Kim, S. E. Bradforth, D. W. Arnold, R. B. Metz, and D. Neumark, J. Chem. Phys. 103, 7801 (1995). Google ScholarScitation
  43. 43. M. Brouard, H. M. Lambert, C. Russell, J. Short, and J. P. Simons, Faraday Discuss. 102, 179 (1995). Google ScholarCrossref
  44. 44. A. J. Alexander, F. J. Aoiz, L. Banares, M. Brouard, J. Short, and J. P. Simons, J. Phys. Chem. 101, 7544 (1997). Google ScholarCrossref
  45. 45. M. Brouard, D. W. Hughes, K. S. Kalogerakis, and J. P. Simons, J. Phys. Chem. 102, 9559 (1998). Google ScholarCrossref
  1. © 1999 American Institute of Physics.