Control and femtosecond time-resolved imaging of torsion in a chiral molecule

Jonas L.  Hansen; Jens H.  Nielsen; Christian Bruun  Madsen; Anders Thyboe  Lindhardt; Mikael P.  Johansson; Troels  Skrydstrup; Lars Bojer  Madsen; Henrik  Stapelfeldt

doi:10.1063/1.4719816

Abstract

We study how the combination of long and short laser pulses can be used to induce torsion in an axially chiral biphenyl derivative (3,5-difluoro-3^′,5^′-dibromo-4^′-cyanobiphenyl). A long, with respect to the molecular rotational periods, elliptically polarized laser pulse produces 3D alignment of the molecules, and a linearly polarized short pulse initiates torsion about the stereogenic axis. The torsional motion is monitored in real-time by measuring the dihedral angle using femtosecond time-resolved Coulomb explosion imaging. Within the first 4 picoseconds (ps), torsion occurs with a period of 1.25 ps and an amplitude of 3° in excellent agreement with theoretical calculations. At larger times, the quantum states of the molecules describing the torsional motion dephase and an almost isotropic distribution of the dihedral angle is measured. We demonstrate an original application of covariance analysis of two-dimensional ion images to reveal strong correlations between specific ejected ionic fragments from Coulomb explosion. This technique strengthens our interpretation of the experimental data.

REFERENCES

1. A. H. Zewail, Science 242, 1645 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.242.4886.1645 , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
2. J. Shao and P. Hänggi, J. Chem. Phys. 107, 9935 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.475296 , , Google ScholarScitation, CAS
3. Y. Fujimura, L. González, K. Hoki, J. Manz, and Y. Ohtsuki, Chem. Phys. Lett. 306, 1 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2614(99)00440-6 , , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
4. D. Gerbasi, M. Shapiro, and P. Brumer, J. Chem. Phys. 115, 5349 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1405116 , , Google ScholarScitation, CAS
5. P. Král and M. Shapiro, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 183002 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.183002 , , Google ScholarCrossref
6. K. Hoki, L. González, and Y. Fujimura, J. Chem. Phys. 116, 2433 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1432996 , , Google ScholarScitation, ISI, CAS
7. D. Kröner, M. F. Shibl, and L. González, Chem. Phys. Lett. 372, 242 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2614(03)00407-X , , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
8. D. Kröner and B. Klaumünzer, Chem. Phys. 338, 268 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemphys.2007.04.010 , , Google ScholarCrossref
9. E. L. Eliel and A. H. Wilen, in Stereochemistry of Organic Compounds (Wiley, New York, 1994), Chap. 14. , Google Scholar
10. M. Shapiro and P. Brumer, J. Chem. Phys. 95, 8658 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.461247 , Google ScholarScitation, CAS
11. S. Ramakrishna and T. Seideman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 103001 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.103001 , , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
12. L. H. Coudert, L. F. Pacios, and J. Ortigoso, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 113004 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.113004 , , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
13. S. M. Parker, M. A. Ratner, and T. Seideman, J. Chem. Phys. 135, 224301 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3663710 , , Google ScholarScitation, ISI
14. C. B. Madsen, L. B. Madsen, S. S. Viftrup, M. P. Johansson, T. B. Poulsen, L. Holmegaard, V. Kumarappan, K. A. Jørgensen, and H. Stapelfeldt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 073007 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.073007 , , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
15. C. B. Madsen, L. B. Madsen, S. S. Viftrup, M. P. Johansson, T. B. Poulsen, L. Holmegaard, V. Kumarappan, K. A. Jørgensen, and H. Stapelfeldt, J. Chem. Phys. 130, 234310 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3149789 , , Google ScholarScitation, ISI, CAS
16. J. J. Larsen, K. Hald, N. Bjerre, H. Stapelfeldt, and T. Seideman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2470 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.2470 , , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
17. I. Nevo, L. Holmegaard, J. H. Nielsen, J. L. Hansen, H. Stapelfeldt, F. Filsinger, G. Meijer, and J. Küpper, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 11, 9912 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1039/b910423b , , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
18. Dipole moments and polarizabilities were computed with TURBOMOLE 6.2 (Ref. 35) at density functional theory (DFT) level, employing the B3LYP functional which combines Becke's three-parameter hybrid exchange functional³⁶ with the Lee-Yang-Parr correlation functional;³⁷ the correlation of the uniform electron gas was modeled with the Vosko-Wilk-Nusair VWN5 formulation.³⁸ The doubly-polarized triple-zeta basis set, TZVPP,³⁹ was used throughout. This level of theory has been shown to be suitable for the study of biphenyls.⁴⁰ , , Google Scholar
19. L. Holmegaard, J. H. Nielsen, I. Nevo, H. Stapelfeldt, F. Filsinger, J. Küpper, and G. Meijer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 023001 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.023001 , Google ScholarCrossref
20. F. Filsinger, J. Küpper, G. Meijer, L. Holmegaard, J. H. Nielsen, I. Nevo, J. L. Hansen, and H. Stapelfeldt, J. Chem. Phys. 131, 064309 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3194287 , , Google ScholarScitation
21. J. L. Hansen, L. Holmegaard, L. Kalhøj, S. L. Kragh, H. Stapelfeldt, F. Filsinger, G. Meijer, J. Küpper, D. Dimitrovski, M. Abu-samha, C. P. J. Martiny, and L. B. Madsen, Phys. Rev. A 83, 023406 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.83.023406 , , Google ScholarCrossref
22. The spotsizes were determined by scanning a 10 μm pinhole across the foci of the laser beams. All peak intensities quoted in the text are calculated using the following formula $I_{0} = \frac{4 \sqrt{\ln 2}}{π^{3 / 2}} \frac{E_{pulse}}{ω_{0}^{2} τ}$ , where ω₀ is the spot size measured from the center of the profile till the position where the the intensity has dropped to I₀/e, and τ is the pulse duration measured at FWHM. , Google Scholar
23. The dynamic polarizabilities of the molecule, at equilibrium, λ = 800 nm are α_zz = 46.83 Å³, α_yy = 16.82 Å³, α_xx = 32.02 Å³. Google Scholar
24. H. Stapelfeldt and T. Seideman, Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 543 (2003).. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.75.543 , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
25. J. L. Hansen, H. Stapelfeldt, D. Dimitrovski, M. Abu-samha, C. P. J. Martiny, and L. B. Madsen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 073001 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.073001 , , Google ScholarCrossref
26. L. J. Frasinski, K. Codling, and P. A. Hatherly, Science 246, 1029 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.246.4933.1029 , , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
27. J. W. Goodman, in Statistical Optics (Wiley, New York, 1985). , Google Scholar
28. R. Dörner, V. Mergel, O. Jagutzki, L. Spielberger, J. Ullrich, R. Moshammer, and H. Schmidt-Böcking, Phys. Rep. 330, 95 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-1573(99)00109-X , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
29. J. Ullrich, R. Moshammer, A. Dorn, R. Dörner, L. Schmidt, and H. Schmidt-Böcking, Rep. Prog. Phys. 66, 1463 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/66/9/203 , , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
30. R. H. Brown and R. Q. Twiss, Nature (London) 178, 1046 (1956). https://doi.org/10.1038/1781046a0 , , Google ScholarCrossref
31. W. P. Aue, E. Bartholdi, and R. R. Ernst, J. Chem. Phys. 64, 2229 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.432450 , , Google ScholarScitation, ISI, CAS
32. C. Schröter, K. Kosma, and T. Schultz, Science 333, 1011 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204352 , , Google ScholarCrossref
33. D. Korolev and N. Bumagin, Tetrahedron Lett. 46, 5751 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tetlet.2005.06.085 , , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
34. T. Itoh, Y. Nakata, K. Hirai, and H. Tomioka, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 957 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja056575j , , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
35. R. Ahlrichs, M. Bär, M. Häser, H. Horn, and C. Kölmel, Chem. Phys. Lett. 162, 165 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(89)85118-8 , , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
36. A. D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 5648 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.464913 , , Google ScholarScitation, ISI, CAS
37. C. Lee, W. Yang, and R. G. Parr, Phys. Rev. B 37, 785 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.37.785 , , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
38. S. H. Vosko, L. Wilk, and M. Nusair, Can. J. Phys. 58, 1200 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1139/p80-159 , , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS
39. A. Schäfer, C. Huber, and R. Ahlrichs, J. Chem. Phys. 100, 5829 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.467146 , , Google ScholarScitation, ISI
40. M. P. Johansson and J. Olsen, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 4, 1460 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1021/ct800182e , , Google ScholarCrossref, CAS