No Access
Published Online: 17 August 1998
Accepted: October 1996
Journal of Applied Physics 81, 744 (1997); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.364299
more...
We have investigated electrical and optical properties of the high-conductivity layers formed in both undoped and B-doped diamond films prepared by chemical vapor deposition. It is found that both hydrogenated undoped and B-doped diamond films have high-concentration holes of ∼1018 cm−3 at 297 K. These films exhibit little temperature dependence of the hole concentration between 120 and 400 K, while that of the oxidized B-doped film has a strong temperature dependence with an activation energy 0.38 eV. The Hall mobility of all the hydrogenated films of ∼30 cm2/Vs at 297 K is one to two orders of magnitude smaller than that of the oxidized B-doped film and increases with increasing temperature. The I−V characteristics of Al–Schottky contacts to the hydrogenated undoped film show excellent rectification properties and the temperature dependence of their forward characteristics is well explained by a junction theory inclusive of the tunneling process, i.e., thermionic-field emission theory, indicating that the depletion layer becomes thin due to high-density space charge in the depletion layer. We have also found a broad cathodoluminescence peak at around 540 nm in the hydrogenated films which disappears with subsequent oxidation treatment, indicating the existence of hydrogen-related gap states in the subsurface region of as-deposited homoepitaxial diamond films. High density hydrogen is detected in the subsurface region of the hydrogenated films by secondary ion mass spectroscopy. These experimental results suggest the existence of hydrogen-induced shallow acceptors in the surface region of as-deposited (hydrogenated) diamond films and that the difference between the hydrogenated and the oxidized films observed in both electrical and optical properties originates from hydrogen incorporated in the subsurface region.
  1. 1. See, for example, J. T. Glass, D. L. Dreifus, R. E. Fauber, B. A. Fox, M. L. Hartsell, R. B. Henard, J. S. Holmes, D. Malta, L. S. Plano, A. J. Tessmer, G. J. Tessmer, and H. A. Wynand, in Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on New Diamond Science and Technology, edited by S. Saito, N. Fujimori, O. Fukunaga, M. Kamo, K. Kobashi, and M. Yoshikawa (MYU, Tokyo, 1994), p. 355. Google Scholar
  2. 2. Appearance of this layer depends on a cooling down procedure after diamond film deposition. Cooling down in oxygen-containing atmosphere leads to an increase in resistivity of the films. See, for example, Y. Mori, A. Hatta, T. Ito, and A. Hiraki, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 1 31, L1718 (1992). Google ScholarCrossref
  3. 3. S. A. Grot, G. Sh. Gildenblat, C. W. Hatfield, C. R. Wronski, A. R. Badzian, T. Badzian, and R. Messier, IEEE Electron Device Lett. 11, 100 (1990). Google ScholarCrossref
  4. 4. M. I. Landstrassand K. V. Ravi, Appl. Phys. Lett. 55, 1391 (1989). Google ScholarScitation
  5. 5. S. Albinand L. Watkins, Appl. Phys. Lett. 56, 1454 (1990). Google ScholarScitation
  6. 6. Y. Mori, H. Kawarada, and A. Hiraki, Appl. Phys. Lett. 58, 940 (1991). Google ScholarScitation
  7. 7. H. Shiomi, Y. Nishibayashi, and N. Fujimori, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 1 30, 1363 (1991). Google ScholarCrossref
  8. 8. T. Maki, S. Shikama, M. Komori, Y. Sakaguchi, K. Sakuta, and T. Kobayashi, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 1 31, L1446 (1992). Google ScholarCrossref
  9. 9. H. Kawarada, M. Aoki, H. Sasaki, and K. Tsugawa, Diam. Relat. Mater. 3, 961 (1994). Google ScholarCrossref
  10. 10. H. Kiyota, E. Matsushima, K. Sato, H. Okushi, T. Ando, M. Kamo, Y. Sato, and M. Iida, Appl. Phys. Lett. 67, 3596 (1995). Google ScholarScitation
  11. 11. K. Hayashi, S. Yamanaka, H. Okushi, and K. Kajimura, Appl. Phys. Lett. 68, 376 (1996). Google ScholarScitation
  12. 12. K. Hayashi, H. Watanabe, S. Yamanaka, H. Okushi, K. Kajimura, and T. Sekiguchi, Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 1122(1996). Google ScholarScitation
  13. 13. J. Shirafujiand T. Sugino, Diam. Relat. Mater. 5, 706 (1996). Google ScholarCrossref
  14. 14. H. Kawarada, H. Sasaki, and A. Sato, Phys. Rev. B 52, 11351 (1995). Google ScholarCrossref
  15. 15. Y. Muto, T. Sugino, J. Shirafuji, and K. Kobashi, Appl. Phys. Lett. 59, 843 (1991). Google ScholarScitation
  16. 16. R. E. Stallcup, A. F. Aviles, and J. M. Perez, Appl. Phys. Lett. 66, 2331 (1995). Google ScholarScitation
  17. 17. See articles in Hydrogen in Semiconductors, edited by M. Stutzmann and J. Chevallier (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1991). Google Scholar
  18. 18. G. S. Higashi, Y. J. Chabal, G. W. Trucks, and K. Raghavachari, Appl. Phys. Lett. 56, 656 (1990). Google ScholarScitation
  19. 19. H. Tokumoto, Y. Morita, and K. Miki, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 259, 409 (1992). Google ScholarCrossref
  20. 20. B. Pate, in Diamond: Electronic Properties and Applications, edited by L. S. Pan and D. R. Kania (Kluwer Academic, Boston, 1995), Chap. 2. Google Scholar
  21. 21. In addition to various models attributed to hydrogen, some researchers pointed out, based on the analysis of Raman scattering spectra, the contribution of amorphous carbon to this conductivity of as-grown diamond surfaces (Refs. 3 and 15); however, Kawarada et al. (Ref. 14) and Stallcup et al. (Ref. 16) observed STS spectra with the p-type conduction on the 2×1 reconstructed diamond surfaces, indicating this p-type conduction originates from the diamond phase. Google Scholar
  22. 22. T. Sekiguchiand K. Sumino, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 66, 4277 (1995). Google ScholarScitation
  23. 23. K. Kanayaand S. Okayama, J. Phys. D 5, 43 (1972). Google ScholarCrossref
  24. 24. S. M. Sze, Physics of Semiconductor Devices, 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1981), Chap. 1. Google Scholar
  25. 25. A. T. Collinsand A. W. S. Williams, J. Phys. C 4, 1789 (1971). Google ScholarCrossref
  26. 26. E. H. Rhoderick and R. H. Williams, Metal-Semiconductor Contacts, 2nd ed. (Clarendon, Oxford, 1988), Chap. 3. Google Scholar
  27. 27. A. T. Collins and E. C. Lightowlers, in The Properties of Diamond, edited by J. E. Fields (Academic, London, 1979), Chap. 3. Google Scholar
  28. 28. F. A. Padovaniand R. Stratton, Solid-State Electron. 9, 695 (1966). Google ScholarCrossref
  29. 29. M. Aokiand H. Kawarada, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 1 33, L708 (1994). Google ScholarCrossref
  30. 30. A. T. Collins, Diam. Relat. Mater. 1, 457 (1992). Google ScholarCrossref
  31. 31. A. A. Gippius, V. S. Vavilov, A. M. Zaitsev, and B. S. Zhakupbekov, Physica (Amsterdam) 116B, 187 (1983). Google ScholarCrossref
  32. 32. V. S. Vavilov, A. A. Gippius, A. M. Zaitsev, B. V. Deryagin, B. V. Spitsyn, and A. E. Aleksenko, Sov. Phys. Semicond. 14, 1078 (1980). Google Scholar
  33. 33. W. Zhang, B. Hu, E. Xie, Y. Zhang, L. Han, Z. Song, and G. Chen, J. Mater. Res. 10, 2350 (1995). Google ScholarCrossref
  34. 34. E. Holzschuh, W. Kündig, P. F. Meier, B. D. Patterson, J. P. F. Sellschop, M. C. Stemmet, and H. Appel, Phys. Rev. A 25, 1272 (1982). Google ScholarCrossref
  35. 35. T. L. Estle, S. Estreicher, and D. S. Marynick, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1547 (1987). Google ScholarCrossref
  36. 36. P. Briddon, R. Jones, and G. M. S. Lister, J. Phys. C 21, L1027 (1988). Google ScholarCrossref
  37. 37. J. P. F. Sellschop, C. C. P. Madiba, and H. J. Annegarn, Nucl. Instrum. Methods 168, 529 (1980). Google ScholarCrossref
  38. 38. M. I. Landstrassand K. V. Ravi, Appl. Phys. Lett. 55, 975 (1989). Google ScholarScitation
  1. © 1997 American Institute of Physics.