No Access
Published Online: 13 July 2011
Accepted: June 2011
Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 023105 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3609321
more...View Affiliations
We report the influence of size controlled interfacial voids on the optical properties of non-epitaxial polycrystalline ZnO films grown by atomic layer deposition. Interfacial voids generated due to nanoscale Kirkendall effect [A. D. Smigelskas and E. O. Kirkendall, Trans. AIME 171, 130, (1947)], along the ZnO-Al2O3 interface, enhanced the ratio of near band edge to defect luminescence of ZnO films up to eight folds. This improvement is attributed to stress relaxation caused by formation of interfacial voids that allowed greater grain growth within the polycrystalline ZnO films upon annealing. Larger crystals have a lower surface-to-volume ratio profile which lessens the defect emission by decreasing surface effects on the optical properties of ZnO.
This work was supported by German Research Foundation (DFG) under the contract ZA 131/23-1 (Freiburg). We thank Professor Dr. Dietrich Hesse for the fruitful discussions.
  1. 1. J. W. Dini, Electrodeposition: The Materials Science of Coatings and Substrates (Noyes, New Jersey, 1993), pp. 251. Google Scholar
  2. 2. P. Frajtag, et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 023115 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3540680 , Google ScholarScitation
  3. 3. U. Ozgur, et al., J. Appl. Phys. 98, 041301 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1992666 , Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  4. 4. M. Knez, et al., Adv. Mater. 19, 3425 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.v19:21 , Google ScholarCrossref
  5. 5. Y. Yin, et al., Science 304, 711 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1096566 , Google ScholarCrossref
  6. 6. H. J. Fan, et al., Nature Mater 5, 627 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1673 , Google ScholarCrossref
  7. 7. A. D. Smigelskas, et al., Trans. AIME 171, 130 (1947). Google Scholar
  8. 8. Y. Yang, et al., J. Phys. Chem. C, 112, 4068 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp710948j , Google ScholarCrossref
  9. 9. Z. K. Tang, et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 72, 3270 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.121620 , Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  10. 10. B. Lin, et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 943 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1394173 , Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  11. 11. J -P Richters, et al., Nanotechnology 19, 305202 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/19/30/305202 , Google ScholarCrossref
  12. 12. D. H. Weber, et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 253126 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2827563 , Google ScholarScitation
  13. 13. L. Schmidt-Mende, et al., Mater. Today 10, 40 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(07)70078-0 , Google ScholarCrossref
  14. 14. T. Matsumoto, et al., Appl. Phys. Lett., 81, 1231 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1499991 , Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  15. 15. E. S. Machlin, Materials Science in Microelectronics II: The Effects of Structures on Properties in Thin Films (2nd Edition, Elsevier, UK, 2006), pp. 141. Google Scholar
  16. 16. C. M. Tan, et al., Apllications of Finite Element Methods for Reliability Studies on ULSI Interconnections (1st Edition, Springer, London, 2011), pp. 22–23. Google ScholarCrossref
  17. 17. P. Shewmon, Diffusion in Solids, 2nd ed., The Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, Warrendale, PA, 1989. Google Scholar
  18. 18. F. Güder, et al., Small 6, 1603 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201000561 , Google ScholarCrossref
  1. © 2011 American Institute of Physics.