No Access
Published Online: 13 May 2011
Accepted: April 2011
Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 191115 (2011); https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3591977
Optical bistability is observed in cw-operating InGaN-based laser diodes including a saturable absorber (SA) section. The dependence of the light-current hysteresis on the SA section length and reverse bias (VSA) has been studied. An analytical approach is developed to estimate the carrier lifetime τa in the SA section from the measurements of the hysteresis width, which leads to τa=1.9ns at zero bias. τa is found to decrease rapidly for higher reverse biases and a minimum of τa=0.4ns is interpolated for flatband conditions. We explain the dependence of the carrier lifetime on VSA via the modification of the quantum-confined Stark effect.
This research is supported by the EC Seventh Framework Program FP7/2007-2013 under Grant Agreement No. 238556 (FEMTOBLUE).
  1. 1. T. Oki, K. Saito, H. Watanabe, T. Miyajima, M. Kuramoto, M. Ikeda, and H. Yokohama, Appl. Phys. Express 3, 032104 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1143/APEX.3.032104, Google ScholarCrossref
  2. 2. H. Watanabe, T. Miyajima, M. Kuramoto, M. Ikeda, and H. Yokoyama, Appl. Phys. Express 3, 052701 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1143/APEX.3.052701, Google ScholarCrossref
  3. 3. Y. Kawaguchi, Y. Tani, P. O. Vaccaro, S. Ito, and H. Kawanishi, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 50, 020209 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1143/JJAP.50.020209, Google ScholarCrossref
  4. 4. M. J. Adams, A. Hurtado, D. Labukhin, and I. D. Henning, Chaos 20, 037102 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3491096, Google ScholarScitation
  5. 5. H. Kawaguchi and G. Iwane, Electron. Lett. 17, 167 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1049/el:19810117, Google ScholarCrossref
  6. 6. Ch. Harder, K. Y. Lau, and A. Yariv, Appl. Phys. Lett. 39, 382 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.92745, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  7. 7. M. Ueno and R. Lang, J. Appl. Phys. 58, 1689 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.336065, Google ScholarScitation
  8. 8. M. Kuznetsov, Opt. Lett. 10, 399 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.10.000399, Google ScholarCrossref
  9. 9. H. Uenohara, R. Takahashi, Y. Kawamura, and H. Iwamura, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 32, 873 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1109/3.493013, Google ScholarCrossref
  10. 10. L. R. Brovelli, J. Hugi, H. Jäckel, and H. Melchior, J. Appl. Phys. 76, 7713 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.357945, Google ScholarScitation
  11. 11. H. Kawaguchi, Opt. Quantum Electron. 19, S1 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02034349, Google ScholarCrossref
  12. 12. L. Barreira and Y. B. Pesin, Lyapunov Exponents and Smooth Ergodic Theory (AMS, Providence, 2002). Google Scholar
  13. 13. W. G. Scheibenzuber, U. T. Schwarz, L. Sulmoni, J. -F. Carlin, A. Castiglia, and N. Grandjean, Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 181103 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3514232, Google ScholarScitation
  14. 14. Y. D. Jho, J. S. Yahng, E. Oh, and D. S. Kim, Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 1130 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1396315, Google ScholarScitation, ISI
  1. © 2011 American Institute of Physics.